2001 Ford Ranger: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2001 Ford Ranger
On the 2001 Ford Ranger, the failure owners report most often is other body or interior problem, and the reports cluster around 102,500 miles. The earliest to appear is other wheel or tire problem, reported by a median of 40,000 miles. Overall it scores 64 out of 100, high risk for a 2001.
High risk for a 2001 — 239th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. 687 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2001 Ford Ranger
Owners have reported 57 named failure modes on the 2001 Ford Ranger, and the three most-reported carry 25% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other body or interior problem leads with 79 reports, about 0.2 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 83k to 135,000 miles.
Other suspension problem follows with 46 reports, usually reported between 81k to 120,000 miles.
Seat belt or retractor failure follows with 44 reports, usually reported between 66k to 105,000 miles. 1 of those report mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into body (123), airbag (82) and brakes (64).
At what mileage it happens
373 of the reports on the 2001 Ford Ranger came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 83,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 27% by 50,000 miles, 61% by 100,000 miles and 91% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 13 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 80,000 and 90,000 miles, which alone holds 10% of the dated reports.
18% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: other wheel or tire problem around 38k, other brake problem around 48k, other powertrain problem around 50k and airbag failed to deploy in a crash around 53k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 57. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 13 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
How bad it is when it goes
Across the named modes, 66 mention a crash, 9 a fire, 44 an injury and 5 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.02, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000, other suspension problem at $350–$2,000, seat belt or retractor failure at $200–$900 and fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure at $250–$1,800. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
15% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other body or interior problem | body | 79 | 54 | 83k | 104k | 135k | 0.2 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 46 | 26 | 81k | 102k | 120k | 0.1 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 44 | 24 | 66k | 81k | 107k | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 40 | 37 | 80k | 100k | 135k | 0.1 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 39 | 34 | 85k | 109k | 114k | 0.1 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 39 | 15 | 27k | 38k | 76k | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 38 | 16 | 36k | 54k | 116k | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 25 | 9 | 37k | 53k | 83k | 0.1 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Other engine problem | engine | 24 | 8 | 49k | 117k | 131k | 0.1 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 23 | 12 | 24k | 48k | 56k | 0.1 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 22 | 12 | 34k | 50k | 62k | 0.0 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 15 | 7 | — | 20k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 13 | 5 | — | 100k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 13 | 5 | — | 40k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 13 | 7 | — | 60k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Manual clutch or hydraulics failure | transmission | 12 | 3 | — | 50k | — | 0.0 | $900–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 10 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 9 | 4 | — | 83k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 9 | 2 | — | 76k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 8 | 7 | — | 66k | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 8 | 7 | — | 108k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 7 | 4 | — | 13k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 7 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 6 | 2 | — | 90 | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 6 | 6 | — | 135k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 5 | 5 | — | 29k | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 5 | 3 | — | 51k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 5 | 1 | — | 67k | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 5 | 2 | — | 108k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 4 | 1 | — | 52k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 4 | 2 | — | 52k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 4 | 1 | — | 19k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 4 | 3 | — | 88k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 3 | 3 | — | 33k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 3 | 3 | — | 24k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 3 | 2 | — | 65k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 3 | 1 | — | 6k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 3 | 1 | — | 25k | — | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 2 | 1 | — | 46k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 120k | — | 0.0 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 2 | 2 | — | 44k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 55k | — | 0.0 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 204k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 36k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 33k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Overheating | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 200k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Thermostat failure | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 200k | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Harsh or jerky shifting | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 131k | — | 0.0 | $600–$4,000 | Moderate |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 1 | 1 | — | 182k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 1 | 1 | — | 85k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 6k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 1 | 1 | — | 30k | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 51 | 23 | 44k | 73k | 104k | 0.1 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2001 Ford Ranger draws about 1.5 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 72nd percentile of complaint rates among 2001 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 448,275 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2001 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other body or interior problem
Ford made a extended cab with back doors. By ford eliminating the b-pillar or post. Front door is just latch to the rear door without a post to support it. Which can result in minimal strength and protection against side impacts. *jg
I purchased a new 2001 ford range in nov of that year. The truck came with a hard fiberglass bed cover. It has a locking system and a safety latch at the inside of the top. This safety latch failed when I was in the bed and the top shut down. I have contacted ford about the problem. They have said it is not their responsibility to fix this as they claim it is an aftermarket accessory. The truck was brought into the dealer before the original warranty was up. The top is listed in the owners manual and it was part of the truck at the time of purchase. If my kid's had been locked inside the situation could have been worse. *jb
Other suspension problem
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 ford ranger. While the vehicle was undergoing a front end alignment, the contact was informed that the front lower ball joints were defective, loose, and worn. He stated that the steering was fine and he could not tell that there was an issue prior to the repair visit. The manufacturer offered no assistance. The current and failure mileages were approximately 43,000.
Rear of frame has rusted away. Rear bumper is ready to fall off. Left spring up against bed floor. This truck has the original exhaust on it no other problems ever I use ford 5w20 syn. Blend oil, changed every 3,000 miles. Guess I wasted all that money?? I get 24 miles to the gal. Highway. Now I cant take it there. Still looks good setting in my driveway. I am 68 yrs.old, my only veh. No money for another vec. Now what???? Thanks for letting me ramble.........[xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). *tr
Seat belt or retractor failure
While driving, the front passenger seat belt unlocked from the belt buckle without warning. The cause had not been determined. The vehicle was taken to the dealership, however they were unable to resolve the problem. *jb recall#01v227001. *sc rq04011.*pco previous owner had taken veh in for recall work and replaced dsb only. Now psb failed. Owner gave perm. To release info.*pco
It had been raining and it was slushy out, my truck got pulled by slush and I hit a guard rail almost head on and bounced off of it and wound up right on the edge of the inside lane of the highway once the truck was stopped my airbags went off, I then had an asthma attack from the powder that came out of the air bags. How ironic that the passenger side air bag was shut off yet it still went off. Also when my truck went in the shop to be fixed I found out that both seatbelt pre-tensioners had to be replaced since both of them had broke yet I was the only one in the truck. This truck was fixed by a ford dealer. I would like to know why the seat belt pre-tensioner on the passenger side broke and I would like to know why the air bag went off when it was shut off. I have pictures of the accident and the damage that was done. I asked the ford dealer why the air bag on the passenger side had went off and why the seat belt pre-tensioner had broke and all they could tell me is they did not know. I do not agree with that answer and I would like this to be investigated. I had to pay double of what it would have cost me to replace one air bag…
Recalls on the 2001 model year
NHTSA has issued 9 recall campaigns covering the 2001 Ford Ranger, affecting an estimated 693,777 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover vehicle speed control, exterior lighting:headlights and exterior lighting. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
4,500,000 vehicles 2009-10-13- Defect
- Ford is recalling model years 1995-2003 windstar, 2000-2003 excursion diesel, 1993-1997 and 1999-2003 f-250 sd through f-550 sd diesel, 1992-2003 e-150 through e-550, 1995-2002 explorer, 1997 and 2002 mercury mountaineer, 1995-1997 and 2001-2003 ranger, and 1994 f53 vehicles equipped with the texas instruments speed control deactivation switch (scds). The scds may leak internally and then overheat, smoke, or burn.
- Consequence
- A vehicle fire could occur with or without the engine running.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify owners that dealers will install a fused wiring harness in line with the scds. On 1999-2003 windstar vehicles with a leaking scds, dealers will also inspect the ABS control module connector and repair as necessary. Repairs will be completed free of charge. The safety recall began on october 27, 2009. Owners may contact ford at 1-888-222-2751.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
42,540 vehicles 2009-05-11- Defect
- Dope, inc. Is recalling 42,540 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Dope, inc. Will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on july 28, 2009. Owners may contact dope, inc. At 1-626-272-1798.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07- Defect
- Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
3,600,000 vehicles 2007-08-03- Defect
- On certain pickup trucks, passenger vehicles, sport utility vehicles, and motor homes chassis, the speed control deactivation switch may, under certain conditions, leak internally and then overheat, smoke, or burn.
- Consequence
- This could result in an underhood fire.
- Remedy
- Dealers will install a fused wiring harness. Owners of the passenger cars included in this campaign will be instructed to return their vehicles to their dealers to have the speed control deactivation switch disconnected as an interim repair. As soon as repair parts are available (expected october 2007), owners will be instructed to return to the dealers for installation of a fused wiring harness. The recall began on august 13, 2007, and mailing completed by september 19, 2007. Owners may contact ford at 1-888-222-2751.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
3,593 vehicles 2006-07-17- Defect
- Certain aj motorsport combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Aj motorsport will notify owners and offer reimbursement for the lamps. The recall began on july 31, 2006. Owners may contact aj motorsport at 626-618-2026.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
27,176 vehicles 2006-05-24- Defect
- Certain ck motorsports combination headlights, clear corner, bumper, and side marker lights sold as replacement lamps for use on the passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Ck motorsport will notify owners and replace the noncompliant lamps free of charge. The recall began on july 1, 2006. Owners may contact ck motorsport at 1-909-610-7211.
SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY
1,400,000 vehicles 2001-07-16- Defect
- Vehicle description: passenger and sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and minivans. Equipped with seat belts supplied by trw. It is possible that the driver's and/or front passenger's outboard seat belt buckle may not fully latch. Ford crown victoria built at st. Thomas assembly plant from 4/17/00 - 5/29/01 mercury grand marquis built at st. Thomas assembly plant from 4/17/00 - 5/29/01. Lincoln town cars built at wixom assembly plant from 3/27/00 - 5/30/01. Lincoln navigators built at michigan truck plant from 4/11/00 - 5/31/01. Ford windstars built at oakville…
- Consequence
- In the event of a crash, the restraint system may not provide adequate occupant protection, increasing the risk of personal injury to the seat occupant.
- Remedy
- Dealers will inspect the front outboard seat belt buckles and if the buckle fails the inspection process, it will be replaced. Owner notification began july 25, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.
TIRES:TREAD/BELT
13,000,000 vehicles 2001-05-22- Defect
- This is not a safety recall in accordance with the safety act. However, it is deemed a safety improvement campaign by the agency. Equipment description: ford is replacing all firestone wilderness at 15, 16, and 17 inch tires mounted on ford trucks and suvs. Ford reports tread separation can occur due to a combination of the sensitivity of the tire design to stress, aging, and manufacturing differences between plants. Ford is replacing these tires to prevent possible premature tire failure. Vehicle description: the vehicles listed below may have been originally equipped…
- Consequence
- Should the tread separate at highway speeds, a vehicle crash could occur, possibly resulting in personal injury or death.
- Remedy
- The replacement/reimbursement program for this campaign expired on march 31, 2002. However, customers can contact ford at 1-877-917-3673 or go on-line to www.ford.com for possible assistance.
STRUCTURE:BODY:HOOD:HINGE AND ATTACHMENTS
137,700 vehicles 2000-11-28- Defect
- Vehicle description: sport utility vehicles with steel hoods and certain pickup trucks equipped with sheet molding compound hoods. A wire formed hood striker could be susceptible to fatigue fractures. If the hood striker fractures, the hood could fly open while the vehicle is being driven.
- Consequence
- A hood fly-up while the vehicle is being operated could result in reduced driver visibility.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the hood striker.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2001 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 2001 — 239th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.
Across the 23 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 58 and 2023 worst at 81, with 2001 itself at 64.
If the model year is negotiable, 1996 and 1997 score lower than 2001 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2001–2003 generation specifically, 2001 is the strongest year at 64 and 2002 the weakest at 72.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2001-2003 generation, 2001 Ford Ranger scores best at 64 and 2002 Ford Ranger worst at 72.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other brake problem from about 24k, other wheel or tire problem from about 27k, other powertrain problem from about 34k and other speed control problem from about 36k.
On a 2001 Ford Ranger with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other brake problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
Where these figures stop being useful
687 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 687 reports, 373 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 54% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2001 Ford Ranger?
The most-reported failures are other body or interior problem (79 reports, median 102,500 miles), other suspension problem (46 reports, median 102,500 miles) and seat belt or retractor failure (44 reports, median 80,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2001 Ford Ranger problems start?
Other wheel or tire problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 40,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 25,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 83,000 miles.
Is the 2001 Ford Ranger reliable?
It scores 64 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 239th riskiest of the 320 2001 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2001 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford Ranger is best?
Within the 2001–2003 generation, 2001 scores best at 64 out of 100 and 2002 worst at 72. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed