AtWhatMileage
Body · 47 owner reports

Other body or interior problem on the 2007 Toyota Tundra

1 fire 1 injury 2 of the 47 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 47
With an odometer reading 38
Reports per 1,000 built 0.4 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 32%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 2
Typical repair $200–$2,000
What it means when it happens Moderate
Rank among this year's problems 4th

When other body or interior problem gets reported

Owners of the 2007 Toyota Tundra report other body or interior problem at a median of 57,500 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 17,500 miles and a quarter after 115,000 miles, from 38 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 88,000 miles. It is the 4th most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 2,500 miles at the tenth percentile to 135,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 133,575 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

32% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 38 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
1,425 miles 17,375 miles 58,500 miles 113,750 miles 135,000 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 1 a fire and 1 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $200–$2,000 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 20 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2018, at a median of 5,000 miles, and latest on the 2023 at 140,000 miles.

By volume the 2000 carries the most reports, with 316; the 2007 has 47. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 2000 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 112k
  2. 2001 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 111k
  3. 2002 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 106k
  4. 2003 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 113k
  5. 2004 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 116k
  6. 2005 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 113k
  7. 2006 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 101k
  8. 2007 (this one) 59k
  9. 2008 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 37k
  10. 2009 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 24k
  11. 2010 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 23k
  12. 2011 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 65k
  13. 2012 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 37k
  14. 2013 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 30k
  15. 2014 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 31k
  16. 2015 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 36k
  17. 2016 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 24k
  18. 2017 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 5k
  19. 2018 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 3k
  20. 2019 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  21. 2020 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  22. 2021 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  23. 2022 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 7k
  24. 2023 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 139k
  25. 2024 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 32k
  26. 2025 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem
    no odometer readings given
    —

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Since day one that I have purchased the truck I have complained that the brakes don't slow the truck down as it should. That you have to pump it at least one time for them to act normal when slowing down. Some times it is over half way to the floor before you stop. And that is with out pulling a load. When I talked to the dealership (jay wolfe toyota of k.c) was told that "it was magic brakes" , I have had to go back to the days of old where you give it a pump then it works. I have almost rear ended several people. These brakes are dangerous. And I paid $50,000. For that. They did not consider this to be a problem that maybe I needed to get use to the truck. *tr

25 miles NHTSA complaint 626244 filed 2007-06-04

Nut holding the driver's side heat duct was loose. This allowed the heat duct to fall down and block the driver's use of the brake pedal and the accelerator pedal. Luckily for me I was not on a busy street or driving at highway speed. This defect almost completely blocks the drivers use of the brake pedal. If this happens to someone on a crowded freeway at speed they could be seriously injured or killed in the accident. *tr

6,400 miles NHTSA complaint 654087 filed 2008-01-17

Toyota 2007 tundra twice accelerated uncontrollably due to a stuck accelerator on the factory floor mats, which are a very thick rubber and don't come with safety clips. Mat was moved back but fear it may slide forward again. *tr

6,000 miles NHTSA complaint 654545 filed 2008-01-22

Also reported on the 2007 Toyota Tundra

Other engine problem

53 reports median 68k

Other speed control problem

53 reports median 36k

Other suspension problem

51 reports median 967

Other powertrain problem

41 reports median 45k

Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure

25 reports median 136k

Other electrical problem

20 reports median 68k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 47 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does other body or interior problem happen on the 2007 Toyota Tundra?

Across 38 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 57,500 miles. A quarter were filed before 17,500 miles and a quarter after 115,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is other body or interior problem on the 2007 Toyota Tundra?

47 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.4 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed