AtWhatMileage
Lighting · 5 owner reports

Tail light, brake light or signal failure on the 2005 Dodge Durango

Only 5 reports for this mode came with an odometer reading, which is too few for percentiles to mean anything. The page is here because someone linked to it; treat the figures as anecdotes, and see the full report for this year instead.

Reports of this failure 5
With an odometer reading 5
Reports per 1,000 built 0.0 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 0%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 0
Typical repair $100–$900
What it means when it happens Moderate
Rank among this year's problems 36th

When tail light, brake light or signal failure gets reported

There are 5 reports of tail light, brake light or signal failure on the 2005 Dodge Durango, 5 with a mileage attached. That is too few to place the failure on the odometer with any confidence.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 85,000 miles. It is the 36th most-reported problem on this model year.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 5 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
— — 48,098 miles — —

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Putting it right typically runs $100–$900 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 16 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 1998, at a median of 5,000 miles, and latest on the 2000 at 85,000 miles.

By volume the 2014 carries the most reports, with 104; the 2005 has 5. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 1998 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 3k
  2. 1999 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 84k
  3. 2000 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 87k
  4. 2001 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  5. 2002 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 11k
  6. 2003 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 21k
  7. 2005 (this one) 48k
  8. 2006 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 75k
  9. 2007 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 80k
  10. 2011 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 66k
  11. 2012 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 22k
  12. 2013 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 12k
  13. 2014 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 53k
  14. 2015 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 50k
  15. 2016 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 46k
  16. 2017 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 44k
  17. 2018 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 29k
  18. 2019 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 68k
  19. 2020 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  20. 2021 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  21. 2022 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure 21k
  22. 2023 Dodge Durango tail light, brake light or signal failure
    no odometer readings given
    —

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

On dec 19 2008 as I was driving home during a severe thunderstorm when my driver side wind shield wiper suddenly stopped working and got tangled up with the passenger side wiper that continued to work normally. This happened minutes before I was about to enter the freeway so luckily I was in a place where I could safely pull over. I tried to wait out the storm but it was getting really bad so I had to drive at 20-30 MPH with my hazard lights on. I first thought that the bolt holding the wiper arm was stripped but after taking it to the dealer to get inspected, to my surprise I was told that it was the linkage for the wiper system. The linkage just broke out of nowhere. Our vehicle is only 3 1/2 years old and I have never heard of such a thing happening on new or old vehicles of any make. The repair technician told me that the linkage broke because of the way the part was made. The amount it cost to repair my vehicle came out to $607.00 for parts and labor and was barely able to get it replaced today. It also took 7-10 days to order and ship the part to the repair shop. I was informed that it was replaced with the same model part…

48,098 miles NHTSA complaint 704105 filed 2009-01-15

On dec 19 2008 as I was driving home during a severe thunderstorm when my driver side wind shield wiper suddenly stopped working and got tangled up with the passenger side wiper that continued to work normally. This happened minutes before I was about to enter the freeway so luckily I was in a place where I could safely pull over. I tried to wait out the storm but it was getting really bad so I had to drive at 20-30 MPH with my hazard lights on. I first thought that the bolt holding the wiper arm was stripped but after taking it to the dealer to get inspected, to my surprise I was told that it was the linkage for the wiper system. The linkage just broke out of nowhere. Our vehicle is only 3 1/2 years old and I have never heard of such a thing happening on new or old vehicles of any make. The repair technician told me that the linkage broke because of the way the part was made. The amount it cost to repair my vehicle came out to $607.00 for parts and labor and was barely able to get it replaced today. It also took 7-10 days to order and ship the part to the repair shop. I was informed that it was replaced with the same model part…

48,098 miles NHTSA complaint 704106 filed 2009-01-15

On dec 19 2008 as I was driving home during a severe thunderstorm when my driver side wind shield wiper suddenly stopped working and got tangled up with the passenger side wiper that continued to work normally. This happened minutes before I was about to enter the freeway so luckily I was in a place where I could safely pull over. I tried to wait out the storm but it was getting really bad so I had to drive at 20-30 MPH with my hazard lights on. I first thought that the bolt holding the wiper arm was stripped but after taking it to the dealer to get inspected, to my surprise I was told that it was the linkage for the wiper system. The linkage just broke out of nowhere. Our vehicle is only 3 1/2 years old and I have never heard of such a thing happening on new or old vehicles of any make. The repair technician told me that the linkage broke because of the way the part was made. The amount it cost to repair my vehicle came out to $607.00 for parts and labor and was barely able to get it replaced today. It also took 7-10 days to order and ship the part to the repair shop. I was informed that it was replaced with the same model part…

48,098 miles NHTSA complaint 704107 filed 2009-01-15

Also reported on the 2005 Dodge Durango

Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure

527 reports median 70k

Other fuel system problem

268 reports median 72k

Other engine problem

219 reports median 60k

Differential or transfer case failure

104 reports median 125k

Other powertrain problem

100 reports median 106k

Other electrical problem

97 reports median 63k

How far this goes

This page is kept out of search results because 5 reports is not enough to publish percentiles from. It stays reachable because somebody looking at this exact car would rather see the reports than be told there are none.

Complaints are voluntary, so 5 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does tail light, brake light or signal failure happen on the 2005 Dodge Durango?

Across 5 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 50,000 miles. A quarter were filed before — and a quarter after —. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is tail light, brake light or signal failure on the 2005 Dodge Durango?

5 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.0 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed