AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2001 Ford Taurus: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2001 Ford Taurus

On the 2001 Ford Taurus, the failure owners report most often is strut, shock or spring failure, and the reports cluster around 70,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other brake problem, reported by a median of 45,000 miles. Overall it scores 67 out of 100, high risk for a 2001.

High risk for a 2001 — 170th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. 1,264 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

What breaks on the 2001 Ford Taurus

Owners have reported 68 named failure modes on the 2001 Ford Taurus, and the three most-reported carry 48% of everything filed.

Strut, shock or spring failure leads with 292 reports, about 1.9 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 52k to 90,000 miles.

Other suspension problem follows with 245 reports, usually reported between 46k to 95,000 miles.

Other speed control problem follows with 70 reports, usually reported between 45k to 142,500 miles. 1 of those report mention a fire.

By system, the reports fall mostly into suspension (546), adas (102) and brakes (100).

When these failures get reported

828 of the reports on the 2001 Ford Taurus came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 73,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 28% by 50,000 miles, 73% by 100,000 miles and 93% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 9 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 70,000 and 80,000 miles, which alone holds 11% of the dated reports.

15% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

In the order they tend to show up: other brake problem around 43k, other wheel or tire problem around 46k, other electrical problem around 46k and loss of braking around 52k.

Median
  1. Strut, shock or spring failure 70k
  2. Other suspension problem 74k
  3. Other speed control problem 116k
  4. Other brake problem 43k
  5. Other powertrain problem 103k
  6. Other body or interior problem 122k
  7. Other engine problem 69k
  8. Cruise control failure 135k
  9. Other wheel or tire problem 46k
  10. Seat belt or retractor failure 69k
  11. Other electrical problem 46k
  12. Rust or structural corrosion 80k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 68. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 72.8k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 9 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

Severity, and what it costs

Across the named modes, 89 mention a crash, 18 a fire, 61 an injury and 4 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.25, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: strut, shock or spring failure at $500–$2,000, other suspension problem at $350–$2,000, other speed control problem at $250–$2,000 and other brake problem at $300–$1,800. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

10% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Strut, shock or spring failure suspension 292 242 52k 70k 90k 1.9 $500–$2,000 Moderate
Other suspension problem suspension 245 196 46k 74k 95k 1.6 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Other speed control problem adas 70 31 45k 116k 142k 0.5 $250–$2,000 Critical
Other brake problem brakes 51 24 24k 43k 125k 0.3 $300–$1,800 High
Other powertrain problem transmission 35 17 50k 103k 126k 0.2 $400–$4,500 High
Other body or interior problem body 33 20 46k 122k 157k 0.2 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Other engine problem engine 31 16 40k 69k 97k 0.2 $300–$4,000 High
Cruise control failure adas 30 25 99k 135k 141k 0.2 $200–$1,400 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 27 8 30k 46k 72k 0.2 $200–$1,500 High
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 25 16 54k 69k 117k 0.2 $200–$900 High
Other electrical problem electrical 24 14 25k 46k 64k 0.2 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Rust or structural corrosion body 20 15 73k 80k 111k 0.1 $500–$6,000 High
Loss of braking brakes 18 9 47k 52k 107k 0.1 $400–$3,000 Critical
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 17 10 42k 66k 73k 0.1 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 17 13 43k 74k 112k 0.1 $200–$1,500 Critical
Other visibility problem glass 17 8 18k 71k 138k 0.1 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 13 7 — 44k — 0.1 $700–$2,600 High
Wiper or washer failure glass 13 5 — 35k — 0.1 $120–$800 Moderate
Other lighting problem lighting 13 9 75k 105k 125k 0.1 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 11 1 — 20 — 0.1 $250–$1,500 High
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 11 6 — 28k — 0.1 $300–$1,400 Moderate
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 10 7 — 120k — 0.1 $450–$2,200 High
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 10 4 — 67k — 0.1 $300–$1,600 High
Blower motor or climate control failure hvac 10 5 — 79k — 0.1 $250–$1,200 Moderate
Tail light, brake light or signal failure lighting 10 7 — 66k — 0.1 $100–$900 Moderate
Other steering problem steering 10 4 — 44k — 0.1 $350–$2,400 High
Complete transmission failure transmission 9 6 — 63k — 0.1 $2,800–$8,000 Critical
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 9 4 — 49k — 0.1 $500–$2,400 High
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 9 8 60k 68k 90k 0.1 $400–$2,200 High
Other fuel system problem fuel 9 7 — 56k — 0.1 $300–$2,200 High
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 7 4 — 121k — 0.0 $700–$3,000 High
Headlight failure or clouding lighting 7 2 — 67k — 0.0 $150–$1,800 Moderate
Head gasket failure engine 6 5 — 74k — 0.0 $1,400–$4,000 Critical
Alternator or charging system failure electrical 6 1 — 91k — 0.0 $450–$1,600 High
Parking brake failure brakes 6 5 — 154k — 0.0 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Oil leak engine 5 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$2,200 Moderate
Radiator or coolant leak cooling 5 2 — 73k — 0.0 $350–$1,900 High
Fuel pump failure fuel 5 5 — 101k — 0.0 $600–$2,600 High
Fuel gauge or level sensor failure fuel 5 3 — 44k — 0.0 $300–$1,200 Moderate
Air conditioning failure hvac 5 5 — 57k — 0.0 $400–$2,800 Moderate
DPF, EGR or DEF system failure emissions 5 2 — 95k — 0.0 $800–$5,000 High
Stalling while driving engine 4 3 — 6k — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Water pump failure cooling 4 1 — 157k — 0.0 $500–$2,200 High
Fuel leak or fuel odor fuel 4 0 — — — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Instrument cluster or gauge failure infotainment 4 1 — 65k — 0.0 $350–$1,400 Moderate
Power steering pump or fluid leak steering 4 1 — 12k — 0.0 $350–$1,600 Moderate
Other seat belt problem airbag 4 0 — — — 0.0 $200–$900 High
Torque converter failure transmission 3 2 — 100k — 0.0 $1,100–$3,200 High
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 3 2 — 98k — 0.0 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 3 2 — 43k — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Master cylinder or brake booster failure brakes 3 2 — 75k — 0.0 $450–$2,200 Critical
Steering column or shaft failure steering 3 1 — 108k — 0.0 $600–$2,500 Critical
No-start or intermittent start failure engine 2 1 — 31k — 0.0 $200–$1,800 Moderate
Misfire or rough idle engine 2 2 — 119k — 0.0 $250–$1,600 Moderate
Overheating cooling 2 1 — 80k — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Heater core failure cooling 2 2 — 51k — 0.0 $700–$2,400 Moderate
Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure transmission 2 2 — 88k — 0.0 $250–$1,400 High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 2 2 — 78k — 0.0 $250–$1,600 Critical
Door latch or handle failure body 2 2 — 52k — 0.0 $250–$1,200 High
Electrical fire or melted wiring electrical 1 1 — 112k — 0.0 $1,500–$9,000 Critical
Excessive oil consumption engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $900–$6,500 High
Intake carbon buildup engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $400–$1,200 Moderate
Thermostat failure cooling 1 1 — 74k — 0.0 $250–$900 Moderate
Transmission slipping transmission 1 1 — 77k — 0.0 $1,200–$5,500 High
Wheel bearing or hub failure drivetrain 1 1 — 50k — 0.0 $350–$1,200 Moderate
Lane keep or steering assist fault adas 1 0 — — — 0.0 $200–$1,600 High
Loss of power steering steering 1 0 — — — 0.0 $600–$2,800 Critical
Other driver assistance problem adas 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$1,800 High
Unclassified problem other 41 19 48k 75k 91k 0.3 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2001 Ford Taurus draws about 8.4 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 86th percentile of complaint rates among 2001 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 149,843 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2001 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Strut, shock or spring failure

Front left coil spring broke while driving on ny thruway at 65 MPH. Car had to be towed for service. Parts damaged included replacing the coil spring, the strut, axel, tire, and axel bearing. *la

49,860 miles NHTSA complaint 437086 filed 2003-10-25

Front left coil spring broke while driving on ny thruway at 65 MPH. Car had to be towed for service. Parts damaged included replacing the coil spring, the strut, axel, tire, and axel bearing. *la

49,860 miles NHTSA complaint 437087 filed 2003-10-25

Other suspension problem

Problems with 2001 ford taurus brake rotors.*mr the front end vibrated and the brake rotors were replaced numerous times, however the problem still existed. Ford was ordered to repair all repairs but they only turned the rotors. *ph also the passenger window dragged, the lights dimmed when the radio or heater was on, and also the transmission jerked at times and there was a vibration in the front of the vehicle, the mechanic stated it was due to tire wear. *jb

15,500 miles NHTSA complaint 429852 filed 2003-09-11

When applying the brakes the front end shook violently.*ak the dealer rotated and balanced all four tires. The dealer also replaced the front rotors and pads and adjusted the rear brakes. *nm

16,666 miles NHTSA complaint 443647 filed 2003-12-03

Other speed control problem

The vehicle is equipped with adjustable pedals. The pedals are so close together that when the consumer applied the brakes, the engine would surge as if it wanted to continue in drive and not stop. The last incident the vehicle surged to the point consumer could not stop the vehicle. Vehicle was stopped by a fence. *jg

6,647 miles NHTSA complaint 369649 filed 2002-08-21

The brake pedal and the gas pedal are too close, and gas pedal is 1/2 inch lower. When stepping on the brake pedal consumer can hit the gas pedal at the same time. Dealer states there can be no modifications because of design specifications.*ak

1,000 miles NHTSA complaint 439685 filed 2003-11-07

Recalls on the 2001 model year

NHTSA has issued 10 recall campaigns covering the 2001 Ford Taurus, affecting an estimated 496,029 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:disc:pads, suspension:front:springs:coil springs, exterior lighting:brake lights:switch and service brakes, hydraulic:pedals and linkages. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

16E026000

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:PADS

49,635 vehicles 2016-04-01
Defect
Bosch Brake Components LLC (Bosch) is recalling certain aftermarket replacement front brake pads, models Bosch QuietCast BC598 and BP765, Bosch Blue BE598 and BE598H, Prostop PD598 and PD765M, Duralast Gold DG598, Duralast MKD598, Stop Master ST598, UltraStop ULT598, UltraLife MX598 and MX765, BrakeBest MKD765, and Prostop Platinum PGD598. These brake pads, manufactured October 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015 are intended for use on 2001-2007 Ford Taurus, 2001-2005 Mercury Sable, 1995-1999 Ford Taurus SHO, 1995-2002 Lincoln Continental, and 1993-1998 Lincoln Mark VIII…
Consequence
A damaged or broken brake disc may reduce a vehicle's braking power, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Bosch will instruct the owners how to have the affected brake pads replaced, free of charge. The recall began on May 26, 2016. Owners may contact Bosch customer service at 1-888-715-3616.
04V332000

SUSPENSION:FRONT:SPRINGS:COIL SPRINGS

899,060 vehicles 2004-07-15
Defect
On certain passenger vehicles originally sold in or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia, the front coil springs could fracture due to corrosion associated with salt used on the roadways during the winter. A fractured spring could move past the spring seat and contact a front tire.
Consequence
If this occurs, the tire may rupture resulting in a rapid air loss, which could result in a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will install protective spring shields. In addition, ford is extending the warranty coverage of the front coil springs in all other states, for fracture only, up to 10 years of service or 150,000 miles, whichever occurs first. If the vehicle has already accumulated more than 150,000 miles, this coverage will last until july 31, 2005. If either front coil spring fractures, dealers will replace both front springs at no charge to the owner. An interim notice was sent to owners on august 2, 2004. Parts are now available for the 2000-2001 my vehicles and owners were…
04V106000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS:SWITCH

938,789 vehicles 2004-03-02
Defect
Certain passenger vehicles are being recalled to correct a problem with a malfunctioning stop lamp switch and/or associated wiring. This malfunctioning could render the stop lamps inoperable or cause them to stay on all the time. This could cause confusion to a following driver, which could lead to a crash.
Consequence
In addition, if the switch and/or associated wiring fail in the open position, the brake lights will not actuate and the driver will not be able to shift the vehicle out of "park" if they fail in the closed position, the brake lights will remain on, which will not allow the speed control to be activated. This could also cause the battery to discharge.
Remedy
Dealers will remove the stop lamp switch and associated wiring assembly and install a newly designed stop lamp switch and wire assembly. Owner notification is expected to begin on april 5, 2004. Owners should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
02V266000

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:PEDALS AND LINKAGES

369,614 vehicles 2002-10-02
Defect
Certain passenger vehicles equipped with adjustable padels are being recalled in order to adjust the brake and accelerator pedals to a minimum of 50 mm of lateral separation. Simultaneous application of both the brake and accelerator pedals could result in an increase in engine RPM.
Consequence
This could result in a customer experiencing an "unintended vehicle speed increase" or a perceived "unable to stop" condition.
Remedy
Owners will be instructed as to the proper way to set the position of the pedals and to take their vehicles to a dealer to have the spacing between the brake and accelerator pedals measured. If the spacing is found to be less than 50 mm, the dealer will adjust the pedals to increase the distance between them to greater than 50 mm. Owner notification began october 28, 2002. Owners who do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.
01V258000

VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER:MOTOR

1,083,000 vehicles 2001-08-08
Defect
Vehicle description: passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, and light and medium duty pickup trucks. A switch located in the plastic cover of the wiper motor gear case could malfunction and overheat, potentially resulting in loss of intermittent wiper function, loss of wiper park function, complete loss of wiper function, or ignition of the plastic cover material. Switch malfunction is most likely to occur when the intermittent setting of the wipers is being used, or when snow or ice obstructs the blades from returning to the "parked" position at the bottom of the…
Consequence
Loss of visibility while driving increases the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect the date code on the wiper motor. Motors built with the suspect time frame will have the wiper motor gear case cover replaced. Owner notification began august 20, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.
01V144000

SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY

4,567 vehicles 2001-04-27
Defect
Vehicle description: passenger cars. The seat belt buckle tongue may not fully eject from the buckle assembly when the release button is pushed slowly. This condition could also result in a partial latch of the tongue in the buckle.
Consequence
In the event of a vehicle crash, the vehicle occupant may not be properly restrained, possibly resulting in personal injury or death.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the driver and right front passenger seat belt buckles. Owner notification began may 4, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
01V078000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:TAIL LIGHTS:SWITCH

157,000 vehicles 2001-03-12
Defect
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles equipped with adjustable pedals. If the grease from the adjustable pedal assembly enters the stop lamp switch, it can contaminate the contacts leading to carbon build up, and potentially, a short circuit.
Consequence
A short circuit could lead to either the brake lamps staying on, or to a loss of brake lamp function, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the brake lamp switch and wipe down the adjustable pedal assembly to remove excess grease. Owner notification began march 22, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
01V048000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BACK UP LIGHTS

28,000 vehicles 2001-02-28
Defect
Vehicle description: passenger sedans with factory or dealer-installed deck lid spoilers with LED center high mounted stop lamps (chmsl). Vehicles produced with spoilers were manufactured from march 1 through october 31, 2000; and vehicles with spoilers installed by dealers were manufactured from january 1 thorough december 30, 2000. With the ignition switch in the start or run positions and the hazard warning lights operating, the chmsl can illuminate (at reduced intensity) even though the service brakes have not been applied. This does not meet the requirements of fmvss…
Consequence
Under the requirements of the standard, the chmsl shall be activated only upon appplication of the service brakes. Also, the vehicle could roll increasing the risk of a crash, if the shift lever can be shifted out of park without depressing the brake pedal.
Remedy
Dealers will install a jumper/resistor assembly at the spoiler that provides an electrical resistor to ground and corrects the chmsl and brake-shift interlock conditions. Owner notification began march 19, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
00V396000

EQUIPMENT:OTHER:OWNERS/SERVICE/OTHER MANUAL

495,000 vehicles 2000-11-28
Defect
Vehicle description: certain sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and passenger vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of fmvss 225, "child restraint anchorage systems." the affected expedition/navigator owner guides do not identify the locations of seating positions equipped with tether anchorages, and do not provide instructions for securing child seats to these tether anchorages. The f150 sc owner guides do not provide the procedure for securing child seats to the tether anchorages. The taurus/sable owner guides do not identify the center rear seating position…
Consequence
In the event of a crash, the child seat may not be properly attached increasing the risk of injury to the child.
Remedy
Owners will be provided with owner guide inserts revised to provide the required information, and instructions for affixing these inserts to their owner guides. Customers will also be advised that if they prefer, their dealer will affix the inserts to their owner guides.
00V240000

SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE

5,961 vehicles 2000-08-24
Defect
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. The child safety seat anchor latch (iso-fix anchor) fasteners do not have adequate residual torque. The anchors are secured to the floor pan with a reinforcement plate that has two studs that extend upward through the floor pan and the iso-fix anchor. The sealer on the floor pan could cause a soft joint and, even if the nuts are properly torqued, road vibrations could cause the nut to work its way completely off the stud.
Consequence
The anchor may not hold the child safety seat in position during an accident, increasing the risk of injury to the occupant of the child safety seat.
Remedy
Dealers will remove and re-install the bracket nut using a torque retention material (red loctite). Owner notification began september 11, 2000. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2001 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2001 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

How 2001 compares with the other years

High risk for a 2001 — 170th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.

Across the 24 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2019 comes out best at 56 and 2010 worst at 76, with 2001 itself at 67.

If the model year is negotiable, 2019 and 2002 score lower than 2001 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1996–2003 generation specifically, 2002 is the strongest year at 62 and 1997 the weakest at 71.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1996-2003 generation, 2002 Ford Taurus scores best at 62 and 1997 Ford Taurus worst at 71.

What the numbers say to check

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other visibility problem from about 18k, other brake problem from about 24k, other electrical problem from about 25k and other wheel or tire problem from about 30k.

On a 2001 Ford Taurus with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other visibility problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.

Where these figures stop being useful

1,264 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 1,264 reports, 828 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 66% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2001 Ford Taurus?

The most-reported failures are strut, shock or spring failure (292 reports, median 70,000 miles), other suspension problem (245 reports, median 74,000 miles) and other speed control problem (70 reports, median 115,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2001 Ford Taurus problems start?

Other brake problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 45,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 25,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 73,000 miles.

Is the 2001 Ford Taurus reliable?

It scores 67 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 170th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2001 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Ford Taurus is best?

Within the 1996–2003 generation, 2002 scores best at 62 out of 100 and 1997 worst at 71. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed