2002 GMC Sierra 2500: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500
On the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500, the failure owners report most often is loss of braking, and the reports cluster around 120,000 miles. The earliest to appear is ABS module or sensor failure, reported by a median of 70,000 miles. Overall it scores 72 out of 100, high risk for a 2002.
High risk for a 2002 — 83rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. 164 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500
Owners have reported 36 named failure modes on the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500, and the three most-reported carry 38% of everything filed.
Loss of braking leads with 23 reports, about 7.1 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 70k to 140,000 miles.
Other brake problem follows with 20 reports, usually reported between 55k to 120,000 miles.
ABS module or sensor failure follows with 19 reports, usually reported between 45k to 130,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into brakes (74), fuel (16) and body (15).
When these failures get reported
139 of the reports on the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 85,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 24% by 50,000 miles, 61% by 100,000 miles and 88% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 7 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 50,000 and 60,000 miles, which alone holds 11% of the dated reports.
14% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: ABS module or sensor failure around 70k, other brake problem around 90k, fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure around 95k and brake line, hose or caliper failure around 113k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 36. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 7 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
How bad it is when it goes
Across the named modes, 11 mention a crash, 2 a fire, 6 an injury and 1 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.48, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: loss of braking at $400–$3,000, other brake problem at $300–$1,800, ABS module or sensor failure at $500–$2,400 and brake line, hose or caliper failure at $250–$1,600. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
16% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss of braking | brakes | 23 | 23 | 70k | 120k | 140k | 7.1 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 20 | 17 | 55k | 90k | 118k | 6.2 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 19 | 19 | 45k | 70k | 128k | 5.9 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 10 | 10 | 93k | 113k | 114k | 3.1 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 9 | 9 | 85k | 95k | 170k | 2.8 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 9 | 6 | — | 92k | — | 2.8 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 8 | 7 | — | 52k | — | 2.5 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 6 | 6 | — | 37k | — | 1.9 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 6 | 6 | — | 72k | — | 1.9 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 5 | 3 | — | 91k | — | 1.5 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 4 | 3 | — | 101k | — | 1.2 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 4 | 4 | — | 69k | — | 1.2 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 3 | 1 | — | 55k | — | 0.9 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 3 | 1 | — | 60k | — | 0.9 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 3 | 2 | — | 58k | — | 0.9 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Turbocharger or supercharger failure | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 83k | — | 0.6 | $1,500–$4,500 | High |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 32k | — | 0.6 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.6 | $200–$900 | High |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.6 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 2 | 2 | — | 3k | — | 0.6 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 2 | 1 | — | 17k | — | 0.6 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 2 | 1 | — | 400 | — | 0.6 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 2 | 2 | — | 96k | — | 0.6 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.6 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 90k | — | 0.3 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 117k | — | 0.3 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 1 | 1 | — | 82k | — | 0.3 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.3 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 127k | — | 0.3 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 37k | — | 0.3 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 32k | — | 0.3 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.3 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 1 | 1 | — | 8k | — | 0.3 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 1 | 1 | — | 190 | — | 0.3 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 63k | — | 0.3 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 81k | — | 0.3 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 2 | 2 | — | 248k | — | 0.6 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500 draws about 51 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 96th percentile of complaint rates among 2002 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 3,238 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2002 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Loss of braking
Diesel engine quit and it was only equipped with one fuse, and the fuse blew. This resulted in loss of power steering and brakes. *ak. The consumer stated the power steering failed and when that failed it caused the vehicle to have no brakes. *jb
When I pulled into a left turn lane and tried to apply the brakes the pedal went nearly to the floor and I had no brakes luckily there were no other cars on the road or in the intersection at the time so I went on through and there was no accident, I was camping at the time and I got the truck back to the campground when I backed the truck into the campsite and applied the brakes they started working normally, I took the truck to the dealer and they said that they could find nothing wrong they even said that they have had several other vehicles do the same thing and could not find anything wrong with them and that this problem was normal for the vehicle. *nm
Other brake problem
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra 2500 hd. Whenever the contact depresses the brake pedal while driving at any speed, the pedal pulsates and acts as if it does not want to go down properly. The brakes make a noise and the vehicle does not stop properly. The current mileage was 7,000 and failure mileage was 300.
Started my vehicle so could move it in front of my garage. When I tried to turn the steering wheel wouldn't move and I had very limited braking power. It took an exceptional amount of pressure on the brake pedal just to stop the vehicle at a very low speed. Thankfully no one was hurt and no property damage occurred. *tr
ABS module or sensor failure
Gm recall #05068 anti- lock causing increased stopping distances, gm is only repairing this problem on 1/2 ton products due to the fact it is a simple inexpensive repair. I own a 3/4 ton truck with the exact same problem but due to the fact a repair consists of replacement of the front wheel bearings they (gm) have chosen not to include 3/4 ton in this recall. I have on several occasions had increased stopping distances due to the sensor failure, my dealership said they can repair gm's defect at a price of $800.00 to me. *jb
Unwanted antilock brake activation. Same as indicated on NHTSA campaign # 05v379000. Was told by gmc my vehicle was not part of above recall with no reasonable explanation give as to why. *nm
Recalls on the 2002 model year
NHTSA has issued 4 recall campaigns covering the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500, affecting an estimated 4,157 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover service brakes, air, fuel system, gasoline, steering and interior lighting. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
SERVICE BRAKES, AIR
6,800 vehicles 2006-06-06- Defect
- Certain federal-mogul national and carquest aftermarket hub assemblies, p/n 515058, sold for use on 2001-2006 general motors 1500 and 2500 4WD trucks. On the subject hub assemblies, the ABS sensor cord departs from the hub assembly at a 90 degree angle. As a result, there is a fit issue with the brake rotor dust shield interfering with the ABS sensor cord. If the hub assembly is installed despite this interference, the gap between the ABS sensor and the tone wheel may be altered. This may weaken the output of the ABS sensor. Diminished output could result in an unwanted…
- Consequence
- If stopping distance is limited, a vehicle crash could occur.
- Remedy
- Federal-mogul will notify its owners and will either credit the customers account or replace the unit. The recall is expected to begin during june 2006. Owners can contact federal-mogul customer service at 1-800-563-8507 ext 3530.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
88,303 vehicles 2006-05-19- Defect
- Certain replacement fuel filters, fram brand name p/n g3727, with date codes x52911 through x60801 sequentially or x600141 and a mexico country or origin marking on the fuel filter housing manufactured from october 18, 2005, through march 21, 2006, sold for use on the vehicles listed above and on certain school buses. (to see the school bus engine sizes, click on "document search" and then "bus applications"). The connector on the fuel filter was not manufactured to honeywell's specification. As a result, the o-ring may not seat correctly on the fuel line.
- Consequence
- This condition may cause an inadequate seal at the connection, potentially leading to a fuel leak. In the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
- Remedy
- Honeywell will notify owners and replace the fuel filters free of charge. The recall began on october 18, 2006. Owners may contact fram customer service at 1-800-890-2075 (option 1).
STEERING
1,360 vehicles 2006-02-01- Defect
- Certain fabtech aftermarket replacement pitman arms, p/nos. Fts71000 and fts71001, installed for use on certain 2001-2006 gm c/k 2500 pick up trucks and sport utility vehicles. The pin located inside the pitman arm can shear off due to a reverse bending fatigue condition, resulting in a total loss of steering control.
- Consequence
- Loss of steering control could lead to a vehicle crash with potential injury or death.
- Remedy
- Fabtech will notify owners and replace the pitman and idler arms free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during february 2006. Owners may contact fabtech at 909-597-7800.
INTERIOR LIGHTING
38,863 vehicles 2001-06-26- Defect
- Vehicle description: certain pickup trucks equipped with 6.6l diesel engines fail to comply with requirements of fmvss no. 105, "hydraulic and electric brake systems." these vehicles have a brake system warning light in the instrument cluster that may not illuminate when the brake fluid is low. In addition, when the brake fluid is low, the vehicle may not meet the partial system requirements of fmvss no. 105.
- Consequence
- These conditions could result in reduced braking capability, which could lead to a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will change the location of a wire connection in the underhood bussed electrical center. Owner notification began july 9, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact chevrolet at 1-800-222-1020 or gmc at 1-800-462-8782.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2002 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 2002 — 83rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.
Across the 27 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2007 comes out best at 63 and 2025 worst at 81, with 2002 itself at 72.
If the model year is negotiable, 2007, 2013, 2012, 2009, 2008, 2014, 2021, 2000, 2023 and 2011 score lower than 2002 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1997–2002 generation specifically, 2000 is the strongest year at 67 and 2002 the weakest at 72.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1997-2002 generation, 2000 GMC Sierra 2500 scores best at 67 and 2002 GMC Sierra 2500 worst at 72.
Where to spend the inspection money
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: ABS module or sensor failure from about 45k, other brake problem from about 55k, loss of braking from about 70k and fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure from about 85k.
On a 2002 GMC Sierra 2500 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether ABS module or sensor failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
What this page cannot tell you
164 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 164 reports, 139 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 85% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500?
The most-reported failures are loss of braking (23 reports, median 120,000 miles), other brake problem (20 reports, median 90,000 miles) and abs module or sensor failure (19 reports, median 70,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2002 GMC Sierra 2500 problems start?
Abs module or sensor failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 70,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 45,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 85,000 miles.
Is the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500 reliable?
It scores 72 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 83rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2002 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the GMC Sierra 2500 is best?
Within the 1997–2002 generation, 2000 scores best at 67 out of 100 and 2002 worst at 72. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed