2010 Nissan Rogue: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2010 Nissan Rogue
On the 2010 Nissan Rogue, the failure owners report most often is other powertrain problem, and the reports cluster around 67,500 miles. Across every failure mode on this year, half the dated reports were filed before 72,000 miles. Overall it scores 71 out of 100, high risk for a 2010.
High risk for a 2010 — 134th riskiest of the 275 2010 vehicles we can rate. 421 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What owners report breaking
Owners have reported 51 named failure modes on the 2010 Nissan Rogue, and the three most-reported carry 35% of everything filed.
Other powertrain problem leads with 68 reports, about 1.0 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 50k to 97,500 miles.
Other speed control problem follows with 44 reports, usually reported between 51k to 107,500 miles.
CVT failure follows with 36 reports, usually reported between 57k to 90,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into transmission (124), adas (65) and engine (34).
At what mileage it happens
349 of the reports on the 2010 Nissan Rogue came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 72,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 25% by 50,000 miles, 72% by 100,000 miles and 96% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 1 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 50,000 and 60,000 miles, which alone holds 13% of the dated reports.
15% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: other powertrain problem around 68k, other engine problem around 68k, other speed control problem around 70k and CVT failure around 71k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 51. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 1 report came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
What happens when these parts fail
Across the named modes, 6 mention a crash, 20 a fire and 4 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.94, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other powertrain problem at $400–$4,500, other speed control problem at $250–$2,000, CVT failure at $3,000–$8,500 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
43% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 68 | 64 | 50k | 68k | 98k | 1.0 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 44 | 40 | 51k | 70k | 107k | 0.7 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| CVT failure | transmission | 36 | 27 | 57k | 71k | 91k | 0.5 | $3,000–$8,500 | Critical |
| Other engine problem | engine | 30 | 26 | 47k | 68k | 106k | 0.4 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 20 | 20 | 48k | 86k | 94k | 0.3 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 18 | 17 | 40k | 75k | 121k | 0.3 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 16 | 13 | 79k | 84k | 127k | 0.2 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Overheating | cooling | 15 | 15 | 64k | 76k | 101k | 0.2 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 14 | 6 | — | 121k | — | 0.2 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 13 | 11 | 30k | 73k | 105k | 0.2 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 7 | 3 | — | 73k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 6 | 6 | — | 93k | — | 0.1 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 5 | 1 | — | 111k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 5 | 2 | — | 50k | — | 0.1 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 4 | 4 | — | 60k | — | 0.1 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 4 | 4 | — | 86k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 4 | 1 | — | 59k | — | 0.1 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 4 | 2 | — | 87k | — | 0.1 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 4 | 4 | — | 109k | — | 0.1 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Other steering problem | steering | 4 | 4 | — | 114k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 3 | 3 | — | 56k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 3 | 3 | — | 72k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 3 | 3 | — | 120k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 3 | 3 | — | 74k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 3 | 3 | — | 97k | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 3 | 2 | — | 25 | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 3 | 2 | — | 42k | — | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 2 | 2 | — | 53k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 50k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 54k | — | 0.0 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 2 | 2 | — | 47k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 80k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 2 | 1 | — | 121k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 81k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 44k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Thermostat failure | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 55k | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 46k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 85k | — | 0.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 100k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 3k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 24k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Airbag deployed without a crash | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $2,500–$8,000 | Critical |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 16k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 3k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 1 | 1 | — | 46k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 30k | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 15k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 1 | 1 | — | 107k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 1 | 1 | — | 55k | — | 0.0 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 46 | 34 | 43k | 55k | 91k | 0.7 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2010 Nissan Rogue draws about 6.3 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 90th percentile of complaint rates among 2010 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 66,973 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2010 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other powertrain problem
When slowing to a stop after a long (2 hours) period of driving at highway speeds, the car could not then accelerate after a stop. The rpms would rev to between 2-3,000 but the car would not accelerate for a few seconds. In intersections, this was dangerous because it could cause an accident. The car only has 500 miles on it. An initial trip to the dealership said that there were no codes and no problem. On the return trip, after an extended highway drive, the same problem occurred. The car is unsafe to drive in its current condition and is going back to the dealership tomorrow. *tr
Nissan rouge 2010 - it has only been 5 months since I bought a brand new rogue 2010 from victory nissan chesapeake. I received a recall card from them regarding a throttle noise. I took my car for change oil and the nissan service did a reprogram to eliminate the noise. The noise had lessened. Thinking that it is a brand new car, I did an observation and waited for my second change oil and complained about the noise in my car again and the brake that felt like it's losing a thread when you step on it. After my change oil, I was told that my transmission needs to be replaced. However, the dealer has to order it and will call me back in 2-3 days. A week had passed and I did not receive a call. I called nissan usa to complain about the service and I have been driving this car knowing that there is a problem and have complained about the break and the transmission. I called back again and the service agent just told me that the transmission is not yet in. I was driving in the rain when the accelerator just kept going even if I was not pressing on it. I was concerned and took the car back to the dealer and was given a rental car. I…
Other speed control problem
Tl*the contact owns a 2010 nissan rogue. The contact stated that after driving out of a toll booth the vehicle would not accelerate. The dealer checked the vehicle and stated that it was functioning normally. The dealer decided to replace the transmission at no charge to the contact after it was inspected by a nissan engineer. The current and failure mileages were 2800.
Tl*the contact owns a 2010 nissan rogue. The contact stated that the vehicle would not accelerate after coming to a complete stop. The rpms increase but the vehicle would not move forward. The dealer was contacted and the vehicle will be repaired. The failure and current mileages were approximately 3100.
CVT failure
Tl* the contact owns a 2010 nissan rogue. The contact was attempting to accelerate from a complete stop yet the vehicle would not respond. The contact abruptly depressed the accelerator pedal into the floorboard yet the vehicle would not accelerate over 5 MPH. The vehicle was shut off and resumed normal operation when restarted. The dealer performed a diagnostic and determined that the CVT valve body would need replacing. The vehicle was left with the dealer where the contact was awaiting repairs. The VIN was not available. The failure mileage was approximately 1,700.
Tl* the contact owns a 2010 nissan rogue. The contact stated that the vehicle lost power abnormally while decelerating to a toll booth and the vehicle became resistant to acceleration attempts. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the contact was informed that the CVT transmission needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired yet the failure recurred after one year. The vehicle was taken back to the dealer where the dealer advised that the failure as caused by the valve body. The vehicle was left with the dealer for further repairs. The failure mileage was 3,000 and the current was 13,000. Updated 9/19/11 *cn updated 2/21/12 *cn
Recalls on the 2010 model year
NHTSA has issued 2 recall campaigns covering the 2010 Nissan Rogue, affecting an estimated 67,351 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover electrical system and equipment:electrical:navigational system(global positioning . Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
468,815 vehicles 2015-01-26- Defect
- Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2008-2013 Nissan Rogue vehicles manufactured March 7, 2007, to November 26, 2013, and 2014 Nissan Rogue Select vehicles manufactured September 23, 2013, to July 2, 2014. The affected vehicles may experience an electrical short in the harness connector due to a mixture of snow/water and salt seeping through the carpet on the driver side floor near the harness connector.
- Consequence
- An electrical short can cause a vehicle fire.
- Remedy
- Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the kick panel wiring harness connector and will if necessary install a new harness connector and waterproof seal, free of charge. The recall began on February 26, 2015. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
EQUIPMENT:ELECTRICAL:NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEM(GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM)
7,948 vehicles 2010-09-10- Defect
- Nissan is recalling certain vehicles that were equipped with a garmin nuvi model 750 navigation system. The batteries contained in the affected gps units can overheat.
- Consequence
- Overheated batteries could result in a fire.
- Remedy
- Nissan will notify owners and the repairs will be performed by garmin technicians by replacing the battery and inserting a spacer on top of the battery free of charge. The safety recall began on september 16, 2010. Owners may contact garmin directly at 1-866-957-1981 or nissan at 1-800-647-7261.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2010 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
How 2010 compares with the other years
High risk for a 2010 — 134th riskiest of the 275 2010 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 19 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2025 comes out best at 64 and 2018 worst at 80, with 2010 itself at 71.
If the model year is negotiable, 2025 scores lower than 2010 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2007–2013 generation specifically, 2009 is the strongest year at 69 and 2013 the weakest at 73.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2007-2013 generation, 2009 Nissan Rogue scores best at 69 and 2013 Nissan Rogue worst at 73.
Where to spend the inspection money
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other fuel system problem from about 30k, other electrical problem from about 40k, other engine problem from about 47k and cruise control failure from about 48k.
On a 2010 Nissan Rogue with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other fuel system problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
The limits of complaint data
421 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 421 reports, 349 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 83% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2010 Nissan Rogue?
The most-reported failures are other powertrain problem (68 reports, median 67,500 miles), other speed control problem (44 reports, median 70,000 miles) and cvt failure (36 reports, median 70,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2010 Nissan Rogue problems start?
Other powertrain problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 67,500 miles and a quarter of reports before 50,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 72,000 miles.
Is the 2010 Nissan Rogue reliable?
It scores 71 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 134th riskiest of the 275 2010 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2010 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Nissan Rogue is best?
Within the 2007–2013 generation, 2009 scores best at 69 out of 100 and 2013 worst at 73. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed