Model year report

2000 Ford Taurus: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2000 Ford Taurus

On the 2000 Ford Taurus, the failure owners report most often is strut, shock or spring failure, and the reports cluster around 72,000 miles. The earliest to appear is parking brake failure, reported by a median of 30,000 miles. Overall it scores 68 out of 100, high risk for a 2000.

High risk for a 2000 — 135th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. 1,497 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

The failures owners actually file about

Owners have reported 71 named failure modes on the 2000 Ford Taurus, and the three most-reported carry 35% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Strut, shock or spring failure leads with 258 reports, about 1.7 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 55k to 98,000 miles.

Other suspension problem follows with 193 reports, usually reported between 53k to 101,000 miles.

Other engine problem follows with 72 reports, usually reported between 56k to 90,000 miles. 7 of those reports mention a fire.

By system, the reports fall mostly into suspension (464), brakes (129) and engine (111).

When these failures get reported

735 of the reports on the 2000 Ford Taurus came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 70,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 27% by 50,000 miles, 74% by 100,000 miles and 95% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 10 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 60,000 and 70,000 miles, which alone holds 12% of the dated reports.

13% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

In the order they tend to show up: parking brake failure around 32k, other brake problem around 48k, tail light, brake light or signal failure around 51k and complete transmission failure around 58k.

Median

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 71. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage

half by 70k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 10 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

Line share of reports filed by that mileage
Dashed the median reported mileage

Severity, and what it costs

Across the named modes, 98 mention a crash, 39 a fire, 50 an injury and 1 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.26, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: strut, shock or spring failure at $500–$2,000, other suspension problem at $350–$2,000, other engine problem at $300–$4,000 and other speed control problem at $250–$2,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

16% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode	System	Reports	With reading	25th	Median	75th	Per 1,000	Typical repair	Severity
Strut, shock or spring failure	suspension	258	210	55k	72k	98k	1.7	$500–$2,000	Moderate
Other suspension problem	suspension	193	139	53k	76k	101k	1.3	$350–$2,000	Moderate
Other engine problem	engine	72	19	56k	68k	90k	0.5	$300–$4,000	High
Other speed control problem	adas	62	20	81k	100k	141k	0.4	$250–$2,000	Critical
Other powertrain problem	transmission	60	24	48k	64k	102k	0.4	$400–$4,500	High
Other brake problem	brakes	46	16	23k	48k	72k	0.3	$300–$1,800	High
Other lighting problem	lighting	42	13	20k	60k	100k	0.3	$120–$1,200	Moderate
Other electrical problem	electrical	41	15	44k	100k	130k	0.3	$250–$2,000	Moderate
Fuel pump failure	fuel	37	9	61k	67k	67k	0.2	$600–$2,600	High
Other wheel or tire problem	wheels	36	12	26k	72k	86k	0.2	$200–$1,500	High
Seat belt or retractor failure	airbag	33	15	58k	63k	99k	0.2	$200–$900	High
Other body or interior problem	body	33	18	47k	72k	97k	0.2	$200–$2,000	Moderate
Tail light, brake light or signal failure	lighting	32	12	45k	51k	71k	0.2	$100–$900	Moderate
ABS module or sensor failure	brakes	30	7	—	60k	—	0.2	$500–$2,400	High
Cruise control failure	adas	26	15	34k	74k	91k	0.2	$200–$1,400	High
Tire blowout or tread separation	wheels	23	7	—	77k	—	0.2	$200–$1,500	Critical
Other fuel system problem	fuel	23	7	—	160k	—	0.2	$300–$2,200	High
Other visibility problem	glass	22	6	—	98k	—	0.1	$150–$1,400	Moderate
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash	airbag	21	7	—	51k	—	0.1	$1,000–$5,000	Critical
Premature brake pad or rotor wear	brakes	20	7	—	25k	—	0.1	$300–$1,400	Moderate
No-start or intermittent start failure	engine	17	4	—	80k	—	0.1	$200–$1,800	Moderate
Complete transmission failure	transmission	17	10	45k	58k	118k	0.1	$2,800–$8,000	Critical
Loss of braking	brakes	16	6	—	121k	—	0.1	$400–$3,000	Critical
Headlight failure or clouding	lighting	15	10	67k	80k	90k	0.1	$150–$1,800	Moderate
Wiper or washer failure	glass	13	5	—	66k	—	0.1	$120–$800	Moderate
CV axle or driveshaft failure	drivetrain	12	9	56k	75k	75k	0.1	$450–$2,200	High
Fuel leak or fuel odor	fuel	12	3	—	40k	—	0.1	$300–$2,500	Critical
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault	airbag	12	2	—	39k	—	0.1	$300–$1,600	High
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure	steering	12	4	—	96k	—	0.1	$700–$2,600	High
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure	suspension	12	7	—	76k	—	0.1	$400–$2,200	High
Other steering problem	steering	12	4	—	54k	—	0.1	$350–$2,400	High
Wiring harness or short circuit	electrical	11	1	—	68k	—	0.1	$400–$3,500	High
Overheating	cooling	10	5	—	74k	—	0.1	$400–$3,500	High
Parking brake failure	brakes	9	8	32k	32k	35k	0.1	$250–$1,300	Moderate
Rust or structural corrosion	body	9	4	—	104k	—	0.1	$500–$6,000	High
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure	electrical	8	6	—	50k	—	0.1	$700–$3,000	High
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure	electrical	8	4	—	70k	—	0.1	$250–$1,500	High
Other seat belt problem	airbag	8	0	—	—	—	0.1	$200–$900	High
Stalling while driving	engine	7	3	—	44k	—	0.0	$300–$2,500	Critical
Torque converter failure	transmission	7	6	—	55k	—	0.0	$1,100–$3,200	High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure	brakes	7	3	—	42k	—	0.0	$250–$1,600	Critical
Oil leak	engine	6	4	—	120k	—	0.0	$250–$2,200	Moderate
Radiator or coolant leak	cooling	6	0	—	—	—	0.0	$350–$1,900	High
Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure	transmission	6	2	—	67k	—	0.0	$250–$1,400	High
Fuel gauge or level sensor failure	fuel	6	5	—	40k	—	0.0	$300–$1,200	Moderate
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure	fuel	6	1	—	90k	—	0.0	$250–$1,800	Moderate
Heater core failure	cooling	5	3	—	95k	—	0.0	$700–$2,400	Moderate
Engine sensor failure	electrical	4	0	—	—	—	0.0	$180–$900	Moderate
Airbag inflator rupture	airbag	4	0	—	—	—	0.0	$0–$0	Critical
Door latch or handle failure	body	4	2	—	120k	—	0.0	$250–$1,200	High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin	emissions	4	2	—	38k	—	0.0	$250–$2,000	High
Misfire or rough idle	engine	3	3	—	77k	—	0.0	$250–$1,600	Moderate
Intake carbon buildup	engine	3	0	—	—	—	0.0	$400–$1,200	Moderate
Alternator or charging system failure	electrical	3	1	—	32k	—	0.0	$450–$1,600	High
Steering column or shaft failure	steering	3	1	—	127k	—	0.0	$600–$2,500	Critical
Head gasket failure	engine	2	1	—	80k	—	0.0	$1,400–$4,000	Critical
Wheel, stud or lug nut failure	wheels	2	1	—	47k	—	0.0	$150–$1,500	Critical
Air conditioning failure	hvac	2	1	—	133k	—	0.0	$400–$2,800	Moderate
Blower motor or climate control failure	hvac	2	2	—	64k	—	0.0	$250–$1,200	Moderate
Complete engine failure or seizure	engine	1	0	—	—	—	0.0	$4,500–$12,000	Critical
Cooling fan failure	cooling	1	1	—	100k	—	0.0	$350–$1,300	Moderate
Transmission will not engage a gear	transmission	1	1	—	59k	—	0.0	$1,500–$6,000	Critical
Wheel bearing or hub failure	drivetrain	1	0	—	—	—	0.0	$350–$1,200	Moderate
Instrument cluster or gauge failure	infotainment	1	0	—	—	—	0.0	$350–$1,400	Moderate
Master cylinder or brake booster failure	brakes	1	0	—	—	—	0.0	$450–$2,200	Critical
Power steering pump or fluid leak	steering	1	0	—	—	—	0.0	$350–$1,600	Moderate
Alignment fault and uneven tire wear	suspension	1	0	—	—	—	0.0	$150–$1,200	Moderate
Sunroof failure or glass breakage	body	1	0	—	—	—	0.0	$700–$4,500	High
Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure	body	1	1	—	40	—	0.0	$250–$1,500	Moderate
Catalytic converter failure	emissions	1	0	—	—	—	0.0	$900–$3,500	Moderate
Other driver assistance problem	adas	1	1	—	100k	—	0.0	$250–$1,800	High
Unclassified problem	other	70	20	47k	87k	103k	0.5	—	Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2000 Ford Taurus draws about 10.0 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 87th percentile of complaint rates among 2000 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 149,843 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2000 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Strut, shock or spring failure

I have a ford tarus 2000, with 41,000 miles, my wife went to drive the car and before she started the car -the car was stationary- there was an explosive sound in the front due to the left front tire blowing out. I raised the car with a jack and found the coil spring had broken apart and was embedded in the tire. Had someone been driving the car at 70 MPH it is quite likely the car would have rolled over. If a spring failure does happen while the car is at driving velocity and causes the car to wreck in one way or another, the broken spring will be seen as a result of the crash and not as the cause of the crash. The ford people told me there is no recall and that they are allowed 1% failure rate before a recall is initiated. The spring is very critical to steering and to allow 10,000 failures, a possible 10,000 fatalities per million is unacceptable. *jb

41,000 miles NHTSA complaint 404054 filed 2003-04-23

My wife was leaving work and upon setting in the car hear a load noise, on investigation by a aaa mechanic the front coil spring on the driver's side had broken and punctured the tire. The plastic linkage connecting the anti-sway bar was also broken. If the car had been moving it would have wrecked and possibly rolled. I thought this had been fixed on earlier models of the taurus, I know there was a recall to put anti-puncture protection from broken springs. *nlm

66,250 miles NHTSA complaint 406240 filed 2003-05-06

Recalls on the 2000 model year

NHTSA has issued 8 recall campaigns covering the 2000 Ford Taurus, affecting an estimated 526,309 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover suspension:front:springs:coil springs, exterior lighting:brake lights:switch, service brakes, hydraulic:pedals and linkages and visibility:windshield wiper/washer:motor. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

04V332000

SUSPENSION:FRONT:SPRINGS:COIL SPRINGS

899,060 vehicles 2004-07-15

Defect: On certain passenger vehicles originally sold in or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia, the front coil springs could fracture due to corrosion associated with salt used on the roadways during the winter. A fractured spring could move past the spring seat and contact a front tire.
Consequence: If this occurs, the tire may rupture resulting in a rapid air loss, which could result in a crash.
Remedy: Dealers will install protective spring shields. In addition, ford is extending the warranty coverage of the front coil springs in all other states, for fracture only, up to 10 years of service or 150,000 miles, whichever occurs first. If the vehicle has already accumulated more than 150,000 miles, this coverage will last until july 31, 2005. If either front coil spring fractures, dealers will replace both front springs at no charge to the owner. An interim notice was sent to owners on august 2, 2004. Parts are now available for the 2000-2001 my vehicles and owners were…

04V106000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS:SWITCH

938,789 vehicles 2004-03-02

Defect: Certain passenger vehicles are being recalled to correct a problem with a malfunctioning stop lamp switch and/or associated wiring. This malfunctioning could render the stop lamps inoperable or cause them to stay on all the time. This could cause confusion to a following driver, which could lead to a crash.
Consequence: In addition, if the switch and/or associated wiring fail in the open position, the brake lights will not actuate and the driver will not be able to shift the vehicle out of "park" if they fail in the closed position, the brake lights will remain on, which will not allow the speed control to be activated. This could also cause the battery to discharge.
Remedy: Dealers will remove the stop lamp switch and associated wiring assembly and install a newly designed stop lamp switch and wire assembly. Owner notification is expected to begin on april 5, 2004. Owners should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

02V266000

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:PEDALS AND LINKAGES

369,614 vehicles 2002-10-02

Defect: Certain passenger vehicles equipped with adjustable padels are being recalled in order to adjust the brake and accelerator pedals to a minimum of 50 mm of lateral separation. Simultaneous application of both the brake and accelerator pedals could result in an increase in engine RPM.
Consequence: This could result in a customer experiencing an "unintended vehicle speed increase" or a perceived "unable to stop" condition.
Remedy: Owners will be instructed as to the proper way to set the position of the pedals and to take their vehicles to a dealer to have the spacing between the brake and accelerator pedals measured. If the spacing is found to be less than 50 mm, the dealer will adjust the pedals to increase the distance between them to greater than 50 mm. Owner notification began october 28, 2002. Owners who do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.

01V258000

VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER:MOTOR

1,083,000 vehicles 2001-08-08

Defect: Vehicle description: passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, and light and medium duty pickup trucks. A switch located in the plastic cover of the wiper motor gear case could malfunction and overheat, potentially resulting in loss of intermittent wiper function, loss of wiper park function, complete loss of wiper function, or ignition of the plastic cover material. Switch malfunction is most likely to occur when the intermittent setting of the wipers is being used, or when snow or ice obstructs the blades from returning to the "parked" position at the bottom of the…
Consequence: Loss of visibility while driving increases the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Dealers will inspect the date code on the wiper motor. Motors built with the suspect time frame will have the wiper motor gear case cover replaced. Owner notification began august 20, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.

01V075000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS:SWITCH

74,000 vehicles 2001-03-12

Defect: Vehicle description: passenger and sport utility vehicles. Due to the use of incorrect material by a supplier, the headlamp switch knob can fracture and separate from the headlamp switch.
Consequence: This would cause difficulty for the driver to activate the headlamps, which could affect driver visibility, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Dealers will replace the headlamp switch knob. Owner notification began april 9, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

01V078000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:TAIL LIGHTS:SWITCH

157,000 vehicles 2001-03-12

Defect: Vehicle description: passenger vehicles equipped with adjustable pedals. If the grease from the adjustable pedal assembly enters the stop lamp switch, it can contaminate the contacts leading to carbon build up, and potentially, a short circuit.
Consequence: A short circuit could lead to either the brake lamps staying on, or to a loss of brake lamp function, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Dealers will replace the brake lamp switch and wipe down the adjustable pedal assembly to remove excess grease. Owner notification began march 22, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

01V048000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BACK UP LIGHTS

28,000 vehicles 2001-02-28

Defect: Vehicle description: passenger sedans with factory or dealer-installed deck lid spoilers with LED center high mounted stop lamps (chmsl). Vehicles produced with spoilers were manufactured from march 1 through october 31, 2000; and vehicles with spoilers installed by dealers were manufactured from january 1 thorough december 30, 2000. With the ignition switch in the start or run positions and the hazard warning lights operating, the chmsl can illuminate (at reduced intensity) even though the service brakes have not been applied. This does not meet the requirements of fmvss…
Consequence: Under the requirements of the standard, the chmsl shall be activated only upon appplication of the service brakes. Also, the vehicle could roll increasing the risk of a crash, if the shift lever can be shifted out of park without depressing the brake pedal.
Remedy: Dealers will install a jumper/resistor assembly at the spoiler that provides an electrical resistor to ground and corrects the chmsl and brake-shift interlock conditions. Owner notification began march 19, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

00V242000

EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS

167,000 vehicles 2000-08-24

Defect: Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. The "vehicle capacity weight" and "designated seating capacity" information was not printed on the safety certification labels affixed to these vehicles. On affected sable sedan vehicles, the "vehicles capacity weight" (and also the luggage load) information printed on this label is incorrect - sable wagon luggage load was incorrectly used for the sable sedan. These vehicles do not comply with the label requirements of fmvss no. 110, "tire selection and rims."
Consequence: Excessive loading can cause tire and vehicle damage that could result in a crash.
Remedy: Owners will be provided with a supplemental label with the correct information, along with instructions for affixing the label adjacent to the vehicle certification label. Owner notification began october 20, 2000. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2000 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2000 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

Left fewer and less serious reports
Right more, or worse
Marker this vehicle

Better and worse years of the same car

High risk for a 2000 — 135th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.

Across the 24 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2019 comes out best at 56 and 2010 worst at 76, with 2000 itself at 68.

If the model year is negotiable, 2019, 2002 and 2003 score lower than 2000 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1996–2003 generation specifically, 2002 is the strongest year at 62 and 1997 the weakest at 71.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1996-2003 generation, 2002 Ford Taurus scores best at 62 and 1997 Ford Taurus worst at 71.

What to look at before buying one

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other lighting problem from about 20k, other brake problem from about 23k, other wheel or tire problem from about 26k and parking brake failure from about 32k.

On a 2000 Ford Taurus with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other lighting problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.

The limits of complaint data

1,497 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 1,497 reports, 735 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 49% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2000 Ford Taurus?

The most-reported failures are strut, shock or spring failure (258 reports, median 72,000 miles), other suspension problem (193 reports, median 76,000 miles) and other engine problem (72 reports, median 70,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2000 Ford Taurus problems start?

Parking brake failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 30,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 30,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 70,000 miles.

Is the 2000 Ford Taurus reliable?

It scores 68 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 135th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2000 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Ford Taurus is best?

Within the 1996–2003 generation, 2002 scores best at 62 out of 100 and 1997 worst at 71. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt 20 August 2026 Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed