2018 Toyota Rav4: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2018 Toyota Rav4
On the 2018 Toyota Rav4, the failure owners report most often is other electrical problem, and the reports cluster around 20,000 miles. The earliest to appear is sunroof failure or glass breakage, reported by a median of 5,000 miles. Overall it scores 72 out of 100, high risk for a 2018.
High risk for a 2018 — 178th riskiest of the 251 2018 vehicles we can rate. 443 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What owners report breaking
Owners have reported 51 named failure modes on the 2018 Toyota Rav4, and the three most-reported carry 31% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other electrical problem leads with 90 reports, about 0.3 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 5k to 50,000 miles.
Other engine problem follows with 25 reports, usually reported between 12k to 65,000 miles. 10 of those reports mention a fire.
Other brake problem follows with 24 reports, usually reported between 1k to 20,000 miles. 2 of those reports mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (120), adas (46) and engine (43).
When these failures get reported
194 of the reports on the 2018 Toyota Rav4 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 11,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 84% by 50,000 miles, 95% by 100,000 miles and 99% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 47% of the dated reports.
76% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, which is early enough that a fair number of these cars were still under a factory warranty when the owner complained.
In the order they tend to show up: sunroof failure or glass breakage around 6k, headlight failure or clouding around 7k, other brake problem around 8k and alternator or charging system failure around 9k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 51. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
What happens when these parts fail
Across the named modes, 45 mention a crash, 41 a fire and 15 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.75, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, other engine problem at $300–$4,000, other brake problem at $300–$1,800 and alternator or charging system failure at $450–$1,600. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
16% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 90 | 21 | 5k | 21k | 49k | 0.3 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 25 | 10 | 12k | 48k | 65k | 0.1 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 24 | 13 | 1k | 8k | 22k | 0.1 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 19 | 17 | 7k | 9k | 9k | 0.1 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 16 | 9 | 18k | 20k | 66k | 0.1 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 16 | 11 | 365 | 7k | 9k | 0.1 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 15 | 12 | 3k | 6k | 27k | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 15 | 8 | 8k | 14k | 45k | 0.0 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 13 | 9 | 500 | 10k | 35k | 0.0 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 11 | 6 | — | 12k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 10 | 3 | — | 61k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Lane keep or steering assist fault | adas | 9 | 7 | — | 16k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,600 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 9 | 4 | — | 8k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 9 | 5 | — | 10k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 8 | 6 | — | 16k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Other steering problem | steering | 8 | 2 | — | 94 | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 7 | 6 | — | 40k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Overheating | cooling | 7 | 1 | — | 18k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 7 | 6 | — | 11k | — | 0.0 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 7 | 3 | — | 8k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 5 | 1 | — | 20k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 4 | 2 | — | 128k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 4 | 1 | — | 400 | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Thermostat failure | cooling | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 3 | 3 | — | 160 | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 3 | 3 | — | 12k | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 3 | 1 | — | 10k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Windshield cracking | glass | 3 | 3 | — | 7k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 80k | — | 0.0 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 2 | 2 | — | 2k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Backup camera failure | infotainment | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Audio or connectivity failure | infotainment | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$900 | Low |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 2 | 1 | — | 65k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 2 | 2 | — | 17k | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 2 | 1 | — | 15k | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Oil leak | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Piston, ring or cylinder wall damage | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $3,000–$9,500 | Critical |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 72k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Tire pressure monitor failure | wheels | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $80–$600 | Low |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Unclassified problem | other | 54 | 12 | 13 | 4k | 17k | 0.2 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2018 Toyota Rav4 draws about 1.4 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 75th percentile of complaint rates among 2018 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 308,928 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2018 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other electrical problem
The vehicle was stationary in a driveway for approximately 2 hours. After pulling away from the house, dash panel indicators were showing malfunctions on brake systems, aws, etc. It showed that all computer systems were malfunctioning. I drove immediately to the dealer. Inspection showed that the wire harness on the vehicle had been chewed apart, off, and insulation had been removed. I investigated the internet on this problem and it seems that several vehicle makes and models were affected. It seems that the manufactures were using a food based ingredient in the insulation of the wires, (soy). This is attracting rodents, (squirrels) to this for food. It could happen anywhere, parked at the post office, grocery store, your friends house, etc. My vehicle only has 980 miles. I have never had this before. What would happen if the wires catch on fire or your car stops on the freeway because of this issue. Can this be investigated? At this point, what's going to keep this from happening again. We've had several toyota vehicles in the past and did not have any wire harness problems.
I am very disappointed. I bought a rav4 2018 in february of this year, it has only 1,900 miles and is already at the dealer after taking my kids to school I went back home and I usually do I activate the vehicle alarm but it did not work. The keys does not activate or dis-activate the vehicle alarm and when the car is on the tire pressure sign started to blink. The dealer staff said that one of the computer is not working right. At this moment they don't know what is going on and ironically is not time for the first payment yet.
Other brake problem
I was driving in a fast food drive through. It was a stop and go pace because there were around 5 cars before me and was traveling approx 3 MPH. I began to proceed but this time as I went to apply my brakes they went to the floor and I couldn't stop the car. In order to avoid the car in front of me I turned my wheel to the right and jumped the curb and hit a wall. The vehicle was 3 days old.
Tl* the contact owns a 2018 toyota rav4. While driving 35 MPH, the brake pedal was applied and made an abnormal grinding noise. There were no warning indicators illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer (haley toyota of richmond, 3600 lonas pkwy, midlothian, va 23112, (804) 545-7411) where it was diagnosed that an alignment was needed. The vehicle was repaired; however the failure recurred. The manufacturer was notified and provided case number: 1808171087, but no further assistance was provided. The failure mileage was 21,500.
Recalls on the 2018 model year
NHTSA has issued 3 recall campaigns covering the 2018 Toyota Rav4, affecting an estimated 309,088 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover electrical system:12v/24v/48v battery and equipment:other:labels. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY
1,853,568 vehicles 2023-11-01- Defect
- Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2013-2018 RAV4 vehicles. Certain replacement 12-volt batteries may not fit properly in the battery tray, allowing the battery to move and contact the hold-down bracket, possibly causing a short circuit.
- Consequence
- A battery short circuit increases the risk of a fire.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the battery clamp sub-assembly, battery tray, and positive terminal cover, free of charge. Owner letters were mailed December 27, 2024, to 2013-2014 RAV4 owners. Additional owner notification letters will be mailed in phases, phase 2 will begin on May 14, 2025, and phase 3 in late July 2025. Owners may contact Toyota's customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for this recall are 23TB13 and 23TA13.
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
1,325 vehicles 2019-06-28- Defect
- Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain 2017-2019 Toyota Camry, Corolla, Rav4, Sienna, and Yaris iA vehicles equipped with factory-installed floor mats. The load carrying capacity modification label may be incorrect. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 110, "Tire Selection and Rims."
- Consequence
- An incorrect label may lead to unintentionally overloading the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- SET will notify owners and provide a corrected label for placement over the inaccurate label, free of charge. The recall began August 23, 2019. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-270-9371. SET's number for this recall is SET19A.
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
649 vehicles 2017-12-20- Defect
- Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2017-2018 Toyota 4Runner and Tundra, 2018 Toyota Highlander, RAV4 and Lexus GX460 and 2017 Toyota Sienna and Tacoma vehicles. These vehicles may have incorrect load carrying capacity modification labels. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 110, "Tire Selection and Rims."
- Consequence
- An incorrect load information label can result in the operator overloading the vehicle and increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners and provide them with corrected labels, free of charge. The recall began on January 23, 2018. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for this recall are H0Z for Toyota vehicles, and HLF for Lexus vehicles.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2018 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
How 2018 compares with the other years
High risk for a 2018 — 178th riskiest of the 251 2018 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.
Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2001 comes out best at 63 and 2019 worst at 83, with 2018 itself at 72.
If the model year is negotiable, 2001, 2004, 2003, 1999, 2000, 2005, 1998, 2002, 2014 and 2016 score lower than 2018 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2013–2018 generation specifically, 2014 is the strongest year at 68 and 2018 the weakest at 72.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2013-2018 generation, 2014 Toyota Rav4 scores best at 68 and 2018 Toyota Rav4 worst at 72.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: headlight failure or clouding from about 365, other body or interior problem from about 500, other brake problem from about 1k and sunroof failure or glass breakage from about 3k.
On a 2018 Toyota Rav4 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether headlight failure or clouding has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
Where these figures stop being useful
443 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 443 reports, 194 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 44% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2018 Toyota Rav4?
The most-reported failures are other electrical problem (90 reports, median 20,000 miles), other engine problem (25 reports, median 50,000 miles) and other brake problem (24 reports, median 10,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2018 Toyota Rav4 problems start?
Sunroof failure or glass breakage is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 5,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 5,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 11,000 miles.
Is the 2018 Toyota Rav4 reliable?
It scores 72 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 178th riskiest of the 251 2018 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2018 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Toyota Rav4 is best?
Within the 2013–2018 generation, 2014 scores best at 68 out of 100 and 2018 worst at 72. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed