1998 Honda Accord: what breaks, and at what mileage
What breaks on the 1998 Honda Accord
On the 1998 Honda Accord, the failure owners report most often is ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure, and the reports cluster around 127,500 miles. The earliest to appear is other speed control problem, reported by a median of 70,000 miles. Overall it scores 71 out of 100, high risk for a 1998.
High risk for a 1998 — 32nd riskiest of the 271 1998 vehicles we can rate. 1,429 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork.
The failures owners actually file about
Owners have reported 74 named failure modes on the 1998 Honda Accord, and the three most-reported carry 32% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure leads with 161 reports, about 1.7 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 91k to 160,000 miles.
Other powertrain problem follows with 157 reports, usually reported between 69k to 117,500 miles.
Other electrical problem follows with 135 reports, usually reported between 87k to 155,000 miles. 2 of those reports mention a fire.
By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (324), transmission (265) and engine (143).
The mileage the reports cluster at
588 of the reports on the 1998 Honda Accord came with an odometer reading, and half of those were filed before 101,000 miles.
Cumulatively, 10% by 50,000 miles, 46% by 100,000 miles and 76% by 150,000 miles of the dated reports had been filed, with 41 filed above the top of the chart.
The busiest stretch is between 90,000 and 100,000 miles, which alone holds 10% of the dated reports.
6% of the dated reports were filed below 36,000 miles, so this is mostly a story about older, higher-mileage cars.
In the order they tend to show up: other speed control problem around 70k, catalytic converter failure around 82k, complete transmission failure around 85k and other powertrain problem around 91k.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
Showing the 12 most-reported failure modes of 74. The full list is in the table below.
How reports accumulate
Every report with an odometer reading, cumulative, from 0 to 200,000 miles. A further 41 reports came in above that, which is why the line stops short of the top. A curve that climbs early is a car with early problems, whatever its total.
- Line share of reports filed by that mileage
- Dashed the median reported mileage
How bad it is when it goes
Across the named modes, 107 mention a crash, 3 a fire, 57 an injury and 3 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.
The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.60, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.
What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure at $250–$1,500, other powertrain problem at $400–$4,500, other electrical problem at $250–$2,000 and other engine problem at $300–$4,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.
30% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.
Every reported failure mode
| Failure mode | System | Reports | With reading | 25th | Median | 75th | Per 1,000 | Typical repair | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure | electrical | 161 | 84 | 91k | 127k | 160k | 1.7 | $250–$1,500 | High |
| Other powertrain problem | transmission | 157 | 66 | 69k | 91k | 118k | 1.7 | $400–$4,500 | High |
| Other electrical problem | electrical | 135 | 64 | 87k | 127k | 156k | 1.4 | $250–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other engine problem | engine | 82 | 38 | 80k | 116k | 154k | 0.9 | $300–$4,000 | High |
| Complete transmission failure | transmission | 75 | 49 | 67k | 85k | 93k | 0.8 | $2,800–$8,000 | Critical |
| Other body or interior problem | body | 70 | 26 | 92k | 107k | 142k | 0.7 | $200–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Other speed control problem | adas | 59 | 11 | 42k | 70k | 106k | 0.6 | $250–$2,000 | Critical |
| Control arm, ball joint or bushing failure | suspension | 47 | 38 | 99k | 147k | 164k | 0.5 | $400–$2,200 | High |
| Fuel gauge or level sensor failure | fuel | 43 | 1 | — | 87k | — | 0.5 | $300–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Other fuel system problem | fuel | 29 | 4 | — | 127k | — | 0.3 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Seat belt or retractor failure | airbag | 28 | 4 | — | 69k | — | 0.3 | $200–$900 | High |
| Other suspension problem | suspension | 27 | 12 | 72k | 139k | 168k | 0.3 | $350–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Catalytic converter failure | emissions | 25 | 15 | 76k | 82k | 104k | 0.3 | $900–$3,500 | Moderate |
| Other wheel or tire problem | wheels | 25 | 7 | — | 100k | — | 0.3 | $200–$1,500 | High |
| Other visibility problem | glass | 23 | 1 | — | 30k | — | 0.2 | $150–$1,400 | Moderate |
| No-start or intermittent start failure | engine | 20 | 8 | 55k | 96k | 115k | 0.2 | $200–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Airbag inflator rupture | airbag | 18 | 2 | — | 224k | — | 0.2 | $0–$0 | Critical |
| Airbag failed to deploy in a crash | airbag | 17 | 3 | — | 178k | — | 0.2 | $1,000–$5,000 | Critical |
| Stalling while driving | engine | 16 | 12 | 135k | 144k | 178k | 0.2 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure | electrical | 16 | 3 | — | 56k | — | 0.2 | $700–$3,000 | High |
| Other brake problem | brakes | 16 | 5 | — | 63k | — | 0.2 | $300–$1,800 | High |
| Other steering problem | steering | 16 | 4 | — | 98k | — | 0.2 | $350–$2,400 | High |
| Manual clutch or hydraulics failure | transmission | 14 | 3 | — | 77k | — | 0.1 | $900–$2,800 | Moderate |
| ABS module or sensor failure | brakes | 13 | 5 | — | 138k | — | 0.1 | $500–$2,400 | High |
| Cruise control failure | adas | 13 | 3 | — | 65k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,400 | High |
| Misfire or rough idle | engine | 11 | 5 | — | 55 | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,600 | Moderate |
| Loss of braking | brakes | 11 | 3 | — | 67k | — | 0.1 | $400–$3,000 | Critical |
| CV axle or driveshaft failure | drivetrain | 10 | 9 | 125k | 146k | 192k | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | High |
| Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure | fuel | 10 | 7 | — | 200k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Torque converter failure | transmission | 9 | 8 | 98k | 110k | 139k | 0.1 | $1,100–$3,200 | High |
| Tire blowout or tread separation | wheels | 8 | 5 | — | 58k | — | 0.1 | $200–$1,500 | Critical |
| DPF, EGR or DEF system failure | emissions | 8 | 5 | — | 97k | — | 0.1 | $800–$5,000 | High |
| Master cylinder or brake booster failure | brakes | 7 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $450–$2,200 | Critical |
| Premature brake pad or rotor wear | brakes | 7 | 3 | — | 101k | — | 0.1 | $300–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Steering column or shaft failure | steering | 7 | 4 | — | 17k | — | 0.1 | $600–$2,500 | Critical |
| Paint peeling or clear coat failure | body | 7 | 4 | — | 95k | — | 0.1 | $600–$6,000 | Low |
| Rust or structural corrosion | body | 7 | 7 | — | 173k | — | 0.1 | $500–$6,000 | High |
| Other lighting problem | lighting | 7 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.1 | $120–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Transmission slipping | transmission | 6 | 4 | — | 67k | — | 0.1 | $1,200–$5,500 | High |
| Alternator or charging system failure | electrical | 6 | 3 | — | 90k | — | 0.1 | $450–$1,600 | High |
| Parking brake failure | brakes | 6 | 2 | — | 77k | — | 0.1 | $250–$1,300 | Moderate |
| Fuel leak or fuel odor | fuel | 5 | 3 | — | 193k | — | 0.1 | $300–$2,500 | Critical |
| Engine sensor failure | electrical | 5 | 2 | — | 90k | — | 0.1 | $180–$900 | Moderate |
| Oil leak | engine | 4 | 1 | — | 132k | — | 0.0 | $250–$2,200 | Moderate |
| Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault | airbag | 4 | 3 | — | 132k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,600 | High |
| Air conditioning failure | hvac | 4 | 4 | — | 190k | — | 0.0 | $400–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Timing chain, belt or tensioner failure | engine | 3 | 3 | — | 132k | — | 0.0 | $1,200–$4,500 | Critical |
| Excessive oil consumption | engine | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$6,500 | High |
| Radiator or coolant leak | cooling | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,900 | High |
| Overheating | cooling | 3 | 2 | — | 74k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Transmission fluid leak | transmission | 3 | 3 | — | 61k | — | 0.0 | $300–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Fuel pump failure | fuel | 3 | 3 | — | 155k | — | 0.0 | $600–$2,600 | High |
| Sunroof failure or glass breakage | body | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $700–$4,500 | High |
| Headlight failure or clouding | lighting | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,800 | Moderate |
| Engine knock or bearing noise | engine | 2 | 1 | — | 67k | — | 0.0 | $2,500–$9,000 | High |
| Differential or transfer case failure | drivetrain | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $900–$4,200 | High |
| Wheel bearing or hub failure | drivetrain | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Instrument cluster or gauge failure | infotainment | 2 | 2 | — | 104k | — | 0.0 | $350–$1,400 | Moderate |
| Steering rack, gear or tie rod failure | steering | 2 | 1 | — | 161k | — | 0.0 | $700–$2,600 | High |
| Strut, shock or spring failure | suspension | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $500–$2,000 | Moderate |
| Window regulator or power window failure | body | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$900 | Moderate |
| Seat, track or recliner failure | body | 2 | 1 | — | 87k | — | 0.0 | $300–$2,200 | High |
| Other seat belt problem | airbag | 2 | 1 | — | 55k | — | 0.0 | $200–$900 | High |
| Complete engine failure or seizure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $4,500–$12,000 | Critical |
| Head gasket failure | engine | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $1,400–$4,000 | Critical |
| Harsh or jerky shifting | transmission | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $600–$4,000 | Moderate |
| Fuel injector failure | fuel | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $450–$2,800 | Moderate |
| Wiring harness or short circuit | electrical | 1 | 1 | — | 192k | — | 0.0 | $400–$3,500 | High |
| Alignment fault and uneven tire wear | suspension | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,200 | Moderate |
| Wheel, stud or lug nut failure | wheels | 1 | 1 | — | 240k | — | 0.0 | $150–$1,500 | Critical |
| Door latch or handle failure | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,200 | High |
| Liftgate, tailgate or trunk failure | body | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $250–$1,500 | Moderate |
| Tail light, brake light or signal failure | lighting | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $100–$900 | Moderate |
| Wiper or washer failure | glass | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.0 | $120–$800 | Moderate |
| Unclassified problem | other | 82 | 19 | 60k | 95k | 130k | 0.9 | — | Moderate |
Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound. Repair costs are typical independent-shop ranges for the failure, not figures from these reports.
How often, against how many were built
Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 1998 Honda Accord draws about 15 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 90th percentile of complaint rates among 1998 vehicles we can rate.
That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.
The working figure is 93,976 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 1998 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The odometer reading is the one the owner gave.
Ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure
Labor for removing aftermarket alarm system in order to fix recall 02v120000 concerning ignition switch failure should be at cost to maufacturer whether it is an aftermarket product or not. *tt
My 1998 honda accord (VIN [xxx]) was recalled due to a faulty ignition switch. As a result, I took my vehicle to the dealer on june 10, 2002. Honda stated in its recall notice that it will take several months to manufacture parts for the 1.3 million vehicles involved." prior to the availability of the replacement part, honda instructed the dealer to use existing stock to replace the faulty part. This replacement part is now experiencing the same stalling problem associated with the recalled part. The invoice stated the following: car stalls at times when driving. Faulty ignition switch per american honda. Replacement of complete ignition switch will relieve ignition recall per [xxx] and [xxx] with american honda. No further repair or replacement of ignition will be necessary.*jb information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). *tr
Other powertrain problem
Consumer stated there was transmission fluid leaking through the bearings when driving. The manufacturer had not extended the warranty on the year make and model. Mr the leak was discovered while the vehicle was in for it's routine maintenance. The manufacturer informed consumer that this fault was not a defect problem for the model and year of the vehicle. *jg *jb
I purchase a 1998 honda accord with the intentions of keeping it for a lifetime at 30,000 unfortunately at 50,000 the transmission began to jerk when you began to brake. It seems the car didnt know what gear it was in. After hundreds of dollars attempting to find the problem honda corp. Assured me they have never seen such a problem in any of their cars and had not had any complaints on any of their 1998 accords. They then charged me 1,500 dollar for the repair not counting the hundreds of dollars I paid them to simply find the problem. Now just 6 months later my transmission feels as if it's slipping when I park on a hill. Again they don't want to admitt to any knowledge of any past problems. Now I'm sure they are aware of past problems because it was explained to me the transmission I received 6 months ago was a repaired transmission from another accord. What can I do to help myself????? Anyone please help!
Other electrical problem
The horn sometimes works and sometimes does not. We have been to the dealer 12 times prior and each time they were able to make it work but there has been three close calls where the horn did not work and a car backing almost hit my car. We had to yell to make the other car stop! Today 12/11/02 we had yet another very close call and the dealer finally was able to see there is a fault as the horn did not function when the wheel is turned. They said the vehicle is out of warranty and may cost over $250 to fix! Please let me know if this is a safety item and should be fixed free by the manufacturer. Thanks very much!
Consumer backed out of driveway and vehicle hesitated as if going to stall. Down the street from home car stalled. Consumer restarted vehicle, and attempted to return home, and without warning flames "shot" out from under hood when the accelerator pedal was depressed. Every component under the hood burned completely. **request callback from odi** *ak
Recalls on the 1998 model year
NHTSA has issued 19 recall campaigns covering the 1998 Honda Accord, affecting an estimated 221,530 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.
The campaigns cover air bags:frontal:driver side:inflator module, exterior lighting:headlights and exterior lighting. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.
One caution about reading these together: a recall usually raises the complaint count for the same part, because owners who read about it go and file. The mileages stay informative; the counts get noisy.
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:DRIVER SIDE:INFLATOR MODULE
1,439,841 vehicles 2020-01-17- Defect
- Honda (American Honda Motor Co.) is recalling certain 1998 Acura 2.2CL, 1998-1999 Acura 2.3CL, 1998-1999 Acura 3.0CL, 2001 Acura 3.2CL and Acura MDX, 1998-2000 Honda Accord Coupe, Accord Sedan, Civic Sedan, Odyssey and Acura 3.5RL, 1999-2000 Acura 3.2TL, 1996-2000 Civic Coupe, 1997-2000 CR-V, 1997-1998 EV Plus, and 1998-1999 Isuzu Oasis vehicles. These vehicles were equipped with Non-Azide Driver air bag Inflators (NADI) and do not contain phase stabilized ammonium nitrate (PSAN) propellant. Due to a manufacturing issue, the NADI inflators may absorb moisture, causing the…
- Consequence
- In the event of a crash necessitating air bag deployment, an inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants. An underinflated air bag cushion may not properly protect the occupant. These scenarios increase the risk of serious injury or death.
- Remedy
- Honda will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the driver frontal air bag inflator, and replace it if necessary, with an inflator of a different design, free of charge. The recall began October 1, 2020. Owners may contact American Honda's Customer Support & Campaign Center at 1-888-234-2138 or Isuzu customer service at 1-800-255-6727.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
42,540 vehicles 2009-05-11- Defect
- Dope, inc. Is recalling 42,540 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Dope, inc. Will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on july 28, 2009. Owners may contact dope, inc. At 1-626-272-1798.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
16,270 vehicles 2009-04-07- Defect
- Sabersport is recalling 16,270 combination corner and bumper lamp assemblies of various part numbers sold for use as aftermarket equipment for various passenger vehicles. These headlamps fail to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." these lamps do not contain the required amber side reflectors.
- Consequence
- Decreased lighting visibility may result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Sabersport will notify owners and offer a full refund for the noncompliant combination lamps. The safety recall began on may 11, 2009. Owners may contact sabersport at 1-909-598-7589.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
1,921 vehicles 2008-08-11- Defect
- K2 motor is recalling 1,921 aftermarket headlamps of various models sold for use on the above listed vehicles. These headlamps are missing the amber side reflex reflector which fails to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Without the amber side reflex reflectors, the lighting visibility may be affected, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- K2 motor will notify owners and offer a full refund. The recall began on decemeber 17, 2008. Owners may contact k2 motor at 1-909-839-2992.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
4,029 vehicles 2006-07-17- Defect
- Certain tradesonic combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash.
- Remedy
- Tradesonic will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall is expected to begin during july 2006. Owners may contact tradesonic at 626-934-8884.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
87,745 vehicles 2006-06-29- Defect
- Certain aai motorsports combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above list passenger vehicles. Combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
- Consequence
- Lack of amber side reflectors in the lamps will decrease lighting visibility to other drivers and may possibly result in a vehicle crash
- Remedy
- Aai motorsports will notify owners and replace the lamps free of charge. The recall began on august 1, 2006. Owners may contact aai motorsports at 909-923-9188.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
27,176 vehicles 2006-05-24- Defect
- Certain ck motorsports combination headlights, clear corner, bumper, and side marker lights sold as replacement lamps for use on the passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Ck motorsport will notify owners and replace the noncompliant lamps free of charge. The recall began on july 1, 2006. Owners may contact ck motorsport at 1-909-610-7211.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
1,215 vehicles 2006-05-22- Defect
- Certain j & a auto accessories combination headlamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- J & a auto accessories will notify owners and offer to repurchase the headlamps. The recall began on july 10, 2006. Owners may contact j & a auto accessories at 310-327-4981.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
1,648 vehicles 2006-05-15- Defect
- Certain e speed racing combination lamps sold as replacement equipment for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- E speed racing will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began may 10, 2006. Owners may contact e speed racing 909-923-3636.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
724 vehicles 2006-05-08- Defect
- Certain alfaotto combination headlamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Alfaotto will notify owners and replace the headlamps free of charge. The recall began on may 10, 2006. Owners may contact alfaotto at 626-656-2992 or visit their website at www.alfaotto.com.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
845 vehicles 2006-04-18- Defect
- Certain eagle eyes and sonar headlights and corner lights sold as aftermarket for use on 1988-2005 honda civic, 1990-2005 honda accord, and 1990-2001 acura integra passenger vehicles listed above. Headlights and corner lights that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Tom motorsport will notify owners and offer reimbursement for the purchase of noncompliant lights. The recall began april 17, 2006. Owners may contact tom motorsport at 626-968-4007.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
61,944 vehicles 2006-03-23- Defect
- Certain pro-a motors corner lamps, turn signals, and headlights sold as replacement lamps for use on certain passenger vehicles listed above. Some combination lamps that are not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform to federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.
- Consequence
- Without the amber reflectors, the vehicle will be poorly illuminated, possibly resulting in a vehicle crash without warning.
- Remedy
- Pro-a motors will notify owners and offer to repurchase the lamps. The recall began on april 3, 2006. Owners may contact pro-a motors at 323-838-2988.
Recall work is free at a franchised dealer regardless of the car's age. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls before assuming it was done.
How it ranks in the 1998 field
The score at the top of the page, placed among its peers. The zones are the same thresholds the scorer applies, read out of the scorer itself, so the picture and the band word cannot disagree.
Scores are ranked within the model year, never across years, because an older car has had longer to accumulate reports.
- Left fewer and less serious reports
- Right more, or worse
- Marker this vehicle
Better and worse years of the same car
High risk for a 1998 — 32nd riskiest of the 271 1998 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.
Across the 30 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 1997 comes out best at 61 and 2012 worst at 81, with 1998 itself at 71.
If the model year is negotiable, 1997, 1996, 2016 and 2025 score lower than 1998 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.
Within the 1996–1999 generation specifically, 1997 is the strongest year at 61 and 1998 the weakest at 71.
Scores compare each year against other cars of the same model year, so a low number on an older car is a real result and not an artefact of age.
Shorter is better. Years with too few reports to score are shown without a bar rather than as a zero, because no data is not good news.
Within the 1996-1999 generation, 1997 Honda Accord scores best at 61 and 1998 Honda Accord worst at 71.
What to look at before buying one
The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: other speed control problem from about 42k, no-start or intermittent start failure from about 55k, complete transmission failure from about 67k and other powertrain problem from about 69k.
On a 1998 Honda Accord with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether other speed control problem has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.
Treat it as where to point the inspection, not as a prediction. A well-maintained example can sail past every mileage on this page, and a neglected one can fail well before the first of them.
What this page cannot tell you
1,429 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.
Of those 1,429 reports, 588 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 41% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".
The failure modes are assigned by software reading the owner's own words, which is accurate in bulk and wrong in individual cases. A mode with a handful of reports may contain a misfiled one.
And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.
Questions this page answers
What are the most common problems with the 1998 Honda Accord?
The most-reported failures are ignition switch, key fob or immobilizer failure (161 reports, median 127,500 miles), other powertrain problem (157 reports, median 90,000 miles) and other electrical problem (135 reports, median 127,500 miles). Counts come from owner complaints filed with NHTSA, which are voluntary, so they show what owners bothered to report rather than every fault that occurred.
At what mileage do 1998 Honda Accord problems start?
Other speed control problem is the earliest failure mode to show up, with a median reported mileage of 70,000 miles and a quarter of reports before 40,000 miles. Across all failure modes on this year, the median report sits at 101,000 miles.
Is the 1998 Honda Accord reliable?
It scores 71 out of 100 on our risk index, which is high — 32nd riskiest of the 271 1998 vehicles we can rate. The score is a comparison against other 1998 vehicles, not a prediction about any individual car, and it is built from complaint rates, severity and how early failures appear.
Which year of the Honda Accord is best?
Within the 1996–1999 generation, 1997 scores best at 61 out of 100 and 1998 worst at 71. Same body, same engines, different luck.
Where this comes from. Every figure above is computed from NHTSA owner complaints and recall records for this exact make, model and year. Complaints are voluntary and self-selected, so treat counts as a floor. The methodology page writes out each formula, and the same numbers are available as JSON.
What breaks at my mileage Compare with another car
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed