AtWhatMileage
Engine · 7 owner reports

No-start or intermittent start failure on the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe

Only 7 reports for this mode came with an odometer reading, which is too few for percentiles to mean anything. The page is here because someone linked to it; treat the figures as anecdotes, and see the full report for this year instead.

Reports of this failure 7
With an odometer reading 7
Reports per 1,000 built 0.2 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 14%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 0
Typical repair $200–$1,800
What it means when it happens Moderate
Rank among this year's problems 24th

When no-start or intermittent start failure gets reported

There are 7 reports of no-start or intermittent start failure on the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe, 7 with a mileage attached. That is too few to place the failure on the odometer with any confidence.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 88,000 miles. It is the 24th most-reported problem on this model year.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 7 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
— — 66,000 miles — —

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Putting it right typically runs $200–$1,800 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 15 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2017, at a median of 5 miles, and latest on the 1996 at 150,000 miles.

By volume the 2021 carries the most reports, with 26; the 2002 has 7. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 1996 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 148k
  2. 1997 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  3. 1998 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 95k
  4. 1999 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 95k
  5. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 80k
  6. 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 89k
  7. 2002 (this one) 66k
  8. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 124k
  9. 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 80k
  10. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 140k
  11. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 68k
  12. 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 71k
  13. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 98k
  14. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  15. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 10k
  16. 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 74k
  17. 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 38k
  18. 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 45k
  19. 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 5
  20. 2018 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  21. 2019 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  22. 2021 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 37k
  23. 2022 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 5k
  24. 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 28k
  25. 2024 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 700
  26. 2026 Chevrolet Tahoe no-start or intermittent start failure 897

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Problem started at 21000 miles. Car either won't start or loses power while driving. I have had five fuel pumps since then. Now have 53k miles. Also, car won't start on incline even though it has 1/4 tank as verified by dealer service. Everything that can be "fixed" or replaced has been and I am still having starting problems and have to have a new fuel pump ever 3 months. Gm customer assistance unwilling to provide relief. Serviced only at dealers, they can't fix the problem. *ak

21,700 miles NHTSA complaint 459017 filed 2004-03-08

Went to start car so I could pick daughter up from a basketball game (11:30 p.m. On a friday night) and the truck would not start. It would turn but got no fire to it. The following morning it did the same thing to include the monday morning. Had it towed to dealer, it started on the first try when the tow truck let it down. They check it out, told me it was my fuel pump. Charged me $645. The following week (sunday, the same thing occured again and I took it to another dealer on monday and they checked it out, put it on the machine and no problem was noted by the machine. Service manager suggested that it could be the sensors because about every 300 miles or full tank of gas, it has started doing this. Suggested I bring it in next time when it does not start to see if they can detect the problem. Christmas day, it did not start as we were on our way out of town for a family christmas in another state. It did start the next day (sunday) and was fine for the week until today (new year's eve). Again, had it towed to the last dealer and they checked it. It did not start the first time but it did the second try. Asked if I pumped the…

62,251 miles NHTSA complaint 514706 filed 2004-12-31

Dt: the contact stated truck stalled at 60 MPH. No lights came on, it just cut out. It usually restarted after the second time. When parking the truck and letting it sit overnight with of tank of gas it will not start the next day until the contact put more gas into the tank. As long as vehicle did not sit overnight it will usually restart. The contact noticed this happening at 90,000 miles. He knew someone else who had the exact same problem.*ak

90,000 miles NHTSA complaint 554171 filed 2005-09-13

Also reported on the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe

ABS module or sensor failure

57 reports median 86k

Other brake problem

45 reports median 140k

Loss of braking

29 reports median 125k

Other wheel or tire problem

29 reports median 65k

Parking brake failure

28 reports median 50k

Brake line, hose or caliper failure

20 reports median 105k

How far this goes

This page is kept out of search results because 7 reports is not enough to publish percentiles from. It stays reachable because somebody looking at this exact car would rather see the reports than be told there are none.

Complaints are voluntary, so 7 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does no-start or intermittent start failure happen on the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe?

Across 7 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 65,000 miles. A quarter were filed before — and a quarter after —. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is no-start or intermittent start failure on the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe?

7 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.2 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed