AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2005 GMC Sierra 2500: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2005 GMC Sierra 2500

On the 2005 GMC Sierra 2500, the failure owners report most often is other electrical problem, and the reports cluster around 75,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other brake problem, reported by a median of 50,000 miles. Overall it scores 73 out of 100, high risk for a 2005.

High risk for a 2005 — 62nd riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. 159 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

The failures owners actually file about

Owners have reported 37 named failure modes on the 2005 GMC Sierra 2500, and the three most-reported carry 31% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Other electrical problem leads with 18 reports, about 32 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 52k to 115,000 miles.

Instrument cluster or gauge failure follows with 17 reports, usually reported between 19k to 70,000 miles.

Other brake problem follows with 14 reports, usually reported between 39k to 65,000 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into brakes (39), electrical (21) and infotainment (17).

The mileage the reports cluster at

144 of the reports on the 2005 GMC Sierra 2500 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 58,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 33% by 50,000 miles, 80% by 100,000 miles and 95% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 1 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 50,000 and 60,000 miles, which alone holds 19% of the dated reports.

22% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

In the order they tend to show up: other brake problem around 50k, instrument cluster or gauge failure around 57k, other electrical problem around 75k and other steering problem around 115k.

Median
  1. Other electrical problem 75k
  2. Instrument cluster or gauge failure 57k
  3. Other brake problem 50k
  4. Brake line, hose or caliper failure 52k
  5. Other steering problem 115k
  6. Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin 54k
  7. Rust or structural corrosion 41k
  8. Other wheel or tire problem 94k
  9. Radiator or coolant leak 78k
  10. Wheel bearing or hub failure 86k
  11. ABS module or sensor failure 40k
  12. Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure 1

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 37. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 58.5k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 1 report came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

What happens when these parts fail

Across the named modes, 5 mention a crash, 8 a fire and 4 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.43, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, instrument cluster or gauge failure at $350–$1,400, other brake problem at $300–$1,800 and brake line, hose or caliper failure at $250–$1,600. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

13% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Other electrical problem electrical 18 17 52k 75k 114k 31.8 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Instrument cluster or gauge failure infotainment 17 15 19k 57k 71k 30.0 $350–$1,400 Moderate
Other brake problem brakes 14 14 39k 50k 67k 24.7 $300–$1,800 High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 9 6 — 52k — 15.9 $250–$1,600 Critical
Other steering problem steering 9 8 65k 115k 118k 15.9 $350–$2,400 High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 8 7 — 54k — 14.1 $250–$2,000 High
Rust or structural corrosion body 6 6 — 41k — 10.6 $500–$6,000 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 6 5 — 94k — 10.6 $200–$1,500 High
Radiator or coolant leak cooling 5 5 — 78k — 8.8 $350–$1,900 High
Wheel bearing or hub failure drivetrain 5 5 — 86k — 8.8 $350–$1,200 Moderate
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 5 5 — 40k — 8.8 $500–$2,400 High
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 5 5 — 1 — 8.8 $700–$2,600 High
Other body or interior problem body 5 5 — 119k — 8.8 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Loss of braking brakes 4 4 — 43k — 7.1 $400–$3,000 Critical
Parking brake failure brakes 4 4 — 42k — 7.1 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Overheating cooling 3 3 — 12k — 5.3 $400–$3,500 High
Master cylinder or brake booster failure brakes 3 3 — 51k — 5.3 $450–$2,200 Critical
Steering column or shaft failure steering 3 1 — 10k — 5.3 $600–$2,500 Critical
Other speed control problem adas 3 2 — 54k — 5.3 $250–$2,000 Critical
Differential or transfer case failure drivetrain 2 2 — 35k — 3.5 $900–$4,200 High
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 2 2 — 89k — 3.5 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 2 2 — 84k — 3.5 $400–$3,500 High
Blower motor or climate control failure hvac 2 2 — 140k — 3.5 $250–$1,200 Moderate
Other engine problem engine 2 2 — 25k — 3.5 $300–$4,000 High
Other powertrain problem transmission 2 2 — 112k — 3.5 $400–$4,500 High
Head gasket failure engine 1 1 — 108k — 1.8 $1,400–$4,000 Critical
Water pump failure cooling 1 1 — 153k — 1.8 $500–$2,200 High
Fuel leak or fuel odor fuel 1 1 — 85k — 1.8 $300–$2,500 Critical
Fuel gauge or level sensor failure fuel 1 1 — 100k — 1.8 $300–$1,200 Moderate
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 1 1 — 120k — 1.8 $250–$1,500 High
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 1 1 — 11k — 1.8 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Airbag inflator rupture airbag 1 0 — — — 1.8 $0–$0 Critical
Cruise control failure adas 1 1 — 58k — 1.8 $200–$1,400 High
Other fuel system problem fuel 1 1 — 5k — 1.8 $300–$2,200 High
Other suspension problem suspension 1 1 — 65k — 1.8 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Other lighting problem lighting 1 1 — 1k — 1.8 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Other driver assistance problem adas 1 1 — 50k — 1.8 $250–$1,800 High
Unclassified problem other 3 1 — 5 — 5.3 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2005 GMC Sierra 2500 draws about 281 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 98th percentile of complaint rates among 2005 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 566 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2005 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Other electrical problem

Tl*the contact owns a 2005 gmc sierra 2500 hd. The contact stated that the speedometer would occasionally remain at zero or display 110 MPH. It failed to display the correct speeds. The dealer stated that her model year was not included in a related recall. The manufacturer offered no assistance; however, the contact was advised to have the vehicle diagnosed before they could make any judgments. The recall number was unknown. The current mileage was 58,265 and failure mileage was approximately 35,000.

35,000 miles NHTSA complaint 686394 filed 2008-09-03

Speedometer sticks at over 70 MPH then when you shut the vehicle off it goes to 120 and not back to 0 it may sometimes point to the odometer which is down and ill not move back till you start and stop the vehicle a number of times to reset to 0. *tr

69,800 miles NHTSA complaint 699417 filed 2008-12-09

Instrument cluster or gauge failure

Speedometer reads wrong. Will be doing 55 MPH and the speedometer says 120 MPH. At a stop it says I am doing 80 MPH. Gmc wants over $500 to fix this. I am not alone in my complaint there are hundreds, if not thousands of others. Check out this website and see what others are saying: http://www.topix.com/forum/autos/chevrolet-tahoe/t2bgkbgi55eknu77c *jb

50,500 miles NHTSA complaint 643527 filed 2007-10-25

Speedometer was intermittently sticking. (needle would jump up or down, not rotate smoothly with speed changes. This problem lasted approximately 2 weeks. Then started reading high or low by up to 50mph. This lasted approximately 4 days. Then needle rolled over past the 120 mark and stuck there. No repairs have been made yet. *tr

63,854 miles NHTSA complaint 707086 filed 2009-02-05

Other brake problem

Dt*: the contact stated while parked and attempting to accelerate, the vehicle gradually moved. The brakes and steering were also not working. There were no warning signals prior to the incident. The vehicle was taken to a service dealer, however the contact had not received results from the diagnostic testing. The manufacturer was contacted and the contact was informed that there was a pending recall. Updated 11/30/06 *jb

50,000 miles NHTSA complaint 601404 filed 2006-10-31

Tl*the contact owns a 2005 gmc sierra 2500 hd. While driving 65 MPH, the stopping distance increased when the brake pedal was depressed and the steering wheel locked. As of november 19, 2007, the dealer had not completed their inspection to determine the cause of the failure. The VIN was unknown. The current and failure mileages were 69,500.

69,500 miles NHTSA complaint 646680 filed 2007-11-19

Recalls on the 2005 model year

NHTSA has issued 4 recall campaigns covering the 2005 GMC Sierra 2500, affecting an estimated 929 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover equipment adaptive/mobility, service brakes, air, fuel system, gasoline and steering. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

08V519000

EQUIPMENT ADAPTIVE/MOBILITY

133 vehicles 2008-10-06
Defect
Mobilityworks is recalling 133 my 2005-2006 ford e250, my 2000, 2004-2006 e350, my 2000, 2005 e450, my 2005-2006 gmc 2500, gmc 3500, and my 2006 dodge 2500 vans equipped with ricon platform style wheelchair lifts. These lifts fail to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 403, "platform lift systems for motor vehicles." the anti-stow interlock may not detect the presence of a wheelchair or mobility aid user. The pressure sensing switch that detects the presence of weight on the platform was not adjusted to the necessary sensitivity…
Consequence
A lift occupant can be injured should the lift begin to stow unintentionally.
Remedy
Mobilityworks is working with ricon to correct the wheelchair lifts free of charge (please see 07e097). Owners may contact ricon at 1-818-267-3000 or mobilityworks at 1-800-769-8267.
06E050000

SERVICE BRAKES, AIR

6,800 vehicles 2006-06-06
Defect
Certain federal-mogul national and carquest aftermarket hub assemblies, p/n 515058, sold for use on 2001-2006 general motors 1500 and 2500 4WD trucks. On the subject hub assemblies, the ABS sensor cord departs from the hub assembly at a 90 degree angle. As a result, there is a fit issue with the brake rotor dust shield interfering with the ABS sensor cord. If the hub assembly is installed despite this interference, the gap between the ABS sensor and the tone wheel may be altered. This may weaken the output of the ABS sensor. Diminished output could result in an unwanted…
Consequence
If stopping distance is limited, a vehicle crash could occur.
Remedy
Federal-mogul will notify its owners and will either credit the customers account or replace the unit. The recall is expected to begin during june 2006. Owners can contact federal-mogul customer service at 1-800-563-8507 ext 3530.
06E043000

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE

88,303 vehicles 2006-05-19
Defect
Certain replacement fuel filters, fram brand name p/n g3727, with date codes x52911 through x60801 sequentially or x600141 and a mexico country or origin marking on the fuel filter housing manufactured from october 18, 2005, through march 21, 2006, sold for use on the vehicles listed above and on certain school buses. (to see the school bus engine sizes, click on "document search" and then "bus applications"). The connector on the fuel filter was not manufactured to honeywell's specification. As a result, the o-ring may not seat correctly on the fuel line.
Consequence
This condition may cause an inadequate seal at the connection, potentially leading to a fuel leak. In the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
Remedy
Honeywell will notify owners and replace the fuel filters free of charge. The recall began on october 18, 2006. Owners may contact fram customer service at 1-800-890-2075 (option 1).
06E010000

STEERING

1,360 vehicles 2006-02-01
Defect
Certain fabtech aftermarket replacement pitman arms, p/nos. Fts71000 and fts71001, installed for use on certain 2001-2006 gm c/k 2500 pick up trucks and sport utility vehicles. The pin located inside the pitman arm can shear off due to a reverse bending fatigue condition, resulting in a total loss of steering control.
Consequence
Loss of steering control could lead to a vehicle crash with potential injury or death.
Remedy
Fabtech will notify owners and replace the pitman and idler arms free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during february 2006. Owners may contact fabtech at 909-597-7800.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2005 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2005 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

Where 2005 sits in the model line

High risk for a 2005 — 62nd riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.

Across the 27 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2007 comes out best at 63 and 2025 worst at 81, with 2005 itself at 73.

If the model year is negotiable, 2007, 2013, 2012, 2009, 2008, 2014, 2021, 2000, 2023, 2011, 2015, 1999 and 1998 score lower than 2005 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 2003–2006 generation specifically, 2003 is the strongest year at 71 and 2006 the weakest at 76.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 2003-2006 generation, 2003 GMC Sierra 2500 scores best at 71 and 2006 GMC Sierra 2500 worst at 76.

What to look at before buying one

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: instrument cluster or gauge failure from about 19k, other brake problem from about 39k, other electrical problem from about 52k and other steering problem from about 65k.

On a 2005 GMC Sierra 2500 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether instrument cluster or gauge failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.

What this page cannot tell you

159 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 159 reports, 144 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 91% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2005 GMC Sierra 2500?

The most-reported failures are other electrical problem (18 reports, median 75,000 miles), instrument cluster or gauge failure (17 reports, median 55,000 miles) and other brake problem (14 reports, median 50,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2005 GMC Sierra 2500 problems start?

Other brake problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 50,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 40,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 58,000 miles.

Is the 2005 GMC Sierra 2500 reliable?

It scores 73 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 62nd riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2005 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the GMC Sierra 2500 is best?

Within the 2003–2006 generation, 2003 scores best at 71 out of 100 and 2006 worst at 76. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed