AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2005 Ford Crown Victoria: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2005 Ford Crown Victoria

On the 2005 Ford Crown Victoria, the failure owners report most often is control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure, and the reports cluster around 80,000 miles. The earliest to appear is other powertrain problem, reported by a median of 55,000 miles. Overall it scores 65 out of 100, high risk for a 2005.

High risk for a 2005 — 213th riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. 240 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

The failures owners actually file about

Owners have reported 35 named failure modes on the 2005 Ford Crown Victoria, and the three most-reported carry 43% of everything filed.

Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure leads with 48 reports, about 1.0 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 50k to 120,000 miles.

Other lighting problem follows with 38 reports, usually reported between 62k to 102,500 miles.

Headlight failure or clouding follows with 16 reports, usually reported between 70k to 100,000 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (61), lighting (60) and steering (32).

When these failures get reported

196 of the reports on the 2005 Ford Crown Victoria came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 80,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 24% by 50,000 miles, 63% by 100,000 miles and 93% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 2 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 100,000 and 110,000 miles, which alone holds 11% of the dated reports.

16% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

In the order they tend to show up: other powertrain problem around 53k, other electrical problem around 63k, other lighting problem around 80k and control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure around 81k.

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 35. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 80k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 2 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

How bad it is when it goes

Across the named modes, 16 mention a crash, 2 a fire, 6 an injury and 1 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.50, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure at $700–$3,000, other lighting problem at $120–$1,200, headlight failure or clouding at $150–$1,800 and other powertrain problem at $400–$4,500. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

13% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 48 44 50k 81k 120k 1.0 $700–$3,000 High
Other lighting problem lighting 38 32 62k 80k 103k 0.8 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Headlight failure or clouding lighting 16 14 70k 97k 100k 0.3 $150–$1,800 Moderate
Other powertrain problem transmission 12 12 47k 53k 103k 0.2 $400–$4,500 High
Other electrical problem electrical 12 9 22k 63k 121k 0.2 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 10 8 92k 102k 121k 0.2 $700–$2,600 High
Other steering problem steering 10 9 80k 98k 150k 0.2 $350–$2,400 High
Steering column or shaft failure steering 9 9 51k 93k 126k 0.2 $600–$2,500 Critical
Other speed control problem adas 9 6 — 25k — 0.2 $250–$2,000 Critical
Complete engine failure or seizure engine 7 7 — 70k — 0.1 $4,500–$12,000 Critical
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 6 4 — 93k — 0.1 $300–$1,600 High
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 6 6 — 88k — 0.1 $400–$2,200 High
Tail light, brake light or signal failure lighting 6 5 — 63k — 0.1 $100–$900 Moderate
Other engine problem engine 6 4 — 117k — 0.1 $300–$4,000 High
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 4 3 — 18k — 0.1 $200–$900 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 4 2 — 78k — 0.1 $200–$1,500 High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 3 0 — — — 0.1 $250–$1,600 Critical
Loss of power steering steering 3 2 — 104k — 0.1 $600–$2,800 Critical
Other fuel system problem fuel 3 2 — 47k — 0.1 $300–$2,200 High
Other brake problem brakes 3 3 — 4k — 0.1 $300–$1,800 High
Other visibility problem glass 3 2 — 61k — 0.1 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Other body or interior problem body 3 0 — — — 0.1 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Stalling while driving engine 2 2 — 76k — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Fuel pump failure fuel 2 2 — 55k — 0.0 $600–$2,600 High
Loss of braking brakes 2 2 — 88k — 0.0 $400–$3,000 Critical
Misfire or rough idle engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$1,600 Moderate
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 1 0 — — — 0.0 $450–$2,200 High
Differential or transfer case failure drivetrain 1 1 — 23k — 0.0 $900–$4,200 High
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 1 1 — 190k — 0.0 $400–$3,500 High
Airbag inflator rupture airbag 1 0 — — — 0.0 $0–$0 Critical
Paint peeling or clear coat failure body 1 0 — — — 0.0 $600–$6,000 Low
Catalytic converter failure emissions 1 1 — 48k — 0.0 $900–$3,500 Moderate
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 1 1 — 118k — 0.0 $250–$2,000 High
Wiper or washer failure glass 1 0 — — — 0.0 $120–$800 Moderate
Other suspension problem suspension 1 1 — 140k — 0.0 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Unclassified problem other 3 2 — 80k — 0.1 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2005 Ford Crown Victoria draws about 4.9 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 80th percentile of complaint rates among 2005 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 49,334 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2005 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure

I recently began having headlight trouble when my headlights started to shut off while I was driving. I own a 2005 ford crown victoria I still had my dash lights and tail lights working. Apparently it is some sort of design flaw in the lcm and it only applies to the low beams and constant on high beam function. The flash to pass function will still work though when it was malfunctioning. It seems to be on the lcm or lighting control module. *tr

98 miles NHTSA complaint 687632 filed 2008-09-11

Tl*the contact owns approximately six 2005 ford crown victorias. The vehicles are driven by police officers. The contact stated that the exterior lighting control modules were defective on each vehicle. The headlights would randomly dim without warning. The manufacturer stated that they would notate the failures. The failure and current mileages were between 60,000-80,000. The vins of the remaining four vehicles are [xxx], [xxx],[xxx] and [xxx]. Info via fax on 12/03/08 with all resulting in the replacement of the lighting control module.pco information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). *tr

60,000 miles NHTSA complaint 696242 filed 2008-11-13

Other lighting problem

Tl*the contact owns approximately six 2005 ford crown victorias. The vehicles are driven by police officers. The contact stated that the exterior lighting control modules were defective on each vehicle. The headlights would randomly dim without warning. The manufacturer stated that they would notate the failures. The failure and current mileages were between 60,000-80,000.

60,000 miles NHTSA complaint 696243 filed 2008-11-13

Tl*the contact owns a 2005 ford crown victoria. The contact stated that the headlights failed on his vehicle. The headlights do not illuminate at night and he cannot see where he is driving. The manufacturer will not assist unless NHTSA issues a recall. The failure mileage was 79,500.

79,500 miles NHTSA complaint 722161 filed 2009-06-01

Headlight failure or clouding

Headlights turned off while driving at night. Refer to the following: NHTSA action number: n/a NHTSA recall campaign number: pe08066 n/a make: ford model: crown victoria manufacturer : ford motor company year : 2005 component : exterior lighting:headlights ford found that some lighting control modules (lcm) in the subject vehicles contained defective solder joints on the printed circuit board. This condition can lead to poor headlight performance ranging from intermittent outage and dimming to eventual headlights failure. The failure does not affect other lighting functions (park, emergency flasher, brake and flash to pass lights).

45,000 miles NHTSA complaint 777841 filed 2010-03-30

My headlights will just go out. The parking light and rear light stay on. The headlight will go out and some times for the whole ride. Then sometime they will stay on for the ride. When the lights go out you have to use the passing high beams. I called the dealer and told him over the phone what was happening and he told me what the problem was without even looking at the car. He stated he knew what it was because it happens all the. I feel this is a safety issue that should be addressed. I was told it would cost $342.00 to fix. *tr

95,000 miles NHTSA complaint 834074 filed 2011-01-01

Recalls on the 2005 model year

NHTSA has issued 6 recall campaigns covering the 2005 Ford Crown Victoria, affecting an estimated 123,573 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover exterior lighting:headlights, steering:rack and pinion:pinion shaft, steering and fuel system, gasoline. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.

15V861000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

296,004 vehicles 2015-12-22
Defect
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles manufactured October 3, 2001, to August 2, 2005. The affected vehicles have a lighting control module (LCM) that may fail, resulting in a loss of headlights.
Consequence
A loss of headlights can reduce driver visibility and increase the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the LCM, free of charge. The recall began April 14, 2017. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 15S39.
14V704000

STEERING:RACK AND PINION:PINION SHAFT

36,888 vehicles 2014-11-05
Defect
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria, 2005-2011 Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles manufactured March 23, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and 2005-2011 Lincoln Town Car vehicles manufactured March 8, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and on which the upper intermediate shaft was serviced during the course of safety recall 13V-385. The prior repairs may not have been correctly performed.
Consequence
Improper servicing of the upper intermediate shaft could cause the shaft to separate, which can then result in a loss of steering control, and increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Ford will notify the owners of vehicles whose repair records reflect that the upper intermediate steering shaft was repaired during the course of the prior recall 13V-385. Dealers will inspect and replace the upper immediate shaft if necessary free of charge. The recall began November 17, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 14S25.
13V385000

STEERING

355,000 vehicles 2013-08-29
Defect
Ford is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria (including Crown Victoria Police Interceptors), Mercury Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Car vehicles. The affected vehicles are currently registered or were originally sold in Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Severe corrosion can seize the lower intermediate shaft which may…
Consequence
If the lower bearing separates, the vehicle may experience a loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Ford will notify owners and dealers will replace the lower intermediate shaft, free of charge. The upper intermediate shaft and steering column lower bearing will be inspected to identify any damage that may have occurred as a result of lower intermediate shaft corrosion, and repaired or replaced as necessary. If the steering column lower bearing has separated, a retainer clip will be installed. The recall began on October 23, 2013. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's recall number is 13S08.
06E056000

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE

58,640 vehicles 2006-06-13
Defect
Certain aftermarket fuel filters sold under the purolator brand name, p/n f65277, shipped from january 16 through june 2, 2006, for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Due to incorrect design, the quick connectors may not fully seat with the tube interface, even though the person making the connection may believe that the quick connector is fully attached.
Consequence
Failure of this connection could lead to fuel spillage and, in the presence of an ignition source, a fire could occur.
Remedy
Ufi will notify owners and replace the filters free of charge. The recall began on august 4, 2006. Owners may contact ufi filters usa at 800-230-5876.
05V518000

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:12V/24V/48V BATTERY:CABLES

98,836 vehicles 2005-11-09
Defect
On certain passenger vehicles, the battery cable includes a fusible link that may contact and subsequently chafe on a #2 cross member attaching bolt.
Consequence
This condition may result in heat damage and could lead to a fire.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect the fusible link and position it away from the cross member bolt. If the fusible link has already chafed and copper wires have been exposed, the fusible link will be replaced. The recall began on november 18, 2005. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673, or lincoln/mercury at 1-800-521-4140.
05V206000

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING:INTERIOR/UNDER DASH

132,800 vehicles 2005-05-09
Defect
On certain police interceptors (cvpi) and commercial heavy duty (taxi) vehicles, at extremely high operating temperatures, the sound insulating panel, located under the vehicle positioned between the exhaust system and the underbody, could sag and possibly contact the surface of the catalytic converter.
Consequence
If this occurs, the insulator might experience charring of the outer layer, burning odor, or smoke which may ultimately result in a fire.
Remedy
Dealers will remove the existing dash insulator and install a revised design insulator pad free of charge. The recall began on june 3, 2005. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2005 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2005 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

How 2005 compares with the other years

High risk for a 2005 — 213th riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.

Across the 15 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2004 comes out best at 57 and 2009 worst at 68, with 2005 itself at 65.

If the model year is negotiable, 2004, 2000, 1999 and 1998 score lower than 2005 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 2002–2005 generation specifically, 2004 is the strongest year at 57 and 2002 the weakest at 67.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 2002-2005 generation, 2004 Ford Crown Victoria scores best at 57 and 2002 Ford Crown Victoria worst at 67.

Where to spend the inspection money

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other electrical problem from about 22k, other powertrain problem from about 47k, control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure from about 50k and steering column or shaft failure from about 51k.

On a 2005 Ford Crown Victoria with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other electrical problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.

The limits of complaint data

240 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 240 reports, 196 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 82% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2005 Ford Crown Victoria?

The most-reported failures are control module (ecm/pcm/bcm) failure (48 reports, median 80,000 miles), other lighting problem (38 reports, median 80,000 miles) and headlight failure or clouding (16 reports, median 95,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2005 Ford Crown Victoria problems start?

Other powertrain problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 55,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 45,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 80,000 miles.

Is the 2005 Ford Crown Victoria reliable?

It scores 65 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 213th riskiest of the 320 2005 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2005 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Ford Crown Victoria is best?

Within the 2002–2005 generation, 2004 scores best at 57 out of 100 and 2002 worst at 67. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed