2012 Ford F-150: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2012 Ford F-150
On the 2012 Ford F-150, the failure owners report most often is other powertrain problem, and the reports cluster around 90,000 miles. The earliest to appear is catalytic converter failure, reported by a median of 15,000 miles. Overall it scores 73 out of 100, high risk for a 2012.
High risk for a 2012 — 103rd riskiest of the 271 2012 vehicles we can rate. 2,441 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2012 Ford F-150
Owners have reported 80 named failure modes on the 2012 Ford F-150, and the three most-reported carry 39% of everything filed.
Other powertrain problem leads with 479 reports, about 1.1 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 48k to 130,000 miles.
Other engine problem follows with 332 reports, usually reported between 7k to 55,000 miles. 2 of those reports mention a fire.
Other speed control problem follows with 148 reports, usually reported between 11k to 89,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into engine (560), transmission (500) and adas (216).
At what mileage it happens
2,009 of the reports on the 2012 Ford F-150 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 59,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 44% by 50,000 miles, 75% by 100,000 miles and 92% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 27 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 15% of the dated reports.
35% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, which is early enough that a fair number of these cars were still under a factory warranty when the owner complained.
In the order they tend to show up: catalytic converter failure around 16k, other fuel system problem around 17k, other engine problem around 18k and cruise control failure around 19k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 80. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 27 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
What happens when these parts fail
Across the named modes, 49 mention a crash, 20 a fire, 27 an injury and 1 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.22, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other powertrain problem at $400–$4,500, other engine problem at $300–$4,000, other speed control problem at $250–$2,000 and other steering problem at $350–$2,400. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
45% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 479 | 394 | 48k | 90k | 130k | 1.1 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 332 | 302 | 7k | 18k | 55k | 0.8 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 148 | 126 | 11k | 30k | 89k | 0.4 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other steering problem | steering | 122 | 100 | 45k | 76k | 123k | 0.3 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 116 | 106 | 38k | 57k | 78k | 0.3 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 102 | 85 | 45k | 66k | 96k | 0.2 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 101 | 95 | 6k | 23k | 54k | 0.2 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 85 | 61 | 40k | 84k | 106k | 0.2 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 83 | 64 | 35k | 53k | 89k | 0.2 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 70 | 67 | 9k | 17k | 34k | 0.2 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 56 | 45 | 60k | 75k | 100k | 0.1 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 52 | 47 | 37k | 52k | 84k | 0.1 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 37 | 27 | 9k | 19k | 61k | 0.1 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 30 | 23 | 6k | 47k | 72k | 0.1 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 30 | 23 | 21k | 58k | 93k | 0.1 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 28 | 23 | 52k | 69k | 103k | 0.1 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 27 | 23 | 15k | 70k | 139k | 0.1 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 27 | 20 | 81k | 105k | 136k | 0.1 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 26 | 20 | 70k | 98k | 136k | 0.1 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 24 | 17 | 45k | 52k | 96k | 0.1 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 23 | 17 | 72k | 94k | 120k | 0.1 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 22 | 22 | 6k | 16k | 25k | 0.1 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 18 | 12 | 27k | 80k | 115k | 0.0 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 14 | 9 | 44k | 85k | 100k | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Overheating | cooling | 13 | 9 | 105k | 105k | 115k | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 13 | 11 | 81k | 99k | 125k | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 13 | 10 | 32k | 54k | 71k | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 13 | 12 | 29k | 54k | 128k | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 12 | 10 | 79k | 143k | 161k | 0.0 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 11 | 9 | 58k | 58k | 90k | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 11 | 8 | 89k | 90k | 138k | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 11 | 8 | 57k | 89k | 120k | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 10 | 6 | — | 67k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 10 | 6 | — | 82k | — | 0.0 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 9 | 9 | 16k | 30k | 38k | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Software fault or failed update | software | 9 | 3 | — | 12k | — | 0.0 | $0–$600 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 9 | 7 | — | 115k | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 8 | 3 | — | 113k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 8 | 8 | 44k | 52k | 116k | 0.0 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 8 | 5 | — | 54k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Wheel, stud or lug nut failure | wheels | 8 | 2 | — | 22k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,500 | Critical |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 7 | 6 | — | 73k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 7 | 7 | — | 119k | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 7 | 5 | — | 103k | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Water pump failure | cooling | 5 | 5 | — | 67k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,200 | High |
| Audio or connectivity failure | infotainment | 5 | 1 | — | 63k | — | 0.0 | $150–$900 | Low |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 4 | 4 | — | 21k | — | 0.0 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 4 | 3 | — | 31k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Parasitic battery drain | electrical | 4 | 4 | — | 39k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 4 | 4 | — | 36k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Backup camera failure | infotainment | 4 | 2 | — | 187k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 4 | 3 | — | 68k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 4 | 3 | — | 96k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 3 | 3 | — | 48k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 3 | 3 | — | 91k | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 3 | 2 | — | 10k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 3 | 1 | — | 73k | — | 0.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 3 | 3 | — | 100k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 62k | — | 0.0 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 2 | 1 | — | 17k | — | 0.0 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Oil leak | engine | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Engine knock or bearing noise | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 152k | — | 0.0 | $2,500–$9,000 | High |
| Harsh or jerky shifting | transmission | 2 | 2 | — | 91k | — | 0.0 | $600–$4,000 | Moderate |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 2 | 2 | — | 45k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 33k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Infotainment screen failure | infotainment | 2 | 1 | — | 31k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,600 | Low |
| Lane keep or steering assist fault | adas | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,600 | High |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 2 | 1 | — | 109k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 2 | 1 | — | 130k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Piston, ring or cylinder wall damage | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $3,000–$9,500 | Critical |
| Lifter, cam or cylinder-deactivation failure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 168k | — | 0.0 | $1,800–$7,000 | High |
| Turbocharger or supercharger failure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$4,500 | High |
| Thermostat failure | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 53k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 105k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Parking sensor failure | adas | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Low |
| Power steering pump or fluid leak | steering | 1 | 1 | — | 69k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 1 | 1 | — | 85k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 1 | 1 | — | 85k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 106 | 76 | 36k | 61k | 91k | 0.3 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2012 Ford F-150 draws about 5.8 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 86th percentile of complaint rates among 2012 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 421,017 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2012 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other powertrain problem
When accelerating the truck bogged. Rpm of engine increase truck did not. Let off gas and depressed truck began to shake violently. Attempting to merge on interstate. Had to pull over and shut truck off to return to normal. This has happened several occasions. I have documented each time it has happened with more details each time. Ford has looked at truck several times. Latest word is that they have a problem, started a tsb however there isn't a fix available. This is very dangerous when driving especially on the interstate when changing lanes or merging from ramp. There is not any warning and scares the devil out of the driver. *tr
Purchased truck new april 2012. While driving on the interstate I tried to accelerate past a slower vehicle. The truck would hardly run, lost power and speed. This is a known problem with ford ecoboost engine. Unfortunately I did not do my "homework" on this engine package. Many complaints of this problem can be found on the internet. Ford motor co. Knows and admits that there is a problem with condensation build up in the intake tract of this engine. It has been aproblem from introduction. They still have not found a "fix" for this defect. So far this truck has been to the dealer 2 times for this problem and nothing has worked. This truck is dangerous to myself and my family. If it is raining while driving, it will hardly run. It is unsafe to own or operate. *tr
Other engine problem
Tl* the contact owns a 2012 ford f-150 crew cab. The contact stated that the vehicle did not come equipped with covers over the fender wells of the engine. The dealer was notified of the issue who stated to the contact that they no longer offered the feature and that he could purchase one at his expense of $300. The manufacturer was notified of the issue and confirmed the dealer's statement. They offered no further assistance. The failure mileage was 500.
When accelerating the truck bogged. Rpm of engine increase truck did not. Let off gas and depressed truck began to shake violently. Attempting to merge on interstate. Had to pull over and shut truck off to return to normal. This has happened several occasions. I have documented each time it has happened with more details each time. Ford has looked at truck several times. Latest word is that they have a problem, started a tsb however there isn't a fix available. This is very dangerous when driving especially on the interstate when changing lanes or merging from ramp. There is not any warning and scares the devil out of the driver. *tr
Other speed control problem
I was driving in a light rain when I gently pressed the accelerator and the engine started vibrating excessively making the whole truck vibrate like the wheels were falling off. The incident lasted about 10 seconds before it returned to acting normally. *tr
While driving a brand new 2012 ford f-150 w/ 3.5l v6 eco-boost I was attempting to merge onto interstate while towing a small boat trailer when I lost towing power (RPM dropped instantly from ~4000 to ~2000 RPM despite having accelerator depressed) and the entire truck started violently shaking. This continued until I completely let off the gas for a few seconds. I then pressed down on the accelerator and things were back to normal. I could have easily lost control during the rapid deceleration had the roads been wet or if a big ole 18-wheeler had been behind me things could have ended poorly. *tr
Recalls on the 2012 model year
NHTSA has issued 4 recall campaigns covering the 2012 Ford F-150, affecting an estimated 453,584 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover power train:automatic transmission, air bags:frontal:sensor/control module-inactive and power train:automatic transmission:control module (tcm/pcm/t. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
1,263,051 vehicles 2019-02-11- Defect
- Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2011-2013 F-150 vehicles equipped with a 6-speed automatic transmission. The transmission may unexpectedly downshift into first gear, regardless of vehicle speed.
- Consequence
- Unexpectedly downshifting into first gear may result in a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the powertrain control module, free of charge. The recall began March 4, 2019. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 19S07.
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
153,581 vehicles 2016-04-27- Defect
- Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 Ford F-150 trucks, 2012 Ford Expedition, Lincoln Navigator, and Ford Mustang vehicles. The affected vehicles are equipped with an automatic transmission that may unexpectedly downshift to first gear, regardless of vehicle speed.
- Consequence
- An unexpected downshift into first gear can cause the vehicle to slow down suddenly without warning and the rear tires may slide or lock, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the powertrain control module with updated software, free of charge. The recall began on September 19, 2016. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 16S19.
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:SENSOR/CONTROL MODULE-INACTIVE
101 vehicles 2012-05-03- Defect
- Ford is recalling certain model year 2012 f-150 vehicles manufactured from november 6, 2011, through november 15, 2011. Incorrect software for the occupant classification system module (ocsm) was installed on the vehicles either at the time of manufacturing or during the course of replacement of the module as part of a service repair. Under certain driving conditions, the ocsm may misclassify the passenger seats occupant such that the passenger side airbag does not deploy when it should, does not deploy as intended, or deploys when it should not.
- Consequence
- A failure to deploy, failure to deploy as intended, or a deployment when not intended, increases the risk of injury to the passenger side seat occupant.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the ocsm free of charge. The safety recall began on may 21, 2012. Owners may contact the ford motor company customer relationship center at 1-866-436-7332.
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:CONTROL MODULE (TCM/PCM/TECM)
10,500 vehicles 2012-05-03- Defect
- Ford is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 ford f-150, 2012 expedition and lincoln navigator, and 2012-2013 mustang vehicles, for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard nos. 102, "transmission shift lever sequence, starter interlock, and transmission braking effect" and 108 lamps, reflective devices and associated equipment. these vehicles may have a transmission range sensor (trs) that was calibrated out of specification for reverse gear.
- Consequence
- If this condition exists, the transmission may not go into reverse or when the driver pushes the shift lever in the reverse r position and the vehicles transmission does go in reverse, the r may not illuminate on the dashboard of the f-150, expedition, or navigator models and/or the backup lamp on the rear of the f-150, expedition, navigator, or mustang vehicles may not illuminate. These conditions increase the risk of a crash or a pedestrian being struck due to the vehicles not signaling it is in reverse.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace the trs as necessary, free of charge. The safety recall began on june 11, 2012. Owners may contact ford motor company customer relationship center at 1-866-436-7332.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2012 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 2012 sits in the model line
High risk for a 2012 — 103rd riskiest of the 271 2012 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.
Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 63 and 2007 worst at 80, with 2012 itself at 73.
If the model year is negotiable, 1996, 2004, 2005, 1999, 1998, 1997, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2002, 2025 and 2000 score lower than 2012 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2009–2013 generation specifically, 2010 is the strongest year at 69 and 2011 the weakest at 73.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2009-2013 generation, 2010 Ford F-150 scores best at 69 and 2011 Ford F-150 worst at 73.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: stalling while driving from about 6k, catalytic converter failure from about 6k, misfire or rough idle from about 6k and other engine problem from about 7k.
On a 2012 Ford F-150 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether stalling while driving has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
What this page cannot tell you
2,441 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 2,441 reports, 2,009 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 82% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2012 Ford F-150?
The most-reported failures are other powertrain problem (479 reports, median 90,000 miles), other engine problem (332 reports, median 18,000 miles) and other speed control problem (148 reports, median 30,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2012 Ford F-150 problems start?
Catalytic converter failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 15,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 5,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 59,000 miles.
Is the 2012 Ford F-150 reliable?
It scores 73 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 103rd riskiest of the 271 2012 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2012 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford F-150 is best?
Within the 2009–2013 generation, 2010 scores best at 69 out of 100 and 2011 worst at 73. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed