AtWhatMileage
Model year report

1999 Toyota Corolla: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 1999 Toyota Corolla

On the 1999 Toyota Corolla, the failure owners report most often is other body or interior problem, with 21 reports on file. Across every failure mode on this year, half the dated reports were filed before 70,000 miles. Overall it scores 74 out of 100, high risk for a 1999.

High risk for a 1999 — 27th riskiest of the 303 1999 vehicles we can rate. 188 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

The failures owners actually file about

Owners have reported 42 named failure modes on the 1999 Toyota Corolla, and the three most-reported carry 29% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Other body or interior problem leads with 21 reports and about 121 per 1,000 vehicles.

Other wheel or tire problem follows with 18 reports, median 60,000 miles.

Other engine problem follows with 15 reports, median 60,000 miles. 3 of those reports mention a fire.

By system, the reports fall mostly into wheels (24), body (23) and engine (20).

The mileage the reports cluster at

64 of the reports on the 1999 Toyota Corolla came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 70,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 31% by 50,000 miles, 75% by 100,000 miles and 95% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 2 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 70,000 and 80,000 miles, which alone holds 16% of the dated reports.

16% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

Median
  1. Other body or interior problem 56k
  2. Other wheel or tire problem 61k
  3. Other engine problem 62k
  4. Seat belt or retractor failure 37k
  5. Other speed control problem 55k
  6. Other fuel system problem 42k
  7. Other suspension problem 80k
  8. Other visibility problem 82k
  9. Airbag failed to deploy in a crash 195k
  10. Tire blowout or tread separation 60k
  11. Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure 119k
  12. Tail light, brake light or signal failure
    no odometer readings given
    —

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 42. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 70k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 2 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

Severity, and what it costs

Across the named modes, 22 mention a crash, 5 a fire and 17 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.53, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000, other wheel or tire problem at $200–$1,500, other engine problem at $300–$4,000 and seat belt or retractor failure at $200–$900. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

15% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Other body or interior problem body 21 6 — 56k — 121.4 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 18 3 — 61k — 104.0 $200–$1,500 High
Other engine problem engine 15 5 — 62k — 86.7 $300–$4,000 High
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 11 5 — 37k — 63.6 $200–$900 High
Other speed control problem adas 11 4 — 55k — 63.6 $250–$2,000 Critical
Other fuel system problem fuel 7 2 — 42k — 40.5 $300–$2,200 High
Other suspension problem suspension 7 2 — 80k — 40.5 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Other visibility problem glass 7 3 — 82k — 40.5 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 6 2 — 195k — 34.7 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 6 4 — 60k — 34.7 $200–$1,500 Critical
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 5 5 — 119k — 28.9 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Tail light, brake light or signal failure lighting 5 0 — — — 28.9 $100–$900 Moderate
Other powertrain problem transmission 5 3 — 67k — 28.9 $400–$4,500 High
Other electrical problem electrical 4 2 — 35k — 23.1 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Other steering problem steering 4 1 — 70k — 23.1 $350–$2,400 High
Cruise control failure adas 3 0 — — — 17.3 $200–$1,400 High
Other brake problem brakes 3 0 — — — 17.3 $300–$1,800 High
Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure engine 2 1 — 64k — 11.6 $1,200–$4,500 Critical
Excessive oil consumption engine 2 2 — 98k — 11.6 $900–$6,500 High
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 2 0 — — — 11.6 $700–$3,000 High
Loss of braking brakes 2 0 — — — 11.6 $400–$3,000 Critical
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 2 0 — — — 11.6 $500–$2,400 High
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 2 0 — — — 11.6 $300–$1,600 High
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 2 1 — 37k — 11.6 $700–$2,600 High
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 2 0 — — — 11.6 $400–$2,200 High
Headlight failure or clouding lighting 2 1 — 130k — 11.6 $150–$1,800 Moderate
Other lighting problem lighting 2 0 — — — 11.6 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Engine bay fire engine 1 1 — 135k — 5.8 $4,000–$20,000 Critical
Overheating cooling 1 1 — 164k — 5.8 $400–$3,500 High
Complete transmission failure transmission 1 1 — 500 — 5.8 $2,800–$8,000 Critical
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 1 1 — 135k — 5.8 $450–$2,200 High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 1 1 — 65k — 5.8 $250–$1,600 Critical
Parking brake failure brakes 1 1 — 50 — 5.8 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Airbag deployed without a crash airbag 1 0 — — — 5.8 $2,500–$8,000 Critical
Loss of power steering steering 1 1 — 49k — 5.8 $600–$2,800 Critical
Power steering pump or fluid leak steering 1 0 — — — 5.8 $350–$1,600 Moderate
Strut, shock or spring failure suspension 1 0 — — — 5.8 $500–$2,000 Moderate
Rust or structural corrosion body 1 1 — 80k — 5.8 $500–$6,000 High
Window regulator or power window failure body 1 1 — 3k — 5.8 $250–$900 Moderate
DPF, EGR or DEF system failure emissions 1 0 — — — 5.8 $800–$5,000 High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 1 0 — — — 5.8 $250–$2,000 High
Wiper or washer failure glass 1 0 — — — 5.8 $120–$800 Moderate
Unclassified problem other 15 3 — 89k — 86.7 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 1999 Toyota Corolla draws about 1,087 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 99th percentile of complaint rates among 1999 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 173 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 1999 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Other body or interior problem

Whenever weather becomes too cold and wet, driver's side door will not stay shut because of a pin inside the door. I was told by toyota customer service representative (john ledford) who says that he contacted regional service manager (chris tenebhn) and that they told him it is being caused from moisture getting inside the door and that all they offer is to lubricate it more (which they have already done) to try and keep it from freezing again. I have had to drive in bad weather on I-70 to get to work while holding the door shut 4 times this winter alone. I have left messages for the service manager (dennis young) at the lee's summit missouri toyota where I take my car in for service but have not heard back from him.*ak

70,000 miles NHTSA complaint 452193 filed 2004-01-28

Driver and passenger side windows malfunctioned and the door handle sheared off. Consumer took vehicle to dealer for inspection, and the mechanic informed the consumer that this vehicle was not covered under a recall due to vehicle identification number. *ak *jb

52,000 miles NHTSA complaint 462276 filed 2004-03-23

Other wheel or tire problem

Tl*the contact owns a 1999 toyota corolla. The vehicle has cooper tires, size p175/65/r14. While driving 60 MPH, the contact suddenly heard a noise coming from the rear passenger side of the vehicle. She exited the highway and noticed that the rear passenger side tire was completely flat and destroyed. The tires had been on the vehicle for less than a year. The contact returned to the place where the tires were bought and the tires were replaced with the same brand. Within a year, the failure recurred. She believed that the performance of the tires was unacceptable and that a recall should be issued. The DOT number was unknown. The failure mileage was 61,000 and current mileage was 64,000. Updated 07/01/09 *bf updated 07/02/09.*jb

61,000 miles NHTSA complaint 722083 filed 2009-06-01

(1) noticeable strong vibration in steering wheel when car approaches speed of 65-70 MPH. Vibration becomes stronger with increasing speed. The problem was noticed after car had been service at toyota dealer (armstrong toyota).*ak (2) car becomes unstable and difficult to control (3) returned to same dealer. Dealer stated that the problem was tire balacing. Upon checking the car, dealer informed me that tires would not "take" balancing and that the problem was tire pressure. Tire pressure was adjusted, but problem persists.

89,000 miles NHTSA complaint 480229 filed 2004-06-16

Other engine problem

Upon seeing the "check engine" light on I took my 1999 toyota corolla (50,200 miles) to a local toyota dealership for diagnostics. The report indicated that the charcoal canister needed to be replaced. The repair costs are almost $500 with labor. This part is not under warranty past 3 years and 30000 miles. Although this is not a safety issue, it is an environmental and fuel efficiency concern and I think that the company should include it in its extended warranty. I am trying to shop around for a cheaper estimate. I have performed all the recommended maintainence schedules and am concerned that this was not addressed during routine maintainence.*ak

50,200 miles NHTSA complaint 477782 filed 2004-06-01

Purchased my car used on 2002. The car never had any problems until in january 2004, the charcoal canister needed to be replaced. This was at the same time the A/C system needing to be replaced. The A/C system was covered under an extended warranty, however the emission problems were not. I have had problems with the check engine light continually going on and off since this has been replaced. I have taken it back to be checked, the mechanic tells me there is nothing wrong with my car. However, the light continues to arise. The light stayed off for approximately 2-3 months and has now started its on and off again show. The research I have begun has opened my eyes to a whole new world of charcoal canisters being replaced as fast as people change underwear. This replacement cost about $467-/ with labor. As far as I can tell this is the going rate for this job. I am upset to see so many people in the same 'canister' as I and toyota, with whom I love their cars, are not making any adjustments nor standing up to the plate to assist their consumers. I work in a consumer protection agency and know personally how people and businesses…

80,500 miles NHTSA complaint 482637 filed 2004-07-02

Recalls on the 1999 model year

NHTSA has issued 4 recall campaigns covering the 1999 Toyota Corolla, affecting an estimated 259 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover exterior lighting and exterior lighting:headlights. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

09E012000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07
Defect
Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
08E050000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11
Defect
K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence
Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
06E065000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

3,593 vehicles 2006-07-17
Defect
Certain aj motorsport combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Aj motorsport will notify owners and offer reimbursement for the lamps. The recall began on july 31, 2006. Owners may contact aj motorsport at 626-618-2026.
06E026000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

61,944 vehicles 2006-03-23
Defect
Certain pro-a motors corner lamps, turn signals, and headlights sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
Remedy
Pro-a motors will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began on april 3, 2006. Owners may contact pro-a motors at 323-838-2988.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 1999 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 1999 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

Better and worse years of the same car

High risk for a 1999 — 27th riskiest of the 303 1999 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.

Across the 31 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1997 comes out best at 62 and 2010 worst at 82, with 1999 itself at 74.

If the model year is negotiable, 1997, 2025, 2004, 2022 and 2005 score lower than 1999 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1996–2002 generation specifically, 1997 is the strongest year at 62 and 2002 the weakest at 76.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1996-2002 generation, 1997 Toyota Corolla scores best at 62 and 2002 Toyota Corolla worst at 76.

Where these figures stop being useful

188 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 188 reports, 64 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 34% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 1999 Toyota Corolla?

The most-reported failures are other body or interior problem (21 reports, median 55,000 miles), other wheel or tire problem (18 reports, median 60,000 miles) and other engine problem (15 reports, median 60,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

Is the 1999 Toyota Corolla reliable?

It scores 74 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 27th riskiest of the 303 1999 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 1999 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Toyota Corolla is best?

Within the 1996–2002 generation, 1997 scores best at 62 out of 100 and 2002 worst at 76. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed