2007 Ford Crown Victoria: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria
On the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria, the failure owners report most often is steering rack, gear or tie rod failure, and the reports cluster around 140,000 miles. The earliest to appear is control arm, ball joint or bushing failure, reported by a median of 125,000 miles. Overall it scores 66 out of 100, high risk for a 2007.
High risk for a 2007 — 244th riskiest of the 365 2007 vehicles we can rate. 76 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
The failures owners actually file about
Owners have reported 24 named failure modes on the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria, and the three most-reported carry 37% of everything filed.
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure leads with 10 reports, about 0.6 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 85k to 170,000 miles.
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure follows with 10 reports, usually reported between 119k to 125,000 miles.
Other speed control problem follows with 8 reports, median 75,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into steering (20), suspension (10) and adas (8).
When these failures get reported
51 of the reports on the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 100,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 25% by 50,000 miles, 51% by 100,000 miles and 80% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 3 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 40,000 and 50,000 miles, which alone holds 10% of the dated reports.
14% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 24. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 3 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 9 mention a crash and 6 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.99, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: steering rack, gear or tie rod failure at $700–$2,600, control arm, ball joint or bushing failure at $400–$2,200, other speed control problem at $250–$2,000 and steering column or shaft failure at $600–$2,500. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
17% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 10 | 9 | 85k | 138k | 168k | 0.6 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 10 | 10 | 119k | 124k | 125k | 0.6 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 8 | 4 | — | 75k | — | 0.5 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 5 | 5 | — | 48k | — | 0.3 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Other engine problem | engine | 5 | 2 | — | 42k | — | 0.3 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 4 | 2 | — | 156k | — | 0.2 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.2 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.2 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 3 | 1 | — | 230k | — | 0.2 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 3 | 2 | — | 38k | — | 0.2 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 3 | 3 | — | 69k | — | 0.2 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 3 | 2 | — | 69k | — | 0.2 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Engine knock or bearing noise | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 178k | — | 0.1 | $2,500–$9,000 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 2 | 1 | — | 6k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| Overheating | cooling | 1 | 1 | — | 104k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 1 | 1 | — | 66k | — | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 116k | — | 0.1 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 1 | 1 | — | 10k | — | 0.1 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Blower motor or climate control failure | hvac | 1 | 1 | — | 40k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 1 | 1 | — | 48k | — | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 1 | 1 | — | 65k | — | 0.1 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 2 | 1 | — | 252k | — | 0.1 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria draws about 4.5 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 80th percentile of complaint rates among 2007 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 16,904 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2007 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure
Steering wheel became very hard to turn and would not bring itself back to straight position on its own. Also a clicking noise could be heard from the steering column when turning the steering wheel. Ford dealership found that the upper steering shaft had malfunctioned. *tr
The heat shield covering the left side engine exhaust manifold had corroded around the attaching bolts allowing the shield to fall against the steering shaft. I removed the shield before it could interfere with the steering function. *tr
Other speed control problem
Ford crown vic police interceptor,2007: on two previous occasions, upon depressing brake pedal at stop sign, engine would seem to begin to race; however, after stop I would immediately let off brake to go on through stop sign and engine was normal on acceleration. To-day as I left my parking space I approached an automatic gate to pass through and depressed brake pedal to wait for gate to open and engine began to race to the point that I was unable to hold vehicle back and turned off ignition to avoid hitting gate. A large amount of black smoke resulted from racing engine. After engine shut-down, I shifted to park, started engine and had normal idle. I depressed brake to shift into drive and proceeded through gate in normal manner. The only common system that I am aware of (other than possible electrical/computer) to the fuel control is the vacuum system associated with the brake vacuum booster and whatever vacuum may affect the fuel feed. The foot pedal was definitely in an idle position. I am certain that this engine racing problem is initiated by my applying brakes. *tr
This is another of an on going acceleration issue when depressing the foot brake. In this instance I had just backed out of a parking space in a shopping center and drove maybe 200' and had just about rolled to a stop sign for ga highway 212 and very slightly depressed the brake pedal to come to a complete stop. As soon as I started pressing the brake pedal, the engine picked up RPM and I immediately moved foot from brake pedal. End of acceleration. By this time vehicle had already rolled to a complete stop. I did not, as ford seems to think, have my foot on both the gas and brake. The very light pressure I had applied would have my foot three to four inches away from the top of the gas pedal. Yes, I had my foot on the brake. I had to remove my foot from the gas to get to the brake. This is a vehicle malfunction. Not operator error. I am unable to determine a failed component.....fuel? Brake? Electrical? I don't have a clue.
Recalls on the 2007 model year
NHTSA has issued 4 recall campaigns covering the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria, affecting an estimated 19,186 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover steering:rack and pinion:pinion shaft, steering, service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electron and visibility:windshield. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
STEERING:RACK AND PINION:PINION SHAFT
36,888 vehicles 2014-11-05- Defect
- Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria, 2005-2011 Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles manufactured March 23, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and 2005-2011 Lincoln Town Car vehicles manufactured March 8, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and on which the upper intermediate shaft was serviced during the course of safety recall 13V-385. The prior repairs may not have been correctly performed.
- Consequence
- Improper servicing of the upper intermediate shaft could cause the shaft to separate, which can then result in a loss of steering control, and increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify the owners of vehicles whose repair records reflect that the upper intermediate steering shaft was repaired during the course of the prior recall 13V-385. Dealers will inspect and replace the upper immediate shaft if necessary free of charge. The recall began November 17, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 14S25.
STEERING
355,000 vehicles 2013-08-29- Defect
- Ford is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria (including Crown Victoria Police Interceptors), Mercury Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Car vehicles. The affected vehicles are currently registered or were originally sold in Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Severe corrosion can seize the lower intermediate shaft which may…
- Consequence
- If the lower bearing separates, the vehicle may experience a loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Ford will notify owners and dealers will replace the lower intermediate shaft, free of charge. The upper intermediate shaft and steering column lower bearing will be inspected to identify any damage that may have occurred as a result of lower intermediate shaft corrosion, and repaired or replaced as necessary. If the steering column lower bearing has separated, a retainer clip will be installed. The recall began on October 23, 2013. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's recall number is 13S08.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTILOCK/TRACTION CONTROL/ELECTRONIC LIMITED SLIP:CONTROL UNIT/MODULE
630 vehicles 2007-04-26- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles equipped with antilock brake systems (ABS) fail to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 135, "passenger car brake systems." the front and rear right side brake lines may be reversed at the ABS hydraulic control unit.
- Consequence
- The brakes may not operate as intended, which could result in a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will inspect the brake line connections and the hydraulic control unit and reposition them free of charge. The recallbegan on april 27, 2007. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD
422 vehicles 2006-11-15- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 212, 'windshield mounting.' the windshield may not be properly secured to the vehicle body.
- Consequence
- If the windshield is not properly retained to the vehicle, wind noise, squeak/rattles and/or water leaks may occur. Also, loss of windshield retention may reduce occupant protection in the event of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the windshield free of charge. The recall began on november 22, 2006. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2007 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 2007 — 244th riskiest of the 365 2007 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.
Across the 15 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2004 comes out best at 57 and 2009 worst at 68, with 2007 itself at 66.
If the model year is negotiable, 2004, 2000, 1999 and 1998 score lower than 2007 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 2006–2011 generation specifically, 2008 is the strongest year at 65 and 2009 the weakest at 68.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 2006-2011 generation, 2008 Ford Crown Victoria scores best at 65 and 2009 Ford Crown Victoria worst at 68.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: steering rack, gear or tie rod failure from about 85k and control arm, ball joint or bushing failure from about 119k.
On a 2007 Ford Crown Victoria with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether steering rack, gear or tie rod failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
The limits of complaint data
76 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 76 reports, 51 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 67% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria?
The most-reported failures are steering rack, gear or tie rod failure (10 reports, median 140,000 miles), control arm, ball joint or bushing failure (10 reports, median 125,000 miles) and other speed control problem (8 reports, median 75,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2007 Ford Crown Victoria problems start?
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 125,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 120,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 100,000 miles.
Is the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria reliable?
It scores 66 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 244th riskiest of the 365 2007 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2007 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Ford Crown Victoria is best?
Within the 2006–2011 generation, 2008 scores best at 65 out of 100 and 2009 worst at 68. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed