2006 Toyota Highlander: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2006 Toyota Highlander
On the 2006 Toyota Highlander, the failure owners report most often is other brake problem, and the reports cluster around 80,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other powertrain problem, reported by a median of 35,000 miles. Overall it scores 70 out of 100, high risk for a 2006.
High risk for a 2006 — 131st riskiest of the 343 2006 vehicles we can rate. 346 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2006 Toyota Highlander
Owners have reported 45 named failure modes on the 2006 Toyota Highlander, and the three most-reported carry 33% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other brake problem leads with 57 reports, about 0.8 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 43k to 165,000 miles.
Other speed control problem follows with 34 reports, usually reported between 25k to 60,000 miles. 1 of those report mention a fire.
Other engine problem follows with 24 reports, usually reported between 48k to 130,000 miles. 2 of those reports mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into brakes (98), adas (49) and engine (34).
The mileage the reports cluster at
249 of the reports on the 2006 Toyota Highlander came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 69,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 33% by 50,000 miles, 63% by 100,000 miles and 79% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 16 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 16% of the dated reports.
26% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: other powertrain problem around 36k, other fuel system problem around 49k, other speed control problem around 50k and other electrical problem around 70k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 45. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 16 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
What happens when these parts fail
Across the named modes, 32 mention a crash, 4 a fire, 18 an injury and 1 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.27, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other brake problem at $300–$1,800, other speed control problem at $250–$2,000, other engine problem at $300–$4,000 and other electrical problem at $250–$2,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
18% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other brake problem | brakes | 57 | 36 | 43k | 81k | 166k | 0.8 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 34 | 22 | 25k | 50k | 62k | 0.5 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other engine problem | engine | 24 | 21 | 48k | 101k | 129k | 0.3 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 23 | 19 | 30k | 70k | 141k | 0.3 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 22 | 16 | 60k | 71k | 85k | 0.3 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 20 | 11 | 90k | 149k | 151k | 0.3 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 17 | 10 | 4k | 36k | 97k | 0.2 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 13 | 8 | 54k | 102k | 164k | 0.2 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Other steering problem | steering | 13 | 7 | — | 66k | — | 0.2 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 11 | 9 | 70k | 135k | 177k | 0.2 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 8 | 8 | 29k | 49k | 141k | 0.1 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 6 | 5 | — | 68k | — | 0.1 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 6 | 5 | — | 85k | — | 0.1 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 6 | 4 | — | 91k | — | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 6 | 5 | — | 16k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 4 | 4 | — | 7k | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 4 | 4 | — | 15k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 4 | 3 | — | 105k | — | 0.1 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 4 | 4 | — | 256k | — | 0.1 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Overheating | cooling | 3 | 3 | — | 66k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 3 | 1 | — | 53k | — | 0.0 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 3 | 2 | — | 86k | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 3 | 1 | — | 93k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 3 | 3 | — | 79k | — | 0.0 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 82k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 100k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 2 | 2 | — | 58k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 2 | 2 | — | 107k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 2 | 2 | — | 4k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 182k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 80k | — | 0.0 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 2 | 1 | — | 61k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 2 | 1 | — | 94k | — | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 2 | 2 | — | 77k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Water pump failure | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 70k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,200 | High |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 103k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Transmission slipping | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 35k | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$5,500 | High |
| Harsh or jerky shifting | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$4,000 | Moderate |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 1 | 1 | — | 150k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Backup camera failure | infotainment | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 45k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 120k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 1 | 1 | — | 35k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Windshield cracking | glass | 1 | 1 | — | 63k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 18 | 12 | 5k | 38k | 78k | 0.2 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2006 Toyota Highlander draws about 4.7 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 81st percentile of complaint rates among 2006 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 72,854 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2006 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other brake problem
Tl*the contact owns a 2006 toyota highlander. Whenever the contact attempts to apply the brakes at low speeds, the brakes become unresponsive, and the stopping distance increases. There were no warning indicators prior to the failure. The intermittent failure was diagnosed by the dealer, but still persists. The current mileage was 52,000 and failure mileage was 46,000.
We own a 2006 highlander which we purchased new. It has 18,000 miles on it. When going down our driveway (185 feet at 35 degree slope) when the brakes are activated to stop before entering a cross street, on occasion there is little to no braking. It becomes necessary to quickly pump the brake to accomplish braking. This happens intermittently. Discussions with the toyota dealer resulted in no resolution. The explanation was that the vehicle's collision avoidance system or ABS was sensing the slope as a deceleration and was reacting accordingly. They said there were no reported problems (recalls) pertaining to this issue and we should just continue to be ready to pump the brake or pump them before we start down the driveway. *tr
Other speed control problem
2006 toyota highlander 3-3v-6 5 speed auto. Very erratic shifting and hesitation when at slow speeds. Happened mostly in stop and go traffic. Very dangerous because car lurched forward and brakes needed to be applied much harder than one would like. Could never be sure when merging into traffic how the car will respond. Very dangerous. Had a 2002 highlander before this one and had no problems. Car has been back to the dealer 4 times since purchase in july 2006. Each time I was told that the car has to adjust to my driving style. Unless the check engine light goes on they won't even try to fix anything. I even had the regional rep drive it (5 miles) and proclaim the car to be normal. If this is normal, you can keep it. I am so disappointed in this car. Toyota is waiting for a serious accident to occur. I intend to file a claim with the nj lemon law. *ak
Friday early may 2008, I carried my highlander for it's 30k service at 28k, due to hesitation, lurching, backfiring at times and poor gas mileage. At the service, I was told they clean the accelerator senor. The vehicle ran fine getting 28 miles per gallon, but notice a change in the vehicle grounding. I could hear the engine noise though the radio sometimes in the morning. The engine noise was added feature. I noticed the engine shifting was smooth until the following tuesday. It was rain traffic medium driving 65 MPH. The highlander consumed a quarter of a tank within 20 miles. My highlander is kept in garage nightly and most of the day. I make an appointment to my nearest toyota dealer on 16may08 31k. The local dealership reset my vehicle?s computer by connecting the battery and reconnection. I was told 2 weeks before hand at the dealership it was a possibly of vehicle ?s computer software needing upgrading when they cleaned the accelerator senor. Today, the vehicle doesn't have the smooth accelerating power. For this vehicle, riding in traffic causes serious problems due lack of power lurching, poor gas mileage or the possible…
Other engine problem
Toyota highlander hybrid-I have lost ABS brakes, stability control and power steering along with the hybrid engine on two occasions with my 2 week old 2006 highlander. I have brought it to the dealer twice-the first time they found "malfunction codes" and "rebooted" the computer and told me it was operating as "designed," only to happen again 2 days later. Currently, they are replacing a computer. Date of incident and purchase of vehicle is actually 2006 but is not an option below. I am concerned it will happen again and result in an accident in the future. *jb
When I use the A/C and turn it off a bad odor comes from the vent . This is a new 2006 highlander, the next day I brought it to the dealer he said take for service , they told me to drive it for a few more days . I put 1500 miles and the odor is still there . I took it for service again . The mechanic said to use a deodorizer on the vent. I am not a satisfied customer. I want this issue resolved. I paid for the highlander not the smell that came with it. *nm
Recalls on the 2006 model year
NHTSA has issued 7 recall campaigns covering the 2006 Toyota Highlander, affecting an estimated 121,064 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover seats:front assembly:seat heater/cooler, vehicle speed control:accelerator pedal and service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:master cylin. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
7,749 vehicles 2016-06-02- Defect
- Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain 2005-2011 4Runner, Highlander, Sequoia, and Sienna, 2005-2010 Avalon and Tundra, 2006-2008 Camry Solara, 2006-2010 Highlander hybrid, 2006-2011 Rav4 and Tacoma, 2007-2010 FJ Cruiser, 2007-2011 Camry hybrid, 2009-2010 Venza, 2010-2012 Prius, 1988-1990 and 2005-2010 Camry, and 1989 and 2009-2010 Corolla vehicles equipped with aftermarket accessory seat heaters with a copper strand heating element. The electrical wiring in the seat heaters may be damaged when the seat cushion is compressed.
- Consequence
- If damaged, the copper strand heating element may short circuit, increasing the risk of a fire.
- Remedy
- SET will notify owners, and dealers will disconnect the seat heaters, free of charge, and refund the purchase price of the seat heater accessory. The recall began on July 14, 2016. Owners may contact SET customer service at 1-866-405-4226. SET number for this recall is SET16B.
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
3,233 vehicles 2014-11-19- Defect
- Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain model year 2010-2011 Prius and Corolla, 2009-2011 Venza, 2006-2010 Avalon, 2007-2010 FJ Cruiser, 2005-2011 Sienna and Sequoia, 2006-2011 Tacoma 4x2 and 4x4, Camry, Highlander, Tundra 4x2 and 4x4, and 2007-2011 Rav4 and 4Runner. The affected vehicles may experience compression of the seat cushion which may damage the seat heater wiring.
- Consequence
- Damage to the seat heater wiring could cause the wires to short, increasing the risk of the seat burning and causing personal injury to the occupant.
- Remedy
- SET will notify owners, and dealers will disconnect the heaters with copper strand heating elements and refund the purchase price of the seat heater accessory, free of charge. The recall is expected to began in January 2015. Owners may contact SET customer service at 1-866-405-4226.
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL
769,379 vehicles 2011-02-24- Defect
- Toyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2006 highlander, highlander hybrid, and model year 2004-2007 lexus rx330, rx350, and rx400h vehicles. If the forward retention clip used to secure the floor carpet cover, which is located in front of the center console, is not installed properly the cover may lean toward the accelerator pedal and interfere with the accelerator pedal arm.
- Consequence
- If this occurs, the accelerator pedal may temporarily become stuck in a partially depressed position rather than return to the idle position. A stuck accelerator pedal may result in unintended and sustained vehicle speeds and make it difficult to stop, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the floor carpet cover with a newly designed one free or charge. The safety recall is expected to begin during march 2011. Owners may contact toyota at 1-800-331-4331.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:MASTER CYLINDER
728,544 vehicles 2010-10-21- Defect
- Toyota is recalling certain model year 2005-2006 avalon, model year 2004-2006 highlander, model year 2004-2006 lexus rx, and model year 2006 lexus gs and is vehicles. Brake fluid containing polymers is used that acts as lubricants for certain brake system components. If replacement brake fluid is used that does not contain such polymers, or that contains only small amounts, a part of the rubber seal located at the rear of the brake master cylinder may become dry, and the seal may curl during movement of the piston. If this occurs, a small amount of brake fluid could…
- Consequence
- A leak of brake fluid could lead to a change in brake pedal feel and overtime a degradation in braking performance increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the seal with a newly designed one. This service will be performed free of charge. The safety recall began on november 15, 2010. Owners may contact toyota at 1-800-331-4331 and lexus at 1-800-255-3987.
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
153,418 vehicles 2010-02-03- Defect
- Southeast toyota is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 passenger vehicles for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 110, "tire selection and rims." these vehicles were sold without the requisite load carrying capacity modification labels.
- Consequence
- A driver may overload a vehicle which may increase the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will mail to consumers the corrected label or the customer will have the option for dealers to install the label free of charge. The safety recall began on may 27, 2010. Owners may contact southeast toyota at 1-800-301-6859.
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
271,417 vehicles 2010-02-03- Defect
- Gulf states toyota is recalling certain model year 2005-2010 vehicles for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 110, "tire selection and rims." these vehicles were sold between september 1, 2005 and june 2, 2008 without the requisite load carrying capacity modification labels.
- Consequence
- This does not meet the standard requirements.
- Remedy
- Dealers will mail to consumers the corrected label or the customer will have the option for dealers to install the label free of charge. Dealers will also correct the owner's manual. The safety recall began on may 27, 2010. Owners may contact gulf states toyota at 713-580-3300.
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
27,080 vehicles 2009-06-15- Defect
- Toyota is recalling 27,080 model year 2005 through 2010 passenger cars built from september 1, 2005 to may 4, 2009. These vehicles were not equipped with load carrying capacity modification labels which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 110, "tire selection and rims."
- Consequence
- Incorrect load carrying capacity modification labels could result in the vehicle being overloaded, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Toyota will notify owners and provide them with a new, accurate label to be installed over the inaccurate label free of charge. The safety recall began on august 18, 2009. Owners may contact toyota at 1-888-270-9371.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2006 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 2006 — 131st riskiest of the 343 2006 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 24 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2002 comes out best at 60 and 2019 worst at 82, with 2006 itself at 70.
If the model year is negotiable, 2002, 2003 and 2001 score lower than 2006 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2001–2007 generation specifically, 2002 is the strongest year at 60 and 2007 the weakest at 73.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2001-2007 generation, 2002 Toyota Highlander scores best at 60 and 2007 Toyota Highlander worst at 73.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other powertrain problem from about 4k, other speed control problem from about 25k, other fuel system problem from about 29k and other electrical problem from about 30k.
On a 2006 Toyota Highlander with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other powertrain problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.
Where these figures stop being useful
346 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 346 reports, 249 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 72% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2006 Toyota Highlander?
The most-reported failures are other brake problem (57 reports, median 80,000 miles), other speed control problem (34 reports, median 50,000 miles) and other engine problem (24 reports, median 100,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2006 Toyota Highlander problems start?
Other powertrain problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 35,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 5,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 69,000 miles.
Is the 2006 Toyota Highlander reliable?
It scores 70 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 131st riskiest of the 343 2006 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2006 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Toyota Highlander is best?
Within the 2001–2007 generation, 2002 scores best at 60 out of 100 and 2007 worst at 73. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed