2004 Ford Taurus: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2004 Ford Taurus
On the 2004 Ford Taurus, the failure owners report most often is other speed control problem, and the reports cluster around 105,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other body or interior problem, reported by a median of 60,000 miles. Overall it scores 71 out of 100, high risk for a 2004.
High risk for a 2004 — 89th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. 482 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What owners report breaking
Owners have reported 52 named failure modes on the 2004 Ford Taurus, and the three most-reported carry 45% of everything filed.
Other speed control problem leads with 91 reports, about 11 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 70k to 135,000 miles.
Cruise control failure follows with 85 reports, usually reported between 77k to 137,500 miles.
Other powertrain problem follows with 40 reports, usually reported between 79k to 130,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into adas (179), transmission (68) and brakes (31).
The mileage the reports cluster at
403 of the reports on the 2004 Ford Taurus came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 95,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 17% by 50,000 miles, 52% by 100,000 miles and 85% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 13 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 80,000 and 90,000 miles, which alone holds 10% of the dated reports.
13% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: other body or interior problem around 60k, other brake problem around 87k, other engine problem around 94k and cruise control failure around 100k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 52. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 13 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
How bad it is when it goes
Across the named modes, 38 mention a crash, 17 a fire, 17 an injury and 2 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.48, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other speed control problem at $250–$2,000, cruise control failure at $200–$1,400, other powertrain problem at $400–$4,500 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
20% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other speed control problem | adas | 91 | 83 | 70k | 104k | 134k | 11.2 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 85 | 76 | 77k | 100k | 137k | 10.5 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 40 | 36 | 79k | 109k | 131k | 4.9 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 22 | 20 | 67k | 94k | 112k | 2.7 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 18 | 13 | 37k | 100k | 133k | 2.2 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 18 | 17 | 75k | 87k | 131k | 2.2 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 18 | 11 | 46k | 60k | 74k | 2.2 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 11 | 10 | 88k | 125k | 144k | 1.4 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 11 | 11 | 73k | 101k | 131k | 1.4 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 9 | 5 | — | 86k | — | 1.1 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 8 | 6 | — | 74k | — | 1.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 8 | 8 | 78k | 110k | 155k | 1.0 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 8 | 6 | — | 17k | — | 1.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 7 | 7 | — | 169k | — | 0.9 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 7 | 7 | — | 109k | — | 0.9 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 6 | 3 | — | 17k | — | 0.7 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 6 | 6 | — | 75k | — | 0.7 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 6 | 3 | — | 63k | — | 0.7 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 6 | 6 | — | 150k | — | 0.7 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 5 | 4 | — | 60k | — | 0.6 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 5 | 3 | — | 53k | — | 0.6 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 4 | 1 | — | 97k | — | 0.5 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 4 | 3 | — | 133k | — | 0.5 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 4 | 4 | — | 27k | — | 0.5 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 4 | 1 | — | 135k | — | 0.5 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 4 | 3 | — | 40k | — | 0.5 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 4 | 3 | — | 100k | — | 0.5 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 3 | 2 | — | 79k | — | 0.4 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 3 | 3 | — | 56k | — | 0.4 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 3 | 3 | — | 88k | — | 0.4 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 3 | 3 | — | 86k | — | 0.4 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 3 | 3 | — | 160k | — | 0.4 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 3 | 2 | — | 137k | — | 0.4 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 3 | 3 | — | 105k | — | 0.4 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 2 | 2 | — | 72k | — | 0.2 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.2 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 2 | 1 | — | 22k | — | 0.2 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 87k | — | 0.1 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 67k | — | 0.1 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Overheating | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 3k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Heater core failure | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $700–$2,400 | Moderate |
| Transmission slipping | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 130k | — | 0.1 | $1,200–$5,500 | High |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 1 | 1 | — | 93k | — | 0.1 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 81k | — | 0.1 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 44k | — | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 75k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 1 | 1 | — | 87k | — | 0.1 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| DPF, EGR or DEF system failure | emissions | 1 | 1 | — | 79k | — | 0.1 | $800–$5,000 | High |
| Software fault or failed update | software | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $0–$600 | Moderate |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 21 | 15 | 39k | 86k | 136k | 2.6 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2004 Ford Taurus draws about 60 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 96th percentile of complaint rates among 2004 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 8,092 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2004 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other speed control problem
I bought a 2004 ford taurus se brand new. After about two weeks I started to get vibration from the accelerator pedal between 42-45 miles ph. I took the car back to the dealer and a mfg warning came on for this problem and the directive was followed by the dealer so I thought the problem was over. Within two days later the problem got more severe and in addition to the vibrating gas pedal and steering wheel started to shake. I made another appointment and brought the car in for service at the dealer and after waiting two hours for my car the dealer told me that there was nothing they could do for me that this problem was under research to find a permanent fix for both problems. I told the dealer the this is a 2004 ford taurus with 2,900 miles on it and the problem was getting worse by the day and that I wanted my car fixed for fear that something worse would happen. The dealer and ford motor company refused to do anything about it and totally ignored my safety in this car. Ford motor company further said check back in about 6 months maybe we might have a fix for the problems. In the meantime they could care less if something…
Vehicle suddenly accelerated, causing it to go out of control and a striking a building.*ak the consumer stated that he was parking the vehicle with his foot on the brake when it accelerated. The vehicle jumped a concrete retainer and left tire marks on the ground. The vehicle crashed through a glass window of a video store and left tire marks on the carpet. The consumer put the vehicle in park and it came to a stop. The service dealer did not know the cause therefore did not know what to fix. The consumer was told that the vehicle showed signs of an electrical problem. The consumer was told that the RPM's where higher than they should be. *tc
Cruise control failure
Dt: the contact stated the transmission light on dashboard illuminated, also, when using cruise control the transmission will speed up. She took the vehicle to a local dealership; they told her it was the transmission. The repairs will be made at the consumer's expense. *ak
Tl*the contact owns a 2004 ford taurus. While driving 55 MPH, the vehicle's cruise control failed to activate. The vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated that the cable for the cruise control was bad and the connector failed. The repair parts were not covered under the warranty. The engine size was unknown. The current and failure mileages were 56,219.
Other powertrain problem
On two separate occasions vehicle commenced to accelerate while in gear, but vehicle would not move. Vehicle had been to the dealer, and they were unable to duplicate the problem.*ak consumer states transmission shifts hard from 1st to 2nd shift. Also the check transmission light comes on. On another occasion, while cossing a railroad track the vehicle would not accelerate and the transmission neutraled out and the vehicle would not move. Dealer replaced automatic transmission assembly and other power train-related components. *tt
I had rented a 2004 ford taurus from enterprise rent-a-car. I needed to get some things out of another car to put into the rental car. I put the taurus into drive and pulled forward to the other car. I placed the car in park, opened the door, took my foot off the brake and started to get out. After I had both feet on the ground and was standing up, the car began to roll backward. I fell to the ground while holding on to the door and was dragged a few feet. I managed to roll away from the car. The car rolled back to the original parking spot and hit a guard rail and another car.
Recalls on the 2004 model year
NHTSA has issued 2 recall campaigns covering the 2004 Ford Taurus, affecting an estimated 10,001 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:disc:pads and seats:front assembly:power adjust. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:PADS
49,635 vehicles 2016-04-01- Defect
- Bosch Brake Components LLC (Bosch) is recalling certain aftermarket replacement front brake pads, models Bosch QuietCast BC598 and BP765, Bosch Blue BE598 and BE598H, Prostop PD598 and PD765M, Duralast Gold DG598, Duralast MKD598, Stop Master ST598, UltraStop ULT598, UltraLife MX598 and MX765, BrakeBest MKD765, and Prostop Platinum PGD598. These brake pads, manufactured October 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015 are intended for use on 2001-2007 Ford Taurus, 2001-2005 Mercury Sable, 1995-1999 Ford Taurus SHO, 1995-2002 Lincoln Continental, and 1993-1998 Lincoln Mark VIII…
- Consequence
- A damaged or broken brake disc may reduce a vehicle's braking power, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Bosch will instruct the owners how to have the affected brake pads replaced, free of charge. The recall began on May 26, 2016. Owners may contact Bosch customer service at 1-888-715-3616.
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:POWER ADJUST
24,277 vehicles 2004-07-08- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles equipped with power adjustable seats may have been inadequately welded.
- Consequence
- The seat may not perform as intended during a crash which could increase the risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the upper support assembly on the power seats. The recall began on july 20, 2004. Owners should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2004 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 2004 — 89th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 24 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2019 comes out best at 56 and 2010 worst at 76, with 2004 itself at 71.
If the model year is negotiable, 2019, 2002, 2003, 2001, 1999, 2016, 2012, 2000 and 2017 score lower than 2004 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2004–2007 generation specifically, 2006 is the strongest year at 70 and 2007 the weakest at 72.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2004-2007 generation, 2006 Ford Taurus scores best at 70 and 2007 Ford Taurus worst at 72.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other electrical problem from about 37k, other body or interior problem from about 46k, other engine problem from about 67k and other speed control problem from about 70k.
On a 2004 Ford Taurus with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other electrical problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
Where these figures stop being useful
482 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 482 reports, 403 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 84% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2004 Ford Taurus?
The most-reported failures are other speed control problem (91 reports, median 105,000 miles), cruise control failure (85 reports, median 100,000 miles) and other powertrain problem (40 reports, median 110,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2004 Ford Taurus problems start?
Other body or interior problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 60,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 45,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 95,000 miles.
Is the 2004 Ford Taurus reliable?
It scores 71 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 89th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2004 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford Taurus is best?
Within the 2004–2007 generation, 2006 scores best at 70 out of 100 and 2007 worst at 72. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed