AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2005 Toyota 4RUNNER: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER

On the 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER, the failure owners report most often is other body or interior problem, and the reports cluster around 130,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other speed control problem, reported by a median of 50,000 miles. Overall it scores 62 out of 100, high risk for a 2005.

High risk for a 2005 — 275th riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. 553 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

The failures owners actually file about

Owners have reported 49 named failure modes on the 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER, and the three most-reported carry 41% of everything filed.

Other body or interior problem leads with 107 reports, about 1.3 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 85k to 165,000 miles.

Rust or structural corrosion follows with 82 reports, usually reported between 89k to 162,500 miles.

Other suspension problem follows with 38 reports, usually reported between 82k to 175,000 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into body (192), suspension (73) and adas (27).

When these failures get reported

385 of the reports on the 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 113,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 15% by 50,000 miles, 40% by 100,000 miles and 65% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 32 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 150,000 and 160,000 miles, which alone holds 8% of the dated reports.

9% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, so this is mostly a story about older, higher-mileage cars.

In the order they tend to show up: other speed control problem around 49k, other wheel or tire problem around 56k, other brake problem around 84k and other powertrain problem around 102k.

Median
  1. Other body or interior problem 129k
  2. Rust or structural corrosion 140k
  3. Other suspension problem 154k
  4. Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure 130k
  5. Other visibility problem 166k
  6. Other speed control problem 49k
  7. Other brake problem 84k
  8. Radiator or coolant leak 150k
  9. Other engine problem 106k
  10. Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure 84k
  11. Other powertrain problem 102k
  12. Other steering problem 90k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 49. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 113k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 32 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

Severity, and what it costs

Across the named modes, 19 mention a crash, 3 a fire and 10 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 3.76, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000, rust or structural corrosion at $500–$6,000, other suspension problem at $350–$2,000 and control arm, ball joint or bushing failure at $400–$2,200. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

12% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Other body or interior problem body 107 67 85k 129k 166k 1.3 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Rust or structural corrosion body 82 64 89k 140k 162k 1.0 $500–$6,000 High
Other suspension problem suspension 38 22 82k 154k 175k 0.4 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 34 26 103k 130k 149k 0.4 $400–$2,200 High
Other visibility problem glass 25 18 143k 166k 174k 0.3 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Other speed control problem adas 20 16 36k 49k 102k 0.2 $250–$2,000 Critical
Other brake problem brakes 16 12 60k 84k 103k 0.2 $300–$1,800 High
Radiator or coolant leak cooling 15 11 97k 150k 173k 0.2 $350–$1,900 High
Other engine problem engine 15 14 93k 106k 132k 0.2 $300–$4,000 High
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 12 7 — 84k — 0.1 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Other powertrain problem transmission 12 8 78k 102k 143k 0.1 $400–$4,500 High
Other steering problem steering 12 7 — 90k — 0.1 $350–$2,400 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 11 10 32k 56k 67k 0.1 $200–$1,500 High
Differential or transfer case failure drivetrain 10 2 — 77k — 0.1 $900–$4,200 High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 10 7 — 106k — 0.1 $250–$2,000 High
Other electrical problem electrical 6 5 — 170k — 0.1 $250–$2,000 Moderate
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 5 5 — 34k — 0.1 $450–$2,200 High
Loss of braking brakes 4 4 — 73k — 0.0 $400–$3,000 Critical
Cruise control failure adas 4 4 — 36k — 0.0 $200–$1,400 High
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 4 4 — 134k — 0.0 $700–$2,600 High
Other fuel system problem fuel 4 4 — 104k — 0.0 $300–$2,200 High
Head gasket failure engine 3 3 — 121k — 0.0 $1,400–$4,000 Critical
Oil leak engine 3 3 — 127k — 0.0 $250–$2,200 Moderate
Fuel leak or fuel odor fuel 3 0 — — — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 3 3 — 90k — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 3 3 — 76k — 0.0 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Airbag inflator rupture airbag 3 2 — 165k — 0.0 $0–$0 Critical
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 3 1 — 59k — 0.0 $200–$900 High
Sunroof failure or glass breakage body 3 2 — 35k — 0.0 $700–$4,500 High
Catalytic converter failure emissions 3 2 — 75k — 0.0 $900–$3,500 Moderate
Other driver assistance problem adas 3 3 — 44k — 0.0 $250–$1,800 High
Excessive oil consumption engine 2 0 — — — 0.0 $900–$6,500 High
Alternator or charging system failure electrical 2 1 — 135k — 0.0 $450–$1,600 High
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 2 2 — 31k — 0.0 $700–$3,000 High
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 2 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$1,500 High
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 2 1 — 79k — 0.0 $500–$2,400 High
Steering column or shaft failure steering 2 2 — 135k — 0.0 $600–$2,500 Critical
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 2 2 — 41k — 0.0 $200–$1,500 Critical
Tire pressure monitor failure wheels 2 2 — 55k — 0.0 $80–$600 Low
Misfire or rough idle engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$1,600 Moderate
Transmission will not engage a gear transmission 1 1 — 86k — 0.0 $1,500–$6,000 Critical
Complete transmission failure transmission 1 0 — — — 0.0 $2,800–$8,000 Critical
Instrument cluster or gauge failure infotainment 1 1 — 102k — 0.0 $350–$1,400 Moderate
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 1 0 — — — 0.0 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 1 1 — 49k — 0.0 $250–$1,600 Critical
Parking brake failure brakes 1 1 — 30k — 0.0 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 1 1 — 58k — 0.0 $300–$1,600 High
Air suspension failure suspension 1 1 — 18k — 0.0 $900–$4,500 High
Software fault or failed update software 1 1 — 110k — 0.0 $0–$600 Moderate
Unclassified problem other 51 29 79k 140k 180k 0.6 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER draws about 6.5 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 83rd percentile of complaint rates among 2005 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 85,202 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2005 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Other body or interior problem

Driver's seat on new 2005 toyota sr5 4runner rocks and shifts back and forth while driving. Dealer has already replaced seat linkage and frame assembly and seat movement has gradually returned in a very short time period. Dealership tried to call it a normal condition prior to replacing saying that all seats in 4runner's on the lot were loose from the factory. As vehicle is driven and weight of driver shifts back and forth from stops and starts, linkage in seat weakens and works loose. Very poor design. Condition is very dangerous and safety should be toyota's #1 concern but obviously not yet. *jb

3,000 miles NHTSA complaint 590854 filed 2006-08-02

2005 toyota 4 runner sr 5 spare tire bracket/ holder severely prematurely rusted. Dealer unable to remove spare tire. Lubricant applied by dealer to no avail. Bracket/holder defect makes spare tire unavailable for use and can lead to bracket/holder failure. Dealer unable to remedy leaving vehicle owner with no spare and potential for catastrophic event while vehicle in use. *tr

38,000 miles NHTSA complaint 782049 filed 2010-04-18

Rust or structural corrosion

Tl*-the contact owns a 2005 toyota 4runner. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for routine maintenance. The technician detected the left and right front pistons were frozen due to excessive corrosion. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for diagnostic testing. The front brake calipers required a replacement. The estimated cost for repair was $835.00. The contact was displeased to know the manufacturer refused to be financially responsible for the total cost of the repair. The manufacturer offered to cover fifty percent towards the service repair cost. The vehicle had not been repaired at the time of the complaint. The failure mileage was 50,000. The current mileage was 56,000.

50,000 miles NHTSA complaint 774622 filed 2010-03-16

Severe frame rust: 2005 4runner sr5 v8 in stratosphere mica blue. Vehicle has been driven in michigan and ohio for its entire life of 104,850 miles as of today. Vehicle received complete rustproofing of underbody, underhood and body panels when new. Despite undercoating and constant washing in the winter, the frame has experienced significant rust. Front cross member is rusted almost completely through and is expected to break through soon. Trailing arm brackets are becoming thin and I have been warned that when they break I will lose control of the vehicle. Holes are starting to rust through on frame. Mechanic has informed me that underbody coating can not protect from rust that begins inside poorly made frames and that it will become a serious safety concern in the near future. This vehicle has been washed religiously in winter and all inspection/maintenance records are available. Body, interior and driveline are in above average condition, and vehicle has been driven below average miles (9500 per year). How can a car manufacturer make a vehicle frame which rusts out this quickly? The vehicle still looks and drives like new on…

104,850 miles NHTSA complaint 1292781 filed 2016-06-25

Other suspension problem

Tl*- the contact owns a 2005 toyota 4runner. While driving at 30 MPH the vehicle began to wobble from left to right. The contact stated he was unable to control the vehicle when driving more than 30 MPH due to the wobbling of the vehicle. The dealer stated that it appeared that the stabilizer bar was cut in half by a hacksaw. The dealer replaced the stabilizer bar, and there have not been any other occurrences. The vehicle current mileage was 27,000.*ak

27,000 miles NHTSA complaint 618919 filed 2007-04-02

My 2005 toyota 4 runner has become so rusted along the frame and undercarriage that the vehicle is unsafe to drive. I have used the vehicle for highway and normal road use. I bought the vehicle brand new and have never towed anything. My tundra was purchased at exactly the same time and has been driven under the same conditions. It has no rust problems. There seems to be a problem with the undercoating of some of toyota's vehicles. Any information you have would be greatly appreciated. *tr

60,000 miles NHTSA complaint 804543 filed 2010-08-05

Recalls on the 2005 model year

NHTSA has issued 5 recall campaigns covering the 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER, affecting an estimated 107,742 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover seats:front assembly:seat heater/cooler, air bags:side/window, vehicle speed control:accelerator pedal and equipment:other:labels. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

16V396000

SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER

7,749 vehicles 2016-06-02
Defect
Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain 2005-2011 4Runner, Highlander, Sequoia, and Sienna, 2005-2010 Avalon and Tundra, 2006-2008 Camry Solara, 2006-2010 Highlander hybrid, 2006-2011 Rav4 and Tacoma, 2007-2010 FJ Cruiser, 2007-2011 Camry hybrid, 2009-2010 Venza, 2010-2012 Prius, 1988-1990 and 2005-2010 Camry, and 1989 and 2009-2010 Corolla vehicles equipped with aftermarket accessory seat heaters with a copper strand heating element. The electrical wiring in the seat heaters may be damaged when the seat cushion is compressed.
Consequence
If damaged, the copper strand heating element may short circuit, increasing the risk of a fire.
Remedy
SET will notify owners, and dealers will disconnect the seat heaters, free of charge, and refund the purchase price of the seat heater accessory. The recall began on July 14, 2016. Owners may contact SET customer service at 1-866-405-4226. SET number for this recall is SET16B.
16V065000

AIR BAGS:SIDE/WINDOW

320,409 vehicles 2016-02-05
Defect
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2003-2006 Toyota Land Cruiser and Lexus LX470, 2005-2006 Toyota Tundra and Sequoia, 2004-2006 Toyota 4Runner and Lexus GX470 vehicles equipped with side curtain-shield-air bags. The affected vehicles have an air bag control module that may be improperly programmed, causing the side curtain-shield-air bags to deploy inadvertently.
Consequence
If the side curtain-shield-air bags deploy unexpectedly, it can increase the risk of occupant injury.
Remedy
Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will replace the air bag control module with one that has improved programming, free of charge. The recall began on December 1, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-271-9371. Toyota's number for this recall is G0C and GLB.
11V113000

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL

1,363,244 vehicles 2011-02-24
Defect
Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 through 2011 lexus lx570, 2003 through 2009 toyota 4runner, and 2006 through 2010 rav4 vehicles. The accelerator pedal can get stuck in the wide open position due to its being trapped by an unsecured or incompatible driver's floor mat.
Consequence
A stuck open accelerator pedal may result in very high vehicle speeds and make it difficult to stop the vehicle, which could cause a crash, serious injury or death.
Remedy
The remedy is now available. The safety recall began early april 2011. The remedy will involve modification or replacement of the accelerator pedal and replacement of any toyota all-weather floor mat. Owners may contact toyota at 1-800-331-4331 or lexus at 1-800-255-3987.
10V036000

EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS

153,418 vehicles 2010-02-03
Defect
Southeast toyota is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 passenger vehicles for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 110, "tire selection and rims." these vehicles were sold without the requisite load carrying capacity modification labels.
Consequence
A driver may overload a vehicle which may increase the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will mail to consumers the corrected label or the customer will have the option for dealers to install the label free of charge. The safety recall began on may 27, 2010. Owners may contact southeast toyota at 1-800-301-6859.
10V035000

EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS

271,417 vehicles 2010-02-03
Defect
Gulf states toyota is recalling certain model year 2005-2010 vehicles for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 110, "tire selection and rims." these vehicles were sold between september 1, 2005 and june 2, 2008 without the requisite load carrying capacity modification labels.
Consequence
This does not meet the standard requirements.
Remedy
Dealers will mail to consumers the corrected label or the customer will have the option for dealers to install the label free of charge. Dealers will also correct the owner's manual. The safety recall began on may 27, 2010. Owners may contact gulf states toyota at 713-580-3300.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2005 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2005 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

Better and worse years of the same car

High risk for a 2005 — 275th riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.

Across the 29 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 52 and 2021 worst at 84, with 2005 itself at 62.

If the model year is negotiable, 1996, 1998, 2001 and 1997 score lower than 2005 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1999–2006 generation specifically, 2001 is the strongest year at 58 and 2006 the weakest at 67.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1999-2006 generation, 2001 Toyota 4RUNNER scores best at 58 and 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER worst at 67.

Where to spend the inspection money

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other wheel or tire problem from about 32k, other speed control problem from about 36k, other brake problem from about 60k and other powertrain problem from about 78k.

On a 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other wheel or tire problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.

The limits of complaint data

553 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 553 reports, 385 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 70% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER?

The most-reported failures are other body or interior problem (107 reports, median 130,000 miles), rust or structural corrosion (82 reports, median 140,000 miles) and other suspension problem (38 reports, median 155,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER problems start?

Other speed control problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 50,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 35,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 113,000 miles.

Is the 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER reliable?

It scores 62 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 275th riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2005 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Toyota 4RUNNER is best?

Within the 1999–2006 generation, 2001 scores best at 58 out of 100 and 2006 worst at 67. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed