AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2006 Toyota 4RUNNER: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER

On the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER, the failure owners report most often is rust or structural corrosion, and the reports cluster around 120,000 miles. The earliest to appear is exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin, reported by a median of 1,200 miles. Overall it scores 67 out of 100, high risk for a 2006.

High risk for a 2006 — 232nd riskiest of the 343 2006 vehicles we can rate. 520 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

What breaks on the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER

Owners have reported 51 named failure modes on the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER, and the three most-reported carry 37% of everything filed.

Rust or structural corrosion leads with 78 reports, about 0.9 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 88k to 152,500 miles.

Other body or interior problem follows with 76 reports, usually reported between 89k to 160,000 miles.

Other suspension problem follows with 39 reports, usually reported between 83k to 152,500 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into body (161), suspension (67) and brakes (37).

At what mileage it happens

377 of the reports on the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 102,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 28% by 50,000 miles, 47% by 100,000 miles and 78% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 13 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 14% of the dated reports.

23% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

In the order they tend to show up: exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin around 1k, other wheel or tire problem around 24k, other steering problem around 30k and other powertrain problem around 35k.

Median
  1. Rust or structural corrosion 120k
  2. Other body or interior problem 128k
  3. Other suspension problem 123k
  4. Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure 131k
  5. Other powertrain problem 35k
  6. Other visibility problem 133k
  7. Other steering problem 30k
  8. Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin 1k
  9. Other brake problem 71k
  10. Other wheel or tire problem 24k
  11. Other speed control problem 59k
  12. Other electrical problem 127k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 51. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 102k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 13 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

How bad it is when it goes

Across the named modes, 28 mention a crash, 3 a fire and 30 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.21, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: rust or structural corrosion at $500–$6,000, other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000, other suspension problem at $350–$2,000 and control arm, ball joint or bushing failure at $400–$2,200. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

10% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Rust or structural corrosion body 78 47 88k 120k 152k 0.9 $500–$6,000 High
Other body or interior problem body 76 52 89k 128k 160k 0.9 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Other suspension problem suspension 39 27 83k 123k 152k 0.5 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 26 21 120k 131k 160k 0.3 $400–$2,200 High
Other powertrain problem transmission 20 18 12k 35k 93k 0.2 $400–$4,500 High
Other visibility problem glass 18 12 40k 133k 164k 0.2 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Other steering problem steering 15 13 9k 30k 85k 0.2 $350–$2,400 High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 13 13 1k 1k 1k 0.2 $250–$2,000 High
Other brake problem brakes 13 10 37k 71k 106k 0.2 $300–$1,800 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 12 10 15k 24k 44k 0.1 $200–$1,500 High
Other speed control problem adas 12 9 46k 59k 76k 0.1 $250–$2,000 Critical
Other electrical problem electrical 10 10 107k 127k 150k 0.1 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 9 3 — 50k — 0.1 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Other engine problem engine 8 6 — 53k — 0.1 $300–$4,000 High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 7 6 — 135k — 0.1 $250–$1,600 Critical
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 7 7 — 129k — 0.1 $300–$1,600 High
Overheating cooling 6 6 — 66k — 0.1 $400–$3,500 High
Differential or transfer case failure drivetrain 6 4 — 169k — 0.1 $900–$4,200 High
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 6 6 — 1k — 0.1 $500–$2,400 High
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 6 4 — 129k — 0.1 $200–$900 High
Cruise control failure adas 5 5 — 29k — 0.1 $200–$1,400 High
Steering column or shaft failure steering 5 4 — 61k — 0.1 $600–$2,500 Critical
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 5 5 — 127k — 0.1 $200–$1,500 Critical
Catalytic converter failure emissions 5 3 — 19k — 0.1 $900–$3,500 Moderate
Head gasket failure engine 4 4 — 124k — 0.0 $1,400–$4,000 Critical
Loss of braking brakes 4 4 — 109k — 0.0 $400–$3,000 Critical
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 4 4 — 70k — 0.0 $700–$2,600 High
Oil leak engine 3 3 — 58k — 0.0 $250–$2,200 Moderate
Master cylinder or brake booster failure brakes 3 2 — 52k — 0.0 $450–$2,200 Critical
Parking brake failure brakes 3 3 — 7k — 0.0 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure body 3 3 — 5k — 0.0 $250–$1,500 Moderate
Other driver assistance problem adas 3 2 — 89k — 0.0 $250–$1,800 High
Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure engine 2 1 — 197k — 0.0 $1,200–$4,500 Critical
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 2 2 — 66k — 0.0 $450–$2,200 High
Fuel pump failure fuel 2 2 — 59k — 0.0 $600–$2,600 High
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 2 2 — 4k — 0.0 $700–$3,000 High
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 2 2 — 13k — 0.0 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Airbag inflator rupture airbag 2 0 — — — 0.0 $0–$0 Critical
Strut, shock or spring failure suspension 2 2 — 139k — 0.0 $500–$2,000 Moderate
Paint peeling or clear coat failure body 2 0 — — — 0.0 $600–$6,000 Low
Sunroof failure or glass breakage body 2 0 — — — 0.0 $700–$4,500 High
Engine bay fire engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $4,000–$20,000 Critical
Radiator or coolant leak cooling 1 1 — 186k — 0.0 $350–$1,900 High
Complete transmission failure transmission 1 1 — 124k — 0.0 $2,800–$8,000 Critical
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 1 1 — 118k — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 1 1 — 110k — 0.0 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Lane keep or steering assist fault adas 1 0 — — — 0.0 $200–$1,600 High
Wheel, stud or lug nut failure wheels 1 1 — 10k — 0.0 $150–$1,500 Critical
Headlight failure or clouding lighting 1 0 — — — 0.0 $150–$1,800 Moderate
Other fuel system problem fuel 1 0 — — — 0.0 $300–$2,200 High
Other seat belt problem airbag 1 0 — — — 0.0 $200–$900 High
Unclassified problem other 58 35 93k 131k 155k 0.7 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER draws about 6.1 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 84th percentile of complaint rates among 2006 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 85,202 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2006 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Rust or structural corrosion

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota 4runner. The contact stated that vehicle was taken for inspection where the mechanic informed the contact that there was a significant amount of corrosion and rust on the majority of the frame. There were also two areas where the frame had been previously welded and exhibited holes. The mechanic advised the contact that the defect was as significant safety concern. The manufacturer was not notified of the issue. The current and failure mileage was 58,000.

58,000 miles NHTSA complaint 923895 filed 2012-06-20

The front drivers side of the main frame under the vehicle broke due to excessive rust on the frame. As far as I know toyota has a large recall now on rav 4s and lexus vehicles due to excessive frame rust but there is no current recall on 4 runners. I would like to add my concern in hopes of leading to a recall on 4 runners built during similar time period. According to toyota they say this is an ongoing problem they are trying to address. But they have failed to recall the products that are dangerous. When the frame breaks, this is a deadly situation while driving. Toyota offered me no form of reimbursement when I reported the problem to their corporate office(toyota case #[xxx]) filed with toyota over phone on 9-25-14. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). *tr

105,000 miles NHTSA complaint 1114045 filed 2014-09-26

Other body or interior problem

I have a 2006 toyota 4runner. My drivers seat clicks and shifts each time I accelerate or turn, whether its left or right. I have taken it to a toyota dealership to be fixed, however when they returned it to me, it continued to do the same. It is very annoying and frustrating. I did a search on the internet for "seat clicks, toyota 4runner" and pulled up multiple forums of toyota owners who are experiencing the same thing. It seems that this problem is occurring in older models, as well. I understand toyota is beginning to "slow" their manufacturing process down to ensure higher quality than what they have been making over the past couple of years. I have never seen the 4runner mentioned as a vehicle with defaults, but it definitely need to be made public. *jb

3,000 miles NHTSA complaint 593914 filed 2006-08-25

Dt*: the contact stated while driving 60 MPH on normal road conditions, the surf board strapped to the luggage rack flew off. The contact noticed the rear cross bar detached from the rack side rails. No warning signals were observed. The dealership and the manufacturer did not accept responsibility because the front cross bar moved towards the rear hitting the rear cross bar forcing its detachment. The cross bars were adjusted to the side bars by thumb screws. The contact expressed concern because the board could hit another vehicle with fatal consequences. The contact was also convinced the thumb screws were not safe to strap any load on the luggage rack.

3,500 miles NHTSA complaint 599794 filed 2006-10-16

Other suspension problem

I have a steering problem on my 2006 toyota 4runner v8 sport model, 9191 miles. While driving at highway speeds, the vehicle wants to veer from side to side and is difficult to keep in the proper lane. The dealership and toyota district rep have inspected the vehicle and suggest that this is "normal" behavior for the vehicle and no repair is necessary. I feel that this is a dangerous problem and should be corrected. *jb

9,191 miles NHTSA complaint 588785 filed 2006-07-17

Dt*: the contact stated while driving 30 MPH, the entire vehicle shook. The dealership inspected the vehicle three separate times. On one occasion, the tires were checked and balanced. The vehicle drove better for a short while, but the shaking persisted.

4,000 miles NHTSA complaint 596312 filed 2006-09-15

Recalls on the 2006 model year

NHTSA has issued 5 recall campaigns covering the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER, affecting an estimated 107,742 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover seats:front assembly:seat heater/cooler, air bags:side/window, vehicle speed control:accelerator pedal and equipment:other:labels. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

16V396000

SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER

7,749 vehicles 2016-06-02
Defect
Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain 2005-2011 4Runner, Highlander, Sequoia, and Sienna, 2005-2010 Avalon and Tundra, 2006-2008 Camry Solara, 2006-2010 Highlander hybrid, 2006-2011 Rav4 and Tacoma, 2007-2010 FJ Cruiser, 2007-2011 Camry hybrid, 2009-2010 Venza, 2010-2012 Prius, 1988-1990 and 2005-2010 Camry, and 1989 and 2009-2010 Corolla vehicles equipped with aftermarket accessory seat heaters with a copper strand heating element. The electrical wiring in the seat heaters may be damaged when the seat cushion is compressed.
Consequence
If damaged, the copper strand heating element may short circuit, increasing the risk of a fire.
Remedy
SET will notify owners, and dealers will disconnect the seat heaters, free of charge, and refund the purchase price of the seat heater accessory. The recall began on July 14, 2016. Owners may contact SET customer service at 1-866-405-4226. SET number for this recall is SET16B.
16V065000

AIR BAGS:SIDE/WINDOW

320,409 vehicles 2016-02-05
Defect
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2003-2006 Toyota Land Cruiser and Lexus LX470, 2005-2006 Toyota Tundra and Sequoia, 2004-2006 Toyota 4Runner and Lexus GX470 vehicles equipped with side curtain-shield-air bags. The affected vehicles have an air bag control module that may be improperly programmed, causing the side curtain-shield-air bags to deploy inadvertently.
Consequence
If the side curtain-shield-air bags deploy unexpectedly, it can increase the risk of occupant injury.
Remedy
Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will replace the air bag control module with one that has improved programming, free of charge. The recall began on December 1, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-271-9371. Toyota's number for this recall is G0C and GLB.
11V113000

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL

1,363,244 vehicles 2011-02-24
Defect
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 through 2011 lexus lx570, 2003 through 2009 toyota 4runner, and 2006 through 2010 rav4 vehicles. The accelerator pedal can get stuck in the wide open position due to its being trapped by an unsecured or incompatible driver's floor mat.
Consequence
A stuck open accelerator pedal may result in very high vehicle speeds and make it difficult to stop the vehicle, which could cause a crash, serious injury or death.
Remedy
The remedy is now available. The safety recall began early april 2011. The remedy will involve modification or replacement of the accelerator pedal and replacement of any toyota all-weather floor mat. Owners may contact toyota at 1-800-331-4331 or lexus at 1-800-255-3987.
10V036000

EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS

153,418 vehicles 2010-02-03
Defect
Southeast toyota is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 passenger vehicles for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 110, "tire selection and rims." these vehicles were sold without the requisite load carrying capacity modification labels.
Consequence
A driver may overload a vehicle which may increase the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will mail to consumers the corrected label or the customer will have the option for dealers to install the label free of charge. The safety recall began on may 27, 2010. Owners may contact southeast toyota at 1-800-301-6859.
10V035000

EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS

271,417 vehicles 2010-02-03
Defect
Gulf states toyota is recalling certain model year 2005-2010 vehicles for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 110, "tire selection and rims." these vehicles were sold between september 1, 2005 and june 2, 2008 without the requisite load carrying capacity modification labels.
Consequence
This does not meet the standard requirements.
Remedy
Dealers will mail to consumers the corrected label or the customer will have the option for dealers to install the label free of charge. Dealers will also correct the owner's manual. The safety recall began on may 27, 2010. Owners may contact gulf states toyota at 713-580-3300.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2006 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2006 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

Where 2006 sits in the model line

High risk for a 2006 — 232nd riskiest of the 343 2006 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.

Across the 29 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 52 and 2021 worst at 84, with 2006 itself at 67.

If the model year is negotiable, 1996, 1998, 2001, 1997, 2002, 2004, 2003, 2005 and 2025 score lower than 2006 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1999–2006 generation specifically, 2001 is the strongest year at 58 and 2006 the weakest at 67.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1999-2006 generation, 2001 Toyota 4RUNNER scores best at 58 and 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER worst at 67.

What to look at before buying one

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin from about 1k, other steering problem from about 9k, other powertrain problem from about 12k and other wheel or tire problem from about 15k.

On a 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.

Where these figures stop being useful

520 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 520 reports, 377 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 73% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER?

The most-reported failures are rust or structural corrosion (78 reports, median 120,000 miles), other body or interior problem (76 reports, median 127,500 miles) and other suspension problem (39 reports, median 122,500 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER problems start?

Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 1,200 miles and a quarter of reports before 1,200 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 102,000 miles.

Is the 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER reliable?

It scores 67 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 232nd riskiest of the 343 2006 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2006 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Toyota 4RUNNER is best?

Within the 1999–2006 generation, 2001 scores best at 58 out of 100 and 2006 worst at 67. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed