2002 Chevrolet Cavalier: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier
On the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier, the failure owners report most often is other electrical problem, and the reports cluster around 70,000 miles. The earliest to appear is fuel pump failure, reported by a median of 70,000 miles. Overall it scores 76 out of 100, severe risk for a 2002.
Severe risk for a 2002 — 33rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. 254 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier
Owners have reported 53 named failure modes on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier, and the three most-reported carry 20% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other electrical problem leads with 21 reports, about 121 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 31k to 120,000 miles.
Fuel pump failure follows with 17 reports, usually reported between 26k to 145,000 miles.
Other body or interior problem follows with 13 reports, median 55,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (37), brakes (28) and fuel (25).
The mileage the reports cluster at
135 of the reports on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 54,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 43% by 50,000 miles, 85% by 100,000 miles and 94% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 17% of the dated reports.
33% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 53. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 28 mention a crash, 5 a fire and 18 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.89, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, fuel pump failure at $600–$2,600, other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000 and seat belt or retractor failure at $200–$900. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
16% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 21 | 8 | 31k | 72k | 120k | 121.4 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 17 | 13 | 26k | 68k | 147k | 98.3 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 13 | 5 | — | 57k | — | 75.1 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 12 | 7 | — | 40k | — | 69.4 | $200–$900 | High |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 9 | 1 | — | 5k | — | 52.0 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 9 | 4 | — | 27k | — | 52.0 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 9 | 2 | — | 89k | — | 52.0 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 8 | 6 | — | 70k | — | 46.2 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 8 | 2 | — | 43k | — | 46.2 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 8 | 7 | — | 21k | — | 46.2 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 7 | 5 | — | 13k | — | 40.5 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 7 | 5 | — | 65k | — | 40.5 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 7 | 2 | — | 61k | — | 40.5 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 7 | 4 | — | 105k | — | 40.5 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 7 | 4 | — | 41k | — | 40.5 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 6 | 5 | — | 9k | — | 34.7 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 6 | 3 | — | 60k | — | 34.7 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 5 | 3 | — | 90k | — | 28.9 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 5 | 4 | — | 10k | — | 28.9 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 5 | 1 | — | 80k | — | 28.9 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 4 | 4 | — | 56k | — | 23.1 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | 23.1 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 3 | 3 | — | 4k | — | 17.3 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 17.3 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 3 | 3 | — | 53k | — | 17.3 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 3 | 1 | — | 171k | — | 17.3 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 3 | 2 | — | 90k | — | 17.3 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 3 | 3 | — | 72k | — | 17.3 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 2 | 1 | — | 54k | — | 11.6 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 150k | — | 11.6 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Overheating | cooling | 2 | 1 | — | 54k | — | 11.6 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Thermostat failure | cooling | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 11.6 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 2 | 2 | — | 10k | — | 11.6 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 11.6 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 54k | — | 11.6 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 85k | — | 11.6 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 2 | 1 | — | 49k | — | 11.6 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Electrical fire or melted wiring | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 45k | — | 5.8 | $1,500–$9,000 | Critical |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 72k | — | 5.8 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 6k | — | 5.8 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 47k | — | 5.8 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 5.8 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 50k | — | 5.8 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 1 | 1 | — | 25k | — | 5.8 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 5.8 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 104k | — | 5.8 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 33k | — | 5.8 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 5.8 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Power steering pump or fluid leak | steering | 1 | 1 | — | 52k | — | 5.8 | $350–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Window regulator or power window failure | body | 1 | 1 | — | 50k | — | 5.8 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 5.8 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 5.8 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 1 | 1 | — | 47k | — | 5.8 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 18 | 6 | — | 80k | — | 104.0 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier draws about 1,468 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 100th percentile of complaint rates among 2002 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 173 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2002 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other electrical problem
My car has a tendancy to not start. I sat in a prking lot once for 10 minutes trying to start my cavalier. It started when the car only had 100 miles on it. I have complained to the dealership on at least 4 different occasions, only to be told they do not find any problems. I want this resolved!!
Vehicle shut down on highway, other vehicle on highway exceeding speed of 50 MPH. *bf the consumer is suing turnerville auto complex for repairs made to an unsafe vehicle. The vehicle defect in the enhanced traction system or ets system. The vehicle had to be towed to the nearest dealership. *tc
Fuel pump failure
Front rotors warped prematurely, about every 10000 miles. Grinding noise heard at low speeds, whether in gear or coasting & not brake related. Premature fuel pump failure, causing engine to shut off. *ak
Front rotors warped prematurely, about every 10000 miles. Grinding noise heard at low speeds, whether in gear or coasting & not brake related. Premature fuel pump failure, causing engine to shut off. *ak
Other body or interior problem
The wire that connects to the air conditioner is too short and will intermittently cause the AC to kick in. When the AC kicks in this will cause the vehicle to surge forward. There is a technical service bulletin about this problem, but the manufacturer will not do any thing about it. *ph
I own a 2002 chevrolet cavalier. I recently found out that the car was not made with the latch system specifically the lower anchors in the folds of the seat, so I can install a car seat. The car also does not come with the child locking mechanism in the 3 point lap and shoulder belt. At this point I am unable to use my vehicle to transport my 2 children who require car seats as there is no way to safely install the car seat. I called the chevy dealership who was unable to find this part (lower anchor or seatbelts with child locking mechanism). I called gm and they are unable to supply the parts and I have called aftermarket parts stores who are unable to find parts. A search of the internet I found other people with the same problem, but no solution. I feel this is very dangerous. I am the original owner of the car and I was never made aware of this problem. *tr
Recalls on the 2002 model year
NHTSA has issued 5 recall campaigns covering the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier, affecting an estimated 278 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover exterior lighting, steering, exterior lighting:headlights and fuel system, other:storage:tank assembly:pressure relief dev. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07- Defect
- Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
STEERING
3,855 vehicles 2008-10-17- Defect
- Dorman products is recalling 3,900 intermediate steering shafts dorman part nos. 425-151, 425-152, and 425-153, (sold under dorman's "oe solutions" brand name), balkamp #'s 7-3057, 7-3058, 7-3059 (sold under the "napa" brand name), and platinum parts #'s 2425151, 2425152, and 2425153 manufactured during the month of september 2007. These replacement steering shafts can be used on the vehicles listed above. The weld connecting the inner tube to the outer tube may be defective.
- Consequence
- If the weld fails, loss of steering could result, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Dorman will notify owners and replace the steering shafts free of charge. The recall began on october 16, 2008. Owners may contact dorman toll free at 1-800-523-2492.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11- Defect
- K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY:PRESSURE RELIEF DEVICES
742 vehicles 2007-03-12- Defect
- Certain delphi fuel pressure regulators, p/nos. Fp10020-11b1, fp10026-11b1, and fp10027-11b1, sold after january 9, 2007, as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles listed above. The universal pressure regulators (upr) were produced without an o'ring and retainer.
- Consequence
- Fuel may leak, possibly resulting in a fire.
- Remedy
- Delphi will notify owners and replace the upr free of charge. The recall began on april 23, 2007. Owners can contact delphi at 877-411-8770.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
61,944 vehicles 2006-03-23- Defect
- Certain pro-a motors corner lamps, turn signals, and headlights sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Pro-a motors will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began on april 3, 2006. Owners may contact pro-a motors at 323-838-2988.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2002 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
How 2002 compares with the other years
Severe risk for a 2002 — 33rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.
Across the 10 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1999 comes out best at 66 and 2002 worst at 76, with 2002 itself at 76.
If the model year is negotiable, 1999, 2003, 2005, 2000, 1998, 1996, 2001, 1997 and 2004 score lower than 2002 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1996–2002 generation specifically, 1999 is the strongest year at 66 and 2002 the weakest at 76.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1996-2002 generation, 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier scores best at 66 and 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier worst at 76.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: fuel pump failure from about 26k and other electrical problem from about 31k.
On a 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether fuel pump failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
Where these figures stop being useful
254 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 254 reports, 135 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 53% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier?
The most-reported failures are other electrical problem (21 reports, median 70,000 miles), fuel pump failure (17 reports, median 70,000 miles) and other body or interior problem (13 reports, median 55,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier problems start?
Fuel pump failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 70,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 25,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 54,000 miles.
Is the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier reliable?
It scores 76 out of 100 on our risk index, which is severe — 33rd riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2002 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Chevrolet Cavalier is best?
Within the 1996–2002 generation, 1999 scores best at 66 out of 100 and 2002 worst at 76. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed