AtWhatMileage
Adas · 21 owner reports

Other speed control problem on the 2007 Toyota 4RUNNER

3 crashes 1 injury 4 of the 21 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 21
With an odometer reading 15
Reports per 1,000 built 0.2 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 60%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 4
Typical repair $250–$2,000
What it means when it happens Critical
Rank among this year's problems 2nd

When other speed control problem gets reported

Owners of the 2007 Toyota 4RUNNER report other speed control problem at a median of 35,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 20,000 miles and a quarter after 50,000 miles, from 15 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 78,000 miles. It is the 2nd most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 20,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 80,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 61,816 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

60% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 15 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
17,524 miles 20,000 miles 33,000 miles 48,379 miles 79,340 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 3 a crash and 1 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $250–$2,000 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

This mode is classified as critical, which means a failure can leave the car unable to stop, steer, or stay out of the way of traffic. It is weighted accordingly in the risk score.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 15 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2008, at a median of 20,000 miles, and latest on the 1997 at 210,000 miles.

By volume the 2007 is the worst of them, which makes this a problem of this specific year rather than of the model as a whole.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 1996 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 69k
  2. 1997 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 210k
  3. 1998 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 203k
  4. 1999 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 150k
  5. 2000 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 107k
  6. 2001 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 166k
  7. 2002 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 160k
  8. 2003 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 62k
  9. 2004 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 69k
  10. 2005 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 49k
  11. 2006 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 59k
  12. 2007 (this one) 33k
  13. 2008 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 21k
  14. 2009 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 12k
  15. 2010 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 35k
  16. 2011 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 22k
  17. 2012 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 44k
  18. 2013 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 74k
  19. 2014 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 32k
  20. 2015 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 49k
  21. 2016 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 27k
  22. 2017 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem 45k
  23. 2018 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  24. 2022 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  25. 2023 Toyota 4RUNNER other speed control problem
    no odometer readings given
    —

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Tl* - the contact stated that the brake and accelerator pedals were approximately an inch apart. The contact stated that while applying the accelerator he also inadvertently applied the brake pedal. *ak updated 1/31/2007 - *nm

200 miles NHTSA complaint 608831 filed 2007-01-08

I was waiting in line of traffic to pick up my daughter at school. Car was in drive, my foot was firmly on the brake pedal, when the engine suddenly raced and the car lurched forward about 10 feet. I stomped harder on the brakes and the car did stop, but at no time had my foot ever left the brake pedal, and was not even remotely touching the gas. At first I thought the car had been hit from behind, but when the incident was over, I realized that was not the case. My wife observed the incident from the passenger seat and concurs that my foot was on the brake the whole time. She later checked to make sure that the mat had not shifted to press on the gas, but confirmed that nothing was in contact, or even near the gas pedal. My wife took the car to the dealer the same day to check the computer codes, but nothing was recorded in the history. Dealer was unable to observe the phenomenon. The check engine light did not come on. I purchased the car new in october 2007. Mileage at the time of the incident was 19,912. *tr

19,912 miles NHTSA complaint 671075 filed 2008-05-23

Tl* the contact owns a 2007 toyota 4 runner. While driving 45 MPH the vehicle accelerated to 90 MPH. He had to drive over grass and small shrubs to decelerate. The vehicle was towed to the dealer for inspection. The technician could not duplicate the failure, therefore they could not provide a remedy. The failure and current mileages were 23,000.

23,000 miles NHTSA complaint 738313 filed 2009-10-05

Also reported on the 2007 Toyota 4RUNNER

Other body or interior problem

35 reports median 69k

Other brake problem

17 reports median 59k

Rust or structural corrosion

12 reports median 160k

Other visibility problem

11 reports median 133k

Other engine problem

9 reports median 17k

Loss of braking

8 reports median 23k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 21 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does other speed control problem happen on the 2007 Toyota 4RUNNER?

Across 15 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 35,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 20,000 miles and a quarter after 50,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is other speed control problem on the 2007 Toyota 4RUNNER?

21 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.2 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed