AtWhatMileage
Model year report

2002 Mercury Mountaineer: what breaks, and at what mileage

What breaks on the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer

On the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer, the failure owners report most often is other powertrain problem, and the reports cluster around 77,500 miles. The earliest to appear is steering column or shaft failure, reported by a median of 900 miles. Overall it scores 69 out of 100, high risk for a 2002.

High risk for a 2002 — 145th riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. 504 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.

What owners report breaking

Owners have reported 66 named failure modes on the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer, and the three most-reported carry 34% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Other powertrain problem leads with 81 reports, about 1.7 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 56k to 107,500 miles.

Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure follows with 54 reports, usually reported between 50k to 87,500 miles.

Other body or interior problem follows with 34 reports, usually reported between 57k to 85,000 miles. 1 of those report mention a fire.

By system, the reports fall mostly into transmission (124), body (90) and drivetrain (49).

At what mileage it happens

348 of the reports on the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 75,000 miles.

Cumulatively, 24% by 50,000 miles, 71% by 100,000 miles and 92% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 2 filed above the top of the chart.

The busiest stretch is between 50,000 and 60,000 miles, which alone holds 13% of the dated reports.

14% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.

In the order they tend to show up: steering column or shaft failure around 883, ABS module or sensor failure around 39k, wheel bearing or hub failure around 50k and liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure around 65k.

Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 66. The full list is in the table below.

How reports accumulate

Share of reports filed by each mileage
half by 74.8k

Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 2 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.

  • Line share of reports filed by that mileage
  • Dashed the median reported mileage

How bad it is when it goes

Across the named modes, 11 mention a crash, 7 a fire and 28 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.44, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other powertrain problem at $400–$4,500, liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure at $250–$1,500, other body or interior problem at $200–$2,000 and differential or transfer case failure at $900–$4,200. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

42% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

Every reported failure mode

Mileage figures are percentiles of owner-reported readings. Click a column to sort.
Failure mode System Reports With reading 25th Median 75th Per 1,000 Typical repair Severity
Other powertrain problem transmission 81 68 56k 78k 108k 1.7 $400–$4,500 High
Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure body 54 31 50k 65k 88k 1.1 $250–$1,500 Moderate
Other body or interior problem body 34 16 57k 70k 85k 0.7 $200–$2,000 Moderate
Differential or transfer case failure drivetrain 23 18 62k 85k 88k 0.5 $900–$4,200 High
Wheel bearing or hub failure drivetrain 23 22 47k 50k 61k 0.5 $350–$1,200 Moderate
Complete transmission failure transmission 18 14 69k 83k 116k 0.4 $2,800–$8,000 Critical
Other suspension problem suspension 17 10 56k 85k 102k 0.4 $350–$2,000 Moderate
Shifter, linkage or stuck-in-park failure transmission 16 7 — 108k — 0.3 $250–$1,400 High
Steering column or shaft failure steering 16 15 883 883 111k 0.3 $600–$2,500 Critical
ABS module or sensor failure brakes 14 9 36k 39k 167k 0.3 $500–$2,400 High
Other engine problem engine 14 8 43k 81k 132k 0.3 $300–$4,000 High
Other visibility problem glass 13 6 — 114k — 0.3 $150–$1,400 Moderate
Other speed control problem adas 12 5 — 35k — 0.3 $250–$2,000 Critical
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure electrical 9 4 — 36k — 0.2 $250–$1,500 High
Misfire or rough idle engine 8 8 111k 133k 152k 0.2 $250–$1,600 Moderate
Seat belt or retractor failure airbag 8 6 — 52k — 0.2 $200–$900 High
Strut, shock or spring failure suspension 8 7 — 68k — 0.2 $500–$2,000 Moderate
Other wheel or tire problem wheels 8 6 — 111k — 0.2 $200–$1,500 High
Parking brake failure brakes 7 4 — 85k — 0.1 $250–$1,300 Moderate
Tire blowout or tread separation wheels 7 6 — 50k — 0.1 $200–$1,500 Critical
Other electrical problem electrical 7 4 — 138k — 0.1 $250–$2,000 Moderate
Cruise control failure adas 6 5 — 90k — 0.1 $200–$1,400 High
Other brake problem brakes 6 2 — 80k — 0.1 $300–$1,800 High
Other steering problem steering 5 3 — 109k — 0.1 $350–$2,400 High
Harsh or jerky shifting transmission 4 4 — 69k — 0.1 $600–$4,000 Moderate
Wiring harness or short circuit electrical 4 4 — 53k — 0.1 $400–$3,500 High
Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure suspension 4 2 — 111k — 0.1 $400–$2,200 High
Overheating cooling 3 3 — 59k — 0.1 $400–$3,500 High
Torque converter failure transmission 3 3 — 66k — 0.1 $1,100–$3,200 High
CV axle or driveshaft failure drivetrain 3 3 — 65k — 0.1 $450–$2,200 High
Fuel gauge or level sensor failure fuel 3 3 — 60k — 0.1 $300–$1,200 Moderate
Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure steering 3 1 — 170k — 0.1 $700–$2,600 High
Engine bay fire engine 2 0 — — — 0.0 $4,000–$20,000 Critical
Complete engine failure or seizure engine 2 2 — 86k — 0.0 $4,500–$12,000 Critical
Head gasket failure engine 2 1 — 92k — 0.0 $1,400–$4,000 Critical
No-start or intermittent start failure engine 2 1 — 86k — 0.0 $200–$1,800 Moderate
Engine knock or bearing noise engine 2 2 — 55k — 0.0 $2,500–$9,000 High
Alternator or charging system failure electrical 2 2 — 41k — 0.0 $450–$1,600 High
Loss of braking brakes 2 2 — 59k — 0.0 $400–$3,000 Critical
Premature brake pad or rotor wear brakes 2 2 — 52k — 0.0 $300–$1,400 Moderate
Airbag deployed without a crash airbag 2 2 — 102k — 0.0 $2,500–$8,000 Critical
Blower motor or climate control failure hvac 2 2 — 115k — 0.0 $250–$1,200 Moderate
Wiper or washer failure glass 2 1 — 50k — 0.0 $120–$800 Moderate
Other fuel system problem fuel 2 1 — 38k — 0.0 $300–$2,200 High
Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure engine 1 1 — 54k — 0.0 $1,200–$4,500 Critical
Oil leak engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$2,200 Moderate
Lifter, cam or cylinder-deactivation failure engine 1 0 — — — 0.0 $1,800–$7,000 High
Radiator or coolant leak cooling 1 0 — — — 0.0 $350–$1,900 High
Transmission slipping transmission 1 1 — 75k — 0.0 $1,200–$5,500 High
Transmission will not engage a gear transmission 1 1 — 59k — 0.0 $1,500–$6,000 Critical
Fuel pump failure fuel 1 1 — 67k — 0.0 $600–$2,600 High
Fuel injector failure fuel 1 0 — — — 0.0 $450–$2,800 Moderate
Fuel leak or fuel odor fuel 1 0 — — — 0.0 $300–$2,500 Critical
Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure electrical 1 1 — 87k — 0.0 $700–$3,000 High
Master cylinder or brake booster failure brakes 1 1 — 193k — 0.0 $450–$2,200 Critical
Brake line, hose or caliper failure brakes 1 1 — 150k — 0.0 $250–$1,600 Critical
Airbag failed to deploy in a crash airbag 1 1 — 100k — 0.0 $1,000–$5,000 Critical
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault airbag 1 1 — 75k — 0.0 $300–$1,600 High
Loss of power steering steering 1 0 — — — 0.0 $600–$2,800 Critical
Rust or structural corrosion body 1 1 — 95k — 0.0 $500–$6,000 High
Sunroof failure or glass breakage body 1 0 — — — 0.0 $700–$4,500 High
Air conditioning failure hvac 1 1 — 67k — 0.0 $400–$2,800 Moderate
DPF, EGR or DEF system failure emissions 1 1 — 66k — 0.0 $800–$5,000 High
Exhaust leak or fumes in the cabin emissions 1 1 — 22k — 0.0 $250–$2,000 High
Other lighting problem lighting 1 0 — — — 0.0 $120–$1,200 Moderate
Other driver assistance problem adas 1 0 — — — 0.0 $250–$1,800 High
Unclassified problem other 17 10 65k 92k 140k 0.4 — Moderate

Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer draws about 11 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 88th percentile of complaint rates among 2002 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 47,872 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2002 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.

Other powertrain problem

2002 mercury mountaineer: we have experienced the vehicle rapidly downshifting from 4th gear to 2nd gear without warning. This has happened when driving in longer distance in city traffic. We are afraid of being rear ended. The vehicle also does not run properly when cold. When outside temperatures are in the 20?s (20 degrees on the fahrenheit scale) it will only go between 10-15 MPH until warm. Wheels feel like they are spinning. The vehicle also makes a howling noise (sounds computer generated) at between 55-70 MPH. The transmission was replaced at 11,000 miles. It did not solve the problems. Ford has offered a cash settlement of $6200.00. We do have the extended warranty. Can these problems be fixed? The first issue is the one of greatest concern. *la

9,900 miles NHTSA complaint 433409 filed 2003-10-03

From the time the consumer purchased the vehicle there have been problems with it. The transmission in the vehicle made a loud clunking sound. The dealer replaced the transmission once but the consumer continued to experience problems. The head liner on the ceiling fell down. *jb

90 miles NHTSA complaint 476857 filed 2004-05-25

Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure

Consumer left her rear back hatch open, and closed the garage door. The hatch glass exploded upon impact of the garage door. Consumer feels that "the glass in unsafe , cause if the glass had implode in an accident, it could of cause serious injuries to the occupant. Please provide more details. Ts orig part of liftgate invest, but later det. To be not related to investigation_pco

9,000 miles NHTSA complaint 386223 filed 2002-12-18

Bracket on left side of lift gate broke, the lift gate detached from the bracket and cylinders. The lift gate fell on my upper body as a result I have been seeking medical attention. *jb pe04045.pco

27,980 miles NHTSA complaint 414194 filed 2003-06-23

Other body or interior problem

From the time the consumer purchased the vehicle there have been problems with it. The transmission in the vehicle made a loud clunking sound. The dealer replaced the transmission once but the consumer continued to experience problems. The head liner on the ceiling fell down. *jb

90 miles NHTSA complaint 476856 filed 2004-05-25

I purchased my 2002 mountaineer on june 20, 2004. When I am driving and hit the speed of 75 MPH I hear a loud whistling sound and the only way to get rid of the noise is to reduce my speed to under 75 MPH. I have spoken with another person who owns the same SUV and he has the same problem only on a larger scale. He has had the weather stripping replaced twice and still the noise remains. I will be taking it in soon to have it checked over since I am also having another problem when I stop and apply the brakes (loud squeaking noise). *jb

38,900 miles NHTSA complaint 491492 filed 2004-08-18

Recalls on the 2002 model year

NHTSA has issued 4 recall campaigns covering the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer, affecting an estimated 99,005 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover vehicle speed control, visibility:glass, side/rear and tires:sidewall. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.

09V399000

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL

4,500,000 vehicles 2009-10-13
Defect
Ford is recalling model years 1995-2003 windstar, 2000-2003 excursion diesel, 1993-1997 and 1999-2003 f-250 sd through f-550 sd diesel, 1992-2003 e-150 through e-550, 1995-2002 explorer, 1997 and 2002 mercury mountaineer, 1995-1997 and 2001-2003 ranger, and 1994 f53 vehicles equipped with the texas instruments speed control deactivation switch (scds). The scds may leak internally and then overheat, smoke, or burn.
Consequence
A vehicle fire could occur with or without the engine running.
Remedy
Ford will notify owners that dealers will install a fused wiring harness in line with the scds. On 1999-2003 windstar vehicles with a leaking scds, dealers will also inspect the ABS control module connector and repair as necessary. Repairs will be completed free of charge. The safety recall began on october 27, 2009. Owners may contact ford at 1-888-222-2751.
07E104000

VISIBILITY:GLASS, SIDE/REAR

1,657 vehicles 2007-12-11
Defect
Certain curved tempered replacement glass manufactured by hangzhou safety glass ltd and supplied to safelite by auto temp inc., identified as DOT-430, and sold for use on certain domestic and foreign vehicles may not break into small pieces as expected of tempered glass and fails to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 205, "glazing materials."
Consequence
In the event of a vehicle crash, the occupant(s) may be seriously injured by shattered glass.
Remedy
Safelite will notify its retail customers and replace the glass free of charge. Retail customers can contact safelite toll free at 1-888-843-2906. Safelite will notify its wholesale customers and reimburse wholesale customers for current inventory and at a specified rate for replacing their customer's glass. Wholesale customers can contact safelite's wholesale division, service autoglass toll free at 1-888-246-6298. The recall began on january 15, 2008.
01V171000

TIRES:SIDEWALL

52,000 vehicles 2001-05-24
Defect
Vehicle description: sport utility vehicles. The right side tires may have horizontal cuts on the edge of the tread that could have occurred during vehicle assembly.
Consequence
Over time, the tire could fail, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect the tires and, if any slices are found, the cut tires will be replaced. Owner notification began june 7, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
01I010000

VISIBILITY:GLASS, SIDE/REAR

50,224 vehicles 2001-04-10
Defect
This is not a safety recall in accordance with the safety act. However, it is deemed a safety improvement campaign by the agency. Vehicle description: 2002 ford explorer and mercury montaineer sport utility vehicles. The brackets connecting the left cylinders to each side of the liftgate glass could rotate out of position if either the urethane bond or torque are not sufficient.
Consequence
Rotation of the brackets could potentially cause the lift cylinders to detach from the glass or, in some cases, could potentially cause the liftgate glass to break. Either condition is most likely to occur when the glass is being closed.
Remedy
Ford dealers will inspect the vehicles for the position of both the left and right liftgatge glass lift cylinder brackets. If the brackets are in the proper position, the bracket retainers will be tightened to a higher torque. In cases where the bracket is not properly position, the bracket must be re-aligned.

Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.

How it ranks in the 2002 field

The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.

Risk score against the rest of the 2002 field

Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.

  • Left fewer and less serious reports
  • Right more, or worse
  • Marker this vehicle

Better and worse years of the same car

High risk for a 2002 — 145th riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.

Across the 13 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1999 comes out best at 59 and 2005 worst at 72, with 2002 itself at 69.

If the model year is negotiable, 1999, 1997, 2001, 1998 and 2000 score lower than 2002 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 2002–2005 generation specifically, 2002 is the strongest year at 69 and 2005 the weakest at 72.

Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.

Risk score by model year, out of 100

Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.

Within the 2002-2005 generation, 2002 Mercury Mountaineer scores best at 69 and 2005 Mercury Mountaineer worst at 72.

Where to spend the inspection money

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: steering column or shaft failure from about 883, ABS module or sensor failure from about 36k, other engine problem from about 43k and wheel bearing or hub failure from about 47k.

On a 2002 Mercury Mountaineer with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether steering column or shaft failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.

What this page cannot tell you

504 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 504 reports, 348 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 69% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.

Questions this page answers

What are the most common problems with the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer?

The most-reported failures are other powertrain problem (81 reports, median 77,500 miles), liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure (54 reports, median 65,000 miles) and other body or interior problem (34 reports, median 70,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.

At what mileage do 2002 Mercury Mountaineer problems start?

Steering column or shaft failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 900 miles and a quarter of reports before 900 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 75,000 miles.

Is the 2002 Mercury Mountaineer reliable?

It scores 69 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 145th riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2002 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.

Which year of the Mercury Mountaineer is best?

Within the 2002–2005 generation, 2002 scores best at 69 out of 100 and 2005 worst at 72. Same body, same engines, different luck.

Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.

What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed