2017 Subaru Outback: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2017 Subaru Outback
On the 2017 Subaru Outback, the failure owners report most often is other electrical problem, and the reports cluster around 29,000 miles. The earliest to appear is seat belt or retractor failure, reported by a median of 5,000 miles. Overall it scores 75 out of 100, severe risk for a 2017.
Severe risk for a 2017 — 103rd riskiest of the 263 2017 vehicles we can rate. 1,108 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What owners report breaking
Owners have reported 65 named failure modes on the 2017 Subaru Outback, and the three most-reported carry 45% of everything filed.
Other electrical problem leads with 249 reports, about 26 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 18k to 42,000 miles.
Other visibility problem follows with 166 reports, usually reported between 22k to 56,000 miles.
Windshield cracking follows with 84 reports, usually reported between 21k to 50,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (326), glass (252) and engine (111).
When these failures get reported
620 of the reports on the 2017 Subaru Outback came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 30,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 80% by 50,000 miles and 99% by 100,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed.
The busiest stretch is between 30,000 and 40,000 miles, which alone holds 18% of the dated reports.
59% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, which is early enough that a fair number of these cars were still under a factory warranty when the owner complained.
In the order they tend to show up: seat belt or retractor failure around 3k, other steering problem around 12k, sunroof failure or glass breakage around 12k and other powertrain problem around 16k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 65. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 50 mention a crash, 4 a fire and 25 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 3.15, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, other visibility problem at $150–$1,400, windshield cracking at $300–$1,600 and no-start or intermittent start failure at $200–$1,800. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
15% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 249 | 108 | 18k | 29k | 42k | 25.5 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 166 | 127 | 22k | 36k | 56k | 17.0 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Windshield cracking | glass | 84 | 62 | 21k | 39k | 50k | 8.6 | $300–$1,600 | Moderate |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 71 | 42 | 24k | 38k | 52k | 7.3 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 37 | 23 | 5k | 16k | 37k | 3.8 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Parasitic battery drain | electrical | 36 | 10 | 18k | 27k | 34k | 3.7 | $200–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 31 | 15 | 7k | 29k | 36k | 3.2 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 25 | 13 | 7k | 31k | 42k | 2.6 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 25 | 13 | 10k | 40k | 50k | 2.6 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 22 | 7 | — | 38k | — | 2.3 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 21 | 14 | 8k | 19k | 31k | 2.2 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Lane keep or steering assist fault | adas | 17 | 12 | 15k | 30k | 35k | 1.7 | $200–$1,600 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 17 | 14 | 12k | 26k | 34k | 1.7 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 15 | 9 | 300 | 12k | 30k | 1.5 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 14 | 7 | — | 40k | — | 1.4 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 14 | 10 | 9k | 12k | 27k | 1.4 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 13 | 8 | 15k | 21k | 28k | 1.3 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 9 | 9 | 3k | 3k | 17k | 0.9 | $200–$900 | High |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 9 | 7 | — | 35k | — | 0.9 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 9 | 3 | — | 44k | — | 0.9 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| CVT failure | transmission | 7 | 4 | — | 8k | — | 0.7 | $3,000–$8,500 | Critical |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 5 | 4 | — | 31k | — | 0.5 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 5 | 3 | — | 24k | — | 0.5 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 5 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.5 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 5 | 2 | — | 14k | — | 0.5 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Infotainment screen failure | infotainment | 4 | 2 | — | 29k | — | 0.4 | $400–$2,600 | Low |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 4 | 4 | — | 1k | — | 0.4 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 4 | 2 | — | 32k | — | 0.4 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 4 | 3 | — | 31k | — | 0.4 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 4 | 2 | — | 23k | — | 0.4 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.3 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 3 | 1 | — | 46k | — | 0.3 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 3 | 1 | — | 30k | — | 0.3 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Backup camera failure | infotainment | 3 | 2 | — | 20k | — | 0.3 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Power steering pump or fluid leak | steering | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.3 | $350–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 3 | 3 | — | 97k | — | 0.3 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.2 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 48k | — | 0.2 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.2 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Audio or connectivity failure | infotainment | 2 | 2 | — | 40k | — | 0.2 | $150–$900 | Low |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 2 | 1 | — | 701 | — | 0.2 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 42k | — | 0.2 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.2 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Tire pressure monitor failure | wheels | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.2 | $80–$600 | Low |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 2 | 2 | — | 12k | — | 0.2 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.2 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 2 | 2 | — | 79k | — | 0.2 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 2 | 1 | — | 52k | — | 0.2 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Oil leak | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Water pump failure | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $500–$2,200 | High |
| Overheating | cooling | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 65k | — | 0.1 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 5k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Starter failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — | 0.1 | $350–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 10k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 14k | — | 0.1 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 45k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 118 | 56 | 12k | 29k | 40k | 12.1 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2017 Subaru Outback draws about 113 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 97th percentile of complaint rates among 2017 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 9,763 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2017 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other electrical problem
Tl* the contact owns a 2017 subaru outback. The contact stated that when the vehicle was started, there was an loud abnormal sound. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where the failure was undetermined. The contact also mentioned the all the windows failed to function except for the driver side window. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 2,000. Updated 01/11/2017*ct updated 06/07/17*lj consumer dealer was made aware of window failure and it was fixed. (still making same loud noise (12-3-16). Updated 7/9/18*jb *tr
The "check engine" light came on a week ago and the engine became sluggish when accelerating. We took the car to marin subaru service department where they did a diagnostic test. Result is that a rodent must have chewed through the soy-based harness covering the sensor wire. Repair bill = $1,400, subaru says its not covered by the new car warranty. They are telling us not to drive the car now as it could be dangerous. Insurance says it does not cover this either. Subaru and the other mftrs have known about this issue for some time apparently but continue to use material they know attracts rodents.
Other visibility problem
Tl* the contact owns a 2017 subaru outback. While driving various speeds, there was a glare from outside the vehicle that reflected off the face plate of the navigation system without warning. The failure distracted the contact from driving and hindered her visibility. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, where the glare failure was confirmed. A buy back for the vehicle was offered; however, the contact declined. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 1,000. Updated 04/06/17 lj the consumer stated the buy back offer involved a $5,500 loss. The consumer stated the light was so extreme that it was painful, causing nausea and migraines. Updated 09/20/20017*js
Our windshield began slowly cracking starting at the base of the driver side front window. It began at the bottom edge (heat strip) and moved half up the windshield before we replaced. Cost $569 for oem windshield. Subaru dealer denied the warranty claim, while admitting a problem with earlier versions that year's outback.
Windshield cracking
The quality of the windshield leaves a lot to be desired. This is the second time in less than a year I have had to replace my windshield. In both occasions, the windshield cracked while the vehicle was in motion. I thought the first crack was caused by a small object/projectile I could not see. Then the second crack occurred a few months later (about 5 months apart) around the same spot (driver side) as the first one. In about 30 minutes, the crack radiated quickly from the driver side all the way to the middle of the windshield. In both cases, even if the crack was caused by a small object, the impact was too small to explain such major damage. The first time the windshield cracked, it was replaced by a subaru recommended part and not by an aftermarket windshield. I will use a subaru recommended part again. However, based on the evidence, I do not have any confidence that the problem will not resurface. I think the windshield is fundamentally defective.
> the auto in this complaint is equipped with subaru's "eyesight" driver assist technology. > june 18, 2018 - driving on divided interstate highway, there was a very loud "bang," - the new replacement windshield cracked and instantly the crack extended 2/3 of the way across the full width of the windshield. After pulling over to the side of the highway and taking a look at the windshield to determine what caused the crack, I sadly discovered that one section of the outside glass had separated from plastic behind it to the degree, that when ranning my hand against the outside glass surface, it cut my hand. The separation was enough that I questioned whether it was safe to continue to drive the car. I did drive the car home. The next day I took the car to my dealership's service dept. - they pointed to a minute nick on the very bottom of the windshield, so small that I did not see it until it was pointed out to me, as the "outside source" causing the crack. I don't buy what they are saying. I believe the the glass is so fragile that it simply cracks from stress from normal driving movement of the auto. And that the fragile glass…
Recalls on the 2017 model year
NHTSA has issued 4 recall campaigns covering the 2017 Subaru Outback, affecting an estimated 9,912 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover air bags: air bag/restraint control module, steering:column and suspension. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
AIR BAGS: AIR BAG/RESTRAINT CONTROL MODULE
46 vehicles 2019-12-19- Defect
- Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain 2016-2017 Outback vehicles. A replacement air bag control module may have been installed that is not compatible with the passenger air bag module, possibly affecting air bag deployment.
- Consequence
- In the event of a crash necessitating passenger frontal air bag deployment, the air bag may not deploy properly, increasing the risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will replace the passenger air bag module, free of charge. The recall began February 3, 2020. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-844-373-6614. Subaru's number for this recall is WUX-09.
STEERING:COLUMN
54 vehicles 2016-10-06- Defect
- Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2017 Legacy and Outback vehicles manufactured September 21, 2016, to September 23, 2016. In the affected vehicles, the knee guard bracket may not be properly attached to the steering beam assembly.
- Consequence
- If the knee guard is not properly attached and the driver is not wearing a seatbelt, the knee guard may not be able to properly restrain the driver's lower body in the event of a crash, increasing the risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the knee guard welding on each vehicle's steering beam, replacing the beam as necessary, free of charge. The recall began November 14, 2016. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WTL-72.
SUSPENSION
99 vehicles 2016-08-03- Defect
- Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2017 Outback vehicles manufactured June 20, 2016, to June 23, 2016. The affected vehicles may have improperly tightened attaching bolts for the front left and right brake calipers, wheel hubs, and the right stabilizer clamp.
- Consequence
- If any of the front brake caliper, wheel hub or stabilizer clamp attaching bolts loosen or detach, the related components would also become loose and may detach possibly making the vehicle unstable and reducing the braking capability. These conditions would increase the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Subaru has notified owners, and dealers will inspect the bolts for proper torque, and replace any loose bolts, free of charge. The recall began on August 8, 2016. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783. Subaru's number for this recall is WTE-66.
STEERING:COLUMN
48,819 vehicles 2016-05-11- Defect
- Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru) is recalling certain model year 2016-2017 Legacy and Outback vehicles manufactured February 29, 2016, to May 6, 2016. The steering column on the affected vehicles may have been improperly machined, and as a result, turning the steering wheel may have no effect on the direction of the wheels.
- Consequence
- The loss of steering ability would increase the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the lot number on the steering column, replacing the steering column, as necessary, free of charge. The recall began May 13, 2016. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-800-782-2783 or by visiting http://www.wtd65.service-campaign.com. Subaru's number for this recall is WTD-65. Note: Until the vehicles have been inspected, owners are advised not to drive their vehicles.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2017 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 2017 sits in the model line
Severe risk for a 2017 — 103rd riskiest of the 263 2017 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 31 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2026 comes out best at 60 and 2020 worst at 80, with 2017 itself at 75.
If the model year is negotiable, 2026, 1997, 1996, 1999, 1998, 2007, 2000, 2006, 2008, 2002, 2001, 2025, 2009, 2004, 2005 and 2003 score lower than 2017 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2015–2017 generation specifically, 2016 is the strongest year at 75 and 2015 the weakest at 78.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2015-2017 generation, 2016 Subaru Outback scores best at 75 and 2015 Subaru Outback worst at 78.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other steering problem from about 300, seat belt or retractor failure from about 3k, other powertrain problem from about 5k and other engine problem from about 7k.
On a 2017 Subaru Outback with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other steering problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
Where these figures stop being useful
1,108 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 1,108 reports, 620 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 56% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2017 Subaru Outback?
The most-reported failures are other electrical problem (249 reports, median 29,000 miles), other visibility problem (166 reports, median 36,000 miles) and windshield cracking (84 reports, median 40,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2017 Subaru Outback problems start?
Seat belt or retractor failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 5,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 5,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 30,000 miles.
Is the 2017 Subaru Outback reliable?
It scores 75 out of 100 on our risk index, which is severe — 103rd riskiest of the 263 2017 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2017 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Subaru Outback is best?
Within the 2015–2017 generation, 2016 scores best at 75 out of 100 and 2015 worst at 78. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed