2003 Subaru Forester: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2003 Subaru Forester
On the 2003 Subaru Forester, the failure owners report most often is other fuel system problem, and the reports cluster around 115,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other speed control problem, reported by a median of 55,000 miles. Overall it scores 69 out of 100, high risk for a 2003.
High risk for a 2003 — 143rd riskiest of the 330 2003 vehicles we can rate. 238 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2003 Subaru Forester
Owners have reported 35 named failure modes on the 2003 Subaru Forester, and the three most-reported carry 34% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other fuel system problem leads with 37 reports, about 1.6 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 91k to 135,000 miles.
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure follows with 24 reports, usually reported between 112k to 155,000 miles.
Fuel leak or fuel odor follows with 20 reports, usually reported between 70k to 155,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into fuel (58), engine (30) and suspension (28).
At what mileage it happens
190 of the reports on the 2003 Subaru Forester came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 85,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 25% by 50,000 miles, 58% by 100,000 miles and 85% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 4 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 130,000 and 140,000 miles, which alone holds 10% of the dated reports.
21% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: other speed control problem around 55k, airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault around 57k, head gasket failure around 67k and other engine problem around 78k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 35. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 4 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
How bad it is when it goes
Across the named modes, 26 mention a crash, 18 an injury and 4 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.54, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other fuel system problem at $300–$2,200, control arm, ball joint or bushing failure at $400–$2,200, fuel leak or fuel odor at $300–$2,500 and other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
19% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 37 | 33 | 91k | 115k | 136k | 1.6 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 24 | 22 | 112k | 126k | 157k | 1.1 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 20 | 20 | 70k | 88k | 157k | 0.9 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 19 | 13 | 62k | 137k | 150k | 0.8 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 17 | 15 | 57k | 78k | 124k | 0.7 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 13 | 11 | 28k | 57k | 89k | 0.6 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 11 | 7 | — | 8k | — | 0.5 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 11 | 11 | 39k | 55k | 77k | 0.5 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 9 | 8 | 46k | 67k | 120k | 0.4 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 8 | 5 | — | 32k | — | 0.4 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 7 | 5 | — | 70k | — | 0.3 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 6 | 6 | — | 99k | — | 0.3 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 6 | 3 | — | 59k | — | 0.3 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 4 | 2 | — | 28k | — | 0.2 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 4 | 1 | — | 78k | — | 0.2 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 3 | 3 | — | 31k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 3 | 1 | — | 22k | — | 0.1 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 3 | 2 | — | 55k | — | 0.1 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 3 | 2 | — | 169k | — | 0.1 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 3 | 2 | — | 90k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 36k | — | 0.1 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 25k | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 2 | 2 | — | 27k | — | 0.1 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 2 | 1 | — | 220k | — | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 90k | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 1 | 1 | — | 189k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 85k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 37k | — | 0.0 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 18k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 96k | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 1 | 1 | — | 78k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Other steering problem | steering | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 7 | 4 | — | 84k | — | 0.3 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2003 Subaru Forester draws about 10 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 88th percentile of complaint rates among 2003 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 22,729 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2003 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other fuel system problem
Today, I started my 2003 subaru forested, and let the car run with the heat on for about 15 minutes while I scraped the frost off of my windows. When I opened the door to get in, the cabin wreaked of gas fumes. This is the third time this has happened. Once each in jan 2006 and jan 2007 I reported this to the dealership. In 2006 they attempted to replace the clamps, in '07 they replaced some hoses. Apparently these fixes are still not sufficient to solve the problem. The only current solution to the problem is to operate the car at warm temperatures or let it warm up before driving. The gas fumes are still getting in to the cabin when it idles, though. *tr
Cabin has strong fuel smell when starting in the morning. The smell is like someone poured a cup of fuel on the front seat. The dealer stated there was an issue with the fuel line leaking. Many other subaru owners are complaining about this issue on the subaru owner websites. *tr
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure
Tl* the contact owns a 2003 subaru forester . The contact stated that he received notification of NHTSA campaign id number: 11v464000. (suspension: front:control arm:lower arm) and the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for repairs. The dealer advised the contact that the repair could not be performed because the sub frame was rusted. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and the current mileage was 69,000. Updated 03/28/12*lj the consumer stated after contacting subaru of america, they agreed to cover all costs associated with the repair, including the replacement of the subframe. Updated 03/30/12*jb
Tl* the contact owns a 2003 subaru forester . The contact stated that he received notification of NHTSA campaign id number: 11v464000. (suspension: front:control arm:lower arm) and the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for repairs. The dealer advised the contact that the repair could not be performed because the sub frame was rusted. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and the current mileage was 69,000. Updated 03/28/12*lj the consumer stated after contacting subaru of america, they agreed to cover all costs associated with the repair, including the replacement of the subframe. Updated 03/30/12*jb
Fuel leak or fuel odor
On monday night, 5 feb. 2007, when I parked my car in the garage it smelled strongly of gasoline. I checked under the hood and the odor seemed to be coming from the passenger side of the engine compartment. I did not see any gasoline leaking. The strength of the odor seems to be related to the cold weather (15-20 deg. F). That monday was the first time that I had ever noticed the smell of gasoline emanating from the engine compartment. The odor was so intense that I decided to park the car outside as a precaution. I drove the car tuesday morning and parked it in the garage and it smelled of gas again. As the outside temperature has increased, the intensity of the smell has decreased. During very cold weather small amounts of gasoline seemed to be leaking from one of the fuel lines or escaping from the engine. On 9 february, I brought the car to dealer (heritage subaru, owings mills, md) service department and asked them to investigate the cause of the gasoline smell. The dealer replaced three short rubber fuel hoses (p/n 807707130) from the engine compartment. The replaced hoses showed no sign of wear, holes, cuts, abrasions etc…
My 2003 subaru forester has a fuel leak smell that enters the car interior.. It's not a rich fuel mixture exhaust smell, it's the smell of raw fuel inside the cabin. It comes and goes. I see online others are having this problem. Subaru should be held accountable and forced to have a recall to fix the problem once and for all. *tr
Recalls on the 2003 model year
NHTSA has issued 3 recall campaigns covering the 2003 Subaru Forester, affecting an estimated 38,742 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover suspension:front:control arm:lower arm, seat belts:front:buckle assembly and power train:automatic transmission. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM:LOWER ARM
318,215 vehicles 2011-09-06- Defect
- Subaru is recalling certain model year 2002-2007 impreza, model year 2003-2008 forester, and model year 2005-2006 saab 9-2x vehicles manufactured from september 5, 2000 through november 26, 2007 originally sold, or currently registered in, massachusetts, maryland, michigan, new hampshire, new york, pennsylvania, vermont, wisconsin, connecticut, delaware, iowa, illinois, indiana, maine, minnesota, missouri, new jersey, ohio, rhode island, west virginia and the district of columbia. The front lower control arms may break at the hanger brackets due to corrosion if the hanger…
- Consequence
- A broken control arm can result in the loss of control of the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Subaru will handle their vehicles and saab will handle theirs. Dealers will inspect the degree of corrosion of the front lower control arms, and will either rustproof or replace them. This service will be performed free of charge. The safety recall is expected to begin during december 2011. Owners may contact subaru at 1-800-782-2783. Owners may contact saab at 1-800-955-9007.
SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY
326 vehicles 2003-02-20- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles fail to comply with requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 209, "seat belt assemblies." the left and right front seat belt buckle/latch assemblies were improperly manufactured.
- Consequence
- In the event of a crash, the front seat belts could unlatch, which could result in personal injury to the seat occupant.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the left and right front seat belt buckle/latch assemblies. Owner notification began february 19, 2003. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact subaru at 1-800-782-2783.
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
172,564 vehicles 2002-10-30- Defect
- Certain sport utility and passenger vehicles equipped with automatic transmissions were produced with an improperly manufactured transmission parking rod. When the transmission selector lever is placed in the "p" (park) position, the transmission park mechanism, that is intended to hold your vehicle, may not engage.
- Consequence
- The vehicle could then move/roll without prior warning, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the automatic transmission parking rod assembly. Owner notification january 8, 2003. An interim owner notification will be sent during november 2002. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact subaru at 1-800-782-2783.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2003 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 2003 — 143rd riskiest of the 330 2003 vehicles we can rate. The comparison is always within the same model year, so an older car is never penalised for having had longer to break.
Across the 29 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2000 comes out best at 61 and 2024 worst at 83, with 2003 itself at 69.
If the model year is negotiable, 2000, 1998, 1999, 2005, 2008, 2007, 2001 and 2026 score lower than 2003 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1998–2004 generation specifically, 2000 is the strongest year at 61 and 2003 the weakest at 69.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1998-2004 generation, 2000 Subaru Forester scores best at 61 and 2003 Subaru Forester worst at 69.
Where to spend the inspection money
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault from about 28k, other speed control problem from about 39k, head gasket failure from about 46k and other engine problem from about 57k.
On a 2003 Subaru Forester with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
The limits of complaint data
238 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 238 reports, 190 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 80% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2003 Subaru Forester?
The most-reported failures are other fuel system problem (37 reports, median 115,000 miles), control arm, ball joint or bushing failure (24 reports, median 125,000 miles) and fuel leak or fuel odor (20 reports, median 90,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2003 Subaru Forester problems start?
Other speed control problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 55,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 40,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 85,000 miles.
Is the 2003 Subaru Forester reliable?
It scores 69 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 143rd riskiest of the 330 2003 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2003 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Subaru Forester is best?
Within the 1998–2004 generation, 2000 scores best at 61 out of 100 and 2003 worst at 69. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed