AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2001 GMC Sierra 2500: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500

On the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500, the failure owners report most often is loss of braking, and the reports cluster around 65,000 miles. The earliest to appear is ABS module or sensor failure, reported by a median of 50,000 miles. Overall it scores 70 out of 100, high risk for a 2001.

High risk for a 2001 — 86th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. 171 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

What breaks on the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500

Owners have reported 35 named failure modes on the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500, and the three most-reported carry 29% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Loss of braking leads with 19 reports, about 1.5 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 27k to 105,000 miles.

ABS module or sensor failure follows with 17 reports, usually reported between 36k to 85,000 miles.

Other brake problem follows with 14 reports, usually reported between 65k to 150,000 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into brakes (70), engine (18) and fuel (18).

At what mileage it happens

134 of the reports on the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 67,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 35% by 50,000 miles, 66% by 100,000 miles and 86% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 4 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 30,000 and 40,000 miles, which alone holds 12% of the dated reports.

22% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

In the order they tend to show up: ABS module or sensor failure around 48k, loss of braking around 64k, brake line, hose or caliper failure around 73k and other engine problem around 84k.

Median
  1. Loss of braking 64k
  2. ABS module or sensor failure 48k
  3. Other brake problem 106k
  4. Other engine problem 84k
  5. Brake line, hose or caliper failure 73k
  6. Other wheel or tire problem 76k
  7. Stalling while driving 82k
  8. Audio or connectivity failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  9. Fuel pump failure 62k
  10. Premature brake pad or rotor wear 18k
  11. Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure 49k
  12. Engine sensor failure 44k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 35. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 66.5k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 4 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

How bad it is when it goes

Across the named modes, 17 mention a crash, 3 a fire and 7 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.18, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: loss of braking at $400–$3,000, ABS module or sensor failure at $500–$2,400, other brake problem at $300–$1,800 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

14% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Loss of braking brakes 19 16 27k 64k 103k 1.5 $400–$3,000 Critical
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 17 16 36k 48k 84k 1.3 $500–$2,400 High
Other brake problem brakes 14 9 65k 106k 150k 1.1 $300–$1,800 High
Other engine problem engine 12 11 62k 84k 122k 0.9 $300–$4,000 High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 9 9 57k 73k 90k 0.7 $250–$1,600 Critical
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 9 6 — 76k — 0.7 $200–$1,500 High
Stalling while driving engine 6 6 — 82k — 0.5 $300–$2,500 Critical
Audio or connectivity failure infotainment 6 0 — — — 0.5 $150–$900 Low
Fuel pump failure fuel 5 5 — 62k — 0.4 $600–$2,600 High
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 5 4 — 18k — 0.4 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 4 4 — 49k — 0.3 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Engine sensor failure electrical 4 4 — 44k — 0.3 $180–$900 Moderate
Power steering pump or fluid leak steering 4 4 — 46k — 0.3 $350–$1,600 Moderate
Rust or structural corrosion body 4 4 — 125k — 0.3 $500–$6,000 High
Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure body 4 2 — 44k — 0.3 $250–$1,500 Moderate
Other fuel system problem fuel 4 4 — 88k — 0.3 $300–$2,200 High
Other steering problem steering 4 2 — 105k — 0.3 $350–$2,400 High
Other body or interior problem body 4 4 — 134k — 0.3 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Fuel gauge or level sensor failure fuel 3 3 — 70k — 0.2 $300–$1,200 Moderate
Master cylinder or brake booster failure brakes 3 1 — 243k — 0.2 $450–$2,200 Critical
Parking brake failure brakes 3 3 — 43k — 0.2 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 3 2 — 69k — 0.2 $200–$1,500 Critical
Wheel bearing or hub failure drivetrain 2 2 — 25k — 0.2 $350–$1,200 Moderate
Fuel injector failure fuel 2 1 — 172k — 0.2 $450–$2,800 Moderate
Loss of power steering steering 2 2 — 25k — 0.2 $600–$2,800 Critical
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 2 2 — 138k — 0.2 $700–$2,600 High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 2 1 — 130k — 0.2 $250–$2,000 High
Other powertrain problem transmission 2 1 — 42k — 0.2 $400–$4,500 High
Other suspension problem suspension 2 1 — 143k — 0.2 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Transmission will not engage a gear transmission 1 0 — — — 0.1 $1,500–$6,000 Critical
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 1 0 — — — 0.1 $450–$2,200 High
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 1 1 — 159k — 0.1 $400–$3,500 High
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 1 0 — — — 0.1 $250–$1,500 High
Steering column or shaft failure steering 1 1 — 165k — 0.1 $600–$2,500 Critical
Other electrical problem electrical 1 1 — 75k — 0.1 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Unclassified problem other 5 2 — 85k — 0.4 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500 draws about 13 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 90th percentile of complaint rates among 2001 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 12,914 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2001 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Loss of braking

2001 gmc sierra with 6065 miles that is 6 thousand. 65 miles ... Total brake failure. Rotors and brake pads totally shot.. Not drivable!!!! Close to killing someone, (school bus full of kids) made it to dealer, told the bad news, unbelievable!! 40 thousand dollar truck with 6065 actual miles and no frigging brakes!!!! Repair bil over 1500 dollars!! Gmc says sucks to be me.. No help, no fix, not driveable. What if someone was actually killed??? Would gmc care? No!!!!! Btw this vehical is owned by an 85yr old man drives it to store, and dr.'s office. Help help help....*ak

6,000 miles NHTSA complaint 480593 filed 2004-06-18

2001 gmc sierra with 6065 miles that is 6 thousand. 65 miles ... Total brake failure. Rotors and brake pads totally shot.. Not drivable!!!! Close to killing someone, (school bus full of kids) made it to dealer, told the bad news, unbelievable!! 40 thousand dollar truck with 6065 actual miles and no frigging brakes!!!! Repair bil over 1500 dollars!! Gmc says sucks to be me.. No help, no fix, not driveable. What if someone was actually killed??? Would gmc care? No!!!!! Btw this vehical is owned by an 85yr old man drives it to store, and dr.'s office. Help help help....*ak

6,000 miles NHTSA complaint 480594 filed 2004-06-18

ABS module or sensor failure

Driving on highway in the evening road was wet due to earlier rain, traveling at 60-65 MPH, when another car passed us and changed lanes erratically which caused the need to slow down. Upon engaging the brakes the ABS failed to work, and vehicle's rear end lost traction and slid into next lane of traffic, then hit guard rail and spun truck around and hit bridge guard rail on opposite side, causing truck to startle and ride concrete bridge median and finally coming to rest in grass median. Both the driver and passenger air bags failed to deploy causing minor injuries to both occupants. Needless to say truck is totaled. *la

35,000 miles NHTSA complaint 442701 filed 2003-11-26

Abs will activate when coming to a stop at approximately 5 MPH. Rotors and pads were replaced 1 year ago and dealer paid half under warranty. I'm now told by a reputable mechanic that the speed sensor gear is rusted and the whole hub will have to be replaced. *jb

38,000 miles NHTSA complaint 521579 filed 2005-02-13

Other brake problem

I use my truck to pull a 5th wheel camper. When I started to check it out this year, I noticed a funny shift pattern and a growl with temporary brake loss at approx. 4 mi. Pre hr or less. I took the truck in for repair and they sent me to a gm dealer to have the tcm reflashed. That fixed the shift harshness. After leaving dealership I noticed the growling again. It is not every time I apply the brakes, but I am afraid that I will end up loosing the brakes long enough to hit another vehicle. After doing extensive internet studies I found that this vehicle should be included in a recall that is for the exact same symptoms. I called 2 dealerships but was told that my VIN was not part of the recall. I was told that they were recalled because of defective parts used only on specific VIN numbered vehicles. I asked that if this is true then why is my part failing in the exact same manner if it is not defective. I was told by the service tech. That this was a good question and he would call gm to see if my truck qualified. Apparently not or I wouldn't be filing this. My research also showed another complaint exactly the same as mine on…

25,259 miles NHTSA complaint 715503 filed 2009-04-10

We have a 2001 gmc 2500hd crewcab with the ABS breaking problem. At slow speeds under 10 MPH everytime you stop the ABS activates not alowwing the truck to stop. Gm now has a recall on some models but refuses to fix this problem. This is my 19 yr olds sons truck this needs to be fixed by gm before he gets in an accident and kills himself or someone else. There are so many complaints on the internet about this problem. Why is there nothing being done with the vehicles outside of gm's recall. I am sick of company's making crap and not having to fix it. *cn

81,000 miles NHTSA complaint 759576 filed 2010-02-06

Recalls on the 2001 model year

NHTSA has issued 5 recall campaigns covering the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500, affecting an estimated 17,071 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover service brakes, air, fuel system, gasoline, steering and interior lighting. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.

06E050000

SERVICE BRAKES, AIR

6,800 vehicles 2006-06-06
Defect
Certain federal-mogul national and carquest aftermarket hub assemblies, p/n 515058, sold for use on 2001-2006 general motors 1500 and 2500 4WD trucks. On the subject hub assemblies, the ABS sensor cord departs from the hub assembly at a 90 degree angle. As a result, there is a fit issue with the brake rotor dust shield interfering with the ABS sensor cord. If the hub assembly is installed despite this interference, the gap between the ABS sensor and the tone wheel may be altered. This may weaken the output of the ABS sensor. Diminished output could result in an unwanted…
Consequence
If stopping distance is limited, a vehicle crash could occur.
Remedy
Federal-mogul will notify its owners and will either credit the customers account or replace the unit. The recall is expected to begin during june 2006. Owners can contact federal-mogul customer service at 1-800-563-8507 ext 3530.
06E043000

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE

88,303 vehicles 2006-05-19
Defect
Certain replacement fuel filters, fram brand name p/n g3727, with date codes x52911 through x60801 sequentially or x600141 and a mexico country or origin marking on the fuel filter housing manufactured from october 18, 2005, through march 21, 2006, sold for use on the vehicles listed above and on certain school buses. (to see the school bus engine sizes, click on "document search" and then "bus applications"). The connector on the fuel filter was not manufactured to honeywell's specification. As a result, the o-ring may not seat correctly on the fuel line.
Consequence
This condition may cause an inadequate seal at the connection, potentially leading to a fuel leak. In the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
Remedy
Honeywell will notify owners and replace the fuel filters free of charge. The recall began on october 18, 2006. Owners may contact fram customer service at 1-800-890-2075 (option 1).
06E010000

STEERING

1,360 vehicles 2006-02-01
Defect
Certain fabtech aftermarket replacement pitman arms, p/nos. Fts71000 and fts71001, installed for use on certain 2001-2006 gm c/k 2500 pick up trucks and sport utility vehicles. The pin located inside the pitman arm can shear off due to a reverse bending fatigue condition, resulting in a total loss of steering control.
Consequence
Loss of steering control could lead to a vehicle crash with potential injury or death.
Remedy
Fabtech will notify owners and replace the pitman and idler arms free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during february 2006. Owners may contact fabtech at 909-597-7800.
01V220000

INTERIOR LIGHTING

38,863 vehicles 2001-06-26
Defect
Vehicle description: certain pickup trucks equipped with 6.6l diesel engines fail to comply with requirements of fmvss no. 105, "hydraulic and electric brake systems." these vehicles have a brake system warning light in the instrument cluster that may not illuminate when the brake fluid is low. In addition, when the brake fluid is low, the vehicle may not meet the partial system requirements of fmvss no. 105.
Consequence
These conditions could result in reduced braking capability, which could lead to a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will change the location of a wire connection in the underhood bussed electrical center. Owner notification began july 9, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact chevrolet at 1-800-222-1020 or gmc at 1-800-462-8782.
01V125000

EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS

77,485 vehicles 2001-04-10
Defect
Vehicle description: certain 2-wheel drive pickup trucks fail to comply with requirements of fmvss no. 120, "tire selection and rims for motor vehicles other than passenger cars." the problem was caused by a computer error that resulted in the certification label listing tire size and inflation pressure information that differ from the tire size and the inflation pressure information for the tires on the vehicle. If the vehicle owner or someone servicing the vehicle inflates the tires according to the pressure specified on the label versus the appropriate pressure for the…
Consequence
If the tires are under-inflated, it could reduce the tread life of the tire, and the tire could degrade to a point of allowing sudden air loss. If the tires are over-inflated, it could reduce the tread life of the tire and increase susceptibility to road hazard damage. If sudden air loss or a road hazard causes damage to a tire, control of the vehicle could be adversely affected and could result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Owners will be provided with a new label and installation instructions. However, a dealer can install the label if the owner so desires. Owner notification began may 31, 2001. Owners who do not receive the label and installation instructions within a reasonable time should contact chevrolet at 1-800-222-1020 or gmc at 1-800-462-8782.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2001 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2001 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

How 2001 compares with the other years

High risk for a 2001 — 86th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.

Across the 27 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2007 comes out best at 63 and 2025 worst at 81, with 2001 itself at 70.

If the model year is negotiable, 2007, 2013, 2012, 2009, 2008, 2014, 2021 and 2000 score lower than 2001 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1997–2002 generation specifically, 2000 is the strongest year at 67 and 2002 the weakest at 72.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1997-2002 generation, 2000 GMC Sierra 2500 scores best at 67 and 2002 GMC Sierra 2500 worst at 72.

What to look at before buying one

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: loss of braking from about 27k, ABS module or sensor failure from about 36k, brake line, hose or caliper failure from about 57k and other engine problem from about 62k.

On a 2001 GMC Sierra 2500 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether loss of braking has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.

What this page cannot tell you

171 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 171 reports, 134 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 78% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500?

The most-reported failures are loss of braking (19 reports, median 65,000 miles), abs module or sensor failure (17 reports, median 50,000 miles) and other brake problem (14 reports, median 105,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2001 GMC Sierra 2500 problems start?

Abs module or sensor failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 50,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 35,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 67,000 miles.

Is the 2001 GMC Sierra 2500 reliable?

It scores 70 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 86th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2001 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the GMC Sierra 2500 is best?

Within the 1997–2002 generation, 2000 scores best at 67 out of 100 and 2002 worst at 72. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed