2000 Mercury Sable: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2000 Mercury Sable
On the 2000 Mercury Sable, the failure owners report most often is strut, shock or spring failure, and the reports cluster around 57,500 miles. The earliest to appear is tail light, brake light or signal failure, reported by a median of 30,000 miles. Overall it scores 64 out of 100, high risk for a 2000.
High risk for a 2000 — 225th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. 578 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
The failures owners actually file about
Owners have reported 53 named failure modes on the 2000 Mercury Sable, and the three most-reported carry 38% of everything filed.
Strut, shock or spring failure leads with 96 reports, about 0.6 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 48k to 80,000 miles.
Other suspension problem follows with 69 reports, usually reported between 64k to 105,000 miles.
Other speed control problem follows with 54 reports, usually reported between 36k to 115,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into suspension (169), brakes (66) and adas (63).
At what mileage it happens
288 of the reports on the 2000 Mercury Sable came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 64,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 35% by 50,000 miles, 77% by 100,000 miles and 94% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 3 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 50,000 and 60,000 miles, which alone holds 11% of the dated reports.
22% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
In the order they tend to show up: tail light, brake light or signal failure around 29k, other powertrain problem around 38k, strut, shock or spring failure around 59k and other lighting problem around 63k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 53. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 3 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
Severity, and what it costs
Across the named modes, 42 mention a crash, 10 a fire and 19 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.14, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: strut, shock or spring failure at $500–$2,000, other suspension problem at $350–$2,000, other speed control problem at $250–$2,000 and other lighting problem at $120–$1,200. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
11% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 96 | 75 | 48k | 59k | 81k | 0.6 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 69 | 54 | 64k | 81k | 104k | 0.5 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 54 | 15 | 36k | 85k | 114k | 0.4 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 31 | 13 | 25k | 63k | 96k | 0.2 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 26 | 4 | — | 32k | — | 0.2 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 25 | 16 | 24k | 29k | 47k | 0.2 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 21 | 4 | — | 80k | — | 0.1 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 21 | 8 | 24k | 38k | 59k | 0.1 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 18 | 10 | 50k | 65k | 125k | 0.1 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 13 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 12 | 6 | — | 57k | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 12 | 7 | — | 110k | — | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 11 | 5 | — | 10k | — | 0.1 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 11 | 5 | — | 74k | — | 0.1 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 10 | 5 | — | 29k | — | 0.1 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 9 | 5 | — | 81k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 9 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 8 | 1 | — | 24k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 8 | 3 | — | 97k | — | 0.1 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure | transmission | 6 | 1 | — | 10k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,400 | High |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 6 | 3 | — | 34k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 6 | 2 | — | 135k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 5 | 5 | — | 141k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 5 | 1 | — | 66k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 5 | 3 | — | 65k | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 4 | 4 | — | 146k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 4 | 3 | — | 88k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 4 | 4 | — | 70k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin | emissions | 3 | 3 | — | 32k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,000 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Engine bay fire | engine | 2 | 2 | — | 22k | — | 0.0 | $4,000–$20,000 | Critical |
| Oil leak | engine | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 2 | 2 | — | 76k | — | 0.0 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 2 | 1 | — | 154k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 2 | 2 | — | 38k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 2 | 2 | — | 30k | — | 0.0 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 2 | 1 | — | 78k | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Intake carbon buildup | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $400–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Transmission fluid leak | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,800 | Moderate |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 35k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Power steering pump or fluid leak | steering | 1 | 1 | — | 47k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Air suspension failure | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 22k | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,500 | High |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 121k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| DPF, EGR or DEF system failure | emissions | 1 | 1 | — | 52k | — | 0.0 | $800–$5,000 | High |
| Windshield cracking | glass | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Other steering problem | steering | 1 | 1 | — | 55k | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 29 | 7 | — | 44k | — | 0.2 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2000 Mercury Sable draws about 3.9 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 79th percentile of complaint rates among 2000 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 149,843 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2000 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Strut, shock or spring failure
Front driver side suspension coil spring broke at 49,000 miles. Tip of failed spring punctured tire side wall. Fortunately the car was parked at the time. Vehicle could not be operated due to coil spring interference with wheel well path of replacement tire.
While driving 25 MPH left front coil spring failed, causing left front tire to puncture. Vehicle was unable to move. Vehicle was towed to dealer for analysis, and mechanic determined that the struts and coil springs needed to be replaced due to worn out parts.*ak *la
Other suspension problem
I just paid $700.00 to replace a broken front spring that punctured (exploded) the inside sidewall of my tire in two places...while my car was parked at my office.*ak I feel very fortunate to have not been driving the car at the time of the spring failure. I can only image the potential damage to my car, myself and others nearby if this spring had failed when the car was being driven. I strongly feel this spring failure is not a typical owner maintenance cost. It is clearly a manufacturer/part failure and I requested the cost of this repair to be paid by the manufacturer. Additionally, I strongly recommended the manufacturer consider a recall of this part for the safety of its customers. Ford motor company responded only that the car is out of warranty. The representative for ford stated this part failure was a owner maintenance issue not a safety concern. I strongly disagree. Please respond.
Consumer received ford recall 04s17 in august 2004, which stated the part would be available in december. However, the parts were still not in, and the consumer was concerned. *ak......*ak
Other speed control problem
While vehicle was parked in heavy traffic with engine still running, and without any warning it suddenly accelerated and hit rear end of another vehicle. Dealer stated we never heard something like this. *ak
While stopping at a stop sign vehicle suddenly accelerated. Consumer foot was on the brake pedal when the acceleration occurred. Consumer immediately put the vehicle into neutral. This stopped the acceleration. Then, consumer reversed the vehicle slightly and tilted the steering wheel to the right before putting the vehicle back into drive and accelerating.*ak
Recalls on the 2000 model year
NHTSA has issued 7 recall campaigns covering the 2000 Mercury Sable, affecting an estimated 512,309 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover suspension:front:springs:coil springs, exterior lighting:brake lights:switch, service brakes, hydraulic:pedals and linkages and visibility:windshield wiper/washer:motor. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
SUSPENSION:FRONT:SPRINGS:COIL SPRINGS
899,060 vehicles 2004-07-15- Defect
- On certain passenger vehicles originally sold in or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia, the front coil springs could fracture due to corrosion associated with salt used on the roadways during the winter. A fractured spring could move past the spring seat and contact a front tire.
- Consequence
- If this occurs, the tire may rupture resulting in a rapid air loss, which could result in a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will install protective spring shields. In addition, ford is extending the warranty coverage of the front coil springs in all other states, for fracture only, up to 10 years of service or 150,000 miles, whichever occurs first. If the vehicle has already accumulated more than 150,000 miles, this coverage will last until july 31, 2005. If either front coil spring fractures, dealers will replace both front springs at no charge to the owner. An interim notice was sent to owners on august 2, 2004. Parts are now available for the 2000-2001 my vehicles and owners were…
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS:SWITCH
938,789 vehicles 2004-03-02- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles are being recalled to correct a problem with a malfunctioning stop lamp switch and/or associated wiring. This malfunctioning could render the stop lamps inoperable or cause them to stay on all the time. This could cause confusion to a following driver, which could lead to a crash.
- Consequence
- In addition, if the switch and/or associated wiring fail in the open position, the brake lights will not actuate and the driver will not be able to shift the vehicle out of "park" if they fail in the closed position, the brake lights will remain on, which will not allow the speed control to be activated. This could also cause the battery to discharge.
- Remedy
- Dealers will remove the stop lamp switch and associated wiring assembly and install a newly designed stop lamp switch and wire assembly. Owner notification is expected to begin on april 5, 2004. Owners should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:PEDALS AND LINKAGES
369,614 vehicles 2002-10-02- Defect
- Certain passenger vehicles equipped with adjustable padels are being recalled in order to adjust the brake and accelerator pedals to a minimum of 50 mm of lateral separation. Simultaneous application of both the brake and accelerator pedals could result in an increase in engine RPM.
- Consequence
- This could result in a customer experiencing an "unintended vehicle speed increase" or a perceived "unable to stop" condition.
- Remedy
- Owners will be instructed as to the proper way to set the position of the pedals and to take their vehicles to a dealer to have the spacing between the brake and accelerator pedals measured. If the spacing is found to be less than 50 mm, the dealer will adjust the pedals to increase the distance between them to greater than 50 mm. Owner notification began october 28, 2002. Owners who do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.
VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER:MOTOR
1,083,000 vehicles 2001-08-08- Defect
- Vehicle description: passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, and light and medium duty pickup trucks. A switch located in the plastic cover of the wiper motor gear case could malfunction and overheat, potentially resulting in loss of intermittent wiper function, loss of wiper park function, complete loss of wiper function, or ignition of the plastic cover material. Switch malfunction is most likely to occur when the intermittent setting of the wipers is being used, or when snow or ice obstructs the blades from returning to the "parked" position at the bottom of the…
- Consequence
- Loss of visibility while driving increases the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will inspect the date code on the wiper motor. Motors built with the suspect time frame will have the wiper motor gear case cover replaced. Owner notification began august 20, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS:SWITCH
74,000 vehicles 2001-03-12- Defect
- Vehicle description: passenger and sport utility vehicles. Due to the use of incorrect material by a supplier, the headlamp switch knob can fracture and separate from the headlamp switch.
- Consequence
- This would cause difficulty for the driver to activate the headlamps, which could affect driver visibility, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the headlamp switch knob. Owner notification began april 9, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:TAIL LIGHTS:SWITCH
157,000 vehicles 2001-03-12- Defect
- Vehicle description: passenger vehicles equipped with adjustable pedals. If the grease from the adjustable pedal assembly enters the stop lamp switch, it can contaminate the contacts leading to carbon build up, and potentially, a short circuit.
- Consequence
- A short circuit could lead to either the brake lamps staying on, or to a loss of brake lamp function, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the brake lamp switch and wipe down the adjustable pedal assembly to remove excess grease. Owner notification began march 22, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
167,000 vehicles 2000-08-24- Defect
- Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. The "vehicle capacity weight" and "designated seating capacity" information was not printed on the safety certification labels affixed to these vehicles. On affected sable sedan vehicles, the "vehicles capacity weight" (and also the luggage load) information printed on this label is incorrect - sable wagon luggage load was incorrectly used for the sable sedan. These vehicles do not comply with the label requirements of fmvss no. 110, "tire selection and rims."
- Consequence
- Excessive loading can cause tire and vehicle damage that could result in a crash.
- Remedy
- Owners will be provided with a supplemental label with the correct information, along with instructions for affixing the label adjacent to the vehicle certification label. Owner notification began october 20, 2000. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2000 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
How 2000 compares with the other years
High risk for a 2000 — 225th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 12 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2002 comes out best at 59 and 2008 worst at 74, with 2000 itself at 64.
If the model year is negotiable, 2002 and 2003 score lower than 2000 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1996–2003 generation specifically, 2002 is the strongest year at 59 and 2001 the weakest at 64.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1996-2003 generation, 2002 Mercury Sable scores best at 59 and 2001 Mercury Sable worst at 64.
What the numbers say to check
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other powertrain problem from about 24k, tail light, brake light or signal failure from about 24k, other lighting problem from about 25k and other speed control problem from about 36k.
On a 2000 Mercury Sable with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other powertrain problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
The limits of complaint data
578 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 578 reports, 288 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 50% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2000 Mercury Sable?
The most-reported failures are strut, shock or spring failure (96 reports, median 57,500 miles), other suspension problem (69 reports, median 80,000 miles) and other speed control problem (54 reports, median 85,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2000 Mercury Sable problems start?
Tail light, brake light or signal failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 30,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 25,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 64,000 miles.
Is the 2000 Mercury Sable reliable?
It scores 64 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 225th riskiest of the 327 2000 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2000 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Mercury Sable is best?
Within the 1996–2003 generation, 2002 scores best at 59 out of 100 and 2001 worst at 64. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed