2022 Rivian R1t: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2022 Rivian R1t

Owners have reported 29 named failure modes on the 2022 Rivian R1t, and the three most-reported carry 27% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Cruise control failure leads with 10 reports and about 1.6 per 1,000 vehicles.

Other suspension problem follows with 10 reports.

Other driver assistance problem follows with 8 reports.

By system, the reports fall mostly into adas (26), suspension (17) and software (7).

Severity, and what it costs

Across the named modes, 18 mention a crash and 17 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.47, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: cruise control failure at $200–$1,400, other suspension problem at $350–$2,000, other driver assistance problem at $250–$1,800 and software fault or failed update at $0–$600. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

5% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2022 Rivian R1t draws about 16 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 95th percentile of complaint rates among 2022 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 6,358 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2022 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

Recalls on the 2022 model year

NHTSA has issued 11 recall campaigns covering the 2022 Rivian R1t, affecting an estimated 18,376 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover seat belts:rear/other:retractor, suspension:critical fasteners, seat belts:front:anchorage and equipment:other:labels. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

Where 2022 sits in the model line

Severe risk for a 2022 — 4th riskiest of the 241 2022 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.

Across the 3 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2025 comes out best at 76 and 2022 worst at 87, with 2022 itself at 87.

If the model year is negotiable, 2025 scores lower than 2022 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 2022–2026 generation specifically, 2025 is the strongest year at 76 and 2022 the weakest at 87.

What this page cannot tell you

104 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 104 reports, 1 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 1% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.