AtWhatMileage
Body · 89 owner reports

Other body or interior problem on the 2006 Toyota Tundra

3 crashes 1 injury 4 of the 89 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 89
With an odometer reading 48
Reports per 1,000 built 1.2 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 17%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 4
Typical repair $200–$2,000
What it means when it happens Moderate
Rank among this year's problems 1st

When other body or interior problem gets reported

Owners of the 2006 Toyota Tundra report other body or interior problem at a median of 100,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 55,000 miles and a quarter after 140,000 miles, from 48 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 88,000 miles. It is the 1st most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 12,500 miles at the tenth percentile to 167,500 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 153,800 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

17% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 48 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
13,500 miles 54,000 miles 100,500 miles 138,750 miles 167,300 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 3 a crash and 1 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $200–$2,000 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 20 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2018, at a median of 5,000 miles, and latest on the 2023 at 140,000 miles.

By volume the 2000 carries the most reports, with 316; the 2006 has 89. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 2000 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 112k
  2. 2001 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 111k
  3. 2002 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 106k
  4. 2003 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 113k
  5. 2004 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 116k
  6. 2005 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 113k
  7. 2006 (this one) 101k
  8. 2007 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 59k
  9. 2008 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 37k
  10. 2009 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 24k
  11. 2010 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 23k
  12. 2011 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 65k
  13. 2012 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 37k
  14. 2013 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 30k
  15. 2014 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 31k
  16. 2015 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 36k
  17. 2016 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 24k
  18. 2017 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 5k
  19. 2018 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 3k
  20. 2019 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  21. 2020 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  22. 2021 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  23. 2022 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 7k
  24. 2023 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 139k
  25. 2024 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem 32k
  26. 2025 Toyota Tundra other body or interior problem
    no odometer readings given
    —

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

My young son (7) was attemping to play the video station that is part of my new toyota tundra's video system. The unit started to catch fire. Within a minute of being plugged in into the behind the headrest video, it started to smoke, black smoke. I quickly pulled over the truck, ran to the back and took the unit out of my son's hands before he was injured. The unit was extremely hot.

9,100 miles NHTSA complaint 624167 filed 2007-05-15

I noticed power outlets were loose info dealership, panel was loose as well, dealership replaced a pin and fix pwr outlets. This was in feb.. A month later power outlet panel loose again, dealership replaced pin, this has been happening so many times now, this time power outlet panel as fell to the floor board, I can't brake to well or accelerate with a panel by my feet. I have use the power outlet to run a dvd player and cell phone charger, panel has not drop after pulling the charger out, of power outlets.. Just when I'm driven down the road it falls, I have had another dealership look at thee problem and was info that thee panel was bad. I took it to another shop other than toyota also got panel is worn and vibrations is making thee panel to fall...so I only know I have a panel laying on my floor board its hard to brake or to accelerate. *tr

300 miles NHTSA complaint 643683 filed 2007-10-26

I noticed power outlets were loose info dealership, panel was loose as well, dealership replaced a pin and fix pwr outlets. This was in feb.. A month later power outlet panel loose again, dealership replaced pin, this has been happening so many times now, this time power outlet panel as fell to the floor board, I can't brake to well or accelerate with a panel by my feet. I have use the power outlet to run a dvd player and cell phone charger, panel has not drop after pulling the charger out, of power outlets.. Just when I'm driven down the road it falls, I have had another dealership look at thee problem and was info that thee panel was bad. I took it to another shop other than toyota also got panel is worn and vibrations is making thee panel to fall...so I only know I have a panel laying on my floor board its hard to brake or to accelerate. *tr

300 miles NHTSA complaint 643685 filed 2007-10-26

Also reported on the 2006 Toyota Tundra

Rust or structural corrosion

66 reports median 112k

Airbag inflator rupture

51 reports median 95k

Other suspension problem

33 reports median 165k

Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure

31 reports median 120k

Other speed control problem

22 reports median 47k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 89 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does other body or interior problem happen on the 2006 Toyota Tundra?

Across 48 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 100,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 55,000 miles and a quarter after 140,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is other body or interior problem on the 2006 Toyota Tundra?

89 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 1.2 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed