2014 Ford Expedition: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2014 Ford Expedition
On the 2014 Ford Expedition, the failure owners report most often is other powertrain problem, and the reports cluster around 130,000 miles. Across every failure mode on this year, half the dated reports were filed before 90,000 miles. Overall it scores 62 out of 100, high risk for a 2014.
High risk for a 2014 — 258th riskiest of the 270 2014 vehicles we can rate. 96 owner reports; fleet size borrowed from other years of the same model.
What breaks on the 2014 Ford Expedition
Owners have reported 34 named failure modes on the 2014 Ford Expedition, and the three most-reported carry 36% of everything filed.
Other powertrain problem leads with 20 reports, about 0.3 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 79k to 145,000 miles.
Other electrical problem follows with 9 reports, median 80,000 miles. 2 of those reports mention a fire.
Seat belt or retractor failure follows with 6 reports, median 10,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into transmission (21), electrical (17) and body (10).
The mileage the reports cluster at
57 of the reports on the 2014 Ford Expedition came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 90,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 19% by 50,000 miles, 56% by 100,000 miles and 88% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 4 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 140,000 and 150,000 miles, which alone holds 14% of the dated reports.
12% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 34. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 4 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 8 mention a crash, 2 a fire and 4 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.59, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other powertrain problem at $400–$4,500, other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, seat belt or retractor failure at $200–$900 and control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure at $700–$3,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
30% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 20 | 8 | 79k | 132k | 147k | 0.3 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 9 | 5 | — | 80k | — | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 6 | 5 | — | 12k | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 5 | 2 | — | 150k | — | 0.1 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 5 | 4 | — | 147k | — | 0.1 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Window regulator or power window failure | body | 3 | 3 | — | 90k | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 3 | 2 | — | 212k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 3 | 1 | — | 80k | — | 0.0 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 131k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 106k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 116k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 2 | 2 | — | 72k | — | 0.0 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 2 | 2 | — | 112k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 2 | 2 | — | 105k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 2 | 2 | — | 65k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Oil leak | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 21k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 70k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 90k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 106k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Backup camera failure | infotainment | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 6k | — | 0.0 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 52k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 1 | 1 | — | 54k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 1 | 1 | — | 149k | — | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 1 | 1 | — | 166k | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 44k | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 6 | 3 | — | 64k | — | 0.1 | — | Moderate |
This year had no usable recall paperwork, so the fleet-size estimate is the median of other years of the same model. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2014 Ford Expedition draws about 1.2 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 77th percentile of complaint rates among 2014 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. This year had no usable recall paperwork, so the fleet-size estimate is the median of other years of the same model.
The working figure is 78,351 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2014 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other powertrain problem
Seems to be the same issue with the 2011 to 2013 6r80 transmissions that a previous recall dealt with. While driving the expidition downshifted by itself causing to go off the road and almost being rear ended. My vehicle is made at the same plant and the recall goes to vehicles manufactured to 4/13 mine was 8/13. Which makes it a new model year 2014. The previous recall was 2011 to 12. The later added 2013 models. They need to look into adding 2014 or later to this list since it is happening to this model as well. I do not feel safe driving my expedition. Also the speedometer jumped up and down wrench light came on it jump and surges at lower speeds. But shutting it off seems to reset it for a short while but the issue always comes back.
Tl* the contact owns a 2014 ford expedition. While driving approximately 60 MPH, the transmission seized without warning. The vehicle began to skid and the contact was able to shift into neutral. The contact placed the vehicle into drive and accelerated off the highway. The contact was able to restart the vehicle and resume normal driving. The vehicle was driven to ames ford lincoln (123 airport rd, ames, ia 50010, (515) 233-1913)where it was diagnosed that the gaskets, connectors, and transmission fluid needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was contacted and stated that there were no recalls. The contact was provided case number: cas-21938912. The failure mileage was 146,000. *bf *tr
Other electrical problem
Tl* the contact owns a 2014 ford expedition. While driving approximately 10 MPH, the vehicle stalled and the electronic stability control light flickered on and off repeatedly. The vehicle was taken to a local dealer who was unable to diagnose the failure. The failure recurred three times. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 49,000.
Ford recall on explorer model regarding the vehicle not recognizing that the shift gear is in the parking setting,therefore the key is unable to be removed...also rendering the vehicle unsafe considering that since parking isn't enabled the vehicle may roll resulting in injury or death.I would also like to add to the records that this is the third time I've experienced this malfunction in 3 different model years including 2012 and 2008. I would also like to report that the automatic running boards have become dis engaged in the motor and only work randomly which is also dangerous when entering vehicle.
Seat belt or retractor failure
Tl* the contact owns a 2014 ford expedition. The contact stated that when a passenger was seated in the front passenger's side seat, the warning chime did not activate when the passenger's seat belt was not latched. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 80.
Own a 2014 ford expedition. When a passenger is seated in the front passenger's side seat, the warning chime does not activate when the passenger's seat belt is not latched. The vehicle was diagnosed and rochester ford dealer service stated a part was not put it was optional and they did not repair it. The approximate failure mileage was unknown but reported at 12,000 miles.
How it ranks in the 2014 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 2014 — 258th riskiest of the 270 2014 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.
Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2014 comes out best at 62 and 2018 worst at 78, with 2014 itself at 62.
No other year of this model scores meaningfully better than 2014, so if this generation is what you want, the year is not the lever.
Within the 2012–2014 generation specifically, 2014 is the strongest year at 62 and 2012 the weakest at 72.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2012-2014 generation, 2014 Ford Expedition scores best at 62 and 2012 Ford Expedition worst at 72.
Where to spend the inspection money
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other powertrain problem from about 79k.
On a 2014 Ford Expedition with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other powertrain problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
Where these figures stop being useful
96 owner reports; fleet size borrowed from other years of the same model. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 96 reports, 57 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 59% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2014 Ford Expedition?
The most-reported failures are other powertrain problem (20 reports, median 130,000 miles), other electrical problem (9 reports, median 80,000 miles) and seat belt or retractor failure (6 reports, median 10,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2014 Ford Expedition problems start?
Other powertrain problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 130,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 80,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 90,000 miles.
Is the 2014 Ford Expedition reliable?
It scores 62 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 258th riskiest of the 270 2014 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2014 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford Expedition is best?
Within the 2012–2014 generation, 2014 scores best at 62 out of 100 and 2012 worst at 72. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed