2004 Chevrolet Silverado: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado
On the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado, the failure owners report most often is instrument cluster or gauge failure, and the reports cluster around 50,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other visibility problem, reported by a median of 1,500 miles. Overall it scores 71 out of 100, high risk for a 2004.
High risk for a 2004 — 96th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. 723 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
The failures owners actually file about
Owners have reported 62 named failure modes on the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado, and the three most-reported carry 32% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Instrument cluster or gauge failure leads with 112 reports, about 0.9 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 40k to 72,500 miles.
Loss of braking follows with 58 reports, usually reported between 25k to 100,000 miles.
Other brake problem follows with 58 reports, usually reported between 25k to 102,500 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into brakes (210), infotainment (112) and electrical (54).
The mileage the reports cluster at
600 of the reports on the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 45,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 55% by 50,000 miles, 84% by 100,000 miles and 96% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 5 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 19% of the dated reports.
40% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, which is early enough that a fair number of these cars were still under a factory warranty when the owner complained.
In the order they tend to show up: other visibility problem around 2k, cruise control failure around 3k, other suspension problem around 6k and other body or interior problem around 11k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 62. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 5 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
What happens when these parts fail
Across the named modes, 60 mention a crash, 10 a fire, 31 an injury and 3 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.82, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: instrument cluster or gauge failure at $350–$1,400, loss of braking at $400–$3,000, other brake problem at $300–$1,800 and other electrical problem at $250–$2,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
11% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 112 | 98 | 40k | 50k | 72k | 0.9 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 58 | 53 | 25k | 80k | 100k | 0.5 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 58 | 48 | 25k | 70k | 102k | 0.5 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 38 | 33 | 26k | 40k | 64k | 0.3 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 35 | 35 | 57k | 78k | 108k | 0.3 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 32 | 24 | 2k | 13k | 33k | 0.3 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 29 | 16 | 4k | 11k | 39k | 0.2 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 27 | 23 | 12k | 32k | 56k | 0.2 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 16 | 16 | 25k | 40k | 56k | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 15 | 11 | 16k | 17k | 40k | 0.1 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 15 | 13 | 2k | 14k | 63k | 0.1 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 15 | 9 | 12k | 13k | 19k | 0.1 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 14 | 13 | 36k | 64k | 105k | 0.1 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 14 | 7 | — | 16k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 13 | 11 | 575 | 2k | 4k | 0.1 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 12 | 12 | 37k | 46k | 61k | 0.1 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 12 | 11 | 3k | 6k | 18k | 0.1 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 11 | 9 | 24k | 24k | 30k | 0.1 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 10 | 10 | 1k | 15k | 28k | 0.1 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 10 | 10 | 100 | 3k | 45k | 0.1 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 9 | 8 | 17k | 56k | 71k | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 9 | 7 | — | 30k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 9 | 6 | — | 85k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 9 | 7 | — | 45k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 9 | 7 | — | 40k | — | 0.1 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 8 | 8 | 50k | 94k | 112k | 0.1 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 7 | 5 | — | 21k | — | 0.1 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 7 | 5 | — | 116k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 7 | 6 | — | 41k | — | 0.1 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 6 | 5 | — | 4k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 6 | 5 | — | 6k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 6 | 6 | — | 35k | — | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 5 | 3 | — | 63k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 5 | 5 | — | 113k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 5 | 4 | — | 19k | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 4 | 4 | — | 83k | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 4 | 4 | — | 91k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 4 | 4 | — | 78k | — | 0.0 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 4 | 1 | — | 500 | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 3 | 3 | — | 16k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 3 | 3 | — | 40k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Water pump failure | cooling | 2 | 2 | — | 57k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,200 | High |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 2 | 2 | — | 142k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Overheating | cooling | 2 | 2 | — | 61k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 106k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 40k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 30k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Engine knock or bearing noise | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 50k | — | 0.0 | $2,500–$9,000 | High |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 100 | — | 0.0 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Manual clutch or hydraulics failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 11k | — | 0.0 | $900–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 119k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 97k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 8k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 1k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 78k | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Power steering pump or fluid leak | steering | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 18k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 1 | 1 | — | 75k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 21 | 12 | 37k | 55k | 84k | 0.2 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado draws about 5.9 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 82nd percentile of complaint rates among 2004 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 122,073 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2004 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Instrument cluster or gauge failure
Dt: the contact stated the speedometer stopped working without warning. He took the vehicle to a local dealership to be checked. They determined the instrument cluster panel was faulty. This caused the speedometer to malfunction. He contacted the manufacturer, and they approved the repairs to be made without cost to the contact. *ak
Dt: the contact stated the speedometer stopped working without warning. He took the vehicle to a local dealership to be checked. They determined the instrument cluster panel was faulty. This caused the speedometer to malfunction. He contacted the manufacturer, and they approved the repairs to be made without cost to the contact. *ak
Loss of braking
While driving at low speeds consumer heard a popping noise. Then, the ABS light came on, and the brake pedal went to the floor. Consumer tried to turn the steering wheel to avoid hitting another vehicle, and the steering wheel locked up. Consumer's vehicle collided with the other vehicle, but no damage was sustained due to the low speed driving at time of impact. There was brake valve recall 04v045000, but this vehicle was not included due to VIN. *ak
When driving vehicle lost power and everything shut down. There were no brakes or steering, and the dashboard was completely black. Consumer took the vehicle to the dealer, and was told that if this happened again he would have to tow it back to the dealer. *ak
Other brake problem
When coming to a stop light I was applying my brakes to stop behind a vehicle, brakes went to the floor, causing an accident. Vehicle was taken to the dealer. All brake component were checked, no current technical service bulletins and contacted technical assistant. Dealer was unable to duplicate the problem. *ak
When attempting to apply the brake from a low speed the pedal intermittently proceeded to the floor. Please provide additional information. *jb problem could not be found by dealership. *tc
Recalls on the 2004 model year
NHTSA has issued 15 recall campaigns covering the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado, affecting an estimated 176,103 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover exterior lighting:headlights, wheels:hub, equipment:electrical and air bags:frontal. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11- Defect
- K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
WHEELS:HUB
130,000 vehicles 2007-12-17- Defect
- Certain federal-mogul replacement wheel hub assemblies with the brand names: national, carquest p/nos. 515020, 515021, 515025, 515053, 515054, 515059, and 515060, shipped between january 23, 2006, and december 20, 2007, sold for light duty and medium duty trucks. The inboard retention nut used to maintain hub bearing assembly can loosen resulting in an ABS light indication, noise, and/or wheel separation.
- Consequence
- Wheel separation can result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Federal-mogul will notify customers and will replace the hub assembly free of charge. The recall began on february 7, 2008. Owners can contact federal-mogul toll-free at 877-489-6659.
EQUIPMENT:ELECTRICAL
175 vehicles 2007-08-28- Defect
- Certain cequent 90 degree 7-way right angle adaptors sold by distributors in tow packages for aftermarket sales to tow 5th wheel rv travel trailers. Due to incorrect wiring of the harness, the trailer lights may not operate properly.
- Consequence
- If the trailer lights are not working properly, a vehicle crash can occur.
- Remedy
- All of the defective tow packages are still at the distributor level and have not been sold to any consumers.
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL
794 vehicles 2006-10-31- Defect
- Certain vehicles originally built with cloth seats that were equipped with an automatic air bag passenger sensing system and later reupholstered with aftermarket leather seat cover kits are involved. Testing has indicated that the aftermarket leather seat covers can cause the passenger sensing system to malfunction.
- Consequence
- If the passenger sensing system malfunctions, the front air bag on the passenger side may be disabled when it should be enabled, or enabled when it should be disabled. In either case, in the event of a crash that requires air bag deployment, a front passenger's level of injury may be increased.
- Remedy
- Because a replacement leather seat cover that is compatible with the passenger sensing system is not available, general motors (gm) will repurchase these vehicles in accordance with the terms stated in gm's letter to owners. The recall began on november 6, 2006. Owners should contact gm at 1-877-477-1022 to begin the process of repurchasing their vehicle.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
38,439 vehicles 2006-08-03- Defect
- On certain trucks equipped with an 8.1l v8 (rpo l8-VIN g) engine have a condition in which the engine fuel rail pulse damper retainer clip may fracture resulting in inadequate retention of the damper.
- Consequence
- If the damper comes loose, a fuel leak may result. Fuel leakage, in the presence of an ignition source, could result in a fire.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the engine fuel rail pulse damper retainer clip free of charge. The recall began on august 31, 2006. Owners may contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438 and gmc trucks at 1-866-996-9463.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
4,029 vehicles 2006-07-17- Defect
- Certain tradesonic combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Tradesonic will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during july 2006. Owners may contact tradesonic at 626-934-8884.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
87,745 vehicles 2006-06-29- Defect
- Certain aai motorsports combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above list passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash
- Remedy
- Aai motorsports will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall began on august 1, 2006. Owners may contact aai motorsports at 909-923-9188.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
292,000 vehicles 2006-03-13- Defect
- Certain anzo combination headlamp assemblies sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles. Some combination lamps are not equipped with amber side reflectors which fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Anzo will notify owners and replace the headlamps free of charge. The recall began may 9, 2006. Owners may contact anzo usa at 909-468-3688.
PARKING BRAKE
90,242 vehicles 2005-04-22- Defect
- On certain pickup trucks equipped with manual transmissions and built with either pbr parking brake systems or trw parking brake systems, the parking brake friction linings may wear to an extent where the parking brake can become ineffective in immobilizing a parked vehicle.
- Consequence
- If the parking brake does not hold, unintended vehicle movement could occur, which could result in a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will install a low-force spring clip retainer for vehicles equipped with a pbr parking brake system. On vehicles equipped with the trw parking brake system, dealers will install a redesigned parking brake cable assembly. The recall began on july 29, 2005. Owners may contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438 or gmc at 1-866-996-9463.
SEAT BELTS:REAR/OTHER
1,359,824 vehicles 2005-04-22- Defect
- On certain crew cab pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, the 2nd row center occupant seat belt routing may make it difficult to position the lap portion of the safety belt low around the hips of occupants, especially smaller occupants, seated in this position. Appropriate use of a child seat or booster seat, as recommended for small children, does improve the fit condition for this user group. In addition to instructions on proper infant and young child restraint (with child seats or boosters), special verbiage for restraining older child is included in the owner's…
- Consequence
- A lap portion of the seat belt routing that is not low and snug on the hips can allow the lap belt to ride up on an occupant's abdomen instead of fitting low around their hipbones, and therefore, can expose them to more risk of abdominal and internal organ injury.
- Remedy
- Dealers will cut open the guide loop, remove a portion of the loop, and then the remaining two sides should be folded over and secured with a retainer free of charge. The recall began on july 21, 2005. Owners may contact cadillac at 1-866-982-2339, chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438, gmc at 1-866-996-9463, or hummer at 1-800-732-5493.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
77,411 vehicles 2005-02-08- Defect
- Certain trucks, sport utility vehicles, and vans equipped with bosch hydro-boost brake assemblies, the hydraulic brake booster pressure accumulator may crack and separate from the hydro-boost assembly during normal operating conditions.
- Consequence
- If a separation occurred and the hood of the vehicle were open, fragments from the accumulator could cause injury to people in the immediate area. The presence of this crack or fractured surface could allow the hydraulic fluid to leak from the accumulator circuit of the booster assembly. The loss of fluid would cause increased steering and braking effort and a crash may occur without prior warning.
- Remedy
- Dealers will test the hydro-boost assembly for functional operation of the two-function valve. If the hydro-boost assembly fails the test, dealers will replace the assembly free of charge. The recall began on march 23, 2005. Owners may contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438, gmc trucks at 1-866-996-9463 and hummer at 1-800-732-5493.
SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE
736 vehicles 2004-05-11- Defect
- Certain extended and regular cab pickup trucks and cargo vans converted to compressed natural gas (cng) fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 225, 'child restraint anchorage systems.' these vehicles have one seating position, the center rear seat, equipped with child restraint lower anchorages.
- Consequence
- The standard requires child seat lower anchorages in two seating positions for vehicles with three rear seating positions. The standard cab and cargo van vehicles, which only have front seating positions, have an air bag off switch to disable the front passenger air bag and do not have child restraint lower anchorages in the passenger seat. The standard requires passenger seat child seat lower anchorages in vehicles with an air bag off switch. However, the standard does not require vehicles with only front seating positions to have lower anchorage provisions if the…
- Remedy
- To bring the standard cab and cargo van vehicles into compliance, dealers will inject epoxy into the air bag off switch to prevent air bag activation, relocate the switch behind the instrument panel and then install a cover over the resulting opening. The sun visor label and owner's manual will also be changed. The correction for the extended cab vehicle will consist of changing the front passenger seat to a seat that has child restraint lower anchorages. The recall began on september 9, 2004. Owners should contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438 or gmc at 1-866-996-9463.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2004 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
How 2004 compares with the other years
High risk for a 2004 — 96th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 21 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 66 and 2013 worst at 82, with 2004 itself at 71.
If the model year is negotiable, 1996, 1998 and 2008 score lower than 2004 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1999–2006 generation specifically, 1999 is the strongest year at 69 and 2006 the weakest at 77.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1999-2006 generation, 1999 Chevrolet Silverado scores best at 69 and 2006 Chevrolet Silverado worst at 77.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: cruise control failure from about 100, other visibility problem from about 575, airbag failed to deploy in a crash from about 1k and other powertrain problem from about 2k.
On a 2004 Chevrolet Silverado with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether cruise control failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
What this page cannot tell you
723 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 723 reports, 600 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 83% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado?
The most-reported failures are instrument cluster or gauge failure (112 reports, median 50,000 miles), loss of braking (58 reports, median 80,000 miles) and other brake problem (58 reports, median 70,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2004 Chevrolet Silverado problems start?
Other visibility problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 1,500 miles and a quarter of reports before 600 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 45,000 miles.
Is the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado reliable?
It scores 71 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 96th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2004 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Chevrolet Silverado is best?
Within the 1999–2006 generation, 1999 scores best at 69 out of 100 and 2006 worst at 77. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed