2000 Ford F-150: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2000 Ford F-150
On the 2000 Ford F-150, the failure owners report most often is cruise control failure, and the reports cluster around 90,000 miles. The earliest to appear is steering column or shaft failure, reported by a median of 40,000 miles. Overall it scores 69 out of 100, high risk for a 2000.
High risk for a 2000 — 97th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. 1,274 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2000 Ford F-150
Owners have reported 69 named failure modes on the 2000 Ford F-150, and the three most-reported carry 33% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Cruise control failure leads with 154 reports, about 0.8 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 70k to 117,000 miles.
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure follows with 153 reports, usually reported between 98k to 168,000 miles. 3 of those reports mention a fire.
Other electrical problem follows with 108 reports, usually reported between 64k to 125,000 miles. 79 of those reports mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into adas (205), fuel (191) and engine (186).
When these failures get reported
774 of the reports on the 2000 Ford F-150 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 91,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 18% by 50,000 miles, 54% by 100,000 miles and 81% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 49 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 80,000 and 90,000 miles, which alone holds 10% of the dated reports.
10% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, so this is mostly a story about older, higher-mileage cars.
In the order they tend to show up: steering column or shaft failure around 40k, other body or interior problem around 55k, other brake problem around 58k and steering rack, gear or tie rod failure around 58k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 69. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 49 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
What happens when these parts fail
Across the named modes, 65 mention a crash, 377 a fire and 44 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 6.20, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: cruise control failure at $200–$1,400, fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure at $250–$1,800, other electrical problem at $250–$2,000 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
19% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cruise control failure | adas | 154 | 119 | 70k | 90k | 117k | 0.8 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 153 | 130 | 98k | 125k | 168k | 0.8 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 108 | 65 | 64k | 82k | 126k | 0.6 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 76 | 47 | 62k | 93k | 149k | 0.4 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 69 | 27 | 44k | 55k | 91k | 0.4 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 65 | 52 | 61k | 95k | 137k | 0.3 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 55 | 41 | 50k | 58k | 79k | 0.3 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 50 | 35 | 96k | 122k | 153k | 0.3 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 40 | 14 | 37k | 69k | 94k | 0.2 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 38 | 16 | 68k | 100k | 152k | 0.2 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 25 | 20 | 79k | 100k | 149k | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 24 | 11 | 49k | 70k | 115k | 0.1 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 23 | 16 | 76k | 97k | 133k | 0.1 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 22 | 3 | — | 102k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 21 | 13 | 100k | 112k | 195k | 0.1 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 21 | 8 | 40k | 58k | 156k | 0.1 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 19 | 8 | 70k | 82k | 115k | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 14 | 5 | — | 124k | — | 0.1 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 14 | 7 | — | 26k | — | 0.1 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 13 | 6 | — | 137k | — | 0.1 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 13 | 3 | — | 193k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 12 | 5 | — | 42k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 12 | 6 | — | 51k | — | 0.1 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 12 | 3 | — | 145k | — | 0.1 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 11 | 8 | 7k | 40k | 55k | 0.1 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 10 | 6 | — | 62k | — | 0.1 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 9 | 6 | — | 59k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 8 | 7 | — | 44k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 8 | 2 | — | 163k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 8 | 4 | — | 101k | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 8 | 2 | — | 96k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 7 | 6 | — | 94k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 7 | 7 | — | 19k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 6 | 6 | — | 92k | — | 0.0 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 6 | 2 | — | 40k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 5 | 4 | — | 56k | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 5 | 4 | — | 117k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 5 | 1 | — | 198k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Heater core failure | cooling | 4 | 4 | — | 70k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,400 | Moderate |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 4 | 3 | — | 40k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 4 | 4 | — | 49k | — | 0.0 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 3 | 2 | — | 132k | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 3 | 1 | — | 38k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 3 | 3 | — | 114k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 3 | 1 | — | 147k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 3 | 1 | — | 61k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 141k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Turbocharger or supercharger failure | engine | 2 | 1 | — | 51k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$4,500 | High |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Starter failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 121k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 2 | 1 | — | 147k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Wheel, stud or lug nut failure | wheels | 2 | 1 | — | 26k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,500 | Critical |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 2 | 2 | — | 11k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Oil leak | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Overheating | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 222k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 132k | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 1 | 1 | — | 139k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 1 | 1 | — | 150k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 61 | 17 | 50k | 100k | 144k | 0.3 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2000 Ford F-150 draws about 6.8 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 84th percentile of complaint rates among 2000 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 187,500 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2000 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Cruise control failure
The consumer went to the vehicle in morning and found smoke and fire damage at the front driver's side wheel well. The alleged fire occurred due to a defective cruise control deactivation switch. *nm
2000 ford f150 pickup truck with approx. 126,000 miles, caught fire in the engine compartment after being parked about 5 hours. Fire location was at the left side of the engine compartment. The cause of the fire is belived to be the scds (speed control disengagement switch). Fire damaged truck and edge of carport. *ak
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure
The consumer stated while filling the gas tank, the nozzle flew. The consumer assumed the hose nozzle was faulty which did not allow him to pump gas. The dealer stated the fuel filler valve sticking. *ak *jb
Dt: the consumer stated that gas was leaking on 2000 ford f150. Consumer was smelling gas, and finally took the vehicle to to have it checked about a week later. The dealership inspected the truck and found the leak. The dealership replaced the gas tank. There were no recalls on the truck. The truck was fine once the new gas tank was installed. The owner called ford, and they said that there was no recalls on the truck. *ak
Other electrical problem
While vehicle was parked in driveway around 6:00 pm and around 2 :00 am vehicle had caught on fire. Contacted ford customer service, and ford had no information. Consumer had to deal directly with dealership.*ak
I had a problem with my starter and battery cable on my f150 2000. I looked on this site and noticed there were other reports of the same problem. Cost me $500 to replace all parts. Of corse just out of warranty. If there are that many problems like this there should be a recall and we the owners shouldnt have to pay for the repair. Thank you arthur d.*ak
Recalls on the 2000 model year
NHTSA has issued 17 recall campaigns covering the 2000 Ford F-150, affecting an estimated 513,805 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assembly:mounting, exterior lighting:headlights and exterior lighting. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY:MOUNTING
1,100,000 vehicles 2011-07-29- Defect
- Ford is recalling certain 1997 through 2003 model year ford f-150, 2004 model year ford f-150 heritage, 1997 through 1999 model year f-250 less than 8,500 lbs. Gross vehicle weight rating (gvwr), and 2002 and 2003 lincoln blackwood vehicles manufactured from june 20, 1995, through august 4, 2004, originally sold, or currently registered in, connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the…
- Consequence
- As a result of the corrosion, one or both straps may fail allowing the fuel lines to separate from the tank, or in some cases, causing the tank to contact the ground. Either scenario may result in a fuel leak presenting a fire hazard.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify owners and instruct them to take their vehicles to a ford or lincoln dealer to have the fuel tank straps replaced with straps that have increased corrosion protection. Early in this campaign, if replacement straps are not available, dealers may install a cable support under the strap as an interim repair or a steel reinforcement over the existing strap as a permanent repair. Any repairs will be performed free of charge. The safety recall began on september 16, 2011. Owners may contact ford motor company customer relationship center at 1-866-436-7332…
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
42,540 vehicles 2009-05-11- Defect
- Dope, inc. Is recalling 42,540 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Dope, inc. Will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on july 28, 2009. Owners may contact dope, inc. At 1-626-272-1798.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07- Defect
- Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11- Defect
- K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
EQUIPMENT:ELECTRICAL
175 vehicles 2007-08-28- Defect
- Certain cequent 90 degree 7-way right angle adaptors sold by distributors in tow packages for aftermarket sales to tow 5th wheel rv travel trailers. Due to incorrect wiring of the harness, the trailer lights may not operate properly.
- Consequence
- If the trailer lights are not working properly, a vehicle crash can occur.
- Remedy
- All of the defective tow packages are still at the distributor level and have not been sold to any consumers.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
19,413 vehicles 2006-08-01- Defect
- Certain maxzone headlight assemblies, depo brand, p/nos. 331-1129l-asn and 331-1129r-asn, sold for use as aftermarket equipment for the above listed passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the photometric requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Maxzone will notify owners and offer reimbursement for any noncompliant headlights. The recall began on july 28, 2006. Owners may contact maxzone at 909-822-3288.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
4,029 vehicles 2006-07-17- Defect
- Certain tradesonic combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Tradesonic will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during july 2006. Owners may contact tradesonic at 626-934-8884.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
3,593 vehicles 2006-07-17- Defect
- Certain aj motorsport combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Aj motorsport will notify owners and offer reimbursement for the lamps. The recall began on july 31, 2006. Owners may contact aj motorsport at 626-618-2026.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
87,745 vehicles 2006-06-29- Defect
- Certain aai motorsports combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above list passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash
- Remedy
- Aai motorsports will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall began on august 1, 2006. Owners may contact aai motorsports at 909-923-9188.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
58,640 vehicles 2006-06-13- Defect
- Certain aftermarket fuel filters sold under the purolator brand name, p/n f65277, shipped from january 16 through june 2, 2006, for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Due to incorrect design, the quick connectors may not fully seat with the tube interface, even though the person making the connection may believe that the quick connector is fully attached.
- Consequence
- Failure of this connection could lead to fuel spillage and, in the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
- Remedy
- Ufi will notify owners and replace the filters free of charge. The recall began on august 4, 2006. Owners may contact ufi filters usa at 800-230-5876.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
14,616 vehicles 2006-06-12- Defect
- Certain eagle eyes headlamps, p/nos. Fr208-b101r, fr208-b101l, fr208-b001r, and fr208-b001l, sold for use as replacement equipment for the passenger vehicles listed above. These headlamps fail to conform to the photometric requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Sabry lee will notify owners and offer full credit for any noncompliant headlamp. The recall is expected to begin on june 14, 2006. Owners may contact sabry lee account executive at 1-866-467-2279.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
292,000 vehicles 2006-03-13- Defect
- Certain anzo combination headlamp assemblies sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles. Some combination lamps are not equipped with amber side reflectors which fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Anzo will notify owners and replace the headlamps free of charge. The recall began may 9, 2006. Owners may contact anzo usa at 909-468-3688.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2000 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
How 2000 compares with the other years
High risk for a 2000 — 97th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.
Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 63 and 2007 worst at 80, with 2000 itself at 69.
If the model year is negotiable, 1996 scores lower than 2000 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1996–2003 generation specifically, 1996 is the strongest year at 63 and 2003 the weakest at 73.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1996-2003 generation, 1996 Ford F-150 scores best at 63 and 2003 Ford F-150 worst at 73.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: steering column or shaft failure from about 7k, ABS module or sensor failure from about 37k, other brake problem from about 40k and other body or interior problem from about 44k.
On a 2000 Ford F-150 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether steering column or shaft failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
What this page cannot tell you
1,274 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 1,274 reports, 774 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 61% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2000 Ford F-150?
The most-reported failures are cruise control failure (154 reports, median 90,000 miles), fuel tank, filler or evap failure (153 reports, median 125,000 miles) and other electrical problem (108 reports, median 82,500 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2000 Ford F-150 problems start?
Steering column or shaft failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 40,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 5,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 91,000 miles.
Is the 2000 Ford F-150 reliable?
It scores 69 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 97th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2000 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford F-150 is best?
Within the 1996–2003 generation, 1996 scores best at 63 out of 100 and 2003 worst at 73. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed