2004 Ford F-250 SD: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2004 Ford F-250 SD
On the 2004 Ford F-250 SD, the failure owners report most often is other engine problem, and the reports cluster around 20,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other powertrain problem, reported by a median of 5,000 miles. Overall it scores 75 out of 100, high risk for a 2004.
High risk for a 2004 — 41st riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. 345 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What owners report breaking
Owners have reported 51 named failure modes on the 2004 Ford F-250 SD, and the three most-reported carry 29% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Other engine problem leads with 51 reports, about 4.0 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 7k to 55,000 miles.
Other electrical problem follows with 24 reports, usually reported between 25k to 90,000 miles. 4 of those reports mention a fire.
Other fuel system problem follows with 24 reports, usually reported between 44k to 115,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into engine (105), electrical (46) and fuel (38).
The mileage the reports cluster at
305 of the reports on the 2004 Ford F-250 SD came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 58,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 46% by 50,000 miles, 75% by 100,000 miles and 93% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 1 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 0 and 10,000 miles, which alone holds 17% of the dated reports.
38% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, which is early enough that a fair number of these cars were still under a factory warranty when the owner complained.
In the order they tend to show up: other powertrain problem around 7k, other engine problem around 20k, other speed control problem around 37k and other wheel or tire problem around 40k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 51. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 1 report came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 15 mention a crash, 14 a fire and 8 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.48, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other engine problem at $300–$4,000, other electrical problem at $250–$2,000, other fuel system problem at $300–$2,200 and misfire or rough idle at $250–$1,600. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
39% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other engine problem | engine | 51 | 43 | 7k | 20k | 55k | 4.0 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 24 | 21 | 25k | 67k | 90k | 1.9 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 24 | 24 | 44k | 88k | 115k | 1.9 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 18 | 11 | 75k | 101k | 176k | 1.4 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 16 | 14 | 2k | 37k | 60k | 1.2 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 15 | 15 | 60k | 75k | 86k | 1.2 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 12 | 12 | 39k | 59k | 76k | 0.9 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 12 | 9 | 36k | 40k | 106k | 0.9 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| DPF, EGR or DEF system failure | emissions | 11 | 10 | 63k | 84k | 97k | 0.9 | $800–$5,000 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 11 | 9 | 32k | 70k | 90k | 0.9 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 10 | 10 | 28k | 86k | 97k | 0.8 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 10 | 9 | 83k | 103k | 103k | 0.8 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 9 | 9 | 4k | 7k | 14k | 0.7 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 8 | 6 | — | 105k | — | 0.6 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 8 | 3 | — | 130k | — | 0.6 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 7 | 7 | — | 93k | — | 0.5 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 7 | 7 | — | 12k | — | 0.5 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Oil leak | engine | 6 | 6 | — | 7k | — | 0.5 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 6 | 5 | — | 58k | — | 0.5 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 6 | 2 | — | 125k | — | 0.5 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 6 | 6 | — | 18k | — | 0.5 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Turbocharger or supercharger failure | engine | 5 | 5 | — | 14k | — | 0.4 | $1,500–$4,500 | High |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 5 | 5 | — | 30k | — | 0.4 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 5 | 5 | — | 17k | — | 0.4 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 4 | 4 | — | 120k | — | 0.3 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 4 | 4 | — | 3k | — | 0.3 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 3 | 3 | — | 232 | — | 0.2 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 3 | 3 | — | 53k | — | 0.2 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 3 | 3 | — | 80k | — | 0.2 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 3 | 3 | — | 21k | — | 0.2 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 3 | 3 | — | 79k | — | 0.2 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 77k | — | 0.2 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 102k | — | 0.2 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Cooling fan failure | cooling | 2 | 2 | — | 145k | — | 0.2 | $350–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Harsh or jerky shifting | transmission | 2 | 2 | — | 4k | — | 0.2 | $600–$4,000 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 2 | 2 | — | 13k | — | 0.2 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 65k | — | 0.2 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 31k | — | 0.2 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 2 | 2 | — | 98k | — | 0.2 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Piston, ring or cylinder wall damage | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 10k | — | 0.1 | $3,000–$9,500 | Critical |
| Overheating | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 10k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 450 | — | 0.1 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Manual clutch or hydraulics failure | transmission | 1 | 1 | — | 86k | — | 0.1 | $900–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 35k | — | 0.1 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 77k | — | 0.1 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Brake line, hose or caliper failure | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 110k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,600 | Critical |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 1 | 1 | — | 37k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 1 | 1 | — | 42k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 1 | 1 | — | 109k | — | 0.1 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 169k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 1 | 1 | — | 140k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 2 | 1 | — | 239k | — | 0.2 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2004 Ford F-250 SD draws about 27 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 92nd percentile of complaint rates among 2004 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 12,864 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2004 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Other engine problem
Truck "cuts out" losing power intermittently with no rhyme or reason. It seems electrical since both the glow plug light as well as the water in fuel light come on for about 2 seconds and go off. Once they go off, it will run again until the next occurrence. I have had the complete ficm harness (it ran fine for two weeks after the replacement) replaced by the dealer.iit has been in the shop four times now for a total of 10 days for this problem and it only has 7000 miles. *ak
Truck "cuts out" losing power intermittently with no rhyme or reason. It seems electrical since both the glow plug light as well as the water in fuel light come on for about 2 seconds and go off. Once they go off, it will run again until the next occurrence. I have had the complete ficm harness (it ran fine for two weeks after the replacement) replaced by the dealer.iit has been in the shop four times now for a total of 10 days for this problem and it only has 7000 miles. *ak
Other electrical problem
Truck "cuts out" losing power intermittently with no rhyme or reason. It seems electrical since both the glow plug light as well as the water in fuel light come on for about 2 seconds and go off. Once they go off, it will run again until the next occurrence. I have had the complete ficm harness (it ran fine for two weeks after the replacement) replaced by the dealer.iit has been in the shop four times now for a total of 10 days for this problem and it only has 7000 miles. *ak
The consumers vehicle was not included in the recall regarding the battery cable and subsequently the vehicle caught fire. The vehicle proceeded to burn even when extinguished with a fire extinguisher. The consumer was told by the manufacture the battery cable recall did not include his vehicle. Battery harness NHTSA recall. Please provide information. *jb
Other fuel system problem
My 2004 ford f250 super duty crew-cab truck accelerates and decelerates spontaneously on its own while I am driving at a uniform speed. This can persist for a number of miles before abating. The engine just begins to rev up and then down for no apparent reason. When stopped at a traffic light, with my foot only on the brake, the truck suddenly accelerates and lurches forward. I tried putting it in park while at the traffic light, but it died when I did so. The truck is used for trail fcor two large horses, and should it spontaneously accelerate or completely stop while trailering on the freeway, the results could be disastrous. This significant safety issue is what prompts my complaint to the NHTSA. We took the truck to our ford dealership mechanic, and he said that ford has had a number of similar complaints.*ak
I have a problem when my f250 diesel runs at 1200-1500rpm, the engine seems to shutter and loads up. It sometimes seems to start to stall out and lose power. The dealer has had the vehicle in their service department six times and can not find the problem. They have changes the exhaust sensor and remap the computer with no luck. They have test driven the truck and had the problem occur. The vehicle is becoming dangerous to drive because of the lose of power in traffic. I have had a couple of close rearend collisons becasue of the problem. Nothing has been done to correct the problem. The dealer can not find the problem and has advised me to keep driving it at my risk. Hoping to find a fault code.
Recalls on the 2004 model year
NHTSA has issued 4 recall campaigns covering the 2004 Ford F-250 SD, affecting an estimated 14,570 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover exterior lighting:tail lights, wheels:hub, exterior lighting and electrical system:wiring. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:TAIL LIGHTS
26,715 vehicles 2011-07-13- Defect
- Ford is recalling certain model year 2011 ranger trucks built from january 25, 2011, through april 25, 2011 at the twin cities assembly plant, and service parts distributed to dealers for certain 2004 through 2011 model year ranger trucks, 2002 through 2005 model year excursion vehicles, and 2002 through 2007 model year f-250, f-350, f-450, and f-550 trucks for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." the multi-function switch was shipped with a subcomponent (slider)…
- Consequence
- Non-functioning lights could increase the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the switches free of charge. The safety recall began on august 15, 2011. Owners may contact ford motor company customer relationship center at 1-866-436-7332.
WHEELS:HUB
130,000 vehicles 2007-12-17- Defect
- Certain federal-mogul replacement wheel hub assemblies with the brand names: national, carquest p/nos. 515020, 515021, 515025, 515053, 515054, 515059, and 515060, shipped between january 23, 2006, and december 20, 2007, sold for light duty and medium duty trucks. The inboard retention nut used to maintain hub bearing assembly can loosen resulting in an ABS light indication, noise, and/or wheel separation.
- Consequence
- Wheel separation can result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Federal-mogul will notify customers and will replace the hub assembly free of charge. The recall began on february 7, 2008. Owners can contact federal-mogul toll-free at 877-489-6659.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
61,944 vehicles 2006-03-23- Defect
- Certain pro-a motors corner lamps, turn signals, and headlights sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Pro-a motors will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began on april 3, 2006. Owners may contact pro-a motors at 323-838-2988.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING
180,104 vehicles 2005-06-10- Defect
- Certain pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and vans equipped with 6.0l diesel engines may experience stalling without warning while driving and may or may not restart.
- Consequence
- Should the engine stall, a vehicle crash could occur.
- Remedy
- Dealers will upgrade the fuel injection control module (ficm) wire harness or replaced, and/or have a new injection control pressure (icp)) sensor connector installed free of charge. The recall began on july 22, 2005. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2004 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 2004 sits in the model line
High risk for a 2004 — 41st riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 29 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1997 comes out best at 60 and 2019 worst at 81, with 2004 itself at 75.
If the model year is negotiable, 1997, 2016, 2025, 1999, 2000, 2026, 2002, 2015, 2001, 2024, 2021, 2005 and 2014 score lower than 2004 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1999–2007 generation specifically, 1999 is the strongest year at 66 and 2004 the weakest at 75.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1999-2007 generation, 1999 Ford F-250 SD scores best at 66 and 2004 Ford F-250 SD worst at 75.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other speed control problem from about 2k, other powertrain problem from about 4k, other engine problem from about 7k and other electrical problem from about 25k.
On a 2004 Ford F-250 SD with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other speed control problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
Where these figures stop being useful
345 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 345 reports, 305 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 88% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2004 Ford F-250 SD?
The most-reported failures are other engine problem (51 reports, median 20,000 miles), other electrical problem (24 reports, median 65,000 miles) and other fuel system problem (24 reports, median 90,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2004 Ford F-250 SD problems start?
Other powertrain problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 5,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 5,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 58,000 miles.
Is the 2004 Ford F-250 SD reliable?
It scores 75 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 41st riskiest of the 329 2004 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2004 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford F-250 SD is best?
Within the 1999–2007 generation, 1999 scores best at 66 out of 100 and 2004 worst at 75. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed