AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2002 Chevrolet Cavalier: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier

On the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier, the failure owners report most often is other electrical problem, and the reports cluster around 70,000 miles. The earliest to appear is fuel pump failure, reported by a median of 70,000 miles. Overall it scores 76 out of 100, severe risk for a 2002.

Severe risk for a 2002 — 33rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. 254 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

What breaks on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier

Owners have reported 53 named failure modes on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier, and the three most-reported carry 20% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Other electrical problem leads with 21 reports, about 121 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 31k to 120,000 miles.

Fuel pump failure follows with 17 reports, usually reported between 26k to 145,000 miles.

Other body or interior problem follows with 13 reports, median 55,000 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (37), brakes (28) and fuel (25).

The mileage the reports cluster at

135 of the reports on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 54,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 43% by 50,000 miles, 85% by 100,000 miles and 94% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed.

The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 17% of the dated reports.

33% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

Median
  1. Other electrical problem 72k
  2. Fuel pump failure 68k
  3. Other body or interior problem 57k
  4. Seat belt or retractor failure 40k
  5. ABS module or sensor failure 5k
  6. Other powertrain problem 27k
  7. Other wheel or tire problem 89k
  8. Other engine problem 70k
  9. Other suspension problem 43k
  10. Other visibility problem 21k
  11. Premature brake pad or rotor wear 13k
  12. Other brake problem 65k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 53. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 54k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

Severity, and what it costs

Across the named modes, 28 mention a crash, 5 a fire and 18 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.89, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, fuel pump failure at $600–$2,600, other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000 and seat belt or retractor failure at $200–$900. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

16% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Other electrical problem electrical 21 8 31k 72k 120k 121.4 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Fuel pump failure fuel 17 13 26k 68k 147k 98.3 $600–$2,600 High
Other body or interior problem body 13 5 — 57k — 75.1 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 12 7 — 40k — 69.4 $200–$900 High
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 9 1 — 5k — 52.0 $500–$2,400 High
Other powertrain problem transmission 9 4 — 27k — 52.0 $400–$4,500 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 9 2 — 89k — 52.0 $200–$1,500 High
Other engine problem engine 8 6 — 70k — 46.2 $300–$4,000 High
Other suspension problem suspension 8 2 — 43k — 46.2 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Other visibility problem glass 8 7 — 21k — 46.2 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 7 5 — 13k — 40.5 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Other brake problem brakes 7 5 — 65k — 40.5 $300–$1,800 High
Other steering problem steering 7 2 — 61k — 40.5 $350–$2,400 High
Other lighting problem lighting 7 4 — 105k — 40.5 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Other speed control problem adas 7 4 — 41k — 40.5 $250–$2,000 Critical
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 6 5 — 9k — 34.7 $700–$3,000 High
Tail light, brake light or signal failure lighting 6 3 — 60k — 34.7 $100–$900 Moderate
Radiator or coolant leak cooling 5 3 — 90k — 28.9 $350–$1,900 High
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 5 4 — 10k — 28.9 $700–$2,600 High
Other fuel system problem fuel 5 1 — 80k — 28.9 $300–$2,200 High
Misfire or rough idle engine 4 4 — 56k — 23.1 $250–$1,600 Moderate
Sunroof failure or glass breakage body 4 0 — — — 23.1 $700–$4,500 High
Wheel bearing or hub failure drivetrain 3 3 — 4k — 17.3 $350–$1,200 Moderate
Alternator or charging system failure electrical 3 0 — — — 17.3 $450–$1,600 High
Parking brake failure brakes 3 3 — 53k — 17.3 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Cruise control failure adas 3 1 — 171k — 17.3 $200–$1,400 High
Steering column or shaft failure steering 3 2 — 90k — 17.3 $600–$2,500 Critical
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 3 3 — 72k — 17.3 $400–$2,200 High
Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure engine 2 1 — 54k — 11.6 $1,200–$4,500 Critical
No-start or intermittent start failure engine 2 2 — 150k — 11.6 $200–$1,800 Moderate
Overheating cooling 2 1 — 54k — 11.6 $400–$3,500 High
Thermostat failure cooling 2 0 — — — 11.6 $250–$900 Moderate
Fuel gauge or level sensor failure fuel 2 2 — 10k — 11.6 $300–$1,200 Moderate
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 2 0 — — — 11.6 $400–$3,500 High
Engine sensor failure electrical 2 2 — 54k — 11.6 $180–$900 Moderate
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 2 2 — 85k — 11.6 $250–$1,500 High
Wiper or washer failure glass 2 1 — 49k — 11.6 $120–$800 Moderate
Electrical fire or melted wiring electrical 1 1 — 45k — 5.8 $1,500–$9,000 Critical
Complete engine failure or seizure engine 1 1 — 72k — 5.8 $4,500–$12,000 Critical
Stalling while driving engine 1 1 — 6k — 5.8 $300–$2,500 Critical
Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure transmission 1 1 — 47k — 5.8 $250–$1,400 High
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 1 0 — — — 5.8 $450–$2,200 High
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 1 1 — 50k — 5.8 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Instrument cluster or gauge failure infotainment 1 1 — 25k — 5.8 $350–$1,400 Moderate
Loss of braking brakes 1 0 — — — 5.8 $400–$3,000 Critical
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 1 1 — 104k — 5.8 $250–$1,600 Critical
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 1 1 — 33k — 5.8 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 1 0 — — — 5.8 $300–$1,600 High
Power steering pump or fluid leak steering 1 1 — 52k — 5.8 $350–$1,600 Moderate
Window regulator or power window failure body 1 1 — 50k — 5.8 $250–$900 Moderate
Headlight failure or clouding lighting 1 0 — — — 5.8 $150–$1,800 Moderate
Other seat belt problem airbag 1 0 — — — 5.8 $200–$900 High
Other driver assistance problem adas 1 1 — 47k — 5.8 $250–$1,800 High
Unclassified problem other 18 6 — 80k — 104.0 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier draws about 1,468 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 100th percentile of complaint rates among 2002 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 173 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2002 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Other electrical problem

My car has a tendancy to not start. I sat in a prking lot once for 10 minutes trying to start my cavalier. It started when the car only had 100 miles on it. I have complained to the dealership on at least 4 different occasions, only to be told they do not find any problems. I want this resolved!!

100 miles NHTSA complaint 438057 filed 2003-10-29

Vehicle shut down on highway, other vehicle on highway exceeding speed of 50 MPH. *bf the consumer is suing turnerville auto complex for repairs made to an unsafe vehicle. The vehicle defect in the enhanced traction system or ets system. The vehicle had to be towed to the nearest dealership. *tc

39,517 miles NHTSA complaint 503452 filed 2004-10-26

Fuel pump failure

Front rotors warped prematurely, about every 10000 miles. Grinding noise heard at low speeds, whether in gear or coasting & not brake related. Premature fuel pump failure, causing engine to shut off. *ak

10,000 miles NHTSA complaint 445113 filed 2003-12-13

Front rotors warped prematurely, about every 10000 miles. Grinding noise heard at low speeds, whether in gear or coasting & not brake related. Premature fuel pump failure, causing engine to shut off. *ak

10,000 miles NHTSA complaint 445114 filed 2003-12-13

Other body or interior problem

The wire that connects to the air conditioner is too short and will intermittently cause the AC to kick in. When the AC kicks in this will cause the vehicle to surge forward. There is a technical service bulletin about this problem, but the manufacturer will not do any thing about it. *ph

50,000 miles NHTSA complaint 440531 filed 2003-11-12

I own a 2002 chevrolet cavalier. I recently found out that the car was not made with the latch system specifically the lower anchors in the folds of the seat, so I can install a car seat. The car also does not come with the child locking mechanism in the 3 point lap and shoulder belt. At this point I am unable to use my vehicle to transport my 2 children who require car seats as there is no way to safely install the car seat. I called the chevy dealership who was unable to find this part (lower anchor or seatbelts with child locking mechanism). I called gm and they are unable to supply the parts and I have called aftermarket parts stores who are unable to find parts. A search of the internet I found other people with the same problem, but no solution. I feel this is very dangerous. I am the original owner of the car and I was never made aware of this problem. *tr

75,000 miles NHTSA complaint 717912 filed 2009-04-27

Recalls on the 2002 model year

NHTSA has issued 5 recall campaigns covering the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier, affecting an estimated 278 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover exterior lighting, steering, exterior lighting:headlights and fuel system, other:storage:tank assembly:pressure relief dev. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.

09E012000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07
Defect
Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
08E063000

STEERING

3,855 vehicles 2008-10-17
Defect
Dorman products is recalling 3,900 intermediate steering shafts dorman part nos. 425-151, 425-152, and 425-153, (sold under dorman's "oe solutions" brand name), balkamp #'s 7-3057, 7-3058, 7-3059 (sold under the "napa" brand name), and platinum parts #'s 2425151, 2425152, and 2425153 manufactured during the month of september 2007. These replacement steering shafts can be used on the vehicles listed above. The weld connecting the inner tube to the outer tube may be defective.
Consequence
If the weld fails, loss of steering could result, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Dorman will notify owners and replace the steering shafts free of charge. The recall began on october 16, 2008. Owners may contact dorman toll free at 1-800-523-2492.
08E050000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11
Defect
K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence
Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
07E021000

FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY:PRESSURE RELIEF DEVICES

742 vehicles 2007-03-12
Defect
Certain delphi fuel pressure regulators, p/nos. Fp10020-11b1, fp10026-11b1, and fp10027-11b1, sold after january 9, 2007, as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles listed above. The universal pressure regulators (upr) were produced without an o'ring and retainer.
Consequence
Fuel may leak, possibly resulting in a fire.
Remedy
Delphi will notify owners and replace the upr free of charge. The recall began on april 23, 2007. Owners can contact delphi at 877-411-8770.
06E026000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

61,944 vehicles 2006-03-23
Defect
Certain pro-a motors corner lamps, turn signals, and headlights sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
Remedy
Pro-a motors will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began on april 3, 2006. Owners may contact pro-a motors at 323-838-2988.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2002 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2002 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

How 2002 compares with the other years

Severe risk for a 2002 — 33rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.

Across the 10 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1999 comes out best at 66 and 2002 worst at 76, with 2002 itself at 76.

If the model year is negotiable, 1999, 2003, 2005, 2000, 1998, 1996, 2001, 1997 and 2004 score lower than 2002 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 1996–2002 generation specifically, 1999 is the strongest year at 66 and 2002 the weakest at 76.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1996-2002 generation, 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier scores best at 66 and 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier worst at 76.

What to look at before buying one

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: fuel pump failure from about 26k and other electrical problem from about 31k.

On a 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether fuel pump failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.

Where these figures stop being useful

254 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 254 reports, 135 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 53% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier?

The most-reported failures are other electrical problem (21 reports, median 70,000 miles), fuel pump failure (17 reports, median 70,000 miles) and other body or interior problem (13 reports, median 55,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier problems start?

Fuel pump failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 70,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 25,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 54,000 miles.

Is the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier reliable?

It scores 76 out of 100 on our risk index, which is severe — 33rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2002 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Chevrolet Cavalier is best?

Within the 1996–2002 generation, 1999 scores best at 66 out of 100 and 2002 worst at 76. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed