2000 Ford Focus: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2000 Ford Focus
On the 2000 Ford Focus, the failure owners report most often is other electrical problem, and the reports cluster around 64,000 miles. The earliest to appear is steering rack, gear or tie rod failure, reported by a median of 300 miles. Overall it scores 71 out of 100, high risk for a 2000.
High risk for a 2000 — 70th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. 5,152 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2000 Ford Focus
Owners have reported 85 named failure modes on the 2000 Ford Focus, and the three most-reported carry 30% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other electrical problem leads with 847 reports, about 2.5 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 46k to 88,000 miles.
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure follows with 368 reports, usually reported between 46k to 86,000 miles.
Other engine problem follows with 327 reports, usually reported between 41k to 87,000 miles. 29 of those reports mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (1,330), engine (641) and fuel (555).
The mileage the reports cluster at
2,035 of the reports on the 2000 Ford Focus came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 60,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 38% by 50,000 miles, 82% by 100,000 miles and 97% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 6 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 60,000 and 70,000 miles, which alone holds 12% of the dated reports.
22% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: steering rack, gear or tie rod failure around 275, paint peeling or clear coat failure around 10k, alternator or charging system failure around 13k and wheel, stud or lug nut failure around 15k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 85. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 6 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
How bad it is when it goes
Across the named modes, 250 mention a crash, 164 a fire, 89 an injury and 25 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.18, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure at $250–$1,500, other engine problem at $300–$4,000 and fuel pump failure at $600–$2,600. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
22% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 847 | 438 | 46k | 64k | 88k | 2.5 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 368 | 214 | 46k | 64k | 86k | 1.1 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 327 | 126 | 41k | 59k | 87k | 1.0 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 324 | 149 | 32k | 52k | 75k | 1.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 301 | 102 | 51k | 70k | 100k | 0.9 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 224 | 40 | 17k | 34k | 59k | 0.7 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 159 | 56 | 24k | 76k | 94k | 0.5 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 158 | 73 | 30k | 43k | 58k | 0.5 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 145 | 47 | 42k | 61k | 76k | 0.4 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 139 | 29 | 28k | 45k | 66k | 0.4 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 135 | 35 | 38k | 62k | 108k | 0.4 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 121 | 60 | 40k | 61k | 82k | 0.4 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 114 | 35 | 56k | 68k | 94k | 0.3 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 103 | 44 | 17k | 25k | 35k | 0.3 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 92 | 67 | 45k | 67k | 95k | 0.3 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other steering problem | steering | 90 | 42 | 50k | 76k | 100k | 0.3 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 76 | 18 | 21k | 54k | 90k | 0.2 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 76 | 10 | 45k | 72k | 105k | 0.2 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 71 | 19 | 44k | 63k | 88k | 0.2 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 66 | 24 | 40k | 50k | 84k | 0.2 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 59 | 17 | 37k | 54k | 62k | 0.2 | $200–$900 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 59 | 13 | 65k | 68k | 116k | 0.2 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 50 | 27 | 14k | 58k | 78k | 0.1 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 45 | 13 | 4k | 13k | 98k | 0.1 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Manual clutch or hydraulics failure | transmission | 42 | 3 | — | 87k | — | 0.1 | $900–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 42 | 17 | 25k | 25k | 47k | 0.1 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Overheating | cooling | 38 | 16 | 45k | 59k | 114k | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 37 | 12 | 47k | 54k | 67k | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 34 | 14 | 275 | 275 | 42k | 0.1 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 33 | 12 | 39k | 58k | 59k | 0.1 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 32 | 8 | 39k | 58k | 95k | 0.1 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 27 | 14 | 50k | 69k | 75k | 0.1 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 26 | 7 | — | 80k | — | 0.1 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 26 | 12 | 34k | 52k | 142k | 0.1 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 26 | 14 | 52k | 65k | 89k | 0.1 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 24 | 1 | — | 43k | — | 0.1 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 22 | 9 | 51k | 76k | 90k | 0.1 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 22 | 15 | 24k | 50k | 95k | 0.1 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 20 | 7 | — | 41k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 20 | 5 | — | 50k | — | 0.1 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 20 | 9 | 43k | 43k | 43k | 0.1 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 20 | 3 | — | 63k | — | 0.1 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 20 | 6 | — | 56k | — | 0.1 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 19 | 8 | 18k | 18k | 30k | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 19 | 9 | 39k | 64k | 76k | 0.1 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 17 | 1 | — | 72k | — | 0.1 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 13 | 2 | — | 70k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Wheel, stud or lug nut failure | wheels | 13 | 8 | 15k | 15k | 15k | 0.0 | $150–$1,500 | Critical |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 12 | 2 | — | 77k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 11 | 7 | — | 33k | — | 0.0 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 11 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 11 | 4 | — | 55k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 10 | 9 | 10k | 10k | 10k | 0.0 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Transmission slipping | transmission | 9 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$5,500 | High |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 9 | 3 | — | 90k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 9 | 2 | — | 31k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Engine knock or bearing noise | engine | 8 | 3 | — | 70k | — | 0.0 | $2,500–$9,000 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 8 | 2 | — | 102k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 6 | 4 | — | 103k | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Window regulator or power window failure | body | 6 | 3 | — | 35k | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 5 | 4 | — | 131k | — | 0.0 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Windshield cracking | glass | 5 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 4 | 2 | — | 39k | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| Thermostat failure | cooling | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 4 | 4 | — | 136k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Oil leak | engine | 3 | 1 | — | 52k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Water pump failure | cooling | 3 | 3 | — | 100k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,200 | High |
| Heater core failure | cooling | 3 | 3 | — | 41k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,400 | Moderate |
| Transmission will not engage a gear | transmission | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$6,000 | Critical |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| DPF, EGR or DEF system failure | emissions | 3 | 3 | — | 30k | — | 0.0 | $800–$5,000 | High |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 3 | 1 | — | 30k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 2 | 2 | — | 103k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 2 | 1 | — | 58k | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Air suspension failure | suspension | 2 | 2 | — | 85k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,500 | High |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 40k | — | 0.0 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Intake carbon buildup | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 57k | — | 0.0 | $400–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 51k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Starter failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 39k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Child seat anchor or tether failure | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$700 | High |
| Power steering pump or fluid leak | steering | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Interior water leak | body | 1 | 1 | — | 5k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Moderate |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 1 | 1 | — | 72k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 221 | 54 | 38k | 64k | 103k | 0.7 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2000 Ford Focus draws about 15 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 90th percentile of complaint rates among 2000 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 335,500 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2000 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other electrical problem
While driving the vehicle at any speed, strong chemical fumes spread through out the vehicle. The dealer has been made aware of the problem. Nlm the tire rod has loosened, the battery had blown, and the engine light had stayed illuminated. Scc
The key would not turn the ignition was locked in place it would not move at all and the steering wheel was locked. I called roadside assistance and they told me it was a common problem, in fact, they told me what kind of car I had before I told them, and they said they no longer come out on that defect. They said there are a lot of problem with these models and they had many calls on the ford focus . I am just out of warranty period which is 36000. I don't feel this is my fault. I feel it is a defect with the product. I have had several other problems for which ford refuses to own up to, and I feel the public is being shammed with their claims that this is the #1 car they sell. The steering wheel is locked and I am stuck without being able to move my car. How could I expect this to happen, I feel this is a ford problem, I don't feel that I should have to pay (note: this happened jan 6, 2003, but your site only goes to 2002, therefore, I had to use dec 31, otherwise I could not continue).
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure
Could not put key in ignition and steering wheel locked. Needed to have car towed to dealer. Dealership had a brand new replacment part they told me was "defective" and they had to go to another dealer to get part. Ignition switch was completely replaced at a cost of $260 +/-. 40,000 miles on car and is a 2000 wagon model.
Key would not go into ignition. Called emergency road service. They could not help. They told me this was a common problem and that they were considering a recall. With all of the complaints registered and the number of issues on the internet, I am surprised it has not been done. Ignition already replaced once. This is starting to get to be ridiculous. Finally tapped the key in the car starts but the key will not come out of the ignition switch resulting in a security problem. *jb
Other engine problem
While driving the vehicle at any speed, strong chemical fumes spread through out the vehicle. The dealer has been made aware of the problem. Nlm the tire rod has loosened, the battery had blown, and the engine light had stayed illuminated. Scc
My 2000 ford focus stalled on three seperate occassions. Two times occuring on 2/13/03. I had the car towed to dealership service dept. They told me it was fixed that day. Same exact problem occured next dayon way to work.(only drove car home from dealership day before) drove straight to dealership and told same problem occured.(7am in morning) they called at 5:30pm to tell me they could not duplicate problem and wanted to keep car over weekend. On monday they told me they could not duplicate the problem, had test drove it 83 miles, and returned vehicle with no repair made.(other than upcoming recall I hadn't been notified of yet)
Recalls on the 2000 model year
NHTSA has issued 18 recall campaigns covering the 2000 Ford Focus, affecting an estimated 1,620,555 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover equipment, exterior lighting:headlights and exterior lighting. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
EQUIPMENT
10,006 vehicles 2012-02-24- Defect
- Ride control, llc (ride control) is recalling certain readymount assemblies, p/n 746641mt and 746646mt, with corresponding aftermarket customer part numbers: gabriel g56944 and gabriel g56945, and privately branded partsmaster with part numbers g68944 and g68945. The readymount assemblies were sold as aftermarket service equipment for use on certain 2000 through 2005 ford focus vehicles. These assemblies were assembled with a nut without the necessary washer. The absence of the washer can allow the readymount assembly to pull apart the top mount.
- Consequence
- If the assembly separates during installation, it could result in injury to the installer. If the assembly separates while the vehicle is in motion, it could result in secondary damage to the vehicle and possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Ride control will notify owners and will set up procedures to inspect, repair, and/or replace the affected parts without charge to the owner. The safety recall began on march 30, 2012. Owners may contact ride control at 1-800-999-3903.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
42,540 vehicles 2009-05-11- Defect
- Dope, inc. Is recalling 42,540 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Dope, inc. Will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on july 28, 2009. Owners may contact dope, inc. At 1-626-272-1798.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07- Defect
- Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11- Defect
- K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
27,176 vehicles 2006-05-24- Defect
- Certain ck motorsports combination headlights, clear corner, bumper, and side marker lights sold as replacement lamps for use on the passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Ck motorsport will notify owners and replace the noncompliant lamps free of charge. The recall began on july 1, 2006. Owners may contact ck motorsport at 1-909-610-7211.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
61,944 vehicles 2006-03-23- Defect
- Certain pro-a motors corner lamps, turn signals, and headlights sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Pro-a motors will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began on april 3, 2006. Owners may contact pro-a motors at 323-838-2988.
LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:DOORS:LATCH
589,932 vehicles 2005-02-01- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles with four or five doors and originally sold in or currently registered in connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia, a build-up of corrosion at the pawl pivot area of the rear door latch can cause a binding condition of the pawl that may affect proper engagement of the pawl into the catch. The occupant may experience difficulty opening or…
- Consequence
- If not latched properly, the door may open while the vehicle is in motion. If an occupant fell out of the vehicle, personal injuries could occur.
- Remedy
- Dealers will have a lower rocker seal added to the door and have the rear door latches evaluated free of charge. A latch that passes the evaluation will be lubricated to prevent future corrosion. A latch that does not pass the evaluation will be replaced. In addition, a sticker will be affixed to the rear doors advising the owners to use the recommended lubricant. The recall began on march 9, 2005. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
671,000 vehicles 2003-11-19- Defect
- On certain passenger vehicles, contamination of the filter in the fuel delivery module (fdm) can reduce, and eventually block, the flow of fuel to the engine.
- Consequence
- This may cause engine hesitation, loss of power, surging, and other similar symptoms. Over time, the filter may become sufficiently blocked to cause the engine to stall, which could result in a crash.
- Remedy
- This action is deemed a safety improvement campaign and is not being conducted under the safety act. All owners will be notified of the problem, and dealers will replace the fdm with a new design at no charge if the owner reports that the vehicle exhibits any of the identified symptoms. The free replacement will be available for a period of 10 years following the original purchase of the vehicle, with no mileage limit. Owner notification is expected to begin during november 2003. Owners should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
STEERING:LINKAGES
446,569 vehicles 2002-11-06- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles have loose pinch bolts that secure the lower control arm to the steering knuckle have been reported.
- Consequence
- Loose pinch bolts could exhibit noise, vibration and, in extreme cases if left uncorrected, separation of the joint or fracture of the ball joint stud, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will inspect the steering knuckle pinch bolt for tightness and correct as necessary. Owner notification began february 10, 2003. Owners who do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY:CABLES
291,854 vehicles 2002-11-06- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles equipped with zetec engines, loose or broken attachments and misrouted battery cables could lead to cable insulation damage.
- Consequence
- This, in turn, could cause the battery cables to short resulting in heat damage to the cables. Besides heat damage, the "check engine" light may illuminate, the vehicle may fail to start, or smoke, melting, or fire could also occur.
- Remedy
- Dealers will inspect the battery cables for the condition of the cable insulation and proper tightening of the terminal ends. As necessary, cables will be rerouted, retaining clips installed, and damaged battery cables replaced. Owner notification began february 10, 2003. Owners who do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.
WHEELS:LUGS/NUTS/BOLTS/STUDS
238,653 vehicles 2001-11-29- Defect
- This is not a safety recall in accordance with the safety act. However, it is deemed a safety improvement campaign by the agency. Vehicle description: 2000-2001 ford focus passenger vehicles, originally sold in or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohiom, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, and wisconsin. In high corrosion areas, where salt is used on roadways in the winter, the rear wheel bearing…
- Consequence
- The wheel bearings could prematurely wear and cause a noticeable noise. If not repaired, this condition could progress to the point where the wheel begins to wobble.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the rear wheel bearings at no cost to the consumer. Additional bearing seals will also be installed to ensure a smooth ride. This program will be in effect until december 31, 2002, regardless of mileage. Even if the vehicle has already been serviced under recall campaign 00s31, ford has taken additional steps to keep the wheel bearings in top shape. Owners can contact ford at 1-866-436-7332, concerning this program.
VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER:MOTOR
1,083,000 vehicles 2001-08-08- Defect
- Vehicle description: passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, and light and medium duty pickup trucks. A switch located in the plastic cover of the wiper motor gear case could malfunction and overheat, potentially resulting in loss of intermittent wiper function, loss of wiper park function, complete loss of wiper function, or ignition of the plastic cover material. Switch malfunction is most likely to occur when the intermittent setting of the wipers is being used, or when snow or ice obstructs the blades from returning to the "parked" position at the bottom of the…
- Consequence
- Loss of visibility while driving increases the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will inspect the date code on the wiper motor. Motors built with the suspect time frame will have the wiper motor gear case cover replaced. Owner notification began august 20, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2000 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 2000 sits in the model line
High risk for a 2000 — 70th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 20 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1999 comes out best at 55 and 2014 worst at 80, with 2000 itself at 71.
If the model year is negotiable, 1999, 2011, 2009, 2004 and 2010 score lower than 2000 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1999–2007 generation specifically, 1999 is the strongest year at 55 and 2007 the weakest at 75.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1999-2007 generation, 1999 Ford Focus scores best at 55 and 2007 Ford Focus worst at 75.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: steering rack, gear or tie rod failure from about 275, alternator or charging system failure from about 4k, paint peeling or clear coat failure from about 10k and steering column or shaft failure from about 14k.
On a 2000 Ford Focus with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether steering rack, gear or tie rod failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
Where these figures stop being useful
5,152 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 5,152 reports, 2,035 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 39% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2000 Ford Focus?
The most-reported failures are other electrical problem (847 reports, median 64,000 miles), ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure (368 reports, median 64,000 miles) and other engine problem (327 reports, median 59,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2000 Ford Focus problems start?
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 300 miles and a quarter of reports before 300 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 60,000 miles.
Is the 2000 Ford Focus reliable?
It scores 71 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 70th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2000 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford Focus is best?
Within the 1999–2007 generation, 1999 scores best at 55 out of 100 and 2007 worst at 75. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed