2016 Nissan Rogue: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2016 Nissan Rogue
On the 2016 Nissan Rogue, the failure owners report most often is other electrical problem, and the reports cluster around 55,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other steering problem, reported by a median of 5,000 miles. Overall it scores 72 out of 100, high risk for a 2016.
High risk for a 2016 — 127th riskiest of the 255 2016 vehicles we can rate. 755 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What owners report breaking
Owners have reported 69 named failure modes on the 2016 Nissan Rogue, and the three most-reported carry 27% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other electrical problem leads with 79 reports, about 0.4 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 43k to 82,500 miles.
Other powertrain problem follows with 74 reports, usually reported between 46k to 100,000 miles.
Complete transmission failure follows with 52 reports, usually reported between 64k to 100,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into transmission (186), electrical (128) and body (69).
When these failures get reported
375 of the reports on the 2016 Nissan Rogue came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 51,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 48% by 50,000 miles, 87% by 100,000 miles and 98% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 18% of the dated reports.
34% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: other steering problem around 5k, other suspension problem around 13k, other body or interior problem around 24k and seat belt or retractor failure around 37k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 69. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
How bad it is when it goes
Across the named modes, 36 mention a crash, 7 a fire, 23 an injury and 3 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.58, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, other powertrain problem at $400–$4,500, complete transmission failure at $2,800–$8,000 and CVT failure at $3,000–$8,500. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
36% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 79 | 30 | 43k | 56k | 83k | 0.4 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 74 | 35 | 46k | 74k | 100k | 0.3 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 52 | 19 | 64k | 83k | 99k | 0.2 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| CVT failure | transmission | 48 | 25 | 59k | 72k | 94k | 0.2 | $3,000–$8,500 | Critical |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 46 | 28 | 6k | 24k | 70k | 0.2 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 41 | 23 | 31k | 50k | 95k | 0.2 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 24 | 13 | 31k | 46k | 76k | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 16 | 3 | — | 40k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 16 | 13 | 34k | 48k | 65k | 0.1 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 16 | 9 | 800 | 5k | 58k | 0.1 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 14 | 8 | 1k | 13k | 32k | 0.1 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 14 | 8 | 19k | 70k | 111k | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 14 | 10 | 21k | 44k | 71k | 0.1 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 13 | 5 | — | 32k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 12 | 8 | 13k | 37k | 64k | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Transmission slipping | transmission | 10 | 6 | — | 90k | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$5,500 | High |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 10 | 4 | — | 71k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 9 | 6 | — | 65k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 9 | 5 | — | 68k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 9 | 6 | — | 37k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 8 | 4 | — | 50k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 8 | 6 | — | 13k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 7 | 5 | — | 95k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 7 | 5 | — | 79k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 7 | 4 | — | 28k | — | 0.0 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 7 | 4 | — | 18k | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 6 | 5 | — | 51k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Infotainment screen failure | infotainment | 6 | 3 | — | 75k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,600 | Low |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 5 | 3 | — | 998 | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 4 | 1 | — | 120 | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 4 | 1 | — | 14k | — | 0.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 4 | 2 | — | 114k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 4 | 2 | — | 127k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 4 | 4 | — | 70k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 4 | 4 | — | 37k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 3 | 2 | — | 100 | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Backup camera failure | infotainment | 3 | 1 | — | 4k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 3 | 2 | — | 3k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 3 | 2 | — | 14k | — | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Software fault or failed update | software | 3 | 1 | — | 71k | — | 0.0 | $0–$600 | Moderate |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Engine knock or bearing noise | engine | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $2,500–$9,000 | High |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 2 | 1 | — | 80k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Turbocharger or supercharger failure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$4,500 | High |
| Water pump failure | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,200 | High |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 37k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 40k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 1 | 1 | — | 94k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 120k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 135k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 24k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Lane keep or steering assist fault | adas | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,600 | High |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Tire pressure monitor failure | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 34k | — | 0.0 | $80–$600 | Low |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 91 | 42 | 7k | 36k | 56k | 0.4 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2016 Nissan Rogue draws about 3.4 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 81st percentile of complaint rates among 2016 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 221,593 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2016 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other electrical problem
Tl* the contact owns a 2016 nissan rogue. When it rained or when there was morning condensation, the front passenger door would lock and unlock automatically. Also, the dome light remained illuminated and the red and yellow passenger door ajar warning sensor illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, but was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer stated that they would escalate the issue and get back with the contact. The failure mileage was approximately 5,900.
Tl* the contact owns a 2016 nissan rogue. The contact stated that while attempting to use the A/C unit, the contact stated that there was fiber glass particles coming through vents. The contact stated that there was evidence of fiber glass on the front driver and passenger seats, the rear seats, and also her article of clothing. The vehicle was taken to woody folsom nissan of vidalia, 1609 e. 1st street, vidalia, ga 30474 to be diagnosed. The contact stated that the vehicle was cleaned on three separate occasions however, the issue recurred. The contact was also was concerned about health issues that could arise from breathing in the fiber particles. The manufacturer was notified of the failure but there was no assistance offered in having the issue resolved. The approximate failure mileage was 42,000.
Other powertrain problem
Tl* the contact owns a 2016 nissan rogue. While driving 20-40 MPH, the vehicle experienced moderate constant vibration without warning. The dealer diagnosed that the vehicle ran as intended. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 500....updated 05/17/17 *bf *cn
My wife had the car running in the driveway and returned to the car to push the start/stop button. Without pushing the break the car proceeded to go in reverse. She paniced and as she was getting into the car the door was forced open and damaged to the door.
Complete transmission failure
Tl* the contact leased a 2016 nissan rogue. The driver stated that the transmission failed to function properly. An independent mechanic determined that the vehicle was not safe to drive and suggested that it be serviced by the dealer who sold the vehicle. The contact stated that the vehicle hesitated and the gears were difficult to shift. The vehicle was taken to the dealer (hilltop nissan, 258 nj-10, east hanover, nj 07936, (973) 887-5400) where the transmission was replaced twice, but indicated that it needed to be replaced a third time. The dealer was uncertain if they could offer a loaner vehicle until the failure was remedied. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The VIN was not available. The approximate failure mileage was 45,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2016 nissan rogue. While driving 65 MPH, the transmission failed. Upon depressing the accelerator pedal, a loud dragging noise was heard. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who diagnosed that the CVT was faulty. A dealer and the manufacturer were not made aware of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 69,000.
Recalls on the 2016 model year
NHTSA has issued 7 recall campaigns covering the 2016 Nissan Rogue, affecting an estimated 377,547 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover electrical system:ignition:anti-theft:immobilizer/proximity:, electrical system:wiring:interior/under dash, seats and seat belts. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:IGNITION:ANTI-THEFT:IMMOBILIZER/PROXIMITY:KEY/SENDER
712,458 vehicles 2023-02-16- Defect
- Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2014-2020 Rogue and 2017-2022 Rogue Sport vehicles equipped with a jackknife style ignition key. The jackknife key may collapse into a folded position while driving.
- Consequence
- Driver contact with a key in the collapsed position could inadvertently shut off the vehicle while driving, increasing the risk of a crash. Additionally, if the vehicle shuts off while driving, the air bags may not deploy in a crash as intended, increasing the risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Dealers will insert a spacer into the key slot of the jackknife key, free of charge. Interim notification letters notifying owners of the safety risk were mailed March 29, 2023. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed August 30, 2023. Owners may contact Nissan's customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R22C5.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING:INTERIOR/UNDER DASH
664,779 vehicles 2022-01-21- Defect
- Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2014-2016 Rogue vehicles. The electrical connector for the under dash harness may corrode due to water and salt intrusion from the driver's side foot well.
- Consequence
- Corrosion in the electrical connector can result in power window/seat failure, all-wheel-drive warning light illumination, battery drainage, and electrical connector damage that increases the risk of a fire.
- Remedy
- Dealers will remove the harness tape and harness covering and replace both connectors and apply white lithium grease to the connectors as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed September 23, 2022. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669. Nissan's number for this recall is R21B9.
SEATS
210 vehicles 2017-11-14- Defect
- Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2016 Nissan Rogue vehicles. The vehicles have front passenger seat frames that may be improperly welded. As such, these vehicles fail to meet performance requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 202a, "Head Restraints" and FMVSS 207, "Seating Systems."
- Consequence
- In the event of a crash, the improperly welded seat back frames may increase the risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the front passenger seat back assembly, free of charge. The recall began January 08, 2018. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
SEAT BELTS
4,883 vehicles 2017-10-18- Defect
- Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2016-2017 Nissan Rogue vehicles. The recliner joints on the lower seat frame for the rear seats may have improper welds. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) number 207, "Seating Systems," and 210, "Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages."
- Consequence
- The insufficient welds can increase the risk of injury to the occupants in the event of a crash.
- Remedy
- Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the seat frames and replace any defective lower seat frames, free of charge. The recall began December 6, 2017. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
AIR BAGS:SENSOR:OCCUPANT CLASSIFICATION
757 vehicles 2016-12-19- Defect
- Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2013-2015 Altima vehicles manufactured January 3, 2013, to July 29, 2013, 2015-2016 Rogue vehicles manufactured October 14, 2014, to August 12, 2016, and 2016 Maxima vehicles manufactured June 4, 2015, to August 19, 2015. An incorrect Occupant Classification System (OCS) Electronic Control Unit (ECU) may have been installed in the front passenger seat. The incorrect ECU and seat combination may misclassify the front passenger seat occupant.
- Consequence
- If the front passenger seat occupant is misclassified, the air bag may deploy incorrectly in the event of a crash, increasing the risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the ECU and update the OCS software free of charge. The recall began February 13, 2017. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
AIR BAGS:SENSOR:OCCUPANT CLASSIFICATION
3,296,947 vehicles 2016-04-26- Defect
- Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2016-2017 Nissan Maxima, 2013-2016 Nissan Altima, NV200, LEAF, Sentra, and Pathfinder, 2014-2016 Nissan NV200 Taxi, Infiniti QX60, QX60 Hybrid, and Q50 Hybrid, 2014-2017 Nissan Rogue and Infiniti Q50, 2015-2016 Nissan Murano, Murano Hybrid, and Chevrolet City Express, 2014-2015 Nissan Pathfinder Hybrid, and 2013 Infiniti JX35 vehicles. In these vehicles, the front seat passenger Occupant Classification System (OCS) may incorrectly classify an adult passenger as a child or classify the seat as empty…
- Consequence
- If the passenger frontal air bag does not deploy as intended in the event of a crash, the passenger is at an increased risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Nissan will notify their owners. Chevrolet City Express owners will be notified by General Motors. Dealers will reprogram the Air Bag Control Unit (ACU) and OCS Electronic Control Unit (ECU) in Altima, Maxima, Murano, Rogue, and Sentra vehicles, and replace the OCS ECU in LEAF, NV200, NV200 Taxi, Pathfinder, Infiniti Q50, JX35, and QX60 and Chevrolet City Express vehicles, free of charge. Interim notices were sent to owners on May 31, 2016. Owners will receive a second notice when remedy parts become available. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669…
STRUCTURE:BODY:HATCHBACK/LIFTGATE:SUPPORT DEVICE/STRUT
108,503 vehicles 2016-04-15- Defect
- Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2014-2016 Nissan Rogue vehicles manufactured July 31, 2013, to January 16, 2016. In the affected vehicles, the rear lift gate support stays may corrode due to insufficient anti-corrosion treatment.
- Consequence
- Corrosion of one or both of the rear lift gate support stays could cause a sudden release of pressure. If this occurs, the support stays may break off, increasing the risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the rear tailgate stays, free of charge. The recall began on November 18, 2016. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2016 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 2016 — 127th riskiest of the 255 2016 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.
Across the 19 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2025 comes out best at 64 and 2018 worst at 80, with 2016 itself at 72.
If the model year is negotiable, 2025 and 2022 score lower than 2016 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2014–2020 generation specifically, 2016 is the strongest year at 72 and 2018 the weakest at 80.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2014-2020 generation, 2016 Nissan Rogue scores best at 72 and 2018 Nissan Rogue worst at 80.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other steering problem from about 800, other suspension problem from about 1k, other body or interior problem from about 6k and seat belt or retractor failure from about 13k.
On a 2016 Nissan Rogue with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other steering problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
The limits of complaint data
755 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 755 reports, 375 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 50% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2016 Nissan Rogue?
The most-reported failures are other electrical problem (79 reports, median 55,000 miles), other powertrain problem (74 reports, median 75,000 miles) and complete transmission failure (52 reports, median 85,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2016 Nissan Rogue problems start?
Other steering problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 5,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 800 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 51,000 miles.
Is the 2016 Nissan Rogue reliable?
It scores 72 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 127th riskiest of the 255 2016 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2016 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Nissan Rogue is best?
Within the 2014–2020 generation, 2016 scores best at 72 out of 100 and 2018 worst at 80. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed