AtWhatMileage
Brakes · 23 owner reports

Loss of braking on the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500

5 crashes 5 of the 23 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 23
With an odometer reading 23
Reports per 1,000 built 7.1 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 4%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 5
Typical repair $400–$3,000
What it means when it happens Critical
Rank among this year's problems 1st

When loss of braking gets reported

Owners of the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500 report loss of braking at a median of 120,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 70,000 miles and a quarter after 140,000 miles, from 23 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 78,000 miles. It is the 1st most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 50,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 170,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 118,600 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

When the reports scatter this far, the mileage is telling you about how these cars were driven more than about the part itself.

4% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 23 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
49,200 miles 69,500 miles 120,000 miles 140,000 miles 167,800 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 5 a crash is mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $400–$3,000 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

This mode is classified as critical, which means a failure can leave the car unable to stop, steer, or stay out of the way of traffic. It is weighted accordingly in the risk score.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 9 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 1998, at a median of 2,000 miles, and latest on the 2000 at 140,000 miles.

By volume the 2002 is the worst of them, which makes this a problem of this specific year rather than of the model as a whole.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 1998 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 2k
  2. 1999 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 85k
  3. 2000 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 139k
  4. 2001 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 64k
  5. 2002 (this one) 120k
  6. 2003 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 74k
  7. 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 78k
  8. 2005 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 43k
  9. 2006 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 112k
  10. 2009 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 14k
  11. 2010 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 78k
  12. 2016 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking 61k
  13. 2020 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking
    no odometer readings given
    —
  14. 2022 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking
    no odometer readings given
    —
  15. 2024 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking
    no odometer readings given
    —
  16. 2025 GMC Sierra 2500 loss of braking
    no odometer readings given
    —

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Diesel engine quit and it was only equipped with one fuse, and the fuse blew. This resulted in loss of power steering and brakes. *ak. The consumer stated the power steering failed and when that failed it caused the vehicle to have no brakes. *jb

36,403 miles NHTSA complaint 422663 filed 2003-08-04

When I pulled into a left turn lane and tried to apply the brakes the pedal went nearly to the floor and I had no brakes luckily there were no other cars on the road or in the intersection at the time so I went on through and there was no accident, I was camping at the time and I got the truck back to the campground when I backed the truck into the campsite and applied the brakes they started working normally, I took the truck to the dealer and they said that they could find nothing wrong they even said that they have had several other vehicles do the same thing and could not find anything wrong with them and that this problem was normal for the vehicle. *nm

46,500 miles NHTSA complaint 597197 filed 2006-09-22

I was plowing snow on the common driveway that I share with 3 other neighbors and came around a bend to meet my neighbor's son on his atv. I slammed on the brakes and the pedal went to the floor. Fortunately the pile of snow in front of the plow helped stop my truck. The atv operator dodged in to the snow bank. There was no contact. I found that I had multiple brakeline failures on my truck. I have had a previous brake line failure in 2008 but could not find the work order for repairs to verify date and mileage. *tr

88,500 miles NHTSA complaint 780335 filed 2010-04-10

Also reported on the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500

Other brake problem

20 reports median 90k

ABS module or sensor failure

19 reports median 70k

Brake line, hose or caliper failure

10 reports median 113k

Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure

9 reports median 95k

Other body or interior problem

9 reports median 92k

Other engine problem

8 reports median 52k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 23 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does loss of braking happen on the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500?

Across 23 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 120,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 70,000 miles and a quarter after 140,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is loss of braking on the 2002 GMC Sierra 2500?

23 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 7.1 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed