2001 Ford F-150: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2001 Ford F-150
On the 2001 Ford F-150, the failure owners report most often is misfire or rough idle, and the reports cluster around 90,000 miles. The earliest to appear is steering rack, gear or tie rod failure, reported by a median of 35,000 miles. Overall it scores 71 out of 100, high risk for a 2001.
High risk for a 2001 — 78th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. 1,451 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
The failures owners actually file about
Owners have reported 71 named failure modes on the 2001 Ford F-150, and the three most-reported carry 27% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Misfire or rough idle leads with 162 reports, about 0.9 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 62k to 122,000 miles.
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure follows with 127 reports, usually reported between 98k to 167,000 miles. 4 of those reports mention a fire.
Other engine problem follows with 102 reports, usually reported between 70k to 150,000 miles. 34 of those reports mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into engine (308), adas (181) and airbag (171).
When these failures get reported
906 of the reports on the 2001 Ford F-150 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 98,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 18% by 50,000 miles, 52% by 100,000 miles and 79% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 69 filed above the top of the chart.
11% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: steering rack, gear or tie rod failure around 35k, control arm, ball joint or bushing failure around 63k, other wheel or tire problem around 63k and wiring harness or short circuit around 63k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 71. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 69 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 84 mention a crash, 285 a fire, 63 an injury and 7 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.73, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: misfire or rough idle at $250–$1,600, fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure at $250–$1,800, other engine problem at $300–$4,000 and cruise control failure at $200–$1,400. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
28% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 162 | 151 | 62k | 90k | 122k | 0.9 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 127 | 116 | 98k | 129k | 167k | 0.7 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 102 | 75 | 70k | 111k | 151k | 0.5 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 100 | 62 | 70k | 92k | 125k | 0.5 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 80 | 52 | 72k | 120k | 154k | 0.4 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 77 | 1 | — | 62k | — | 0.4 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 75 | 52 | 65k | 90k | 123k | 0.4 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 73 | 41 | 55k | 81k | 115k | 0.4 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 66 | 35 | 69k | 123k | 150k | 0.4 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 55 | 27 | 35k | 63k | 94k | 0.3 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 39 | 16 | 41k | 64k | 84k | 0.2 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 30 | 25 | 35k | 35k | 55k | 0.2 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 23 | 12 | 109k | 119k | 138k | 0.1 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 20 | 11 | 54k | 90k | 171k | 0.1 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 18 | 14 | 86k | 135k | 138k | 0.1 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 18 | 11 | 88k | 120k | 177k | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 18 | 7 | — | 59k | — | 0.1 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 18 | 14 | 39k | 63k | 65k | 0.1 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 17 | 14 | 60k | 110k | 144k | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 16 | 3 | — | 35k | — | 0.1 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 15 | 5 | — | 85k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 12 | 8 | 66k | 94k | 141k | 0.1 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 10 | 4 | — | 74k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 10 | 5 | — | 87k | — | 0.1 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other steering problem | steering | 10 | 3 | — | 101k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 10 | 3 | — | 45k | — | 0.1 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 9 | 2 | — | 98k | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 9 | 7 | — | 172k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 9 | 6 | — | 129k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 9 | 8 | 47k | 63k | 107k | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 9 | 9 | 77k | 119k | 119k | 0.0 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Manual clutch or hydraulics failure | transmission | 8 | 5 | — | 57k | — | 0.0 | $900–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 8 | 5 | — | 120k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 7 | 1 | — | 43k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 6 | 4 | — | 155k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 6 | 5 | — | 60k | — | 0.0 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 6 | 4 | — | 164k | — | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 5 | 5 | — | 100k | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 5 | 3 | — | 65k | — | 0.0 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 5 | 1 | — | 34k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 5 | 3 | — | 63k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 5 | 5 | — | 50k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 5 | 2 | — | 65k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 5 | 3 | — | 145k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 4 | 1 | — | 99k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 3 | 3 | — | 144k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 3 | 1 | — | 63k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 3 | 1 | — | 68k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 3 | 1 | — | 106k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 150k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 1k | — | 0.0 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Oil leak | engine | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Overheating | cooling | 2 | 1 | — | 137k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Transmission slipping | transmission | 2 | 2 | — | 8k | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$5,500 | High |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 2 | 2 | — | 79k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 2 | 1 | — | 140k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| DPF, EGR or DEF system failure | emissions | 2 | 1 | — | 38k | — | 0.0 | $800–$5,000 | High |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 98k | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| Heater core failure | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 270k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,400 | Moderate |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 200k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 90k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 1 | 1 | — | 45k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 1 | 1 | — | 118k | — | 0.0 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 1 | 1 | — | 90k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Windshield cracking | glass | 1 | 1 | — | 45k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 1 | 1 | — | 45k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 83 | 34 | 53k | 98k | 164k | 0.4 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2001 Ford F-150 draws about 7.7 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 85th percentile of complaint rates among 2001 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 187,500 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2001 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Misfire or rough idle
Re: 2001 ford svt lightning my vehicle violently ejected a spark plug from the engine's head, while merging on a highway on-ramp. Upon failure, the vehicle obviously started misfiring, bucking, and was a handful when pulling over to side of the road. Ford only used 4 sets of threads on their lightining heads from 1999 to early 2003. Conventional heads typically use between 8 and 10 threads to hold a plug, but ford designed their heads with only 4 threads on many modular 5.4-liter v8 motors too (not just the lightning). They have acknowledged that there is a problem, as they have changed the head design in early 2003 to a new part with 8 threads. But ford has not issued a recall for older lightnings (and other f-150's), even though this could be a potential safety problem (fire, loss of control, etc.). I have already had my head replaced with another inferior 4-thread design, and I wonder when the next plug will be blown from my engine. I would like to see NHTSA encourage ford to retrofit all affected vehicles as this is a common problem for many lightning owners.
The rear passenger side spark plug blew out of the head at normal operating speed (40mph). This appears to be a common problem among the ford f150 triton v8 engines (having reviewed several internet web sites). There is a design flaw where the rear passenger side cylinder overheats and causes the sparkplug to blow out of the cylinder head. Consumers must be made aware of this situation and ford needs to take responsibility and be held accountable. If I were on the freeway with my children in the truck when this failure occured I shudder to think of what could have happened. Shame on ford!!!*ak
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 ford f150. While driving at speeds of 70mph the fuel tank fell from the vehicle. There was a large quantity of gasoline spraying from under the vehicle and onto the highway. The contact was able to move the vehicle off the roadway without further incident. The vehicle was towed to his residence where the contact made repairs to the vehicle. The fuel tank straps had fractured causing the fuel tank to fall from place. The dealer was unable to provide any assistance. The manufacture was not contacted. The failure and current mileages were 103,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 ford f-150. The contact stated that while traveling at speeds of 60 MPH, the fuel tank fractured from under the vehicle and onto the roadway. The vehicle was inspected by an independent mechanic who advised the contact that the two straps holding the fuel tank had broken. The failure and current mileages were 162,852. Updated 11/23/10 *cn updated 11/30/10 updated 08/01/11 *bf updated 1/27/2012 *ln
Other engine problem
Vehicle smokes almost every time when first cranked up. Is now beginning to smoke while driving some, especially within a few minutes of cranking. Vehicle stalls mostly in afternoon when outside temp is above 70. Vehicle has slight shake and vibration when driving or sitting still with transmission in gear. Vehicle makes clunking noise around front to front left side if allowed to coast to around 20 MPH then accelerating. *jb
I own a 2001 harley f150 ford truck which has a consistant problem, not diagnosed on several occasions by dealers, the service engine light continually pops on. I was told that the truck had to be in the shop while the light was on in order to diagnose. Shouldn't the computer record this information. It's still not fixed and now the truck is out of warranty.*ak
Recalls on the 2001 model year
NHTSA has issued 19 recall campaigns covering the 2001 Ford F-150, affecting an estimated 494,390 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assembly:mounting, exterior lighting:headlights and exterior lighting. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY:MOUNTING
1,100,000 vehicles 2011-07-29- Defect
- Ford is recalling certain 1997 through 2003 model year ford f-150, 2004 model year ford f-150 heritage, 1997 through 1999 model year f-250 less than 8,500 lbs. Gross vehicle weight rating (gvwr), and 2002 and 2003 lincoln blackwood vehicles manufactured from june 20, 1995, through august 4, 2004, originally sold, or currently registered in, connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the…
- Consequence
- As a result of the corrosion, one or both straps may fail allowing the fuel lines to separate from the tank, or in some cases, causing the tank to contact the ground. Either scenario may result in a fuel leak presenting a fire hazard.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify owners and instruct them to take their vehicles to a ford or lincoln dealer to have the fuel tank straps replaced with straps that have increased corrosion protection. Early in this campaign, if replacement straps are not available, dealers may install a cable support under the strap as an interim repair or a steel reinforcement over the existing strap as a permanent repair. Any repairs will be performed free of charge. The safety recall began on september 16, 2011. Owners may contact ford motor company customer relationship center at 1-866-436-7332…
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
42,540 vehicles 2009-05-11- Defect
- Dope, inc. Is recalling 42,540 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Dope, inc. Will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on july 28, 2009. Owners may contact dope, inc. At 1-626-272-1798.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07- Defect
- Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11- Defect
- K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
EQUIPMENT:ELECTRICAL
175 vehicles 2007-08-28- Defect
- Certain cequent 90 degree 7-way right angle adaptors sold by distributors in tow packages for aftermarket sales to tow 5th wheel rv travel trailers. Due to incorrect wiring of the harness, the trailer lights may not operate properly.
- Consequence
- If the trailer lights are not working properly, a vehicle crash can occur.
- Remedy
- All of the defective tow packages are still at the distributor level and have not been sold to any consumers.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
19,413 vehicles 2006-08-01- Defect
- Certain maxzone headlight assemblies, depo brand, p/nos. 331-1129l-asn and 331-1129r-asn, sold for use as aftermarket equipment for the above listed passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the photometric requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Maxzone will notify owners and offer reimbursement for any noncompliant headlights. The recall began on july 28, 2006. Owners may contact maxzone at 909-822-3288.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
4,029 vehicles 2006-07-17- Defect
- Certain tradesonic combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Tradesonic will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during july 2006. Owners may contact tradesonic at 626-934-8884.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
3,593 vehicles 2006-07-17- Defect
- Certain aj motorsport combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Aj motorsport will notify owners and offer reimbursement for the lamps. The recall began on july 31, 2006. Owners may contact aj motorsport at 626-618-2026.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
87,745 vehicles 2006-06-29- Defect
- Certain aai motorsports combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above list passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash
- Remedy
- Aai motorsports will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall began on august 1, 2006. Owners may contact aai motorsports at 909-923-9188.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
58,640 vehicles 2006-06-13- Defect
- Certain aftermarket fuel filters sold under the purolator brand name, p/n f65277, shipped from january 16 through june 2, 2006, for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Due to incorrect design, the quick connectors may not fully seat with the tube interface, even though the person making the connection may believe that the quick connector is fully attached.
- Consequence
- Failure of this connection could lead to fuel spillage and, in the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
- Remedy
- Ufi will notify owners and replace the filters free of charge. The recall began on august 4, 2006. Owners may contact ufi filters usa at 800-230-5876.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
14,616 vehicles 2006-06-12- Defect
- Certain eagle eyes headlamps, p/nos. Fr208-b101r, fr208-b101l, fr208-b001r, and fr208-b001l, sold for use as replacement equipment for the passenger vehicles listed above. These headlamps fail to conform to the photometric requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Sabry lee will notify owners and offer full credit for any noncompliant headlamp. The recall is expected to begin on june 14, 2006. Owners may contact sabry lee account executive at 1-866-467-2279.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
292,000 vehicles 2006-03-13- Defect
- Certain anzo combination headlamp assemblies sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles. Some combination lamps are not equipped with amber side reflectors which fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Anzo will notify owners and replace the headlamps free of charge. The recall began may 9, 2006. Owners may contact anzo usa at 909-468-3688.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2001 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 2001 sits in the model line
High risk for a 2001 — 78th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.
Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 63 and 2007 worst at 80, with 2001 itself at 71.
If the model year is negotiable, 1996 and 2004 score lower than 2001 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1996–2003 generation specifically, 1996 is the strongest year at 63 and 2003 the weakest at 73.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1996-2003 generation, 1996 Ford F-150 scores best at 63 and 2003 Ford F-150 worst at 73.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other wheel or tire problem from about 35k, steering rack, gear or tie rod failure from about 35k, control arm, ball joint or bushing failure from about 39k and other powertrain problem from about 41k.
On a 2001 Ford F-150 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other wheel or tire problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
The limits of complaint data
1,451 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 1,451 reports, 906 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 62% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2001 Ford F-150?
The most-reported failures are misfire or rough idle (162 reports, median 90,000 miles), fuel tank, filler or evap failure (127 reports, median 129,000 miles) and other engine problem (102 reports, median 110,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2001 Ford F-150 problems start?
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 35,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 35,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 98,000 miles.
Is the 2001 Ford F-150 reliable?
It scores 71 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 78th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2001 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford F-150 is best?
Within the 1996–2003 generation, 1996 scores best at 63 out of 100 and 2003 worst at 73. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed