AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2004 Chevrolet Silverado: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado

On the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado, the failure owners report most often is instrument cluster or gauge failure, and the reports cluster around 50,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other visibility problem, reported by a median of 1,500 miles. Overall it scores 71 out of 100, high risk for a 2004.

High risk for a 2004 — 96th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. 723 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

The failures owners actually file about

Owners have reported 62 named failure modes on the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado, and the three most-reported carry 32% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Instrument cluster or gauge failure leads with 112 reports, about 0.9 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 40k to 72,500 miles.

Loss of braking follows with 58 reports, usually reported between 25k to 100,000 miles.

Other brake problem follows with 58 reports, usually reported between 25k to 102,500 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into brakes (210), infotainment (112) and electrical (54).

The mileage the reports cluster at

600 of the reports on the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 45,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 55% by 50,000 miles, 84% by 100,000 miles and 96% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 5 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 19% of the dated reports.

40% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, which is early enough that a fair number of these cars were still under a factory warranty when the owner complained.

In the order they tend to show up: other visibility problem around 2k, cruise control failure around 3k, other suspension problem around 6k and other body or interior problem around 11k.

Median
  1. Instrument cluster or gauge failure 50k
  2. Loss of braking 80k
  3. Other brake problem 70k
  4. Other electrical problem 40k
  5. Brake line, hose or caliper failure 78k
  6. Other powertrain problem 13k
  7. Other body or interior problem 11k
  8. ABS module or sensor failure 32k
  9. Other speed control problem 40k
  10. Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure 17k
  11. Other engine problem 14k
  12. Other steering problem 13k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 62. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 45k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 5 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

What happens when these parts fail

Across the named modes, 60 mention a crash, 10 a fire, 31 an injury and 3 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.82, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: instrument cluster or gauge failure at $350–$1,400, loss of braking at $400–$3,000, other brake problem at $300–$1,800 and other electrical problem at $250–$2,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

11% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Instrument cluster or gauge failure infotainment 112 98 40k 50k 72k 0.9 $350–$1,400 Moderate
Loss of braking brakes 58 53 25k 80k 100k 0.5 $400–$3,000 Critical
Other brake problem brakes 58 48 25k 70k 102k 0.5 $300–$1,800 High
Other electrical problem electrical 38 33 26k 40k 64k 0.3 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 35 35 57k 78k 108k 0.3 $250–$1,600 Critical
Other powertrain problem transmission 32 24 2k 13k 33k 0.3 $400–$4,500 High
Other body or interior problem body 29 16 4k 11k 39k 0.2 $200–$2,000 Moderate
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 27 23 12k 32k 56k 0.2 $500–$2,400 High
Other speed control problem adas 16 16 25k 40k 56k 0.1 $250–$2,000 Critical
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 15 11 16k 17k 40k 0.1 $700–$2,600 High
Other engine problem engine 15 13 2k 14k 63k 0.1 $300–$4,000 High
Other steering problem steering 15 9 12k 13k 19k 0.1 $350–$2,400 High
Parking brake failure brakes 14 13 36k 64k 105k 0.1 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 14 7 — 16k — 0.1 $200–$1,500 High
Other visibility problem glass 13 11 575 2k 4k 0.1 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Steering column or shaft failure steering 12 12 37k 46k 61k 0.1 $600–$2,500 Critical
Other suspension problem suspension 12 11 3k 6k 18k 0.1 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Differential or transfer case failure drivetrain 11 9 24k 24k 30k 0.1 $900–$4,200 High
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 10 10 1k 15k 28k 0.1 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Cruise control failure adas 10 10 100 3k 45k 0.1 $200–$1,400 High
Master cylinder or brake booster failure brakes 9 8 17k 56k 71k 0.1 $450–$2,200 Critical
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 9 7 — 30k — 0.1 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 9 6 — 85k — 0.1 $200–$1,500 Critical
Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure body 9 7 — 45k — 0.1 $250–$1,500 Moderate
Other fuel system problem fuel 9 7 — 40k — 0.1 $300–$2,200 High
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 8 8 50k 94k 112k 0.1 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Fuel pump failure fuel 7 5 — 21k — 0.1 $600–$2,600 High
Fuel gauge or level sensor failure fuel 7 5 — 116k — 0.1 $300–$1,200 Moderate
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 7 6 — 41k — 0.1 $700–$3,000 High
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 6 5 — 4k — 0.0 $450–$2,200 High
Strut, shock or spring failure suspension 6 5 — 6k — 0.0 $500–$2,000 Moderate
Tail light, brake light or signal failure lighting 6 6 — 35k — 0.0 $100–$900 Moderate
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 5 3 — 63k — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 5 5 — 113k — 0.0 $250–$2,000 High
Wiper or washer failure glass 5 4 — 19k — 0.0 $120–$800 Moderate
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 4 4 — 83k — 0.0 $200–$900 High
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 4 4 — 91k — 0.0 $400–$2,200 High
Rust or structural corrosion body 4 4 — 78k — 0.0 $500–$6,000 High
Headlight failure or clouding lighting 4 1 — 500 — 0.0 $150–$1,800 Moderate
Stalling while driving engine 3 3 — 16k — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure transmission 3 3 — 40k — 0.0 $250–$1,400 High
Other lighting problem lighting 3 0 — — — 0.0 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Water pump failure cooling 2 2 — 57k — 0.0 $500–$2,200 High
Radiator or coolant leak cooling 2 2 — 142k — 0.0 $350–$1,900 High
Overheating cooling 2 2 — 61k — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 2 2 — 106k — 0.0 $250–$1,500 High
Electrical fire or melted wiring electrical 1 1 — 40k — 0.0 $1,500–$9,000 Critical
No-start or intermittent start failure engine 1 1 — 30k — 0.0 $200–$1,800 Moderate
Misfire or rough idle engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$1,600 Moderate
Engine knock or bearing noise engine 1 1 — 50k — 0.0 $2,500–$9,000 High
Complete transmission failure transmission 1 0 — — — 0.0 $2,800–$8,000 Critical
Torque converter failure transmission 1 1 — 100 — 0.0 $1,100–$3,200 High
Manual clutch or hydraulics failure transmission 1 1 — 11k — 0.0 $900–$2,800 Moderate
Fuel injector failure fuel 1 1 — 119k — 0.0 $450–$2,800 Moderate
Fuel leak or fuel odor fuel 1 1 — 97k — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Engine sensor failure electrical 1 1 — 8k — 0.0 $180–$900 Moderate
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 1 1 — 1k — 0.0 $300–$1,600 High
Airbag inflator rupture airbag 1 1 — 78k — 0.0 $0–$0 Critical
Power steering pump or fluid leak steering 1 0 — — — 0.0 $350–$1,600 Moderate
Alignment fault and uneven tire wear suspension 1 1 — 18k — 0.0 $150–$1,200 Moderate
Air conditioning failure hvac 1 1 — 75k — 0.0 $400–$2,800 Moderate
Blower motor or climate control failure hvac 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$1,200 Moderate
Unclassified problem other 21 12 37k 55k 84k 0.2 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado draws about 5.9 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 82nd percentile of complaint rates among 2004 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 122,073 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2004 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Instrument cluster or gauge failure

Dt: the contact stated the speedometer stopped working without warning. He took the vehicle to a local dealership to be checked. They determined the instrument cluster panel was faulty. This caused the speedometer to malfunction. He contacted the manufacturer, and they approved the repairs to be made without cost to the contact. *ak

38,000 miles NHTSA complaint 568038 filed 2006-01-03

Dt: the contact stated the speedometer stopped working without warning. He took the vehicle to a local dealership to be checked. They determined the instrument cluster panel was faulty. This caused the speedometer to malfunction. He contacted the manufacturer, and they approved the repairs to be made without cost to the contact. *ak

38,000 miles NHTSA complaint 568039 filed 2006-01-03

Loss of braking

While driving at low speeds consumer heard a popping noise. Then, the ABS light came on, and the brake pedal went to the floor. Consumer tried to turn the steering wheel to avoid hitting another vehicle, and the steering wheel locked up. Consumer's vehicle collided with the other vehicle, but no damage was sustained due to the low speed driving at time of impact. There was brake valve recall 04v045000, but this vehicle was not included due to VIN. *ak

7,000 miles NHTSA complaint 481116 filed 2004-06-23

When driving vehicle lost power and everything shut down. There were no brakes or steering, and the dashboard was completely black. Consumer took the vehicle to the dealer, and was told that if this happened again he would have to tow it back to the dealer. *ak

2,000 miles NHTSA complaint 515223 filed 2005-01-04

Other brake problem

When coming to a stop light I was applying my brakes to stop behind a vehicle, brakes went to the floor, causing an accident. Vehicle was taken to the dealer. All brake component were checked, no current technical service bulletins and contacted technical assistant. Dealer was unable to duplicate the problem. *ak

9,400 miles NHTSA complaint 480636 filed 2004-06-19

When attempting to apply the brake from a low speed the pedal intermittently proceeded to the floor. Please provide additional information. *jb problem could not be found by dealership. *tc

96 miles NHTSA complaint 500880 filed 2004-10-12

Recalls on the 2004 model year

NHTSA has issued 15 recall campaigns covering the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado, affecting an estimated 176,103 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover exterior lighting:headlights, wheels:hub, equipment:electrical and air bags:frontal. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.

08E050000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11
Defect
K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence
Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
07E106000

WHEELS:HUB

130,000 vehicles 2007-12-17
Defect
Certain federal-mogul replacement wheel hub assemblies with the brand names: national, carquest p/nos. 515020, 515021, 515025, 515053, 515054, 515059, and 515060, shipped between january 23, 2006, and december 20, 2007, sold for light duty and medium duty trucks. The inboard retention nut used to maintain hub bearing assembly can loosen resulting in an ABS light indication, noise, and/or wheel separation.
Consequence
Wheel separation can result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Federal-mogul will notify customers and will replace the hub assembly free of charge. The recall began on february 7, 2008. Owners can contact federal-mogul toll-free at 877-489-6659.
07E066000

EQUIPMENT:ELECTRICAL

175 vehicles 2007-08-28
Defect
Certain cequent 90 degree 7-way right angle adaptors sold by distributors in tow packages for aftermarket sales to tow 5th wheel rv travel trailers. Due to incorrect wiring of the harness, the trailer lights may not operate properly.
Consequence
If the trailer lights are not working properly, a vehicle crash can occur.
Remedy
All of the defective tow packages are still at the distributor level and have not been sold to any consumers.
06V417000

AIR BAGS:FRONTAL

794 vehicles 2006-10-31
Defect
Certain vehicles originally built with cloth seats that were equipped with an automatic air bag passenger sensing system and later reupholstered with aftermarket leather seat cover kits are involved. Testing has indicated that the aftermarket leather seat covers can cause the passenger sensing system to malfunction.
Consequence
If the passenger sensing system malfunctions, the front air bag on the passenger side may be disabled when it should be enabled, or enabled when it should be disabled. In either case, in the event of a crash that requires air bag deployment, a front passenger's level of injury may be increased.
Remedy
Because a replacement leather seat cover that is compatible with the passenger sensing system is not available, general motors (gm) will repurchase these vehicles in accordance with the terms stated in gm's letter to owners. The recall began on november 6, 2006. Owners should contact gm at 1-877-477-1022 to begin the process of repurchasing their vehicle.
06V289000

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

38,439 vehicles 2006-08-03
Defect
On certain trucks equipped with an 8.1l v8 (rpo l8-VIN g) engine have a condition in which the engine fuel rail pulse damper retainer clip may fracture resulting in inadequate retention of the damper.
Consequence
If the damper comes loose, a fuel leak may result. Fuel leakage, in the presence of an ignition source, could result in a fire.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the engine fuel rail pulse damper retainer clip free of charge. The recall began on august 31, 2006. Owners may contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438 and gmc trucks at 1-866-996-9463.
06E064000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

4,029 vehicles 2006-07-17
Defect
Certain tradesonic combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Tradesonic will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during july 2006. Owners may contact tradesonic at 626-934-8884.
06E060000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

87,745 vehicles 2006-06-29
Defect
Certain aai motorsports combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above list passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence
Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash
Remedy
Aai motorsports will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall began on august 1, 2006. Owners may contact aai motorsports at 909-923-9188.
06E023000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

292,000 vehicles 2006-03-13
Defect
Certain anzo combination headlamp assemblies sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles. Some combination lamps are not equipped with amber side reflectors which fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Anzo will notify owners and replace the headlamps free of charge. The recall began may 9, 2006. Owners may contact anzo usa at 909-468-3688.
05V161000

PARKING BRAKE

90,242 vehicles 2005-04-22
Defect
On certain pickup trucks equipped with manual transmissions and built with either pbr parking brake systems or trw parking brake systems, the parking brake friction linings may wear to an extent where the parking brake can become ineffective in immobilizing a parked vehicle.
Consequence
If the parking brake does not hold, unintended vehicle movement could occur, which could result in a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will install a low-force spring clip retainer for vehicles equipped with a pbr parking brake system. On vehicles equipped with the trw parking brake system, dealers will install a redesigned parking brake cable assembly. The recall began on july 29, 2005. Owners may contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438 or gmc at 1-866-996-9463.
05V163000

SEAT BELTS:REAR/OTHER

1,359,824 vehicles 2005-04-22
Defect
On certain crew cab pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, the 2nd row center occupant seat belt routing may make it difficult to position the lap portion of the safety belt low around the hips of occupants, especially smaller occupants, seated in this position. Appropriate use of a child seat or booster seat, as recommended for small children, does improve the fit condition for this user group. In addition to instructions on proper infant and young child restraint (with child seats or boosters), special verbiage for restraining older child is included in the owner's…
Consequence
A lap portion of the seat belt routing that is not low and snug on the hips can allow the lap belt to ride up on an occupant's abdomen instead of fitting low around their hipbones, and therefore, can expose them to more risk of abdominal and internal organ injury.
Remedy
Dealers will cut open the guide loop, remove a portion of the loop, and then the remaining two sides should be folded over and secured with a retainer free of charge. The recall began on july 21, 2005. Owners may contact cadillac at 1-866-982-2339, chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438, gmc at 1-866-996-9463, or hummer at 1-800-732-5493.
05V043000

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

77,411 vehicles 2005-02-08
Defect
Certain trucks, sport utility vehicles, and vans equipped with bosch hydro-boost brake assemblies, the hydraulic brake booster pressure accumulator may crack and separate from the hydro-boost assembly during normal operating conditions.
Consequence
If a separation occurred and the hood of the vehicle were open, fragments from the accumulator could cause injury to people in the immediate area. The presence of this crack or fractured surface could allow the hydraulic fluid to leak from the accumulator circuit of the booster assembly. The loss of fluid would cause increased steering and braking effort and a crash may occur without prior warning.
Remedy
Dealers will test the hydro-boost assembly for functional operation of the two-function valve. If the hydro-boost assembly fails the test, dealers will replace the assembly free of charge. The recall began on march 23, 2005. Owners may contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438, gmc trucks at 1-866-996-9463 and hummer at 1-800-732-5493.
04V225000

SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE

736 vehicles 2004-05-11
Defect
Certain extended and regular cab pickup trucks and cargo vans converted to compressed natural gas (cng) fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 225, 'child restraint anchorage systems.' these vehicles have one seating position, the center rear seat, equipped with child restraint lower anchorages.
Consequence
The standard requires child seat lower anchorages in two seating positions for vehicles with three rear seating positions. The standard cab and cargo van vehicles, which only have front seating positions, have an air bag off switch to disable the front passenger air bag and do not have child restraint lower anchorages in the passenger seat. The standard requires passenger seat child seat lower anchorages in vehicles with an air bag off switch. However, the standard does not require vehicles with only front seating positions to have lower anchorage provisions if the…
Remedy
To bring the standard cab and cargo van vehicles into compliance, dealers will inject epoxy into the air bag off switch to prevent air bag activation, relocate the switch behind the instrument panel and then install a cover over the resulting opening. The sun visor label and owner's manual will also be changed. The correction for the extended cab vehicle will consist of changing the front passenger seat to a seat that has child restraint lower anchorages. The recall began on september 9, 2004. Owners should contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438 or gmc at 1-866-996-9463.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2004 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2004 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

How 2004 compares with the other years

High risk for a 2004 — 96th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.

Across the 21 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 66 and 2013 worst at 82, with 2004 itself at 71.

If the model year is negotiable, 1996, 1998 and 2008 score lower than 2004 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1999–2006 generation specifically, 1999 is the strongest year at 69 and 2006 the weakest at 77.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1999-2006 generation, 1999 Chevrolet Silverado scores best at 69 and 2006 Chevrolet Silverado worst at 77.

What the numbers say to check

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: cruise control failure from about 100, other visibility problem from about 575, airbag failed to deploy in a crash from about 1k and other powertrain problem from about 2k.

On a 2004 Chevrolet Silverado with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether cruise control failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.

What this page cannot tell you

723 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 723 reports, 600 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 83% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado?

The most-reported failures are instrument cluster or gauge failure (112 reports, median 50,000 miles), loss of braking (58 reports, median 80,000 miles) and other brake problem (58 reports, median 70,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2004 Chevrolet Silverado problems start?

Other visibility problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 1,500 miles and a quarter of reports before 600 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 45,000 miles.

Is the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado reliable?

It scores 71 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 96th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2004 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Chevrolet Silverado is best?

Within the 1999–2006 generation, 1999 scores best at 69 out of 100 and 2006 worst at 77. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed