1998 Ford Expedition: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 1998 Ford Expedition
On the 1998 Ford Expedition, the failure owners report most often is other suspension problem, and the reports cluster around 85,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other wheel or tire problem, reported by a median of 80,000 miles. Overall it scores 66 out of 100, high risk for a 1998.
High risk for a 1998 — 119th riskiest of the 271 1998 vehicles we can rate. 1,022 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
The failures owners actually file about
Owners have reported 67 named failure modes on the 1998 Ford Expedition, and the three most-reported carry 27% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other suspension problem leads with 110 reports, about 0.6 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 66k to 120,000 miles.
Misfire or rough idle follows with 101 reports, usually reported between 84k to 145,000 miles. 2 of those reports mention a fire.
Other electrical problem follows with 63 reports, usually reported between 80k to 132,500 miles. 16 of those reports mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into engine (190), suspension (140) and adas (87).
The mileage the reports cluster at
366 of the reports on the 1998 Ford Expedition came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 110,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 8% by 50,000 miles, 41% by 100,000 miles and 77% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 29 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 80,000 and 90,000 miles, which alone holds 10% of the dated reports.
4% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, so this is mostly a story about older, higher-mileage cars.
In the order they tend to show up: other wheel or tire problem around 81k, other suspension problem around 86k, other electrical problem around 98k and misfire or rough idle around 112k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 67. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 29 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 42 mention a crash, 79 a fire, 30 an injury and 1 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.35, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other suspension problem at $350–$2,000, misfire or rough idle at $250–$1,600, other electrical problem at $250–$2,000 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
27% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 110 | 16 | 66k | 86k | 120k | 0.6 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 101 | 74 | 84k | 112k | 144k | 0.5 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 63 | 31 | 80k | 98k | 132k | 0.3 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 57 | 26 | 90k | 120k | 140k | 0.3 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 53 | 9 | 70k | 81k | 136k | 0.3 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 50 | 6 | — | 127k | — | 0.3 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 44 | 26 | 103k | 120k | 169k | 0.2 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 43 | 16 | 102k | 128k | 160k | 0.2 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 40 | 20 | 104k | 123k | 161k | 0.2 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 32 | 5 | — | 70k | — | 0.2 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 30 | 3 | — | 55k | — | 0.2 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 26 | 3 | — | 126k | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 22 | 7 | — | 64k | — | 0.1 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 21 | 11 | 91k | 145k | 182k | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 21 | 1 | — | 40k | — | 0.1 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other steering problem | steering | 21 | 1 | — | 45k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 18 | 2 | — | 135k | — | 0.1 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 17 | 4 | — | 75k | — | 0.1 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 16 | 6 | — | 129k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 15 | 8 | 100k | 115k | 119k | 0.1 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 12 | 6 | — | 149k | — | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 12 | 3 | — | 126k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 12 | 4 | — | 104k | — | 0.1 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Wheel, stud or lug nut failure | wheels | 10 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $150–$1,500 | Critical |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 9 | 4 | — | 86k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 8 | 3 | — | 204k | — | 0.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 7 | 2 | — | 97k | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 7 | 6 | — | 51k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 7 | 1 | — | 132k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 6 | 4 | — | 122k | — | 0.0 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 6 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 6 | 4 | — | 105k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Air suspension failure | suspension | 6 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,500 | High |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 6 | 3 | — | 105k | — | 0.0 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 6 | 6 | — | 28k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 5 | 1 | — | 118k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 4 | 2 | — | 88k | — | 0.0 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Overheating | cooling | 4 | 3 | — | 100k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 4 | 2 | — | 99k | — | 0.0 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 4 | 2 | — | 93k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 3 | 2 | — | 168k | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 3 | 3 | — | 220k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Heater core failure | cooling | 3 | 1 | — | 86k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,400 | Moderate |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 3 | 2 | — | 174k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 3 | 2 | — | 68k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 3 | 3 | — | 76k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 3 | 1 | — | 86k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Oil leak | engine | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 2 | 2 | — | 175k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 2 | 2 | — | 99k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 65k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Window regulator or power window failure | body | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 72k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 106k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Thermostat failure | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 1 | 1 | — | 30k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 76k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 220k | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 130k | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 24 | 9 | 73k | 112k | 128k | 0.1 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 1998 Ford Expedition draws about 5.4 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 84th percentile of complaint rates among 1998 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 190,000 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 1998 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other suspension problem
The right torsion bar of my 1998 ford expedition cracked in march 2001. No injuries were reported. The garage that repaired my vehicle said that there was a distinct defect in the torsion bar and gave me the bar to offer proof to ford that this was indeed and manufacturer defect. The ford motor company was contacted and notified of this problem. The company dragged correspondance out with us over the next several months. No recall was enacted. On january 4, 2003 the left torsion bar went on my 1998 ford expedition as I was exiting the highway. The truck dropped about 12 inches on the left hand side and I slammed my head on the driver window. No serious injury resulted, but I could have lost control of the vehicle and caused serious injury to the others in the car as well as myself.
Front driver's side torsion bar (called a spring by my mechanic) cracked in 2 pieces causing vehicle to lean to the left. About a month later the right side bar also cracked causing vehicle to lean to the right. Vehicle is barely drivable in this condition.*jb
Misfire or rough idle
At 58,000 miles one of the spark plugs was blown out of the cylinder head on the drivers side. The repair required a replacement head assembly; however, no heads are available in the entire country. Only option from ford was to replace the engine! The engine had already been replaced at 33,900 miles due to a piston slap problem. The cylinder head only had 25,000 miles on it when the spark plug blew out. Ford would not provide any assistance due to the fact that the engine warranty ran out at 24,000 miles.
Number three spark plug and assembly blown out of head. I have found this to be common with many 5.4 litre motors since experiencing this. Local ford dealer towne ford in redwood city wanted $2,000.00 to inspect and then start to talk about repair costs. Towed vehicle to mission valley ford in santa clara where service advisor obtained an extended warranty from ford to have head replaced due to numerous similar problems. Repair cost $1900.00 for wich I had to pay $750.00. The motor must be pulled from truck to replace the head. I had been informed by one fleet owner of trucks with several of these motors that had experienced the same problem with the same motors as mine, that one vehicle blew out a spark plug on the driver side after replacing the head on the passenger side. I had both heads replaced at the same time and was told by the service advisor that ford had changed the part numbers of the heads indicating that a change had been made to the new heads supplied for replacement. The total cost was $2,500.00 for both heads replaced. The problem is that the heads do not have enough surface area in them to properly hold the…
Other electrical problem
Interrior light fails to go off, even with vehicle running. On one instance, it began flashing. This was very distracting and dangerous as it was at night. I was only able to turn the interior light off by pulling the relay. This is a known issue with 1999-2000 expeditions, but apparently it affects 1998 vehicles as well.
Interrior light fails to go off, even with vehicle running. On one instance, it began flashing. This was very distracting and dangerous as it was at night. I was only able to turn the interior light off by pulling the relay. This is a known issue with 1999-2000 expeditions, but apparently it affects 1998 vehicles as well.
Recalls on the 1998 model year
NHTSA has issued 7 recall campaigns covering the 1998 Ford Expedition, affecting an estimated 575,841 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover exterior lighting:headlights, exterior lighting and vehicle speed control. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
19,413 vehicles 2006-08-01- Defect
- Certain maxzone headlight assemblies, depo brand, p/nos. 331-1129l-asn and 331-1129r-asn, sold for use as aftermarket equipment for the above listed passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the photometric requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Maxzone will notify owners and offer reimbursement for any noncompliant headlights. The recall began on july 28, 2006. Owners may contact maxzone at 909-822-3288.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
87,745 vehicles 2006-06-29- Defect
- Certain aai motorsports combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above list passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash
- Remedy
- Aai motorsports will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall began on august 1, 2006. Owners may contact aai motorsports at 909-923-9188.
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
4,500,000 vehicles 2005-09-07- Defect
- On certain pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles equipped with speed control, the speed control deactivation switch may overheat, smoke, or burn.
- Consequence
- A fire at the switch could occur.
- Remedy
- By letter dated september 12, 2005, owners were instructed to return their vehicles to their dealers to have the speed control deactivation switch disconnected. Owners who have had their speed control deactivated are being notified that parts will be available and advised to make an appointment to reconnect the speed control beginning in february 2006. Owners who did not have their speed control deactivated are being notified to have their system remedied beginning in february 2006. Owners are urged to avail themselves of the free disconnect service as soon as possible…
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
20,637 vehicles 2000-06-19- Defect
- Vehicle description: mini vans, light pickup trucks, and sport utility vehicles. Off lease canadian vehicles equipped with daytime running lights which meet canadian requirements and not the photometric requirements of fmvss 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." according to ford, the vehicles were imported into the u.s. Erroneously.
- Consequence
- The light given off from the daytime running lights is brighter than allowed by u.s. Standards.
- Remedy
- Dealers will be advised to deactivate the running light function and to complete any outstanding safety recalls on these vehicles.
TRAILER HITCHES
565,800 vehicles 2000-03-07- Defect
- Vehicle description: multi-purpose vehicles. The trailer hitch assembly to the frame attaching bolts could lose the clamp load.
- Consequence
- The trailer hitch could then separate from the vehicle.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the trailer hitch mounting bolts and nut plates.
WHEELS:LUGS/NUTS/BOLTS/STUDS
1,520,000 vehicles 1998-05-13- Defect
- Vehicle description: multi-purpose vehicles and light duty pickup trucks. The lug nuts on these vehicles may not create sufficient clamp load allowing wheel movement in relation to the hub/rotor mounting surface.
- Consequence
- This can result in the loosening of lug nuts, stud fatigue failure, and the potential for a wheel separation from the vehicle, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Owners of these vehicles will be receiving two notifications. The first notification, which began in may 1998, will provide an interim repair procedure until parts become available. This interim procedure can be completed by owners or their dealers. It specifies that the lug nut torque must be verified to be 100 lbs. Then the lug nuts need to be tightened an additional 1/8 to 1/4 turn more. There will be a second owner notification, which is expected to begin july 20, 1998, under which dealers will inspect the wheel studs and replace the wheel lug nuts.
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:GEAR POSITION INDICATION (PRNDL)
866,000 vehicles 1997-10-07- Defect
- Vehicle description: light duty pickup trucks and multi-purpose passenger vehicles. If the automatic transmission shift cable assembly was not fully attached to the steering column bracket, the shift cable assembly can come out of the bracket. The vehicle operator would then not be able to shift the transmission from one of the drive gear positions into the park position even though the gear shift selector would indicate "park."
- Consequence
- The condition would not allow a disengagement of the transmission from the park position or affect proper neutral start switch operation. Unintended vehicle movement could occur if the parking brake was not set.
- Remedy
- Dealers will make the proper attachment of the transmission shift control cable to the steering column bracket and add a tie strap to that connection.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 1998 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 1998 sits in the model line
High risk for a 1998 — 119th riskiest of the 271 1998 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.
Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2026 comes out best at 58 and 2003 worst at 78, with 1998 itself at 66.
If the model year is negotiable, 2026 and 2014 score lower than 1998 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1996–2002 generation specifically, 2000 is the strongest year at 65 and 1997 the weakest at 67.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1996-2002 generation, 2000 Ford Expedition scores best at 65 and 1997 Ford Expedition worst at 67.
Where to spend the inspection money
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other suspension problem from about 66k, other wheel or tire problem from about 70k, other electrical problem from about 80k and misfire or rough idle from about 84k.
On a 1998 Ford Expedition with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other suspension problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
What this page cannot tell you
1,022 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 1,022 reports, 366 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 36% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 1998 Ford Expedition?
The most-reported failures are other suspension problem (110 reports, median 85,000 miles), misfire or rough idle (101 reports, median 112,500 miles) and other electrical problem (63 reports, median 97,500 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 1998 Ford Expedition problems start?
Other wheel or tire problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 80,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 70,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 110,000 miles.
Is the 1998 Ford Expedition reliable?
It scores 66 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 119th riskiest of the 271 1998 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 1998 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford Expedition is best?
Within the 1996–2002 generation, 2000 scores best at 65 out of 100 and 1997 worst at 67. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed