AtWhatMileage
Transmission · 41 owner reports

CVT failure on the 2015 Nissan Rogue

2 crashes 2 injuries 4 of the 41 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 41
With an odometer reading 19
Reports per 1,000 built 0.2 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 21%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 4
Typical repair $3,000–$8,500
What it means when it happens Critical
Rank among this year's problems 4th

When cvt failure gets reported

Owners of the 2015 Nissan Rogue report CVT failure at a median of 65,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 50,000 miles and a quarter after 80,000 miles, from 19 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 90,000 miles. It is the 4th most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 30,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 125,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 96,000 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

21% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 19 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
30,400 miles 49,000 miles 66,000 miles 81,900 miles 126,400 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 2 a crash and 2 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $3,000–$8,500 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

This mode is classified as critical, which means a failure can leave the car unable to stop, steer, or stay out of the way of traffic. It is weighted accordingly in the risk score.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 12 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2023, at a median of 35,000 miles, and latest on the 2009 at 100,000 miles.

By volume the 2013 carries the most reports, with 121; the 2015 has 41. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 2008 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 90k
  2. 2009 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 100k
  3. 2010 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 71k
  4. 2011 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 89k
  5. 2012 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 86k
  6. 2013 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 85k
  7. 2014 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 88k
  8. 2015 (this one) 66k
  9. 2016 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 72k
  10. 2017 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 70k
  11. 2018 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 55k
  12. 2019 Nissan Rogue cvt failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  13. 2021 Nissan Rogue cvt failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  14. 2022 Nissan Rogue cvt failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  15. 2023 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 33k
  16. 2024 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 55k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Vibration on driver side. First time at 45 MPH on highway. Second time while at a drive through pharmacy and entire car shook, seats vibrated so hard I thought they were going to take off into space at any second. Idle corrected but vibration still there, only not as bad. Third time I was told a vibration could not be felt. Second service mechanic finallyad!itted itwas the CVT and there was no fixing it. This all happened between september and november 2017 with four visits to the dealership. This auto was just purchased and I tried to get it fixed before the 90 day warranty ran out

66,000 miles NHTSA complaint 1427647 filed 2017-11-24

Driving on highway and after about 2 hours, car loses speed in middle of traffic pressing gas but car responds like it would hitting the gas in neutral. Had to coast off to a gas station. Upon searching the internet founf the problem is very common and a sensor malfunctioning shuts the CVT. It advised wait 5 minutes and it would reset. Did that and was able to go on. Was very scary in traffic with cars on all sides of me

77,800 miles NHTSA complaint 1446564 filed 2018-02-09

Driving on highway and after about 2 hours, car loses speed in middle of traffic pressing gas but car responds like it would hitting the gas in neutral. Had to coast off to a gas station. Upon searching the internet founf the problem is very common and a sensor malfunctioning shuts the CVT. It advised wait 5 minutes and it would reset. Did that and was able to go on. Was very scary in traffic with cars on all sides of me

77,800 miles NHTSA complaint 1446565 filed 2018-02-09

Also reported on the 2015 Nissan Rogue

Other powertrain problem

71 reports median 69k

Other electrical problem

47 reports median 35k

Other body or interior problem

36 reports median 25k

Other engine problem

34 reports median 36k

Complete transmission failure

32 reports median 91k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 41 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does cvt failure happen on the 2015 Nissan Rogue?

Across 19 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 65,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 50,000 miles and a quarter after 80,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is cvt failure on the 2015 Nissan Rogue?

41 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.2 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed