2002 Mercury Cougar: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 2002 Mercury Cougar
On the 2002 Mercury Cougar, the failure owners report most often is fuel pump failure, and the reports cluster around 60,000 miles. Across every failure mode on this year, half the dated reports were filed before 74,000 miles. Overall it scores 67 out of 100, high risk for a 2002.
High risk for a 2002 — 184th riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. 127 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
What breaks on the 2002 Mercury Cougar
Owners have reported 28 named failure modes on the 2002 Mercury Cougar, and the three most-reported carry 48% of everything filed.
Fuel pump failure leads with 33 reports, about 1.5 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 26k to 85,000 miles.
Other fuel system problem follows with 18 reports, usually reported between 59k to 115,000 miles. 1 of those report mention a fire.
Other engine problem follows with 10 reports, median 90,000 miles.
By system, the reports fall mostly into fuel (54), engine (19) and transmission (10).
The mileage the reports cluster at
100 of the reports on the 2002 Mercury Cougar came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 74,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 25% by 50,000 miles, 77% by 100,000 miles and 94% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed.
The busiest stretch is between 80,000 and 90,000 miles, which alone holds 12% of the dated reports.
19% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 28. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
What happens when these parts fail
Across the named modes, 15 mention a crash, 1 a fire and 15 an injury. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 5.58, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: fuel pump failure at $600–$2,600, other fuel system problem at $300–$2,200, other engine problem at $300–$4,000 and alternator or charging system failure at $450–$1,600. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
26% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 33 | 19 | 26k | 60k | 84k | 1.5 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 18 | 15 | 59k | 80k | 113k | 0.8 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Other engine problem | engine | 10 | 7 | — | 91k | — | 0.5 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 6 | 6 | — | 136k | — | 0.3 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 6 | 4 | — | 61k | — | 0.3 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 5 | 3 | — | 110k | — | 0.2 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 4 | 4 | — | 92k | — | 0.2 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Heater core failure | cooling | 4 | 4 | — | 60k | — | 0.2 | $700–$2,400 | Moderate |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 4 | 3 | — | 85k | — | 0.2 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 4 | 4 | — | 59k | — | 0.2 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 3 | 3 | — | 75k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 3 | 3 | — | 12k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 3 | 3 | — | 30k | — | 0.1 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 3 | 2 | — | 48k | — | 0.1 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 2 | 2 | — | 79k | — | 0.1 | $200–$900 | High |
| DPF, EGR or DEF system failure | emissions | 2 | 2 | — | 126k | — | 0.1 | $800–$5,000 | High |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 45k | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 1 | 1 | — | 112k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 60k | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 51k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 1 | 1 | — | 39k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 1 | 1 | — | 13k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Loss of power steering | steering | 1 | 1 | — | 5k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,800 | Critical |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 1 | 1 | — | 10k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 1 | 1 | — | 141k | — | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 1 | 1 | — | 165k | — | 0.0 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other driver assistance problem | adas | 1 | 1 | — | 126k | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,800 | High |
| Unclassified problem | other | 5 | 5 | — | 125k | — | 0.2 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2002 Mercury Cougar draws about 5.7 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 82nd percentile of complaint rates among 2002 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 22,150 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2002 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Fuel pump failure
Fuel pump was replaced twice because fuel gauge was not reading correctly. After the second replacement, while driving 70 MPH, vehicle shut down and wouldn't restart. Vehicle was towed to the dealer, who stated that fuel pump needed to be replaced again. *ak *nm
Dt: the consumer owns a 2002 mercury cougar. The consumer stated that the vehicle hesitated intermittently followed by a loss of power. While the consumer's daughter was driving the vehicle it stalled in the middle of traffic. None of the warning indicators informed the consumer's daughter that the engine was going to stall. The vehicle would not restart, it was towed home. The vehicle was later towed to a local repair shop ,and the mechanic determined that the fuel pump needed to be replaced, and there was no gasoline flowing to the engine. Recall 04v421000 had been issued for this year, make, and model, but the consumer's vehicle was not included due to VIN. The consumer would have to pay to have the vehicle repaired. *sc *ak
Other fuel system problem
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 mercury cougar. The contact's vehicle had the same problems stated in recall # 04v421000, regarding the fuel system. The contact stated that the vehicle had a slow start and stalled when backing out of the driveway. The vehicle was kept parked for one day and then restarted by the contact. After a week of driving the vehicle it stalled while idling at a stop sign. The contact stated that this was an intermittent failure, and that the vehicle always had a slow start. The dealer stated that the VIN excluded the vehicle from the recall. The current mileage was 99,000 and failure mileage was 98,900.*ak
Tl* the contact owns a 2002 mercury cougar. The current and failure mileage were 77,000. While driving the vehicle the contact tried to accelerate but the vehicle took a long to shift up to speed. Often times the vehicle would stutter and hesitate. The vehicle had been taken to the dealer, and was told that the vehicle was not included in recall 04v421000 due to the VIN. *ak
Other engine problem
Tl* the contact owns a 2002 mercury cougar. The contact stated that while driving approximately 55 MPH, the vehicle suddenly decreased to 10 MPH. The vehicle was taken to a dealer and they advised her that all three catalytic converters were clogged and the fdm needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired for the fdm but not the catalytic converters. The manufacturer was contacted and they offered no assistance. The failure and current mileages were approximately 72,000. The VIN was unavailable.
I was driving my 2002 cougar and the vehicle began to lose power, the check engine light and the fuel light came on. The vehicle came to a complete stop in the middle of the road. I have also experienced the vehicle surging while at a complete stop. I contacted the service manager at my local dealer and the only resolution he could provide me was to have a technician drive it and see if it would happen again. Even though I explained there have been numerous complaints about the issue by other drivers on line, he said there was nothing he could do. My VIN number is not included in the recall "batch" of vehicles. I could pay the $100 diag fee in the event my vehicle does not repeat the complaint. Either way, I would be paying for the repairs out of pocket. *tr
Recalls on the 2002 model year
NHTSA has issued 3 recall campaigns covering the 2002 Mercury Cougar, affecting an estimated 22,492 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover suspension, service brakes, hydraulic and fuel system, gasoline. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
SUSPENSION
6,903 vehicles 2008-04-14- Defect
- Federal mogul is recalling 6,903 aftermarket ball joint assemblies shipped between november 9, 2007 and march 26, 2008, which may have been packaged with incorrect nuts. The part numbers packaged with incorrect nuts are: k7147, k7329, k8683, and 104353. These parts were made for use on the various vehicles listed above.
- Consequence
- The nuts included in the packaging for these ball joint assemblies are missing the intended prevailing torque (self-locking) feature. If the incorrect nut was to become loose, the joining members may loosen leading to a separation of the ball joint. This may result in loss of vehicle control, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Federal mogul will notify owners and replace the parts free of charge. The recall began on may 22, 2008. Owners can contact federal mogul at 877-489-6659.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
7,440 vehicles 2006-03-13- Defect
- Certain aftermarket brake hydraulic master cylinders sold as replacement brake cylinders for certain ford, daimlerchrysler, and jeep passenger vehicles. These brake cylinders were sold under the brand names of napa, raybestos, aimco, AC delco, carquest, bendix, and wagner. Only products that were manufactured from july 27, 2005 through january 17, 2006 (date codes 0529 through 0602) are subject to this recall. When subject to very cold temperatures, an internal seal in the master cylinder could lose flexibility and may cause brake fluid to leak.
- Consequence
- Loss of brake fluid can lead to a decrease in brake line pressure and an increase in stopping distance, which can result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Affinia (brake parts, inc.) will replace the subject brake hydraulic master cylinders free of charge. The recall began on march 20, 2006. Owners can contact affina group customer service at 1-800-323-0354.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
88,600 vehicles 2004-08-30- Defect
- On certain passenger vehicles, contamination of the filter in the fuel delivery module (fdm) can reduce, and eventually block, the flow of fuel to the engine.
- Consequence
- This may cause engine hesitation, loss of power, surging, and other similar symptoms. Over time, the filter may become sufficiently blocked to cause the engine to stall, which could result in a crash.
- Remedy
- This action is deemed a safety improvement campaign and is not being conducted under the safety act. All owners will be notified of the problem, and dealers will replace the fdm with a new design at no charge if the owner reports that the vehicle exhibits any of the identified symptoms. The free replacement will be available for a period of 10 years following the original purchase of the vehicle, with no mileage limit. The campaign began on april 16, 2004. Owners should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 2002 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Where 2002 sits in the model line
High risk for a 2002 — 184th riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. Every score on this site is a rank inside its own model year, which is what makes a 2004 and a 2019 comparable at all.
Across the 6 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1997 comes out best at 59 and 1999 worst at 69, with 2002 itself at 67.
If the model year is negotiable, 1997 and 1996 score lower than 2002 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1996–2002 generation specifically, 1997 is the strongest year at 59 and 1999 the weakest at 69.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1996-2002 generation, 1997 Mercury Cougar scores best at 59 and 1999 Mercury Cougar worst at 69.
Where to spend the inspection money
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: fuel pump failure from about 26k and other fuel system problem from about 59k.
On a 2002 Mercury Cougar with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether fuel pump failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
Where these figures stop being useful
127 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 127 reports, 100 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 79% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 2002 Mercury Cougar?
The most-reported failures are fuel pump failure (33 reports, median 60,000 miles), other fuel system problem (18 reports, median 80,000 miles) and other engine problem (10 reports, median 90,000 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 2002 Mercury Cougar problems start?
Fuel pump failure is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 60,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 25,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 74,000 miles.
Is the 2002 Mercury Cougar reliable?
It scores 67 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 184th riskiest of the 329 2002 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 2002 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Mercury Cougar is best?
Within the 1996–2002 generation, 1997 scores best at 59 out of 100 and 1999 worst at 69. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed