2007 Ford Taurus: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2007 Ford Taurus
On the 2007 Ford Taurus, the failure owners report most often is other speed control problem, and the reports cluster around 97,500 miles. The earliest to appear is other powertrain problem, reported by a median of 40,000 miles. Overall it scores 72 out of 100, high risk for a 2007.
High risk for a 2007 — 91st riskiest of the 365 2007 vehicles we can rate. 196 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2007 Ford Taurus
Owners have reported 39 named failure modes on the 2007 Ford Taurus, and the three most-reported carry 31% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other speed control problem leads with 29 reports, about 15 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 83k to 110,000 miles.
Cruise control failure follows with 21 reports, usually reported between 86k to 105,000 miles.
No-start or intermittent start failure follows with 11 reports, usually reported between 34k to 80,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into adas (53), engine (33) and electrical (20).
The mileage the reports cluster at
171 of the reports on the 2007 Ford Taurus came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 86,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 26% by 50,000 miles, 63% by 100,000 miles and 89% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 1 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 90,000 and 100,000 miles, which alone holds 12% of the dated reports.
19% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: other powertrain problem around 42k, no-start or intermittent start failure around 62k, torque converter failure around 75k and other engine problem around 81k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 39. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 1 report came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
What happens when these parts fail
Across the named modes, 6 mention a crash and 4 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.49, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other speed control problem at $250–$2,000, cruise control failure at $200–$1,400, no-start or intermittent start failure at $200–$1,800 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
31% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other speed control problem | adas | 29 | 25 | 83k | 98k | 109k | 15.2 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 21 | 19 | 86k | 96k | 103k | 11.0 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 11 | 8 | 34k | 62k | 79k | 5.8 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 11 | 11 | 35k | 81k | 120k | 5.8 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 11 | 10 | 56k | 100k | 129k | 5.8 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 9 | 9 | 50k | 75k | 85k | 4.7 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 9 | 7 | — | 102k | — | 4.7 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 8 | 8 | 34k | 42k | 72k | 4.2 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 7 | 7 | — | 132k | — | 3.7 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 6 | 5 | — | 25k | — | 3.1 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 5 | 5 | — | 58k | — | 2.6 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 5 | 5 | — | 163k | — | 2.6 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 4 | 4 | — | 64k | — | 2.1 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 4 | 2 | — | 5 | — | 2.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 4 | 4 | — | 150k | — | 2.1 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 4 | 4 | — | 49k | — | 2.1 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 4 | 4 | — | 35k | — | 2.1 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 4 | 3 | — | 40k | — | 2.1 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 3 | 2 | — | 31k | — | 1.6 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 2 | 2 | — | 100k | — | 1.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 2 | 1 | — | 35k | — | 1.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 44k | — | 1.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 2 | 1 | — | 135k | — | 1.0 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 53k | — | 1.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Power steering pump or fluid leak | steering | 2 | 2 | — | 44 | — | 1.0 | $350–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 150k | — | 1.0 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 2 | 2 | — | 165k | — | 1.0 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 2 | 2 | — | 16k | — | 1.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 100k | — | 0.5 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 75k | — | 0.5 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.5 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 170k | — | 0.5 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 1 | 1 | — | 52k | — | 0.5 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 163k | — | 0.5 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.5 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 1 | 1 | — | 90k | — | 0.5 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 1 | 1 | — | 78k | — | 0.5 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 174k | — | 0.5 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.5 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 8 | 5 | — | 100k | — | 4.2 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2007 Ford Taurus draws about 103 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 97th percentile of complaint rates among 2007 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 1,909 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2007 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other speed control problem
Tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford taurus. While driving at speeds of 40 MPH, there was an unusually large increase in engine rpms. The vehicle then abnormally accelerated without driver intent. The contact was able to shut off the engine mid-acceleration and coasted to a stop. The dealer advised there were no recalls on the vehicle. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic where they advised replacing the vehicle speed control sensor and cables. The failure and current mileages were 107,000. The VIN was not available.
I have owned my 2007 ford taurus for approx. 4 years, and each winter I've had to have the throttle body replaced. Every winter the accelerator tends to become sticky. Luckily I purchased an extended warranty on this car. I have had to use it on several occasions. *tr
Cruise control failure
Tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford taurus. The contact stated that while driving at various speeds, the vehicle experienced sudden abnormal acceleration. The contact stated that the vehicle was still accelerating while the brakes were being applied. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the dealer replaced the cruise control cable. The contact stated that the failure persisted after the repairs. The VIN was not available. The failure mileage was 30,000 and the current mileage was 80,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford taurus. The contact stated that while driving 50 MPH, there was an increase in the engine rpms. The contact had to tap on the accelerator pedal to stop the failure. The failure had since recurred intermittently. The contact also stated that the cruise control feature no longer functioned. The vehicle was taken to and independent repair shop and they could not diagnose the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 111,000. Updated 04/06/12*lj the consumer stated the cruise control feature no longer worked. Updated 04/16/12
No-start or intermittent start failure
Problem started about 4 months after purchase. Long crank time, if not cranked longer than 2 seconds, will not start right away. Only when vehicle`s been sitting for 6 or more hours. I've taken to the garage overnight 4 times, but they keep saying nothings wrong. I didn't have this problem when I first bought this car. Starter, alternator, spark plugs, and wires, and all fuses still good. Will my car be ok? With winter coming, I don`t want to be stranded. *jb
Tl*the contact owns a 2007 ford taurus. The vehicle failed to start occasionally. The failure has occurred eleven times. The vehicle was taken to the dealer on december 10, 2007, but they could not duplicate the failure. On january 21, 2008, the dealer replaced the starter, but the failure recurred. The vehicle was returned to the dealer on march 5, 2008, but they could not duplicate the failure. The failure occurred seven additional times since the last visit to the dealer. The contact has email correspondence available between him and the dealer. The current mileage was 37,000 and failure mileage was 34,000. Updated 4/21/08 *cn
Recalls on the 2007 model year
NHTSA has issued 1 recall campaign covering the 2007 Ford Taurus, affecting an estimated 1,909 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:disc:pads. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:PADS
49,635 vehicles 2016-04-01- Defect
- Bosch Brake Components LLC (Bosch) is recalling certain aftermarket replacement front brake pads, models Bosch QuietCast BC598 and BP765, Bosch Blue BE598 and BE598H, Prostop PD598 and PD765M, Duralast Gold DG598, Duralast MKD598, Stop Master ST598, UltraStop ULT598, UltraLife MX598 and MX765, BrakeBest MKD765, and Prostop Platinum PGD598. These brake pads, manufactured October 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015 are intended for use on 2001-2007 Ford Taurus, 2001-2005 Mercury Sable, 1995-1999 Ford Taurus SHO, 1995-2002 Lincoln Continental, and 1993-1998 Lincoln Mark VIII…
- Consequence
- A damaged or broken brake disc may reduce a vehicle's braking power, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Bosch will instruct the owners how to have the affected brake pads replaced, free of charge. The recall began on May 26, 2016. Owners may contact Bosch customer service at 1-888-715-3616.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2007 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 2007 sits in the model line
High risk for a 2007 — 91st riskiest of the 365 2007 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.
Across the 24 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2019 comes out best at 56 and 2010 worst at 76, with 2007 itself at 72.
If the model year is negotiable, 2019, 2002, 2003, 2001, 1999, 2016, 2012, 2000, 2017, 1998 and 2018 score lower than 2007 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2004–2007 generation specifically, 2006 is the strongest year at 70 and 2007 the weakest at 72.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2004-2007 generation, 2006 Ford Taurus scores best at 70 and 2007 Ford Taurus worst at 72.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: no-start or intermittent start failure from about 34k, other powertrain problem from about 34k, other engine problem from about 35k and torque converter failure from about 50k.
On a 2007 Ford Taurus with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether no-start or intermittent start failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
What this page cannot tell you
196 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 196 reports, 171 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 87% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2007 Ford Taurus?
The most-reported failures are other speed control problem (29 reports, median 97,500 miles), cruise control failure (21 reports, median 95,000 miles) and no-start or intermittent start failure (11 reports, median 60,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2007 Ford Taurus problems start?
Other powertrain problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 40,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 35,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 86,000 miles.
Is the 2007 Ford Taurus reliable?
It scores 72 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 91st riskiest of the 365 2007 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2007 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford Taurus is best?
Within the 2004–2007 generation, 2006 scores best at 70 out of 100 and 2007 worst at 72. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed