Other wheel or tire problem on the 2006 Honda CR-V
1 crash 1 injury 2 of the 7 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.
Only 4 reports for this mode came with an odometer reading, which is too few for percentiles to mean anything. The page is here because someone linked to it; treat the figures as anecdotes, and see the full report for this year instead.
When other wheel or tire problem gets reported
There are 7 reports of other wheel or tire problem on the 2006 Honda CR-V, 4 with a mileage attached. That is too few to place the failure on the odometer with any confidence.
A part like this is normally expected to survive 60,000 miles. It is the 20th most-reported problem on this model year.
The whole distribution
| 10th | 25th | Median | 75th | 90th |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 40,000 miles | — | — |
Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.
What a percentile can and cannot tell you here
These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.
What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.
Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.
What happens, and what it costs
Of these reports, 1 a crash and 1 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.
Putting it right typically runs $200–$1,500 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.
The same failure on other years
The same failure is reported on 25 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2014, at a median of 1,000 miles, and latest on the 1998 at 140,000 miles.
By volume the 2014 carries the most reports, with 52; the 2006 has 7. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.
If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.
I am not sure if you can help me. However, my complaint is with desert honda of las vegas, nv (702) 369-3099. I took my 2006 honda crv for major service, and they did not properly tighten the left lug nuts on my vehicle. I was able to catch this oversight in time before I drove the car any distance. However, this was a potentially fatal mistake that they shrugged off, and I'm sure have forgotten by now. *jb
Today I had a 4th valve stem failure that has occurred on my 2006 honda crv that I purchased used on august 3, 2007. The 1st valve stem failure occurred on august 3, 2007 on the rear right tire. The 2nd valve stem failure occurred on october 10,2007 on the front right tire. The 3rd valve stem failure occurred on february 6, 2008 on the right rear tire again. The 4th valve stem failure occurred on june 18, 2008 on the left front tire. I found out today through an internet search that there has been a recall of some valve stems sure to failure. I do not know the odds of one car having four valve stem failures in less than one year, but I cam guess that this is highly unusual. *tr
2006 honda cr-v exterior spare tire carrier safety problem. My vehicle recently required the spare tire be removed from the vehicle to replace a road hazard damaged tire. On removing the spare tire cover, it was noticed that only two of the three tire lugs that support the tire were in place. The vehicle came with three tire lugs for the spare, as this was noticed when a different spare tire cover was installed within the first month of vehicle ownership. The damaged tire was replaced with a new tire and the serviceman went to place this new tire on the exterior spare tire carrier. He sheared off one more of the lugs and stated that he had not applied excessive force to have this happen. He also mentioned that this was the second lug now missing and that the spare tire should not be placed on the exterior spare tire carrier with only a single lug to carry the weight of the spare tire. The spare tire was placed in the interior rear storage area. I was given the sheared off lug, which I still have in my possession, should it be required to determine if structural failure was the result by examination of a metallurgist. Contacting…
Also reported on the 2006 Honda CR-V
Headlight failure or clouding
Airbag inflator rupture
Other lighting problem
Other electrical problem
Other body or interior problem
Other visibility problem
How far this goes
This page is kept out of search results because 7 reports is not enough to publish percentiles from. It stays reachable because somebody looking at this exact car would rather see the reports than be told there are none.
Complaints are voluntary, so 7 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.
Questions this page answers
At what mileage does other wheel or tire problem happen on the 2006 Honda CR-V?
Across 4 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 40,000 miles. A quarter were filed before — and a quarter after —. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.
How common is other wheel or tire problem on the 2006 Honda CR-V?
7 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.1 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.
What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed