2005 Ford Ranger at 58,500 miles
You did not give a mileage, so this uses 58,500 — the median reported failure mileage for this model year, which is a rough stand-in for “a typical example of this car”. Put your real reading in the box below for an answer about your car.
At 58,500 miles on this car
At 58,500 miles on a 2005 Ford Ranger, 24 of the failure modes other owners have reported already have their median report at or below your reading, and 2 more fall inside the window where they are usually reported. The heaviest of the ones already due is other fuel system problem.
Already past the median 24
Half of all reports of these failures came in at or below where your car is now.
- Other fuel system problem 51k
- Fuel pump failure 51k
- Other electrical problem 54k
- Rust or structural corrosion 56k
- Other wheel or tire problem 31k
- Other brake problem 29k
- Stalling while driving 47k
- No-start or intermittent start failure 56k
- Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure 10k
- Overheating 13k
- Fuel gauge or level sensor failure 16k
- Alternator or charging system failure 38k
12 more.
You are in the window 2
Your reading falls inside the middle half of reports for these.
Typically later 12
Reported further down the road than where you are.
- Airbag failed to deploy in a crash 60k
- Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure 61k
- Other engine problem 62k
- Steering column or shaft failure 65k
- Wiring harness or short circuit 70k
- Other speed control problem 86k
- Radiator or coolant leak 86k
- Other steering problem 88k
- Other powertrain problem 89k
- Airbag inflator rupture 90k
- Complete engine failure or seizure 112k
- Parking brake failure 223k
Timing unknown 3
Reported, but too few owners gave an odometer reading to place them.
- Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault 3×
- Wheel bearing or hub failure 1×
- Seat belt or retractor failure 1×
Why the list is generic until you type a number
Every figure below is a comparison against your odometer, so with no reading given the page has to pick one: 58,500 miles, roughly what a 2005 car covers at 12,000 miles a year. A reading 30,000 miles either side of that moves failures between the columns, which is the difference between a useful list and a generic one.
Already inside the reported range
24 failure modes on the 2005 Ford Ranger have a median reported mileage at or below 58,500: other fuel system problem (median 50,000 miles, 26 reports), fuel pump failure (median 50,000 miles, 19 reports), other electrical problem (median 55,000 miles, 13 reports), rust or structural corrosion (median 55,000 miles, 9 reports), other wheel or tire problem (median 30,000 miles, 9 reports) and other brake problem (median 30,000 miles, 6 reports).
Half the owners who reported each of these had done so by that mileage, which means half had not. A failure being "due" here is a statement about other people's cars, and the useful response is an inspection rather than a pre-emptive repair.
The window you are in now
2 further modes are reported in a band that includes 58,500 miles: other suspension problem (58k to 100,000 miles) and other body or interior problem (50k to 125,000 miles). These are the ones to watch on this car over the next few thousand miles.
A window here is the 25th to 75th percentile of reported mileages, so it holds the middle half of the reports and excludes the tails on both sides.
Still ahead of you
12 further modes sit above your reading, the nearest being airbag failed to deploy in a crash at a median of 60,000 miles. On a car you intend to keep, these are the ones that decide whether it is worth keeping.
What this list is not
It is a reading of what owners of other 2005 Ford Rangers reported, and at what odometer reading they reported it. It is not a maintenance schedule, not a diagnosis, and not a prediction about this car: two identical cars with different service histories are not the same car.
Complaints are filed voluntarily, mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers, and a failure mode with few reports has a wide window even when the median looks precise. Modes with fewer than 8 dated reports are shown without percentiles for that reason.
Where 58,500 miles falls on the curve
The three columns above sort the failure modes one by one. This is the same evidence in aggregate: every dated report on this model year, stacked up in the order the odometer readings arrived. The dashed line marked you is where your car sits. How much of the line is to the left of that mark is how much of this model year's reported trouble is, on the evidence, already behind you.
About 34% of the dated reports on this model year had already been filed by 58,500 miles. That is the share of the problems that show up in this record, not of the problems this car will have. A further 11 reports came in above the top of the scale, which is why the line stops short of the top.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the mileages called out above
A steep early climb means a car whose reports cluster young, which is the pattern of a defect rather than of wear. A line that only gets going past six figures is the opposite. Neither shape says anything about the specific car in your driveway, and a curve built from a few dozen readings can be moved by one owner with a talkative afternoon.
Full report for the 2005 Ford Ranger Compare with another car
Questions this page answers
What should I expect at 58,500 miles on a 2005 Ford Ranger?
24 of the failure modes owners have reported on the 2005 Ford Ranger have a median report at or below 58,500 miles, and 2 more fall inside the mileage window where they are usually reported. That is a watch list drawn from other owners, not a prediction about this car.
How to use the three columns. The left column is the list to hand a mechanic before you buy, and to check the service history for if you already own the car. The middle column is what to budget for this year. The right column is not a reprieve — it is a reminder that a used car has a bill schedule, and this is roughly where it falls. All of it is drawn from 353 owner complaints about this exact model year, not from a maintenance manual. How the percentiles are computed.
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed