AtWhatMileage
Transmission · 69 owner reports

CVT failure on the 2012 Nissan Rogue

3 crashes 3 of the 69 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 69
With an odometer reading 41
Reports per 1,000 built 1.0 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 12%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 3
Typical repair $3,000–$8,500
What it means when it happens Critical
Rank among this year's problems 1st

When cvt failure gets reported

Owners of the 2012 Nissan Rogue report CVT failure at a median of 85,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 70,000 miles and a quarter after 100,000 miles, from 41 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 90,000 miles. It is the 1st most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 35,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 117,500 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 84,224 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

When the reports scatter this far, the mileage is telling you about how these cars were driven more than about the part itself.

12% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 41 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
33,776 miles 70,000 miles 86,000 miles 100,100 miles 118,000 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 3 a crash is mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $3,000–$8,500 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

This mode is classified as critical, which means a failure can leave the car unable to stop, steer, or stay out of the way of traffic. It is weighted accordingly in the risk score.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 12 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2023, at a median of 35,000 miles, and latest on the 2009 at 100,000 miles.

By volume the 2013 carries the most reports, with 121; the 2012 has 69. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 2008 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 90k
  2. 2009 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 100k
  3. 2010 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 71k
  4. 2011 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 89k
  5. 2012 (this one) 86k
  6. 2013 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 85k
  7. 2014 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 88k
  8. 2015 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 66k
  9. 2016 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 72k
  10. 2017 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 70k
  11. 2018 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 55k
  12. 2019 Nissan Rogue cvt failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  13. 2021 Nissan Rogue cvt failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  14. 2022 Nissan Rogue cvt failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  15. 2023 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 33k
  16. 2024 Nissan Rogue cvt failure 55k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Originally the car would hesitate, bog,only while turning or slightly rolling. Additionally now it hesitates from a dead stop. Sometimes it hesitates,goes,then hesitates again. It is an intermittent problem but it occurs while pulling out into traffic or turning through a light. I'm afraid the car will stall and I'll be hit broadside or from behind. The dealer has looked at the car 4 times and says it's the way the CVT transmission works. The car did not do this during the first 2000 miles. I have been driving for 50 years and never had a car operate so dangerously. I am in a lease and nissan will not take the car back. Thank you for your time. *tr

2,000 miles NHTSA complaint 984699 filed 2013-06-07

Originally the car would hesitate, bog,only while turning or slightly rolling. Additionally now it hesitates from a dead stop. Sometimes it hesitates,goes,then hesitates again. It is an intermittent problem but it occurs while pulling out into traffic or turning through a light. I'm afraid the car will stall and I'll be hit broadside or from behind. The dealer has looked at the car 4 times and says it's the way the CVT transmission works. The car did not do this during the first 2000 miles. I have been driving for 50 years and never had a car operate so dangerously. I am in a lease and nissan will not take the car back. Thank you for your time. *tr

2,000 miles NHTSA complaint 984700 filed 2013-06-07

Cvt transmission has never worked correctly. It finally failed at highway speeds.nissan put my family in harms way..nissan refuses to acknowledge and fix under warranty a long sanding problem with these CVT's. They were redesigned which shows there was a big problem. My model year 2012 is a hazard. .....updated 10-15-15-*bf updated 11/08/2017*cn

10 miles NHTSA complaint 1197359 filed 2015-07-09

Also reported on the 2012 Nissan Rogue

Other powertrain problem

49 reports median 72k

Complete transmission failure

36 reports median 99k

Other electrical problem

28 reports median 53k

Other speed control problem

25 reports median 71k

Other engine problem

24 reports median 63k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 69 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does cvt failure happen on the 2012 Nissan Rogue?

Across 41 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 85,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 70,000 miles and a quarter after 100,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is cvt failure on the 2012 Nissan Rogue?

69 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 1.0 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed