AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2000 Ford F-150: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2000 Ford F-150

On the 2000 Ford F-150, the failure owners report most often is cruise control failure, and the reports cluster around 90,000 miles. The earliest to appear is steering column or shaft failure, reported by a median of 40,000 miles. Overall it scores 69 out of 100, high risk for a 2000.

High risk for a 2000 — 97th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. 1,274 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

What breaks on the 2000 Ford F-150

Owners have reported 69 named failure modes on the 2000 Ford F-150, and the three most-reported carry 33% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Cruise control failure leads with 154 reports, about 0.8 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 70k to 117,000 miles.

Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure follows with 153 reports, usually reported between 98k to 168,000 miles. 3 of those reports mention a fire.

Other electrical problem follows with 108 reports, usually reported between 64k to 125,000 miles. 79 of those reports mention a fire.

By system, the reports fall mostly into adas (205), fuel (191) and engine (186).

When these failures get reported

774 of the reports on the 2000 Ford F-150 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 91,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 18% by 50,000 miles, 54% by 100,000 miles and 81% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 49 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 80,000 and 90,000 miles, which alone holds 10% of the dated reports.

10% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, so this is mostly a story about older, higher-mileage cars.

In the order they tend to show up: steering column or shaft failure around 40k, other body or interior problem around 55k, other brake problem around 58k and steering rack, gear or tie rod failure around 58k.

Median
  1. Cruise control failure 90k
  2. Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure 125k
  3. Other electrical problem 82k
  4. Other engine problem 93k
  5. Other body or interior problem 55k
  6. Misfire or rough idle 95k
  7. Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure 58k
  8. Other speed control problem 122k
  9. ABS module or sensor failure 69k
  10. Other wheel or tire problem 100k
  11. Master cylinder or brake booster failure 100k
  12. Other powertrain problem 70k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 69. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 91k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 49 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

What happens when these parts fail

Across the named modes, 65 mention a crash, 377 a fire and 44 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 6.20, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: cruise control failure at $200–$1,400, fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure at $250–$1,800, other electrical problem at $250–$2,000 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

19% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Cruise control failure adas 154 119 70k 90k 117k 0.8 $200–$1,400 High
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 153 130 98k 125k 168k 0.8 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Other electrical problem electrical 108 65 64k 82k 126k 0.6 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Other engine problem engine 76 47 62k 93k 149k 0.4 $300–$4,000 High
Other body or interior problem body 69 27 44k 55k 91k 0.4 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Misfire or rough idle engine 65 52 61k 95k 137k 0.3 $250–$1,600 Moderate
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 55 41 50k 58k 79k 0.3 $700–$2,600 High
Other speed control problem adas 50 35 96k 122k 153k 0.3 $250–$2,000 Critical
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 40 14 37k 69k 94k 0.2 $500–$2,400 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 38 16 68k 100k 152k 0.2 $200–$1,500 High
Master cylinder or brake booster failure brakes 25 20 79k 100k 149k 0.1 $450–$2,200 Critical
Other powertrain problem transmission 24 11 49k 70k 115k 0.1 $400–$4,500 High
Engine bay fire engine 23 16 76k 97k 133k 0.1 $4,000–$20,000 Critical
Other suspension problem suspension 22 3 — 102k — 0.1 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Fuel leak or fuel odor fuel 21 13 100k 112k 195k 0.1 $300–$2,500 Critical
Other brake problem brakes 21 8 40k 58k 156k 0.1 $300–$1,800 High
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 19 8 70k 82k 115k 0.1 $200–$900 High
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 14 5 — 124k — 0.1 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Tail light, brake light or signal failure lighting 14 7 — 26k — 0.1 $100–$900 Moderate
Other fuel system problem fuel 13 6 — 137k — 0.1 $300–$2,200 High
Other steering problem steering 13 3 — 193k — 0.1 $350–$2,400 High
Parking brake failure brakes 12 5 — 42k — 0.1 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 12 6 — 51k — 0.1 $400–$2,200 High
Other visibility problem glass 12 3 — 145k — 0.1 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Steering column or shaft failure steering 11 8 7k 40k 55k 0.1 $600–$2,500 Critical
Radiator or coolant leak cooling 10 6 — 62k — 0.1 $350–$1,900 High
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 9 6 — 59k — 0.0 $700–$3,000 High
No-start or intermittent start failure engine 8 7 — 44k — 0.0 $200–$1,800 Moderate
Loss of braking brakes 8 2 — 163k — 0.0 $400–$3,000 Critical
Wiper or washer failure glass 8 4 — 101k — 0.0 $120–$800 Moderate
Other lighting problem lighting 8 2 — 96k — 0.0 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Electrical fire or melted wiring electrical 7 6 — 94k — 0.0 $1,500–$9,000 Critical
Differential or transfer case failure drivetrain 7 7 — 19k — 0.0 $900–$4,200 High
Head gasket failure engine 6 6 — 92k — 0.0 $1,400–$4,000 Critical
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 6 2 — 40k — 0.0 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Complete transmission failure transmission 5 4 — 56k — 0.0 $2,800–$8,000 Critical
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 5 4 — 117k — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 5 1 — 198k — 0.0 $200–$1,500 Critical
Heater core failure cooling 4 4 — 70k — 0.0 $700–$2,400 Moderate
Instrument cluster or gauge failure infotainment 4 3 — 40k — 0.0 $350–$1,400 Moderate
Rust or structural corrosion body 4 4 — 49k — 0.0 $500–$6,000 High
Complete engine failure or seizure engine 3 2 — 132k — 0.0 $4,500–$12,000 Critical
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 3 1 — 38k — 0.0 $450–$2,200 High
Fuel pump failure fuel 3 3 — 114k — 0.0 $600–$2,600 High
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 3 1 — 147k — 0.0 $250–$1,500 High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 3 1 — 61k — 0.0 $250–$1,600 Critical
Stalling while driving engine 2 2 — 141k — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Turbocharger or supercharger failure engine 2 1 — 51k — 0.0 $1,500–$4,500 High
Alternator or charging system failure electrical 2 0 — — — 0.0 $450–$1,600 High
Starter failure electrical 2 2 — 121k — 0.0 $350–$1,300 Moderate
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 2 1 — 147k — 0.0 $300–$1,600 High
Wheel, stud or lug nut failure wheels 2 1 — 26k — 0.0 $150–$1,500 Critical
Headlight failure or clouding lighting 2 2 — 11k — 0.0 $150–$1,800 Moderate
Oil leak engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$2,200 Moderate
Overheating cooling 1 0 — — — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Transmission will not engage a gear transmission 1 0 — — — 0.0 $1,500–$6,000 Critical
Torque converter failure transmission 1 0 — — — 0.0 $1,100–$3,200 High
Fuel injector failure fuel 1 1 — 222k — 0.0 $450–$2,800 Moderate
Engine sensor failure electrical 1 0 — — — 0.0 $180–$900 Moderate
Airbag inflator rupture airbag 1 1 — 132k — 0.0 $0–$0 Critical
Loss of power steering steering 1 0 — — — 0.0 $600–$2,800 Critical
Strut, shock or spring failure suspension 1 0 — — — 0.0 $500–$2,000 Moderate
Door latch or handle failure body 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$1,200 High
Air conditioning failure hvac 1 0 — — — 0.0 $400–$2,800 Moderate
Blower motor or climate control failure hvac 1 1 — 139k — 0.0 $250–$1,200 Moderate
Catalytic converter failure emissions 1 0 — — — 0.0 $900–$3,500 Moderate
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$2,000 High
Other seat belt problem airbag 1 0 — — — 0.0 $200–$900 High
Other driver assistance problem adas 1 1 — 150k — 0.0 $250–$1,800 High
Unclassified problem other 61 17 50k 100k 144k 0.3 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2000 Ford F-150 draws about 6.8 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 84th percentile of complaint rates among 2000 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 187,500 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2000 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Cruise control failure

The consumer went to the vehicle in morning and found smoke and fire damage at the front driver's side wheel well. The alleged fire occurred due to a defective cruise control deactivation switch. *nm

53,004 miles NHTSA complaint 450222 filed 2004-01-16

2000 ford f150 pickup truck with approx. 126,000 miles, caught fire in the engine compartment after being parked about 5 hours. Fire location was at the left side of the engine compartment. The cause of the fire is belived to be the scds (speed control disengagement switch). Fire damaged truck and edge of carport. *ak

126,000 miles NHTSA complaint 493815 filed 2004-08-31

Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure

The consumer stated while filling the gas tank, the nozzle flew. The consumer assumed the hose nozzle was faulty which did not allow him to pump gas. The dealer stated the fuel filler valve sticking. *ak *jb

6,120 miles NHTSA complaint 428734 filed 2003-09-05

Dt: the consumer stated that gas was leaking on 2000 ford f150. Consumer was smelling gas, and finally took the vehicle to to have it checked about a week later. The dealership inspected the truck and found the leak. The dealership replaced the gas tank. There were no recalls on the truck. The truck was fine once the new gas tank was installed. The owner called ford, and they said that there was no recalls on the truck. *ak

115,000 miles NHTSA complaint 546910 filed 2005-08-01

Other electrical problem

While vehicle was parked in driveway around 6:00 pm and around 2 :00 am vehicle had caught on fire. Contacted ford customer service, and ford had no information. Consumer had to deal directly with dealership.*ak

27,000 miles NHTSA complaint 311442 filed 2001-08-28

I had a problem with my starter and battery cable on my f150 2000. I looked on this site and noticed there were other reports of the same problem. Cost me $500 to replace all parts. Of corse just out of warranty. If there are that many problems like this there should be a recall and we the owners shouldnt have to pay for the repair. Thank you arthur d.*ak

62,000 miles NHTSA complaint 420760 filed 2003-07-26

Recalls on the 2000 model year

NHTSA has issued 17 recall campaigns covering the 2000 Ford F-150, affecting an estimated 513,805 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assembly:mounting, exterior lighting:headlights and exterior lighting. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

11V385000

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY:MOUNTING

1,100,000 vehicles 2011-07-29
Defect
Ford is recalling certain 1997 through 2003 model year ford f-150, 2004 model year ford f-150 heritage, 1997 through 1999 model year f-250 less than 8,500 lbs. Gross vehicle weight rating (gvwr), and 2002 and 2003 lincoln blackwood vehicles manufactured from june 20, 1995, through august 4, 2004, originally sold, or currently registered in, connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the…
Consequence
As a result of the corrosion, one or both straps may fail allowing the fuel lines to separate from the tank, or in some cases, causing the tank to contact the ground. Either scenario may result in a fuel leak presenting a fire hazard.
Remedy
Ford will notify owners and instruct them to take their vehicles to a ford or lincoln dealer to have the fuel tank straps replaced with straps that have increased corrosion protection. Early in this campaign, if replacement straps are not available, dealers may install a cable support under the strap as an interim repair or a steel reinforcement over the existing strap as a permanent repair. Any repairs will be performed free of charge. The safety recall began on september 16, 2011. Owners may contact ford motor company customer relationship center at 1-866-436-7332…
09E025000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

42,540 vehicles 2009-05-11
Defect
Dope, inc. Is recalling 42,540 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Dope, inc. Will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on july 28, 2009. Owners may contact dope, inc. At 1-626-272-1798.
09E012000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07
Defect
Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
08E050000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11
Defect
K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence
Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
07E066000

EQUIPMENT:ELECTRICAL

175 vehicles 2007-08-28
Defect
Certain cequent 90 degree 7-way right angle adaptors sold by distributors in tow packages for aftermarket sales to tow 5th wheel rv travel trailers. Due to incorrect wiring of the harness, the trailer lights may not operate properly.
Consequence
If the trailer lights are not working properly, a vehicle crash can occur.
Remedy
All of the defective tow packages are still at the distributor level and have not been sold to any consumers.
06E067000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

19,413 vehicles 2006-08-01
Defect
Certain maxzone headlight assemblies, depo brand, p/nos. 331-1129l-asn and 331-1129r-asn, sold for use as aftermarket equipment for the above listed passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the photometric requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Maxzone will notify owners and offer reimbursement for any noncompliant headlights. The recall began on july 28, 2006. Owners may contact maxzone at 909-822-3288.
06E064000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

4,029 vehicles 2006-07-17
Defect
Certain tradesonic combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Tradesonic will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during july 2006. Owners may contact tradesonic at 626-934-8884.
06E065000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

3,593 vehicles 2006-07-17
Defect
Certain aj motorsport combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Aj motorsport will notify owners and offer reimbursement for the lamps. The recall began on july 31, 2006. Owners may contact aj motorsport at 626-618-2026.
06E060000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

87,745 vehicles 2006-06-29
Defect
Certain aai motorsports combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above list passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence
Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash
Remedy
Aai motorsports will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall began on august 1, 2006. Owners may contact aai motorsports at 909-923-9188.
06E056000

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE

58,640 vehicles 2006-06-13
Defect
Certain aftermarket fuel filters sold under the purolator brand name, p/n f65277, shipped from january 16 through june 2, 2006, for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Due to incorrect design, the quick connectors may not fully seat with the tube interface, even though the person making the connection may believe that the quick connector is fully attached.
Consequence
Failure of this connection could lead to fuel spillage and, in the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
Remedy
Ufi will notify owners and replace the filters free of charge. The recall began on august 4, 2006. Owners may contact ufi filters usa at 800-230-5876.
06E052000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

14,616 vehicles 2006-06-12
Defect
Certain eagle eyes headlamps, p/nos. Fr208-b101r, fr208-b101l, fr208-b001r, and fr208-b001l, sold for use as replacement equipment for the passenger vehicles listed above. These headlamps fail to conform to the photometric requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Sabry lee will notify owners and offer full credit for any noncompliant headlamp. The recall is expected to begin on june 14, 2006. Owners may contact sabry lee account executive at 1-866-467-2279.
06E023000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

292,000 vehicles 2006-03-13
Defect
Certain anzo combination headlamp assemblies sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles. Some combination lamps are not equipped with amber side reflectors which fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Anzo will notify owners and replace the headlamps free of charge. The recall began may 9, 2006. Owners may contact anzo usa at 909-468-3688.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2000 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2000 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

How 2000 compares with the other years

High risk for a 2000 — 97th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.

Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 63 and 2007 worst at 80, with 2000 itself at 69.

If the model year is negotiable, 1996 scores lower than 2000 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1996–2003 generation specifically, 1996 is the strongest year at 63 and 2003 the weakest at 73.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1996-2003 generation, 1996 Ford F-150 scores best at 63 and 2003 Ford F-150 worst at 73.

What the numbers say to check

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: steering column or shaft failure from about 7k, ABS module or sensor failure from about 37k, other brake problem from about 40k and other body or interior problem from about 44k.

On a 2000 Ford F-150 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether steering column or shaft failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.

What this page cannot tell you

1,274 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 1,274 reports, 774 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 61% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2000 Ford F-150?

The most-reported failures are cruise control failure (154 reports, median 90,000 miles), fuel tank, filler or evap failure (153 reports, median 125,000 miles) and other electrical problem (108 reports, median 82,500 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2000 Ford F-150 problems start?

Steering column or shaft failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 40,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 5,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 91,000 miles.

Is the 2000 Ford F-150 reliable?

It scores 69 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 97th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2000 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Ford F-150 is best?

Within the 1996–2003 generation, 1996 scores best at 63 out of 100 and 2003 worst at 73. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed