2004 Ford Focus: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2004 Ford Focus
On the 2004 Ford Focus, the failure owners report most often is other electrical problem, and the reports cluster around 47,500 miles. The earliest to appear is premature brake pad or rotor wear, reported by a median of 15,000 miles. Overall it scores 68 out of 100, high risk for a 2004.
High risk for a 2004 — 148th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. 499 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2004 Ford Focus
Owners have reported 53 named failure modes on the 2004 Ford Focus, and the three most-reported carry 39% of everything filed.
Other electrical problem leads with 107 reports, about 1.1 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 37k to 70,000 miles.
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure follows with 51 reports, usually reported between 49k to 80,000 miles.
Other body or interior problem follows with 39 reports, usually reported between 40k to 117,500 miles. 3 of those reports mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (171), brakes (47) and body (41).
The mileage the reports cluster at
375 of the reports on the 2004 Ford Focus came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 50,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 49% by 50,000 miles, 83% by 100,000 miles and 94% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 6 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 13% of the dated reports.
34% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: premature brake pad or rotor wear around 14k, other wheel or tire problem around 24k, other powertrain problem around 34k and other brake problem around 35k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 53. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 6 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 33 mention a crash, 17 a fire, 26 an injury and 1 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.45, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure at $250–$1,500, other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
16% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 107 | 79 | 37k | 48k | 69k | 1.1 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 51 | 36 | 49k | 69k | 80k | 0.5 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 39 | 26 | 40k | 88k | 117k | 0.4 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 20 | 16 | 48k | 75k | 104k | 0.2 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 17 | 14 | 15k | 35k | 70k | 0.2 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 17 | 12 | 49k | 75k | 96k | 0.2 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 13 | 10 | 44k | 48k | 83k | 0.1 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 13 | 9 | 5k | 14k | 22k | 0.1 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 12 | 11 | 22k | 34k | 82k | 0.1 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 12 | 9 | 39k | 54k | 90k | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 10 | 6 | — | 9k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Overheating | cooling | 9 | 8 | 126k | 188k | 250k | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 9 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 9 | 9 | 54k | 68k | 75k | 0.1 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 9 | 8 | 10k | 42k | 66k | 0.1 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 9 | 8 | 18k | 24k | 53k | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 8 | 7 | — | 48k | — | 0.1 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 8 | 6 | — | 24k | — | 0.1 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 8 | 7 | — | 33k | — | 0.1 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 7 | 7 | — | 149k | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 6 | 6 | — | 31k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 6 | 6 | — | 6k | — | 0.1 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 5 | 3 | — | 48k | — | 0.1 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 5 | 5 | — | 2k | — | 0.1 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 5 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 5 | 5 | — | 48k | — | 0.1 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 4 | 1 | — | 184k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Thermostat failure | cooling | 4 | 4 | — | 8k | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 4 | 4 | — | 16k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 4 | 4 | — | 67k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 4 | 4 | — | 142k | — | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Manual clutch or hydraulics failure | transmission | 3 | 3 | — | 71k | — | 0.0 | $900–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 3 | 3 | — | 5k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 3 | 1 | — | 64k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 3 | 3 | — | 80k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 92k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 2 | 1 | — | 10k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 73k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 2k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Audio or connectivity failure | infotainment | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$900 | Low |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 18k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 2 | 2 | — | 124k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 2 | 2 | — | 24k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 68k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 29k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 180k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Infotainment screen failure | infotainment | 1 | 1 | — | 110k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,600 | Low |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 88k | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 1 | 1 | — | 42k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 1 | 1 | — | 35k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 22 | 15 | 18k | 79k | 96k | 0.2 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2004 Ford Focus draws about 5.1 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 80th percentile of complaint rates among 2004 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 98,322 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2004 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other electrical problem
2000 ford focus zx3: the tumblers of the ignition are jammed. The key has a rough time going into the mechanism and often gets stuck on the way in or out. Once in, the ignition will not turn at all. The car now has to be towed to be worked on. *jb
I own a 2004 ford focus zts, purchased new in june, 2004. Since purchase, I have had the horn replaced twice,meaning the car has it's 3rd horn. The problem appears to be water entry into the horn itself, possibly shorting out the device. The water could be from a car wash, or from water entry while driving in rain. This is a safety defect, in that I have no idea whether the horn works or not until I attempt to use it. This could be a major issue if I need to warn someone of my presence.*jb
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure
Lock cylinder will not operate to start car. Key will not turn. I purchased car used with 24161 miles as used with balance of new car warrentey. First happened at 30810 miles , 35500 miles,40211 miles, and at 42152 miles. The car is unusable when this happens. *jb
I parked my car to go work one evening,and I came back and it fails to work.neither of my keys will turn the ifnition.my keys go in and out of the the ignition switch only. My car has 40k miles on it,and it needs a recall immediately.I do not have money to fix right now,so I am stranded.*ak
Other body or interior problem
The cigarette lighter after being pushed in getting hot popped out of the holder and landed either on the occupant's lap or on the carpeting. When this was shown to the rental company, and a demonstration was done, the lighter burned the representative's legs. This was a budget rental vehicle.*ak
While as a sole driver and occupant of a 2005 ford focus, I was stopped at a red light and rear-ended by a four door 1995 dodge intrepid at a speed of approximatley 50 miles per hour. My driver's seat collasped in the collision which jerked my neck and back into the rear seat. As a result my thorasic spine, cervical sipne was so injreud as to cause my neck and back including my both arms to suffer a degree of paralysis, and injury to the upper spinal cord. *ak
Recalls on the 2004 model year
NHTSA has issued 6 recall campaigns covering the 2004 Ford Focus, affecting an estimated 100,772 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover equipment, exterior lighting:headlights and fuel system, gasoline. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
EQUIPMENT
10,006 vehicles 2012-02-24- Defect
- Ride control, llc (ride control) is recalling certain readymount assemblies, p/n 746641mt and 746646mt, with corresponding aftermarket customer part numbers: gabriel g56944 and gabriel g56945, and privately branded partsmaster with part numbers g68944 and g68945. The readymount assemblies were sold as aftermarket service equipment for use on certain 2000 through 2005 ford focus vehicles. These assemblies were assembled with a nut without the necessary washer. The absence of the washer can allow the readymount assembly to pull apart the top mount.
- Consequence
- If the assembly separates during installation, it could result in injury to the installer. If the assembly separates while the vehicle is in motion, it could result in secondary damage to the vehicle and possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Ride control will notify owners and will set up procedures to inspect, repair, and/or replace the affected parts without charge to the owner. The safety recall began on march 30, 2012. Owners may contact ride control at 1-800-999-3903.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
42,540 vehicles 2009-05-11- Defect
- Dope, inc. Is recalling 42,540 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Dope, inc. Will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on july 28, 2009. Owners may contact dope, inc. At 1-626-272-1798.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11- Defect
- K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
58,640 vehicles 2006-06-13- Defect
- Certain aftermarket fuel filters sold under the purolator brand name, p/n f65277, shipped from january 16 through june 2, 2006, for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Due to incorrect design, the quick connectors may not fully seat with the tube interface, even though the person making the connection may believe that the quick connector is fully attached.
- Consequence
- Failure of this connection could lead to fuel spillage and, in the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
- Remedy
- Ufi will notify owners and replace the filters free of charge. The recall began on august 4, 2006. Owners may contact ufi filters usa at 800-230-5876.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
61,944 vehicles 2006-03-23- Defect
- Certain pro-a motors corner lamps, turn signals, and headlights sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Pro-a motors will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began on april 3, 2006. Owners may contact pro-a motors at 323-838-2988.
LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:DOORS:LATCH
589,932 vehicles 2005-02-01- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles with four or five doors and originally sold in or currently registered in connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia, a build-up of corrosion at the pawl pivot area of the rear door latch can cause a binding condition of the pawl that may affect proper engagement of the pawl into the catch. The occupant may experience difficulty opening or…
- Consequence
- If not latched properly, the door may open while the vehicle is in motion. If an occupant fell out of the vehicle, personal injuries could occur.
- Remedy
- Dealers will have a lower rocker seal added to the door and have the rear door latches evaluated free of charge. A latch that passes the evaluation will be lubricated to prevent future corrosion. A latch that does not pass the evaluation will be replaced. In addition, a sticker will be affixed to the rear doors advising the owners to use the recommended lubricant. The recall began on march 9, 2005. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2004 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 2004 sits in the model line
High risk for a 2004 — 148th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 20 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1999 comes out best at 55 and 2014 worst at 80, with 2004 itself at 68.
If the model year is negotiable, 1999 and 2011 score lower than 2004 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1999–2007 generation specifically, 1999 is the strongest year at 55 and 2007 the weakest at 75.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1999-2007 generation, 1999 Ford Focus scores best at 55 and 2007 Ford Focus worst at 75.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: premature brake pad or rotor wear from about 5k, other suspension problem from about 10k, other brake problem from about 15k and other wheel or tire problem from about 18k.
On a 2004 Ford Focus with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether premature brake pad or rotor wear has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
Where these figures stop being useful
499 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 499 reports, 375 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 75% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2004 Ford Focus?
The most-reported failures are other electrical problem (107 reports, median 47,500 miles), ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure (51 reports, median 70,000 miles) and other body or interior problem (39 reports, median 87,500 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2004 Ford Focus problems start?
Premature brake pad or rotor wear is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 15,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 5,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 50,000 miles.
Is the 2004 Ford Focus reliable?
It scores 68 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 148th riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2004 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford Focus is best?
Within the 1999–2007 generation, 1999 scores best at 55 out of 100 and 2007 worst at 75. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed