AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2000 Chevrolet Express: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2000 Chevrolet Express

On the 2000 Chevrolet Express, the failure owners report most often is other body or interior problem, and the reports cluster around 65,000 miles. Across every failure mode on this year, half the dated reports were filed before 55,000 miles. Overall it scores 66 out of 100, high risk for a 2000.

High risk for a 2000 — 175th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. 103 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

What breaks on the 2000 Chevrolet Express

Owners have reported 31 named failure modes on the 2000 Chevrolet Express, and the three most-reported carry 36% of everything filed.

Other body or interior problem leads with 15 reports, about 8.6 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 55k to 95,000 miles.

Seat belt or retractor failure follows with 11 reports, median 100,000 miles.

Other wheel or tire problem follows with 11 reports, median 35,000 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into brakes (24), body (17) and wheels (17).

At what mileage it happens

34 of the reports on the 2000 Chevrolet Express came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 55,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 35% by 50,000 miles, 82% by 100,000 miles and 97% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 1 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 50,000 and 60,000 miles, which alone holds 21% of the dated reports.

24% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

Median
  1. Other body or interior problem 63k
  2. Seat belt or retractor failure 100k
  3. Other wheel or tire problem 35k
  4. Other brake problem 37k
  5. ABS module or sensor failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  6. Tire blowout or tread separation 41k
  7. Fuel gauge or level sensor failure 60k
  8. Other suspension problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  9. Other powertrain problem 51k
  10. Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  11. Loss of braking
    no odometer readings given
    —
  12. Cruise control failure 17k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 31. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 55k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 1 report came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

How bad it is when it goes

Across the named modes, 2 mention a crash, 1 a fire and 1 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 3.91, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000, seat belt or retractor failure at $200–$900, other wheel or tire problem at $200–$1,500 and other brake problem at $300–$1,800. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

7% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Other body or interior problem body 15 9 55k 63k 96k 8.6 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 11 4 — 100k — 6.3 $200–$900 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 11 4 — 35k — 6.3 $200–$1,500 High
Other brake problem brakes 10 2 — 37k — 5.7 $300–$1,800 High
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 9 0 — — — 5.2 $500–$2,400 High
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 6 1 — 41k — 3.4 $200–$1,500 Critical
Fuel gauge or level sensor failure fuel 4 3 — 60k — 2.3 $300–$1,200 Moderate
Other suspension problem suspension 4 0 — — — 2.3 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Other powertrain problem transmission 3 2 — 51k — 1.7 $400–$4,500 High
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 2 0 — — — 1.1 $700–$3,000 High
Loss of braking brakes 2 0 — — — 1.1 $400–$3,000 Critical
Cruise control failure adas 2 1 — 17k — 1.1 $200–$1,400 High
Other steering problem steering 2 1 — 28k — 1.1 $350–$2,400 High
Other visibility problem glass 2 1 — 55k — 1.1 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Stalling while driving engine 1 0 — — — 0.6 $300–$2,500 Critical
Water pump failure cooling 1 0 — — — 0.6 $500–$2,200 High
Wheel bearing or hub failure drivetrain 1 0 — — — 0.6 $350–$1,200 Moderate
Fuel injector failure fuel 1 1 — 99k — 0.6 $450–$2,800 Moderate
Master cylinder or brake booster failure brakes 1 0 — — — 0.6 $450–$2,200 Critical
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 1 0 — — — 0.6 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 1 1 — 63k — 0.6 $250–$1,600 Critical
Loss of power steering steering 1 1 — 57k — 0.6 $600–$2,800 Critical
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 1 0 — — — 0.6 $400–$2,200 High
Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure body 1 0 — — — 0.6 $250–$1,500 Moderate
Seat, track or recliner failure body 1 0 — — — 0.6 $300–$2,200 High
Catalytic converter failure emissions 1 1 — 18k — 0.6 $900–$3,500 Moderate
Tail light, brake light or signal failure lighting 1 0 — — — 0.6 $100–$900 Moderate
Other engine problem engine 1 0 — — — 0.6 $300–$4,000 High
Other electrical problem electrical 1 1 — 2k — 0.6 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Other fuel system problem fuel 1 0 — — — 0.6 $300–$2,200 High
Other speed control problem adas 1 0 — — — 0.6 $250–$2,000 Critical
Unclassified problem other 3 1 — 55k — 1.7 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2000 Chevrolet Express draws about 59 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 96th percentile of complaint rates among 2000 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 1,744 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2000 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Other body or interior problem

1st time seat broke was covered under warranty. 2nd was on me, mileage over 60000. The bracket that holds the seat is like 4 thin washers, 1st time 2 brake, dealer replaced. Less than 6 months later, they all broke. I had to wire the seat in place to stop from coming completely off. Can't use the 6 way power at all, for fear of something else coming off or braking. I would guess that there other full size vans out there that have the same problem. The dealer might say its on the conversion company, but it wasn't in my case. Thank you. *ts *nlm **dimsii ivoq entry posted after 12-12-02 cut over to artemis**770174

63,000 miles NHTSA complaint 406385 filed 2003-05-06

While driving , the driver and passenger side seat snapped off the base, on different occasions. *ak the seat belts unlatched by themselves, the rear bench seat failed to stay tight, the side doors were difficult to open and the outside mirrors vibrated and the brakes were faulty *jb *nm

54,920 miles NHTSA complaint 430631 filed 2003-09-16

Seat belt or retractor failure

While driving and or parking, it was difficult for the consumer to roll the windows up or down on the driver's side. *ak the part was replaced three times. The window would only move about 1/4 an inch every minute or so intermittently. It was difficult to open roll down the window when going trough the toll booth. When the window was rolled down, it would take about 5-8 minutes to get it back up. Gm suggested that this was normal. Other problems were: the right cargo door panels rubbed together and made noise, the seat belt light did not come on at times, there was a "whirring" noise when the vehicle was driven at 35 MPH, the bar on the driver's side door did not have enough space for the consumer's hand to use it, the door locks would click when the vehicle was in motion, the mirror switch would work with the key in the off position, the left front window would stick at times, there was a clunk sound when the vehicle was placed in reverse at times, the right rear light was sometimes not bright enough, and the spring on the gas pedal broke. *sc *jb

100,000 miles NHTSA complaint 456679 filed 2004-02-25

While driving and or parking, it was difficult for the consumer to roll the windows up or down on the driver's side. *ak the part was replaced three times. The window would only move about 1/4 an inch every minute or so intermittently. It was difficult to open roll down the window when going trough the toll booth. When the window was rolled down, it would take about 5-8 minutes to get it back up. Gm suggested that this was normal. Other problems were: the right cargo door panels rubbed together and made noise, the seat belt light did not come on at times, there was a "whirring" noise when the vehicle was driven at 35 MPH, the bar on the driver's side door did not have enough space for the consumer's hand to use it, the door locks would click when the vehicle was in motion, the mirror switch would work with the key in the off position, the left front window would stick at times, there was a clunk sound when the vehicle was placed in reverse at times, the right rear light was sometimes not bright enough, and the spring on the gas pedal broke. *sc *jb

100,000 miles NHTSA complaint 456680 filed 2004-02-25

Other wheel or tire problem

The rear passenger side tire tread separated. Consumer changed the tire, and the spare tire started to violently vibrate while driving. The tire had a football size bubble in it. *ak the consumer stated 4 of the original tires failed. *jb *nm

34,725 miles NHTSA complaint 418655 filed 2003-07-17

The rear passenger side tire tread separated. Consumer changed the tire, and the spare tire started to violently vibrate while driving. The tire had a football size bubble in it. *ak the consumer stated 4 of the original tires failed. *jb *nm

34,725 miles NHTSA complaint 418656 filed 2003-07-17

Recalls on the 2000 model year

NHTSA has issued 1 recall campaign covering the 2000 Chevrolet Express, affecting an estimated 1,744 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover steering:hydraulic power assist:hose, piping, and connection. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

00V085000

STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST:HOSE, PIPING, AND CONNECTIONS

10,468 vehicles 2000-03-16
Defect
Vehicle description: passenger vans equipped with a brake warning indicator. Some of these vehicles have a power steering cooler hose that can separate from the power brake booster fluid flow switch assembly.
Consequence
If this occurs, power steering fluid could flow onto hot engine parts and an engine compartment fire could occur.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect for three screw clamps to the power steering hose joints. If the clamps are not the screw type, dealers will replace the clamps.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2000 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2000 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

Where 2000 sits in the model line

High risk for a 2000 — 175th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.

Across the 23 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1996 comes out best at 54 and 2021 worst at 79, with 2000 itself at 66.

If the model year is negotiable, 1996, 2004, 1997, 2006, 2005 and 2011 score lower than 2000 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1996–2001 generation specifically, 1996 is the strongest year at 54 and 2001 the weakest at 73.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1996-2001 generation, 1996 Chevrolet Express scores best at 54 and 2001 Chevrolet Express worst at 73.

Where to spend the inspection money

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other body or interior problem from about 55k.

On a 2000 Chevrolet Express with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other body or interior problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.

The limits of complaint data

103 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 103 reports, 34 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 33% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2000 Chevrolet Express?

The most-reported failures are other body or interior problem (15 reports, median 65,000 miles), seat belt or retractor failure (11 reports, median 100,000 miles) and other wheel or tire problem (11 reports, median 35,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2000 Chevrolet Express problems start?

Other body or interior problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 65,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 55,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 55,000 miles.

Is the 2000 Chevrolet Express reliable?

It scores 66 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 175th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2000 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Chevrolet Express is best?

Within the 1996–2001 generation, 1996 scores best at 54 out of 100 and 2001 worst at 73. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed