2011 Toyota Rav4: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2011 Toyota Rav4
On the 2011 Toyota Rav4, the failure owners report most often is other speed control problem, and the reports cluster around 22,500 miles. The earliest to appear is other powertrain problem, reported by a median of 5,000 miles. Overall it scores 74 out of 100, high risk for a 2011.
High risk for a 2011 — 68th riskiest of the 283 2011 vehicles we can rate. 403 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What owners report breaking
Owners have reported 48 named failure modes on the 2011 Toyota Rav4, and the three most-reported carry 34% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other speed control problem leads with 57 reports, about 0.5 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 10k to 52,500 miles.
Other visibility problem follows with 45 reports, usually reported between 38k to 80,000 miles.
Other brake problem follows with 35 reports, usually reported between 15k to 50,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into adas (66), brakes (57) and glass (47).
When these failures get reported
268 of the reports on the 2011 Toyota Rav4 came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 45,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 54% by 50,000 miles, 87% by 100,000 miles and 98% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 1 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 16% of the dated reports.
40% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, which is early enough that a fair number of these cars were still under a factory warranty when the owner complained.
In the order they tend to show up: other powertrain problem around 6k, other speed control problem around 23k, ABS module or sensor failure around 26k and other brake problem around 26k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 48. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 1 report came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 57 mention a crash, 8 a fire and 14 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.03, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other speed control problem at $250–$2,000, other visibility problem at $150–$1,400, other brake problem at $300–$1,800 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
17% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other speed control problem | adas | 57 | 52 | 10k | 23k | 52k | 0.5 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 45 | 11 | 38k | 60k | 80k | 0.4 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 35 | 31 | 15k | 26k | 51k | 0.3 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 27 | 21 | 43k | 51k | 83k | 0.2 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 15 | 4 | — | 63k | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 12 | 9 | 40k | 72k | 80k | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 11 | 9 | 1k | 6k | 31k | 0.1 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 11 | 4 | — | 54k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 11 | 4 | — | 9k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 11 | 6 | — | 55k | — | 0.1 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 9 | 9 | 67k | 119k | 119k | 0.1 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 8 | 8 | 69k | 77k | 98k | 0.1 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 8 | 8 | 26k | 26k | 117k | 0.1 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 8 | 7 | — | 8k | — | 0.1 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 7 | 7 | — | 40k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 7 | 7 | — | 23k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 5 | 3 | — | 54k | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 5 | 5 | — | 98k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 5 | 5 | — | 180k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 5 | 5 | — | 79k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 5 | 2 | — | 30k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 4 | 2 | — | 94k | — | 0.0 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 4 | 4 | — | 64k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 4 | 3 | — | 32k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 3 | 1 | — | 20k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 3 | 3 | — | 36k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 3 | 2 | — | 176k | — | 0.0 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Oil leak | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 66k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Overheating | cooling | 2 | 1 | — | 165 | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 44k | — | 0.0 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Tire pressure monitor failure | wheels | 2 | 2 | — | 50k | — | 0.0 | $80–$600 | Low |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 2 | 2 | — | 47k | — | 0.0 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 2 | 1 | — | 39k | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 67k | — | 0.0 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 117k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 50k | — | 0.0 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 76k | — | 0.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Lane keep or steering assist fault | adas | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,600 | High |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 90k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 1 | 1 | — | 71k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 1 | 1 | — | 50k | — | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 1 | 1 | — | 4k | — | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 44 | 18 | 15k | 21k | 67k | 0.4 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2011 Toyota Rav4 draws about 3.6 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 85th percentile of complaint rates among 2011 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 112,375 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2011 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other speed control problem
Tl*the contact owns a 2011 toyota rav4. The contact stated that whenever he applied the brakes, his foot made contact with the accelerator pedal, causing the vehicle to surge forward. The dealer referred the contact to the manufacturer who stated that the design coincided with NHTSA standards and offered no assistance. The contact filed a complaint with the manufacturer. The failure mileage was 3,500.
Tl*the contact owns a 2011 toyota rav4. While the vehicle was parked the contact shifted the vehicle into reverse. Slight pressure was applied to the accelerator pedal and the vehicle surged backwards until crashing. The vehicle was stopped and shifted into drive. Upon applying slight pressure to the accelerator pedal the vehicle surged forward until it crashed again. The vehicle was then shut off. A police report was not filed but the driver suffered injuries. The vehicle was towed to an independent repair shop where they were unable to diagnose the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and current mileages were 2,000.
Other visibility problem
When driving at temperatures below 32 degrees (freezing) the heating/cooling system does not work and the windshield and windows fog completely inside the vehicle. This creates an extremely dangerous visibility issue. The only way the vehicle can be driven in cold weather is if the defrost is on full blast with no heat on the feet. Even then, the rear windows are completely steamed up and the driver and front seat passenger windows are only partially clear. The vehicle has been in at least 7 times. If they have been unable to reproduce the problem they have been dismissive of the issue even though they have seen photos. When they have reproduced the problem they have not been able to identify a cause. *tr
Tl* the contact owns a 2011 toyota rav4. The contact stated that during rain weather conditions, the radio failed to function. The contact received notification of NHTSA campaign number: 15v577000 (visibility/wipes) and stated that the part needed for the repair was not available. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacture was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 40,000. Vin tool confirms parts not available. Updated 04/20/16*lj the consumer stated the seat belts in the rear, did not function properly and a recall had been issued due to them being unsafe. Updated 04/28/16. *jb
Other brake problem
Having just descended a hill, I tried to brake while approaching a sharp curve. The brakes were not responding, the vehicle was accelerating and the engine was revving. I put the transmission in neutral as I pulled over to the side of the road and shut the engine off.
Tl* the contact owns a 2011 toyota rav4. The contact was driving 50-55 MPH when the brakes were applied and the brake pedal felt loose, became stick. The vehicle was taken to three dealerships where a diagnostic was performed and all three dealers were unable to locate a failure code. The vehicle was also test driven but the failure was unable to be duplicated. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 4,991 and the current mileage was 8,613. ....updated 06/18/12 *bf the consumer stated the brakes were spongy and the bas did not engage the distance to stop vehicle.
Recalls on the 2011 model year
NHTSA has issued 11 recall campaigns covering the 2011 Toyota Rav4, affecting an estimated 488,120 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover suspension:rear, seats:front assembly:seat heater/cooler, seat belts:rear/other and visibility:power window devices and controls. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
SUSPENSION:REAR
337,449 vehicles 2016-08-12- Defect
- Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2006-2011 Toyota RAV4 vehicles manufactured October 31, 2005, to September 7, 2010, and 2010 Lexus HS250h vehicles manufactured July 6, 2009, to August 26, 2010. The affected vehicles have rear suspension arms (rear tie rods) with adjusting lock nuts that may have been improperly tightened after servicing. As a result of being loose, the arm may have thread damage and may rust, possibly leading to the failure of the arm and an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.
- Consequence
- Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners and dealers will replace both rear suspension arms and encapsulate the locknuts, free of charge. The recall began on September 30, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for this recall are G0V for Toyota vehicles and GLK for Lexus vehicles. Note: This recall supersedes recall 13V-383, in which some vehicles were only inspected, sealed, and did not have both arms replaced. The affected vehicles were previously recalled under 13V-383, but did not have both rear suspension arms replaced at that time…
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
7,749 vehicles 2016-06-02- Defect
- Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain 2005-2011 4Runner, Highlander, Sequoia, and Sienna, 2005-2010 Avalon and Tundra, 2006-2008 Camry Solara, 2006-2010 Highlander hybrid, 2006-2011 Rav4 and Tacoma, 2007-2010 FJ Cruiser, 2007-2011 Camry hybrid, 2009-2010 Venza, 2010-2012 Prius, 1988-1990 and 2005-2010 Camry, and 1989 and 2009-2010 Corolla vehicles equipped with aftermarket accessory seat heaters with a copper strand heating element. The electrical wiring in the seat heaters may be damaged when the seat cushion is compressed.
- Consequence
- If damaged, the copper strand heating element may short circuit, increasing the risk of a fire.
- Remedy
- SET will notify owners, and dealers will disconnect the seat heaters, free of charge, and refund the purchase price of the seat heater accessory. The recall began on July 14, 2016. Owners may contact SET customer service at 1-866-405-4226. SET number for this recall is SET16B.
SEAT BELTS:REAR/OTHER
1,123,752 vehicles 2016-02-19- Defect
- Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2006-2012 RAV4 vehicles manufactured July 28, 2005, to December 19, 2012, and 2012-2014 RAV4 EV vehicles manufactured July 24, 2012, to August 29, 2014. In the event of a frontal collision, the rear seat belts for the outboard seats may be cut by the seat cushion frame.
- Consequence
- A cut seat belt may not properly restrain the seat occupant, increasing their risk of injury in a crash.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will install a protector over both rear seat cushion frames, free of charge. The recall began on June 24, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's number for this recall is G0F.
VISIBILITY:POWER WINDOW DEVICES AND CONTROLS
1,814,284 vehicles 2015-10-22- Defect
- Toyota Motor Company (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2009-2011 Tundra, Sequoia, Corolla, Corolla Matrix and Scion xB, 2008-2011 Highlander and Highlander Hybrid, 2007 Camry and Camry Hybrid, 2009 Camry and Camry Hybrid, 2006-2011 RAV4, 2006-2010 Yaris, and 2009-2010 Scion xD and Pontiac Vibe vehicles. During the manufacturing of the Power Window Master Switch (PWMS), grease lubricant may have been inconsistently applied to the sliding electrical contacts.
- Consequence
- If the sliding electrical contacts are not protected by lubricant, debris and moisture that get into the switch may cause a short circuit and the switch assembly may overheat and melt, increasing the risk of a fire.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the switch, applying a lubricant if no abnormality is found. If abnormality is found, the PWMS circuit board will be replaced, free of charge. The recall is expected to begin December 20, 2015. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's number for this recall is C0M.
VISIBILITY/WIPER
423,456 vehicles 2015-09-18- Defect
- Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2009-2012 RAV4 vehicles manufactured October 27, 2008, to December 19, 2012 and 2012-2014 RAV4 EV vehicles manufactured July 24, 2012, to August 29, 2014. In the affected vehicles, water may drip onto the joint that connects the wiper linkage to the wiper motor.
- Consequence
- Over time, the dripping water may cause corrosion and wear at the joint, potentially resulting in the separation of the wiper linkage. Once this occurs, the wipers would not function, reducing driver visibility and increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will replace the water diverter channel. In addition, a new wiper linkage with a wiper motor crank arm will be installed. The wiper linkage will have a protective cover over the wiper linkage joint to minimize water splash and a retainer ring to prevent the wiper arm from separating from the wiper motor. The recall began on November 7, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota's customer service number at 1-800-331-4331.
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
3,233 vehicles 2014-11-19- Defect
- Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain model year 2010-2011 Prius and Corolla, 2009-2011 Venza, 2006-2010 Avalon, 2007-2010 FJ Cruiser, 2005-2011 Sienna and Sequoia, 2006-2011 Tacoma 4x2 and 4x4, Camry, Highlander, Tundra 4x2 and 4x4, and 2007-2011 Rav4 and 4Runner. The affected vehicles may experience compression of the seat cushion which may damage the seat heater wiring.
- Consequence
- Damage to the seat heater wiring could cause the wires to short, increasing the risk of the seat burning and causing personal injury to the occupant.
- Remedy
- SET will notify owners, and dealers will disconnect the heaters with copper strand heating elements and refund the purchase price of the seat heater accessory, free of charge. The recall is expected to began in January 2015. Owners may contact SET customer service at 1-866-405-4226.
SUSPENSION:REAR
780,584 vehicles 2013-08-28- Defect
- Toyota is recalling certain model year 2006 through 2011 RAV4 and 2010 Lexus HS250h passenger vehicles manufactured from October 2005 through September 2010. If the nuts for adjusting the rear wheel alignment are improperly tightened during service, the rear suspension arm (rear tie rod) may develop unwanted movement and rust leading to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the rear tie rod will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.
- Consequence
- Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the tie rods and replace any that have rust or corrosion on the alignment adjustment threads. All of the rear tie rods will then be encased in an epoxy to prevent future environmental damage. Due to limitations in parts, the recall remedy will be launched in phases from September 2013 through mid-April 2014. All owners will receive notification of the recall, with most receiving second notifications when parts are available in their area. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes Toyota and Lexus recall 12V-373. All vehicles…
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
7,525 vehicles 2013-04-09- Defect
- Southeast Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 and 2010-2013 Toyota Tundra, 2010-2012 Rav4, 2012 Toyota Sequoia, 2010-2011 Toyota Corolla, 2010-2011 Toyota Camry and Camry Hybrid, 2010-2013 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid, 2010-2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser, 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser, 2010-2013 Toyota Venza, 2010-2011 Toyota 4Runner, 2010-2013 Toyota Tacoma, 2011-2012 Toyota Sienna, 2012 Toyota Prius, 2013 Scion FR-S, 2011 Scion XD, 2011 Scion XB, and 2012 Scion TC vehicles. These vehicles were sold with labels that were outside the allowable one percent of…
- Consequence
- An inaccurate label could lead to owners overloading their vehicles and tires. An overloaded vehicle can result in a tire failure which may result in a vehicle crash, personal injury, or property damage.
- Remedy
- Southeast Toyota will notify owners and provide a corrected label with instructions concerning its installation. A small group of the affected vehicles will need additonal remedies which are still being developed. The recall began on May 28, 2013. Owners may contact Southeast Toyota at 1-800-301-6859.
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:SENSOR/CONTROL MODULE-INACTIVE
3,235 vehicles 2013-01-16- Defect
- Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain models interspersed through model years 2009 through 2013 as follows: model year 2009-2012 Tacoma, 4Runner, Camry, Camry Hybrid, Prius, and RAV4; model year 2009-2010 Avalon, FJ Cruiser, and Highlander Hybrid; model year 2010-2013 model year Corolla, Sienna and Tundra; model year 2009-2013 Highlander and Venza; model year 2012 Prius V; and model year 2010-2012 Sequoia. During modification by SET to include accessories such as leather seat covers, seat heaters or headrest DVD systems, these vehicles may not have…
- Consequence
- If the front passenger seat occupant sensing system is out of calibration, the front passenger airbags may not deploy or they may deploy inappropriately for the passenger's size and position. This could increase the risk of personal injury during the event of a vehicle crash necessitating airbag deployment.
- Remedy
- Southeast Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will test the sensitivity of the occupant detection sensors, and recalibrate them as necessary. The recall began on March 21, 2013. Owners may contact Southeast Toyota at 1-800-301-6859.
SUSPENSION:REAR
780,584 vehicles 2012-08-02- Defect
- Toyota is recalling certain model year 2006 through 2011 RAV4 and 2010 Lexus HS250h passenger vehicles manufactured from October 2005 through September 2010. If the nuts for adjusting the rear wheel alignment are improperly tightened during service, the rear suspension arm (rear tie rod) may develop unwanted movement and rust, leading to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the rear tie rod will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.
- Consequence
- Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the rear tie-rod nut for looseness and replace any suspect tie-rod found loose. Dealers will also affix instructions in multiple places to prevent improper servicing in the future. The recall began on November 30, 2012. Owners may contact Toyota at 1-800-331-4331 or Lexus at 1-800-255-3987.
AIR BAGS:SIDE/WINDOW
427 vehicles 2012-02-01- Defect
- Toyota is recalling certain model year 2011 rav4 vehicles, manufactured from november 24, 2011, through december 19, 2011. In the curtain shield airbags, propellant with the incorrect specification was used for the initiator assembled in the airbag inflator. In this condition, the inflator may not perform properly, causing one or both curtain shield airbags to not deploy.
- Consequence
- In the event of a crash, the airbags may not deploy and will not be able to properly protect an occupant, increasing the risk of injuries.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will check the vehicle identification number to identify the curtain shield assemblies and replace the assemblies as necessary with new ones free of charge. The safety recall began on march 8, 2012. Owners may contact toyota at 1-800-331-4331.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2011 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
How 2011 compares with the other years
High risk for a 2011 — 68th riskiest of the 283 2011 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.
Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2001 comes out best at 63 and 2019 worst at 83, with 2011 itself at 74.
If the model year is negotiable, 2001, 2004, 2003, 1999, 2000, 2005, 1998, 2002, 2014, 2016, 2015, 2013 and 2017 score lower than 2011 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2006–2012 generation specifically, 2006 is the strongest year at 72 and 2009 the weakest at 77.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2006-2012 generation, 2006 Toyota Rav4 scores best at 72 and 2009 Toyota Rav4 worst at 77.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other powertrain problem from about 1k, other speed control problem from about 10k, other brake problem from about 15k and ABS module or sensor failure from about 26k.
On a 2011 Toyota Rav4 with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other powertrain problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
The limits of complaint data
403 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 403 reports, 268 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 67% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2011 Toyota Rav4?
The most-reported failures are other speed control problem (57 reports, median 22,500 miles), other visibility problem (45 reports, median 60,000 miles) and other brake problem (35 reports, median 25,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2011 Toyota Rav4 problems start?
Other powertrain problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 5,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 1,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 45,000 miles.
Is the 2011 Toyota Rav4 reliable?
It scores 74 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 68th riskiest of the 283 2011 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2011 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Toyota Rav4 is best?
Within the 2006–2012 generation, 2006 scores best at 72 out of 100 and 2009 worst at 77. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed