AtWhatMileage
Brakes · 106 owner reports

Loss of braking on the 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500

18 crashes 3 fires 7 injuries 28 of the 106 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 106
With an odometer reading 92
Reports per 1,000 built 3.5 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 7%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 28
Typical repair $400–$3,000
What it means when it happens Critical
Rank among this year's problems 1st

When loss of braking gets reported

Owners of the 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 report loss of braking at a median of 90,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 57,500 miles and a quarter after 117,500 miles, from 92 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 78,000 miles. It is the 1st most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 45,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 157,500 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 112,150 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

7% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 92 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
46,000 miles 58,420 miles 89,727 miles 118,353 miles 158,150 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 18 a crash, 3 a fire and 7 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $400–$3,000 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

This mode is classified as critical, which means a failure can leave the car unable to stop, steer, or stay out of the way of traffic. It is weighted accordingly in the risk score.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 21 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2020, at a median of 1,500 miles, and latest on the 2000 at 112,500 miles.

By volume the 2003 carries the most reports, with 142; the 2002 has 106. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Vehicle had grinding noise from rear wheels and loss of power. Rear brakes failed with 9, 975 miles on vehicle. Dealer found right rear brake caliper rusted solid and not operating, causing inner right disk brake pad to wear out prematurely. Was advised that this was a result of the vehicle not being used enough, allowing components inside the caliper to rust. Dealer rebuilt right rear calipers, turned down both excessively rusted rear rotors and replaced rear disc brake pads.

9,976 miles NHTSA complaint 516693 filed 2005-01-12

Vehicle had grinding noise from rear wheels and loss of power. Rear brakes failed with 9, 975 miles on vehicle. Dealer found right rear brake caliper rusted solid and not operating, causing inner right disk brake pad to wear out prematurely. Was advised that this was a result of the vehicle not being used enough, allowing components inside the caliper to rust. Dealer rebuilt right rear calipers, turned down both excessively rusted rear rotors and replaced rear disc brake pads.

9,976 miles NHTSA complaint 516694 filed 2005-01-12

Vehicle had grinding noise from rear wheels and loss of power. Rear brakes failed with 9, 975 miles on vehicle. Dealer found right rear brake caliper rusted solid and not operating, causing inner right disk brake pad to wear out prematurely. Was advised that this was a result of the vehicle not being used enough, allowing components inside the caliper to rust. Dealer rebuilt right rear calipers, turned down both excessively rusted rear rotors and replaced rear disc brake pads.

9,976 miles NHTSA complaint 516695 filed 2005-01-12

Also reported on the 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500

Other brake problem

94 reports median 98k

ABS module or sensor failure

79 reports median 70k

Brake line, hose or caliper failure

43 reports median 124k

Parking brake failure

31 reports median 45k

Rust or structural corrosion

23 reports median 86k

Other body or interior problem

22 reports median 84k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 106 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does loss of braking happen on the 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500?

Across 92 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 90,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 57,500 miles and a quarter after 117,500 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is loss of braking on the 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500?

106 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 3.5 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed