AtWhatMileage
Drivetrain · 16 owner reports

CV axle or driveshaft failure on the 2007 Toyota Tundra

1 crash 1 injury 2 of the 16 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 16
With an odometer reading 13
Reports per 1,000 built 0.1 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 38%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 2
Typical repair $450–$2,200
What it means when it happens High
Rank among this year's problems 11th

When cv axle or driveshaft failure gets reported

Owners of the 2007 Toyota Tundra report CV axle or driveshaft failure at a median of 90,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 25,000 miles and a quarter after 100,000 miles, from 13 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 105,000 miles. It is the 11th most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 15,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 155,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 141,200 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

38% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 13 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
15,600 miles 27,440 miles 90,000 miles 100,000 miles 156,800 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 1 a crash and 1 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $450–$2,200 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 12 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2005, at a median of 700 miles, and latest on the 2008 at 195,000 miles.

By volume the 2004 carries the most reports, with 16; the 2007 has 16. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Truck has a clunk and bump coming from the drive train.when you let the foot off the brake the drive shaft jerks. Issue is getting worse. Arbitration says that toyota has fixed the problem. Still has the problem. *tr

13,000 miles NHTSA complaint 714473 filed 2009-04-01

As I slow down I feel a clunk in the transmission. A few seconds after I come to a complete stop, it feels as if someone bumps me in the rear, only there's no car behind me. They replaced the drive shaft and seal, but now the bump is even more pronounced. Also in the mornings the transmission will not change into 6th gear until I drive app. 1 mile at 60 MPH. I am nearing the expiration of my warranty and I am concerned about this issue. *tr

30,000 miles NHTSA complaint 719899 filed 2009-05-13

Bought my tundra in 07 . In 09 of jan. I took it to toyota stating after braking it felt like being hit from behind. Toyota replaced the driveshaft. In oct. Of 09 it started all over again. Took it back to toyota they said they replaced it once & would not replace it again & that it would keep having this problem. I've emailed toyota , called customer care they said its a characteristic of the tundra. I only have 42000 miles on truck. If I would of known this I wouldn't have bought it. They told me that the lemon law was only 2 years & that wouldnt help. Where do I go from here. *tr

27,440 miles NHTSA complaint 763959 filed 2010-02-17

Also reported on the 2007 Toyota Tundra

Other engine problem

53 reports median 68k

Other speed control problem

53 reports median 36k

Other suspension problem

51 reports median 967

Other body or interior problem

47 reports median 59k

Other powertrain problem

41 reports median 45k

Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure

25 reports median 136k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 16 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does cv axle or driveshaft failure happen on the 2007 Toyota Tundra?

Across 13 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 90,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 25,000 miles and a quarter after 100,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is cv axle or driveshaft failure on the 2007 Toyota Tundra?

16 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.1 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed