AtWhatMileage
Electrical · 118 owner reports

Other electrical problem on the 2007 Toyota Camry

5 crashes 28 fires 5 injuries 38 of the 118 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 118
With an odometer reading 95
Reports per 1,000 built 1.0 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 25%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 38
Typical repair $250–$2,000
What it means when it happens Moderate
Rank among this year's problems 8th

When other electrical problem gets reported

Owners of the 2007 Toyota Camry report other electrical problem at a median of 87,500 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 40,000 miles and a quarter after 115,000 miles, from 95 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 85,000 miles. It is the 8th most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 7,500 miles at the tenth percentile to 140,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 132,854 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

25% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 95 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
6,746 miles 39,401 miles 88,500 miles 114,612 miles 139,600 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 5 a crash, 28 a fire and 5 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $250–$2,000 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 29 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2021, at a median of 35 miles, and latest on the 2025 at 190,000 miles.

By volume the 2007 is the worst of them, which makes this a problem of this specific year rather than of the model as a whole.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 1996 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 124k
  2. 1997 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 101k
  3. 1998 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 120k
  4. 1999 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 113k
  5. 2000 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 50k
  6. 2001 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 40k
  7. 2002 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 60k
  8. 2003 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 92k
  9. 2004 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 60k
  10. 2005 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 73k
  11. 2006 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 77k
  12. 2007 (this one) 89k
  13. 2008 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 66k
  14. 2009 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 71k
  15. 2010 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 20k
  16. 2011 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 40k
  17. 2012 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 29k
  18. 2013 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 24k
  19. 2014 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 44k
  20. 2015 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 30k
  21. 2016 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 20k
  22. 2017 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 24k
  23. 2018 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 7k
  24. 2019 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 20k
  25. 2020 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 3k
  26. 2021 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 35
  27. 2022 Toyota Camry other electrical problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  28. 2023 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 30k
  29. 2024 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 122k
  30. 2025 Toyota Camry other electrical problem 189k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Throttle response delay in 2007 toyota camry (4 cyl. Auto) camry - bought new 4/06 from toyota of nashua (nh). Defect is a delay of 1 1/2 seconds in throttle response. Delay was most noticeable at normal urban traffic speeds of 35 to 45 MPH. A light increase in throttle at constant highway speeds in the 35 to 45 MPH range resulted in the engine 1) usually not remaining in high gear 2) having no response for 1 1/2 seconds, and 3) then roughly down-shifting, as if the driver had called for strong acceleration. The car's speed "sagged", and then the car's engine oversped. The driver then had to decrease throttle to prevent overspeed in traffic. Pulling out into traffic becomes unpredictable and dangerous. Delay and/or over-response in the throttle control's action may create skids on wet and icy roads. Less experienced drivers may become un-nerved by this kind of throttle response. Toyota's response to complaints consisted of these replies: (listed in the order in which they were given over multiple service visits) 1. "we know what it is. It is the fly-by-wire control. They all do it and the owner has to live with it" (spoken over…

50 miles NHTSA complaint 594825 filed 2006-09-01

Dt*: the contact stated the blue tooth feature in the vehicle was not working properly. Intermittently, when using the feature, the person listening on the other side heard a garbled sound. The vehicle had been seen by the dealer on three occasions, but the cause of the problem could not be determined. The manufacturer was also alerted. Updated 01/10/06. *jb

9,750 miles NHTSA complaint 605267 filed 2006-12-05

On several occasions, while attempting to accelerate from a stop, the engine hesitated severely. On more than one occasion attempts to cross at a crossroads or enter a freeway with plenty of time before traffic arrived resulted in several near misses with other cars. The failure of the vehicle to accelerate properly could cause an accident to occur. We have taken the vehicle to greenville toyota in greenville nc, and they said it was a chip in the computer and that they were aware of the problem but were unable to do anything about it. Greenville toyota representatives advised it was a manufacturer's issue. *ak

7,645 miles NHTSA complaint 624183 filed 2007-05-15

Also reported on the 2007 Toyota Camry

Other visibility problem

521 reports median 70k

Other body or interior problem

414 reports median 60k

Other speed control problem

391 reports median 33k

Excessive oil consumption

240 reports median 100k

Other engine problem

238 reports median 75k

Other powertrain problem

190 reports median 3k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 118 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does other electrical problem happen on the 2007 Toyota Camry?

Across 95 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 87,500 miles. A quarter were filed before 40,000 miles and a quarter after 115,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is other electrical problem on the 2007 Toyota Camry?

118 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 1.0 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed