AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2000 Nissan Pathfinder: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder

On the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder, the failure owners report most often is strut, shock or spring failure, and the reports cluster around 157,500 miles. The earliest to appear is steering column or shaft failure, reported by a median of 150,000 miles. Overall it scores 62 out of 100, high risk for a 2000.

High risk for a 2000 — 266th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. 166 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

What breaks on the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder

Owners have reported 34 named failure modes on the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder, and the three most-reported carry 39% of everything filed.

Strut, shock or spring failure leads with 39 reports, about 1.0 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 131k to 167,500 miles.

Steering column or shaft failure follows with 17 reports, usually reported between 140k to 160,000 miles.

Premature brake pad or rotor wear follows with 9 reports.

By system, the reports fall mostly into suspension (52), steering (26) and brakes (22).

At what mileage it happens

100 of the reports on the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 130,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 7% by 50,000 miles, 25% by 100,000 miles and 67% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 2 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 150,000 and 160,000 miles, which alone holds 12% of the dated reports.

4% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, so this is mostly a story about older, higher-mileage cars.

Median
  1. Strut, shock or spring failure 157k
  2. Steering column or shaft failure 149k
  3. Premature brake pad or rotor wear
    no odometer readings given
    —
  4. Other suspension problem 117k
  5. Other speed control problem 75k
  6. Other body or interior problem 111k
  7. ABS module or sensor failure 62k
  8. Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin 25k
  9. Other fuel system problem 102k
  10. Other steering problem 145k
  11. Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure 120k
  12. Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure 121k

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 34. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 130k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 2 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

What happens when these parts fail

Across the named modes, 10 mention a crash, 2 a fire, 8 an injury and 1 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.73, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: strut, shock or spring failure at $500–$2,000, steering column or shaft failure at $600–$2,500, premature brake pad or rotor wear at $300–$1,400 and other suspension problem at $350–$2,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

7% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Strut, shock or spring failure suspension 39 27 131k 157k 167k 1.0 $500–$2,000 Moderate
Steering column or shaft failure steering 17 14 140k 149k 159k 0.5 $600–$2,500 Critical
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 9 0 — — — 0.2 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Other suspension problem suspension 9 6 — 117k — 0.2 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Other speed control problem adas 9 3 — 75k — 0.2 $250–$2,000 Critical
Other body or interior problem body 8 7 — 111k — 0.2 $200–$2,000 Moderate
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 7 4 — 62k — 0.2 $500–$2,400 High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 6 3 — 25k — 0.2 $250–$2,000 High
Other fuel system problem fuel 6 4 — 102k — 0.2 $300–$2,200 High
Other steering problem steering 5 4 — 145k — 0.1 $350–$2,400 High
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 4 3 — 120k — 0.1 $700–$2,600 High
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 4 3 — 121k — 0.1 $400–$2,200 High
Water pump failure cooling 3 0 — — — 0.1 $500–$2,200 High
Parking brake failure brakes 3 3 — 159k — 0.1 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Other powertrain problem transmission 3 1 — 128k — 0.1 $400–$4,500 High
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 3 2 — 61k — 0.1 $200–$1,500 High
No-start or intermittent start failure engine 2 2 — 79k — 0.1 $200–$1,800 Moderate
Engine sensor failure electrical 2 2 — 75k — 0.1 $180–$900 Moderate
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 2 1 — 100k — 0.1 $250–$1,500 High
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 2 2 — 153k — 0.1 $250–$1,600 Critical
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 2 0 — — — 0.1 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 2 0 — — — 0.1 $200–$900 High
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 2 0 — — — 0.1 $200–$1,500 Critical
Rust or structural corrosion body 2 2 — 113k — 0.1 $500–$6,000 High
Other electrical problem electrical 2 0 — — — 0.1 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Other lighting problem lighting 2 0 — — — 0.1 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Oil leak engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$2,200 Moderate
Stalling while driving engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Complete transmission failure transmission 1 1 — 123k — 0.0 $2,800–$8,000 Critical
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 1 0 — — — 0.0 $450–$2,200 High
Fuel leak or fuel odor fuel 1 1 — 49k — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure fuel 1 1 — 115k — 0.0 $250–$1,800 Moderate
Wiper or washer failure glass 1 0 — — — 0.0 $120–$800 Moderate
Other brake problem brakes 1 1 — 66k — 0.0 $300–$1,800 High
Unclassified problem other 3 3 — 109k — 0.1 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder draws about 4.5 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 80th percentile of complaint rates among 2000 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 37,225 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2000 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Strut, shock or spring failure

My 2000 nissan pathfinder se started making strange noises in the front end about a week ago. Upon inspection, I found that the strut tower had totally rusted out and completely separated from the vehicle. When I tapped it with a hammer, it created a huge hole, and the frame just disintegrated. The vehicle is no longer safe to drive and must be taken off the road. Having it repaired is not feasible. As a mechanic, I take very good care of my vehicle. It's maintained and washed regularly. This is clearly a defect in the pathfinder, and should warrant a product recall. Driving the vehicle like this would be risking the safety of my family and myself. *tr

157,000 miles NHTSA complaint 807258 filed 2010-08-16

My 2000 nissan pathfinder se started making strange noises in the front end about a week ago. Upon inspection, I found that the strut tower had totally rusted out and completely separated from the vehicle. When I tapped it with a hammer, it created a huge hole, and the frame just disintegrated. The vehicle is no longer safe to drive and must be taken off the road. Having it repaired is not feasible. As a mechanic, I take very good care of my vehicle. It's maintained and washed regularly. This is clearly a defect in the pathfinder, and should warrant a product recall. Driving the vehicle like this would be risking the safety of my family and myself. *tr

157,000 miles NHTSA complaint 807259 filed 2010-08-16

Steering column or shaft failure

The steering in my 2000 pathfinder seemed to be rubbing. I took it to a trusted mechanic who said that there was rusted metal rubbing against the steering column and that I needed to have a body shop look at it. I took it to the body shop and he said he'd never seen anything like it before but my frame was rusted out and would cost more to fix it than the truck is worth. He advised me not to drive it because my wheels could literally fall in causing a bad accident. I just paid the truck off last year and now unless nissan does something I just own it but will not be able to drive it. *tr

178 miles NHTSA complaint 788415 filed 2010-05-19

I own a 2000 nissan pathfinder le, with 149,000 miles, which is now out of warranty. Tues 7/27/10, while pulling out of a parking space, I lost steering control. Find steering column is snapped. Tow to mechanic, who discovers the shock tower, which is part of the frame (uni-body design), has sheared away from the rest of the wheel-well. The shock tower has pushed up into the steering column, causing it to break. Mechanic gave estimate of $640.00 for steering, and at least $1700.00 for the wheel-well, which is a body shop repair. Also suggested to call nissan to see if there a recall on wheel-wells as this is a safety issue, and is not the first time he has heard of this problem. This is not normal wear and tear, it is a design flaw. Control arms just below tearing in frame, if tearing continued, wheel could also become dislodged, in addition to loss of steering. Nissan was called, and wants vehicle towed to dealership for verification at my expense, and in addition pay for diagnostic service. Apparently, I am at their mercy, however how can they give me an unbiased diagnostic, as I am sure the results will be in their favor. I am…

149,000 miles NHTSA complaint 802678 filed 2010-07-28

Recalls on the 2000 model year

NHTSA has issued 6 recall campaigns covering the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder, affecting an estimated 49,933 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover steering:column, exterior lighting:headlights, exterior lighting and fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assembly:filler pipe and . Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.

11V244000

STEERING:COLUMN

195,991 vehicles 2011-04-20
Defect
Nissan is recalling certain model year 1996-2004 pathfinder and model year 1997-2003 infiniti qx4 vehicles originally sold, or currently registered in, connecticut, delaware, iowa, illinois, indiana, massachusetts, maine, maryland, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, washington d.c., west virginia and wisconsin. In areas of the country in which heavy concentrations of road salt are used, a mixture of snow/water and salt may enter an assembly location hole in the upper strut housing, causing water…
Consequence
The strut housing may crack and pull away from the inner hood ledge assembly. This may lead to grinding noises, increased steering effort, and possibly the steering column to break, resulting in the loss of steering control, which could result in a crash.
Remedy
Nissan will inspect the strut housing and repair the vehicles as necessary, free of charge. An interim notification letter was sent out in may 2011. The second notice was mailed on july 25, 2011. Owners may contact nissan at 1-800-647-7261.
09E025000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS

42,540 vehicles 2009-05-11
Defect
Dope, inc. Is recalling 42,540 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Dope, inc. Will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on july 28, 2009. Owners may contact dope, inc. At 1-626-272-1798.
09E012000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07
Defect
Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
07V435000

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY:FILLER PIPE AND CAP

372,250 vehicles 2007-09-18
Defect
On certain vehicles originally sold in or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, iowa, illinois, indiana, kentucky, massachusetts, maine, maryland, michigan, minnesota, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, tennessee, vermont, virginia, west virginia , wisconsin and the district of columbia, during the coating process of the fuel filler tube assembly, an insufficient amount of coating may have been applied at the lower mounting bracket. This could result in an opening in the coating which can allow water to enter and…
Consequence
This may result in surface rust but not perforation of the tube. However, in those areas of the country which use heavy concentrations of road salt in the winter, if a mixture of snow/water and salt makes contact with the bare metal, corrosion may occur to a degree which results in perforation of the tube. In this case fuel leakage may occur when filling the tank. Fuel leakage, in the presence of an ignition source, could result in a fire.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the fuel filler tube assembly with a new one with an improved coating process. The recall began on november 26, 2007. Owners may contact nissan at 1-800-647-7261.
06E049000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

27,176 vehicles 2006-05-24
Defect
Certain ck motorsports combination headlights, clear corner, bumper, and side marker lights sold as replacement lamps for use on the passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
Remedy
Ck motorsport will notify owners and replace the noncompliant lamps free of charge. The recall began on july 1, 2006. Owners may contact ck motorsport at 1-909-610-7211.
06E026000

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

61,944 vehicles 2006-03-23
Defect
Certain pro-a motors corner lamps, turn signals, and headlights sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
Consequence
Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
Remedy
Pro-a motors will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began on april 3, 2006. Owners may contact pro-a motors at 323-838-2988.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2000 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2000 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

Where 2000 sits in the model line

High risk for a 2000 — 266th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.

Across the 29 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2000 comes out best at 62 and 2013 worst at 82, with 2000 itself at 62.

No other year of this model scores meaningfully better than 2000, so if this generation is what you want, the year is not the lever.

Within the 1996–2004 generation specifically, 2000 is the strongest year at 62 and 1996 the weakest at 67.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 1996-2004 generation, 2000 Nissan Pathfinder scores best at 62 and 1996 Nissan Pathfinder worst at 67.

What to look at before buying one

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: strut, shock or spring failure from about 131k and steering column or shaft failure from about 140k.

On a 2000 Nissan Pathfinder with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether strut, shock or spring failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.

The limits of complaint data

166 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 166 reports, 100 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 60% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder?

The most-reported failures are strut, shock or spring failure (39 reports, median 157,500 miles), steering column or shaft failure (17 reports, median 150,000 miles) and premature brake pad or rotor wear (9 reports). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2000 Nissan Pathfinder problems start?

Steering column or shaft failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 150,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 140,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 130,000 miles.

Is the 2000 Nissan Pathfinder reliable?

It scores 62 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 266th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2000 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Nissan Pathfinder is best?

Within the 1996–2004 generation, 2000 scores best at 62 out of 100 and 1996 worst at 67. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed